Grandmother arrested for holding sign offering conversation outside Scottish hospital performing abortions
Scottish police arrested a 74-year-old grandmother on Thursday for offering conversation to women contemplating abortions because she was in a so-called buffer zone, which criminalizes pro-life speech.
Just days after Vice President JD Vance warned European leaders about rising censorship at the Munich Security Conference, Rose Docherty was arrested in Glasgow, Scotland near the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital for holding a sign that said: "Coercion is a crime, here to talk if you want."
Docherty was the first person to be arrested and charged under The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act, which went into effect in September 2024, the BBC reported.
The law prohibits any protests or vigils from taking place within 200m or 656ft of 30 clinics offering abortion services in Scotland, but the law specifies that the Safe Access Zone could be extended if considered appropriate.
Uk Woman Threatened With Fine For Praying Within Abortion Facility's 'Buffer Zone:' ' Grossly Orwellian'
"Everyone has the right to a consensual conversation," Docherty said. "I simply made myself available for a chat, should anybody like to approach me and speak about any matter on their mind. I didn't breach the rules of the buffer zone – I didn't harass, intimidate, or even seek to influence anyone. I simply stood there, available to speak with love and compassion."
Read On The Fox News App
"It isn't right to deprive anyone of the right to take up my offer to talk," she added. "And it isn't right to censor zones within our country from thoughts, beliefs and conversations that authorities may simply disapprove of. Buffer zones aren't 'pro-choice' – they deprive women of the choice to have a chat outside the clinic. That isn't right."
When reached for comment, Police Scotland directed Fox News Digital to its public release regarding the arrest.
"We were made aware of a group of protesters having gathered in the Hardgate Road area of Glasgow around 2.05pm on Wednesday, 19 February, 2025," the statement said. "Officers attended and a 74-year-old woman was arrested and charged in connection with breach of the exclusion zone. She will be reported to the Procurator Fiscal."
England and Wales have a similar version of the law that criminalizes the act of "influencing" someone's decision to "access" abortion services within 150 meters, or almost 500 feet, of any abortion facility. The United Kingdom expanded its so-called "buffer zone" law to apply to the area around every abortion facility nationwide starting Oct. 31.
The move is an attempt to stop the harassment of patients seeking abortions, but critics and pro-life activists argue the laws are an affront to free speech.
"It's devastating to see an innocent, 74-year-old woman handcuffed and arrested just for offering a consensual conversation," Lois McLatchie Miller, a Scottish spokesperson for Alliance Defending Freedom International, told Fox News Digital. "JD Vance was right to raise concerns – free speech has been eroded in Scotland to a worrying extent."
"In Scotland and across the UK, authorities have been over-zealous in using 'buffer zone' laws to prosecute people just for their thoughts, or for standing peacefully," she added. "The government should clarify at once that silent prayer, and consensual conversation, are not crimes."
Last week, Vance spoke about the Safe Access Zones Act, in which he said people who live within safe access zones had been sent letters by the Scottish government warning them about praying within their homes. The Scottish government said no letters were sent telling people they couldn't pray in their homes and instead explained that only "intentional or reckless behaviour" was covered by the act, the BBC reported.
But, McLatchie Miller said prohibitions of the Scottish buffer zone law even extend inside people's homes, if they live within 200 meters of an abortion facility. A letter sent to residents explains that the law, in general, applies to public places within the area, but can also apply to "activities in a private place (such as a house) within the area between the protected premises and the boundary of a Zone could be an offense if they can be seen or heard within the Zone and are done intentionally or recklessly."
Twitter Erupts Over Clip Of Uk Woman Arrested For Silently Praying Across From Abortion Clinic: 'Terrifying'
"That means, if someone was to 'recklessly' influence someone's decision about abortion from inside their house, they could be committing a crime," she added. "Scottish authorities sent letters to local residents to warn them of this.""Could it be considered 'reckless' to pray by an open window? What about having a conversation about abortion in your garden while people pass by?" she asked. "If someone claims to be 'influenced' by such behaviour, this innocent expression of speech or faith could be unjustly snagged under the law."
Authorities can impose fines of up to £10,000 ($12,600) "or be given an unlimited fine, depending on the court procedure" for anyone who is found to have breached a Safe Access Zone, according to the Scottish government. Citizens can also report a group or individual they believe to be breaking the law by contacting Police Scotland, who are responsible for enforcing Safe Access Zones.
Scottish Greens spokesperson for health, Gillian Mackay MSP, who spearheaded the law, told Fox News Digital that nobody should feel intimidated when accessing healthcare. She also said she is proud that the law has put an end to "protests, graphic banners and unnerving spectating that people were forced to pass to enter hospitals."
"There is harmful misinformation being peddled both in and out of US political spheres that shows how little these critics know about the Act, or it is part of their fear-mongering agenda to misrepresent it," she said. "Nobody is being prosecuted for their thoughts or for praying in their home as the Vice President claimed. For senior politicians to pretend otherwise is plainly ridiculous and dangerous."
"Abortion rights are human rights," she added to Fox News Digital. "Every individual in Scotland has the right to privacy in terms of their healthcare, and my Act ensures they are protected and their privacy is maintained when accessing these services."
Mackay also claimed that the U.S. government is a "clear threat" to reproductive rights.
"Today and every day I will stand with the millions of people across the US who oppose the misogynistic and anti-choice agenda of Donald Trump and JD Vance," she added.
Priest Charged After Praying Outside Abortion Clinic Decries Criminalization Of Thought
Notably, Docherty was offering conversation in her personal capacity on the day she was arrested, but she serves as a leader in the Scottish chapter of the pro-life 40 Days for Life organization. Shawn Carney, the president of the organization, told Fox News Digital that unlike buffer zones in the U.S., where a small area around an abortion clinic is off limits to demonstrators, in the UK, you can't have a pro-life opinion and stand in a restricted area.
"We're in 64 countries around the world, and we have more free speech in Berlin and Moscow and China than we do in Glasgow or London," he said. "That is a fact from our experience."
"It's your country, you can ban whoever you want," he added. "You can just say: 'You're not allowed in the public square,' but you can't say that and say that you support free speech. So don't say that you're for free speech, you're not because you don't allow it. And so that's my issue with them, they run around as if they're heroes, patting themselves on the back, and they're an embarrassment to the West."Original article source: Grandmother arrested for holding sign offering conversation outside Scottish hospital performing abortions
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Germany has evidence of Russia's plans to attack NATO, says Germany's spy chief
Bruno Kahl, President of Germany's Federal Intelligence Service (BND), has said that Russia is preparing to test the credibility of NATO's Article 5, adding that German intelligence has concrete evidence of the Kremlin's preparations for potential aggression against the Alliance. Source: Kahl in a podcast for German outlet Table Briefings, as reported by The Times Details: The BND chief emphasised that Moscow no longer believes in the reliability of NATO's collective defence system – particularly Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which guarantees a joint response in the event of an attack on a member state. He warned that the Kremlin may attempt to test this provision in practice. Quote: "We are very sure, and we have intelligence evidence to back this up, that [Russia's full-scale invasion of] Ukraine is only one step on Russia's path towards the west." More details: Kahl clarified that this "doesn't mean that we expect large tank battalions to roll from the east to the west". German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has issued similar warnings in the past, repeatedly stating that Germany must be "ready for war" by the end of this decade. "Our experts estimate that it could be possible within a period of five to eight years," Pistorius said in an interview with German TV news service Tagesspiegel last year. In its February report, Denmark's military intelligence concluded that after the war in Ukraine ends, Russia could redeploy substantial forces to the borders of other European countries within six months. Kahl also warned that Russia seeks to "push NATO back to its 1990s boundaries", "kick out" the US from Europe and "expand its influence by any means necessary". "We need to nip this in the bud," Kahl stressed. Meanwhile, he noted that despite certain tensions, cooperation with the United States remains stable. "The Americans take Article 5 very seriously, but they rightly insist Europe must do its part," he said. Sinan Selen, Deputy Director General of Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), stated that Russia is increasingly using cyberattacks and sabotage against Western countries. "We have noticed that Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has led to our cyber and espionage defences being increasingly tested," Selen said. An annual report by the BfV reveals that Russia has begun actively deploying so-called "low-level agents" to carry out sabotage operations, particularly placing incendiary devices in parcels, resulting in a series of fires at logistics centres across Europe. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
U.S. races to break China's hold on rare earth magnets
While U.S. trade negotiators work to ease an immediate shortage of rare earth magnets from China, the Trump administration is scrambling to line up viable alternatives that would reduce America's reliance on its chief economic rival. Why it matters: Small-but-powerful rare earth magnets are essential to high-tech products, from cars and robots to electronics and weapons. But China controls 90% of the world's supply of the critical components. The contentious trade relationship between the U.S. and China has amplified the economic and security risks of that reliance. Global automakers are "in full panic" that China's limits on rare earth exports will trigger supply chain shocks like the pandemic-related semiconductor shortages that occurred in 2021 and 2022. The big picture: It's not a new problem. U.S. officials have been talking about the need to mitigate American dependence on China for years. China also dominates processing of metals like lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite used in batteries. The latest: U.S. and Chinese officials met Monday and Tuesday in London to try to iron out their trade issues, amid reports that China was willing to expedite export licenses for U.S. and European automakers if the U.S. loosened export controls on jet engine parts and software. Late Tuesday both sides said they'd reached a framework of a deal, pending approval from both countries' leaders, that would in theory resolve the most recent export issues. Yes, but: There's still an urgency to find alternative sources. President Trump in April called for an investigation into national security risks posed by U.S. reliance on imported processed critical minerals, including rare earth elements. He has also used a series of executive orders to try to bolster domestic supply chains, like fast-tracking environmental reviews for U.S. mining projects. In Congress, meanwhile, rare earth competition with China has galvanized both parties. A spate of bills would create a tax credit for production of high-performance rare earth magnets, use Defense Production Act authority to direct emergency funding, and establish an Energy Department program to finance minerals projects. Two Republicans and two Democrats are pressing legislation that allows the president to strike free trade agreements exclusively focused on critical minerals and rare earth elements. "There is fairly broad bipartisan support around becoming more resilient, especially in areas that invoke national security — and this is clearly one of them," Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican leading that bill, told Axios last month. Zoom in: One deal that's getting a lot of attention is a potential partnership between California-based MP Materials and Saudi Arabia's flagship mining company, Maaden. The deal was inked in May on the sidelines of the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum, coinciding with a broader agreement between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia to cooperate on energy and critical minerals. MP Materials operates California's Mountain Pass, the only rare-earths mine in the U.S., which produces 12% of the global supply. At maximum production, Mountain Pass could yield enough rare earths to supply more than 6 million electric vehicles, the company says. But the bottleneck is magnets, which MP Materials is just beginning to produce. Maaden, a fast-growing, government-controlled mining company, is developing mines for a variety of critical minerals, but doesn't produce rare earths today. What to watch: Together, the companies seek to jointly develop a vertically integrated rare earths supply chain in Saudi Arabia—mining, separation, refining and magnet production—for global consumption. Zoning and environmental regulations in the U.S. make it hard to open a rare earth mine, but Saudi Arabia moves more quickly and is anxious to wean its economy off of oil. Saudi expertise in petrochemical refining can be leveraged for minerals processing, while MP brings experience across the entire rare earths supply chain, including mining, refining and magnet production. Reality check: The preliminary deal is non-binding, so it could still fall apart.
Business of Fashion
an hour ago
- Business of Fashion
French Senate Backs Law to Curb Ultra Fast-Fashion
France's Senate approved a revised version of a law regulating fast fashion on Tuesday, which if implemented would ban advertising by fast-growing Chinese e-commerce platforms like Shein and Temu. Senators in the upper house of parliament voted almost unanimously for a modified version of a bill passed by France's lower house last year, which aims to reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry. Critics say the low-priced garments produced by fast-fashion chains drive excessive consumption and waste, exacerbating the textile sector's impact on the environment. An amended version of the bill distinguishes between 'ultra' fast fashion and 'classic' fast fashion, however, imposing less onerous restrictions on European fast-fashion players like Zara and Kiabi, but drawing criticism from environmental groups. The 'clarifications (made by the Senate) make it possible to target players who ignore environmental, social, and economic realities, notably Shein and Temu, without penalising the European ready-to-wear sector,' said Jean-Francois Longeot, chair of the Senate's Committee on Regional Planning and Sustainable Development. 'Shein is not a fast fashion company,' said the Chinese firm in a statement in response to the vote, adding that its model was 'part of the solution, not the problem'. Faced with competition from very low-priced products, several French brands are experiencing significant difficulties, such as Jennyfer, which went into liquidation at the end of April, and NafNaf, which has been in receivership since May. The law would also introduce penalties for both fast and ultra fast-fashion companies if they don't meet certain environmental criteria, reaching at least 10 euros per item of clothing by 2030, or up to 50 percent of the product's price excluding tax. The government needs to notify the European Commission of the vote, and will then need to set up a joint committee to reach a compromise between the Senate and lower house versions of the law before it is implemented. By Florence Loeve; Editors: Dominique Patton and Mark Potter Learn more: Tariffs Won't Kill Fast Fashion, But They Might Kill Sustainable Fashion Some have hailed America's escalating trade war as a means to finally curb overconsumption of cheap goods. Instead, the economic hardship its likely to bring on will eviscerate efforts to transform the industry for the better, writes Kenneth P. Pucker.
