
Utilities await DOE action on loans to boost grid
The $23 billion in loans rolled out in the waning days of the Biden administration — much of which would go to Midwest states that voted for Trump in November — could trigger big investments in new transmission lines, batteries, renewable energy and natural gas infrastructure.
But to move ahead, the loans need approval from the Trump team.
Advertisement
If the DOE elects to close the loans, advocates argue the financing will help boost electric reliability and control the high costs of upgrading and expanding infrastructure. And all of that is needed as artificial intelligence projects and broad electrification of the economy drive a surge in U.S. electricity demand.
'These loans are critically important at a time of growing load, especially for affordability,' said Christian Fong, senior associate in RMI's carbon-free electricity program.
A recent report from the consultancy ICF International says U.S. electricity demand is likely to grow a whopping 25 percent between 2023 and 2030, and an even more staggering 78 percent by 2050. Citing demand growth and risks of disruption, Energy Secretary Chris Wright issued directives in recent weeks to force utilities to keep fossil fuel plants running.
While the precise terms of the DOE loans are kept confidential, the guarantees generally mean lower interest rates than typically offered by banks. That's especially important as interest rates keep the cost of private capital relatively high. The Federal Reserve is expected to keep interest rates at current levels after a meeting later this month despite pressure from President Donald Trump and some industries to cut rates to free up more money for investment.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration singled out 'investment-grade utilities' as lower risk than other borrowers.
'Of course, one of the benefits of a loan guarantee is that you can access that capital for much cheaper since the federal government is guaranteeing the loan,' said Tyson Slocum, the director of Public Citizen's energy program.
But the fight for the loans comes at a sensitive time for the DOE's Loan Programs Office. Republicans and the Trump administration, including Wright, routinely blast the previous administration for pushing through eleventh-hour grants and loans, including the conditional commitments made in January for loan guarantees to DTE, Consumers Energy, Alliant Energy, PacifiCorp and other utilities.
The Senate is also now taking up the 'big, beautiful bill' reconciliation legislation, which House members used to claw back some LPO funding.
'A key tool'
In testimony at the Senate Appropriations Committee in May, Wright said the Biden administration 'lent or committed $93 billion' between Election Day in November and the inauguration of Trump, adding that he's 'moving slow' in evaluating the loans to ensure they fit with the Trump administration agenda.
In total, the Biden team closed $61 billion in loans and left $47 billion in conditional commitments, much of which, including the utility loan guarantees, could be closed under Trump.
Despite the headwinds for the loan office, Wright called it 'a key tool.'
'We do need to make sure we have funding available in the Loan Programs Office because, used judiciously, it's a way to leverage private capital to make things happen fast,' he told Senate appropriators.
The Department of Energy budget proposal for fiscal 2026 urges $750 million in new credit subsidies to help finance the Loan Programs Office Title 17 program, which deals with nonvehicle projects and was used to strike the tentative utility loans. The DOE's fiscal 26 budget lays out the administration's priorities to Congress as it begins to craft annual appropriations legislation, a separate process from the budget reconciliation debate.
Some of the Trump administration's free-market allies, however, are calling on DOE to nix loans altogether. Tom Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, said Republicans should 'terminate' the office.
'Ideally, all of the loans issued after the election and before President Trump assumed office should be halted,' Pyle said. 'The federal government isn't a bank. There is no reason they should be issuing loans to companies in the first place.'
A month before the tentative utility loan guarantees were announced in January, the DOE's inspector general called on the loan office to suspend financing, arguing that DOE was not properly safeguarding against conflicts of interest. Trump later fired the inspector general, along with others at different departments and agencies.
Other conservatives, like Michael Chamberlain, a Trump first-term veteran who now leads the conservative watchdog Protect the Public's Trust, urged DOE officials to judge the loans based on how closely they align with the president's agenda.
'They need to evaluate if these loans and the projects that they're funding are consistent with the things they want to do,' Chamberlain said.
In a statement to POLITICO's E&E News, a spokesperson for DOE said it's 'conducting a department-wide review to ensure all activities follow the law, comply with applicable court orders and align with the Trump administration's priorities.'
Upgrading infrastructure
The loans would deliver money to a sprawling list of grid projects.
The loan to the Michigan utility DTE includes $1.6 billion to upgrade gas distribution lines and metering and another $7-billion-plus toward renewable generation and storage.
Another $5.2 billion would go to Michigan utility Consumers Energy for solar and wind generation, bringing the total state's share of the loan packages to roughly $14 billion.
American Electric Power would get $1.6 billion for transmission projects across multiple states, while the PacifiCorp loan would put $3.5 billion toward transmission lines meant to boost overall capacity and reduce curtailment of wind power. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. would also get more than $700 million for transmission.
For now, the utilities are still working to secure the loans.
'The conditional commitment from the Department of Energy, if completed, could help lower costs for the customers we serve through lower-interest federal loans,' Brian Wheeler, a spokesperson for Consumers Energy in Michigan, said in an email. 'Consumers Energy is continuing to work with the administration to achieve the shared goal of doing what's best for the Michigan customers we serve.'
David Eskelsen, a spokesperson for PacifiCorp, which serves Utah, Idaho, Oregon and other states, said the company 'continues to work with the U.S. Department of Energy on the loan guarantee terms and anticipates that the review and negotiation process will take several weeks to several months to complete.'
Days before the inauguration, the Biden loan team closed a $15 billion loan guarantee to Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the LPO's largest loan ever. PG&E spokesperson Jennifer Robison said in an email that 'drawing down that lower-cost loan' could save the company's roughly 16 million customers over $1 billion in interest costs over the life of the loan.
'PG&E has met several times with the DOE to talk about the infrastructure investments we are making in California, which support the administration's goals to power the technology industry and secure our country's energy independence,' Robison said.
But in a recent filing with state regulators, PG&E said that 'uncertainty' around the loan was one reason that it was requesting a slight bump in customer bills in 2026, along with tariffs and wildfire costs.
Utilities are required by law to pass their savings from DOE loans onto customers. The Inflation Reduction Act, which Democrats passed alone in 2022 and heralded as the biggest climate legislation in U.S. history, says utilities have to provide 'an assurance' to deliver 'financial benefit' to customers.
Rising costs
On the campaign trail last year, Trump pledged to slash energy bills in half. But federal data shows that electricity prices are poised to rise faster than inflation at least through next year. A recent report from the nonprofit PowerLines shows residential electricity costs have gone up nearly 30 percent since 2021, while natural gas costs have increased nearly 40 percent since 2019.
High interest rates are not the only headwind facing utilities and the energy sector. Energy experts say Trump's trade wars, triggered by the most aggressive tariffs by an American president in a century, threaten to spike the costs of building new energy infrastructure. On Tuesday, Trump doubled steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 percent.
Recent polling from PowerLines, conducted by Ipsos, finds that nearlythree-quarters of Americans are concerned that utility bills will rise over the coming year.
'We are seeing an unprecedented affordability crisis across the U.S. when it comes to rising utility bills and rising electricity prices, and that's something that's afflicting, not just one or two regions here and there, but frankly the whole country,' said Charles Hua, executive director of PowerLines.
Hua said the DOE loan guarantees could pare down costs.
'Utilities are looking at DOE loan financing as an opportunity to put some downward pressure on electric prices,' Hua said. 'For a lot of utilities, this is an attractive option because it means they can reduce the cost of capital for some of these projects.'
RMI's Fong said the loans align with the Trump administration's agenda.
'The new administration is trying to prioritize energy abundance and slashing electric rates at the same time,' Fong said. 'The LPO loans and tax credits are the preeminent way to do that. I'm hopeful the administration will see how beneficial these tools are.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After D.C., Trump says he might use the National Guard to ‘take back' other cities. Can he actually do that?
When President Trump announced his plan Monday to send 800 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to crack down on what he described as 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor' in the nation's capital, he also issued a warning to other cities around the country. "We're going to take back our capital," Trump said. "And then we'll look at other cities also.' But can Trump actually send federal forces elsewhere? And what cities might he target? Here's everything you need to know about the president's warning. What did Trump say about sending the National Guard into other cities? During his news conference on Monday, Trump singled out Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore and Oakland, Calif. as 'other cities also that are bad, very bad.' 'They're so far gone,' he continued. 'We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C. and we're going to clean it up real quick, very quickly, as they say.' Beyond that, the president didn't elaborate on his plans. But he did issue what amounted to an ultimatum: 'self-clean up' or else. 'Other cities are hopefully watching this,' Trump said. 'Maybe they'll self-clean up, and maybe they'll self-do this.' But 'if they don't learn their lesson, if they haven't studied us properly,' he continued, 'then I'm going to look at New York in a little while. … And if we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster.' Later Monday, Trump issued an executive order directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to coordinate with state governors and "authorize the orders of any additional members of the National Guard to active service, as he deems necessary and appropriate, to augment this mission." What does the law say about Trump's plans? Trump's actions in Washington, D.C., are legal. As you may remember from elementary school, D.C. isn't a state. It isn't part of any other state either. It doesn't have a constitution of its own. Instead, D.C. is what's known as a 'federal district,' and it's been mostly under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress since its founding in 1791. In 1973, Congress passed the Home Rule Act, which allowed D.C. residents to elect their own mayor and council members. But the law doesn't give D.C. complete autonomy. Even now Congress controls its budget. Congress also has the power to review and block local legislation. The president, meanwhile, still appoints D.C.'s judges — and he still leads its National Guard. He can also take control of the District's police force by invoking Section 740 of the Home Rule Act, which is precisely what he did Monday. But Trump doesn't have the same powers across the rest of the country. Under current law, governors are in charge of each state's National Guard and the police are largely controlled locally. Trump has already challenged some of these rules. Over the objections of state and local officials, he deployed nearly 5,000 National Guard members and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in June after a new round of ICE workplace raids sparked protests marred by sporadic violence. California Gov. Gavin Newsom swiftly sued the administration to end the mobilization, claiming that Trump was violating the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the president from deploying the armed forces to participate in domestic law enforcement operations unless he declares that an insurrection is underway. A federal judge agreed with Newsom, but an appeals court blocked that ruling. Now Trump and Newsom are facing off in a three-day trial that began on Monday in San Francisco to determine whether Trump has the authority to do what he did in L.A. in other cities such as Chicago and New York. A verdict is expected Wednesday. What does Trump hope to accomplish by mentioning other cities? Whether the president sends federal forces into other cities remains to be seen; much depends on the outcome of the current trial in California (and any subsequent appeals). In the meantime, Trump was clear on Monday: He wants to pressure Democratic-run cities to change certain policies he disagrees with. One policy he mentioned was cashless bail, which eliminates the requirement for defendants to pay money to be released from jail before their trial. Supporters say the policy addresses disparities in the justice system, where those who can afford bail are released while those who cannot remain incarcerated; critics (like Trump) say that it puts the public at risk by releasing potentially dangerous individuals back into the community. Maybe other cities will 'get rid of the cashless bail thing and all of the things that caused the problem,' Trump said Monday. 'I mean, if you go back, this whole thing with cashless bail is a disaster. So many problems came that we never had before.' Have local officials pushed back? Yes. As Yahoo News reported Monday, 'the president's description of crime in Washington, D.C., is not reflected in official statistics, which show that the city had its lowest violent crime rate in over 30 years in 2024. The rates of homicide, sexual abuse, assault with a dangerous weapon and robbery all fell by at least 25% compared to 2023, according to statistics from the U.S. attorney's office for the district.' On Sunday, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, cited similar statistics to claim that Trump is prioritizing politics over policy. 'If the priority is to show force in an American city, we know he can do that here,' Bowser told MSNBC. 'But it won't be because there's a spike in crime.' Officials elsewhere have repeated that message. On Monday, the U.S. Conference of Mayors responded to Trump's actions and statements by touting a "nationwide success story" of plummeting crime rates. An FBI report released Aug. 5 found that between 2023 and 2024, violent crime nationwide dropped by 4.5%, with murder and non-negligent manslaughter falling by nearly 15%. "Ultimately, the best public safety outcomes are delivered by local police departments and local officials, who know the communities," Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt, president of the mayors' conference, said in a statement. "America's mayors never see takeovers by other levels of government as a tactic that has any track record of producing results."
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Airline Stocks Take Flight, Rising Above Cloudy Early-Year Outlooks
Airline-stock investors endured a bumpy ride to start the year. Things are a bit smoother now. Shares of United Airlines (UAL), Delta Air Lines (DAL), American Airlines Group (AAL), Alaska Air Group (ALK), and JetBlue Airways (JBLU) all soared on Tuesday. The US Global Jets exchange-traded fund (JETS) also climbed, and is now roughly flat year-to-date after declining through the spring. The July consumer price report released early Tuesday helped carriers stick the landing. It showed airfares rose 4% in last month, breaking a streak of declines. Jet fuel prices, meanwhile, have fallen to start August. Trade tensions, declining consumer confidence, weather conditions, and general uncertainty were cited as headwinds for the airline industry earlier in the year; the International Air Transport Association in June, trimmed its annual net profit estimate for the sector. The industry outlook now looks more stable, with carriers having mostly restored their earnings guidance after pulling the forecasts earlier this year. There are outliers in the group. Spirit Airlines (FLYY), which emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March, on Monday said that the company continues to be affected by "adverse market conditions," including weak domestic leisure travel in the second quarter and a "challenging" price environment, according to a company filing. Spirit Airlines' management also issued a "going concern" warning in the filing, saying they had "substantial doubt" in the airline's ability to continue operating within the next 12 months. Its stock was down 40% on Tuesday. Read the original article on Investopedia
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sensata Technologies, Seagate Technology, Vishay Intertechnology, Semtech, and Allegro MicroSystems Stocks Trade Up, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks jumped in the afternoon session after the semiconductor sector rallied in intraday trading as a favorable inflation report bolstered investor hopes for a potential Federal Reserve interest rate cut. The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) data showed a slowdown in inflation, fueling a broad market rally that pushed the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to new all-time highs. For the capital-intensive semiconductor industry, the prospect of lower interest rates is particularly welcome, as it can reduce borrowing costs for expansion and research and development. The positive macroeconomic sentiment provided a significant tailwind for the entire sector, as investors anticipate that a more accommodative monetary policy from the central bank will stimulate economic growth and demand for technology. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Analog Semiconductors company Sensata Technologies (NYSE:ST) jumped 5.3%. Is now the time to buy Sensata Technologies? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Memory Semiconductors company Seagate Technology (NASDAQ:STX) jumped 4.1%. Is now the time to buy Seagate Technology? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Analog Semiconductors company Vishay Intertechnology (NYSE:VSH) jumped 5.6%. Is now the time to buy Vishay Intertechnology? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Semiconductor Manufacturing company Semtech (NASDAQ:SMTC) jumped 9.1%. Is now the time to buy Semtech? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Processors and Graphics Chips company Allegro MicroSystems (NASDAQ:ALGM) jumped 6.8%. Is now the time to buy Allegro MicroSystems? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Semtech (SMTC) Semtech's shares are extremely volatile and have had 54 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 11 days ago when the stock dropped 3.2% on the news that the U.S. jobs report for July came in significantly weaker than expected while new widespread import tariffs were announced, sparking fears of a potential economic slowdown. The U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs, far below estimates, and massive downward revisions to the prior two months painted a much weaker picture of the labor market. This has stoked recession fears, which would directly impact demand for chips used in countless products. Compounding these worries, the White House announced new tariffs, including a 20% levy on imports from Taiwan, a global hub for chip manufacturing. This dual shock of slowing domestic growth and renewed trade friction creates a challenging outlook for the highly cyclical and globally connected semiconductor industry, leading to a broad-based sell-off. Semtech is down 14.6% since the beginning of the year, and at $53.02 per share, it is trading 31.3% below its 52-week high of $77.15 from January 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Semtech's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $828.44. Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data