Venezuelans vote, as opposition calls for poll boycott
Voting has opened for parliamentary elections in Venezuela, as opposition parties called for a boycott following mass arrests.
Venezuelans are choosing MPs, governors and other officials on Sunday.
The poll is being conducted against a backdrop of heightened government repression and opposition calls to boycott the election.
The election is the first to allow broad voter participation since last year's presidential contest, which President Nicolás Maduro claimed to have won despite credible evidence to the contrary.
It is taking place two days after the government detained dozens of people, including a prominent opposition leader, and linked them to an alleged plot to hinder the vote.
In the first hours after polls opened, members of the military outnumbered voters in some voting centres in the capital, Caracas.
No lines formed outside the centres, including the country's largest — a stark contrast with the hundreds of people gathered around the same time for the July 28 presidential election.
"I'm not going to vote," said truck driver Carlos León, 41, standing near a desolate polling station in Caracas.
"I don't believe in the (electoral authority). I don't think they'll respect the vote. Nobody forgets what happened in the presidential elections. It's sad, but it's true."
Voter participation, in the eyes of the opposition, legitimises Maduro's claim to power and his government's repressive apparatus, which after the July presidential election detained more than 2000 people including protesters, poll workers, political activists and minors, to quash dissent.
Meanwhile, the ruling party is already touting overwhelming victory across the country, just as it has done in previous regional elections regardless of opposition participation.
A nationwide poll conducted between April 29 and May 4 by the Venezuela-based research firm Delphos showed that only 15.9 per cent of voters expressed a high probability of voting on Sunday.
Of those, 74.2 per cent said they would vote for the candidates of the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela and its allies, while 13.8 per cent said they would vote for contenders associated with two opposition leaders who are not boycotting the elections.
"I think it's absolutely despicable," opposition operative Humberto Villalobos said on Saturday, referring to the election participation of some opposition members.
"We're facing the most brutal repression in recent years in the country. (The vote) is a comedy, a parody."
Voters trickled into polling places in an opposition stronghold in Caracas.
Some ignored the boycott calls based on the belief in their civic duty, while others saw the election as a chance to keep their local government under opposition control.
"I'm defending my municipality," said Edith, the owner of a bankrupt family business who declined to give her last name out of fear of government repression.
"I'm still angry with what happened in July, but I have to defend it."
Other voters cast ballots out of fear of losing their government jobs or food and other state-controlled benefits.
"Most of my friends aren't going to vote, not even a blank vote," state employee Miguel Otero, 69, said.
"But we must comply. We have to send the photo (saying), 'I'm here at the polling station now.'"
Voting has opened for parliamentary elections in Venezuela, as opposition parties called for a boycott following mass arrests.
Venezuelans are choosing MPs, governors and other officials on Sunday.
The poll is being conducted against a backdrop of heightened government repression and opposition calls to boycott the election.
The election is the first to allow broad voter participation since last year's presidential contest, which President Nicolás Maduro claimed to have won despite credible evidence to the contrary.
It is taking place two days after the government detained dozens of people, including a prominent opposition leader, and linked them to an alleged plot to hinder the vote.
In the first hours after polls opened, members of the military outnumbered voters in some voting centres in the capital, Caracas.
No lines formed outside the centres, including the country's largest — a stark contrast with the hundreds of people gathered around the same time for the July 28 presidential election.
"I'm not going to vote," said truck driver Carlos León, 41, standing near a desolate polling station in Caracas.
"I don't believe in the (electoral authority). I don't think they'll respect the vote. Nobody forgets what happened in the presidential elections. It's sad, but it's true."
Voter participation, in the eyes of the opposition, legitimises Maduro's claim to power and his government's repressive apparatus, which after the July presidential election detained more than 2000 people including protesters, poll workers, political activists and minors, to quash dissent.
Meanwhile, the ruling party is already touting overwhelming victory across the country, just as it has done in previous regional elections regardless of opposition participation.
A nationwide poll conducted between April 29 and May 4 by the Venezuela-based research firm Delphos showed that only 15.9 per cent of voters expressed a high probability of voting on Sunday.
Of those, 74.2 per cent said they would vote for the candidates of the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela and its allies, while 13.8 per cent said they would vote for contenders associated with two opposition leaders who are not boycotting the elections.
"I think it's absolutely despicable," opposition operative Humberto Villalobos said on Saturday, referring to the election participation of some opposition members.
"We're facing the most brutal repression in recent years in the country. (The vote) is a comedy, a parody."
Voters trickled into polling places in an opposition stronghold in Caracas.
Some ignored the boycott calls based on the belief in their civic duty, while others saw the election as a chance to keep their local government under opposition control.
"I'm defending my municipality," said Edith, the owner of a bankrupt family business who declined to give her last name out of fear of government repression.
"I'm still angry with what happened in July, but I have to defend it."
Other voters cast ballots out of fear of losing their government jobs or food and other state-controlled benefits.
"Most of my friends aren't going to vote, not even a blank vote," state employee Miguel Otero, 69, said.
"But we must comply. We have to send the photo (saying), 'I'm here at the polling station now.'"
Voting has opened for parliamentary elections in Venezuela, as opposition parties called for a boycott following mass arrests.
Venezuelans are choosing MPs, governors and other officials on Sunday.
The poll is being conducted against a backdrop of heightened government repression and opposition calls to boycott the election.
The election is the first to allow broad voter participation since last year's presidential contest, which President Nicolás Maduro claimed to have won despite credible evidence to the contrary.
It is taking place two days after the government detained dozens of people, including a prominent opposition leader, and linked them to an alleged plot to hinder the vote.
In the first hours after polls opened, members of the military outnumbered voters in some voting centres in the capital, Caracas.
No lines formed outside the centres, including the country's largest — a stark contrast with the hundreds of people gathered around the same time for the July 28 presidential election.
"I'm not going to vote," said truck driver Carlos León, 41, standing near a desolate polling station in Caracas.
"I don't believe in the (electoral authority). I don't think they'll respect the vote. Nobody forgets what happened in the presidential elections. It's sad, but it's true."
Voter participation, in the eyes of the opposition, legitimises Maduro's claim to power and his government's repressive apparatus, which after the July presidential election detained more than 2000 people including protesters, poll workers, political activists and minors, to quash dissent.
Meanwhile, the ruling party is already touting overwhelming victory across the country, just as it has done in previous regional elections regardless of opposition participation.
A nationwide poll conducted between April 29 and May 4 by the Venezuela-based research firm Delphos showed that only 15.9 per cent of voters expressed a high probability of voting on Sunday.
Of those, 74.2 per cent said they would vote for the candidates of the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela and its allies, while 13.8 per cent said they would vote for contenders associated with two opposition leaders who are not boycotting the elections.
"I think it's absolutely despicable," opposition operative Humberto Villalobos said on Saturday, referring to the election participation of some opposition members.
"We're facing the most brutal repression in recent years in the country. (The vote) is a comedy, a parody."
Voters trickled into polling places in an opposition stronghold in Caracas.
Some ignored the boycott calls based on the belief in their civic duty, while others saw the election as a chance to keep their local government under opposition control.
"I'm defending my municipality," said Edith, the owner of a bankrupt family business who declined to give her last name out of fear of government repression.
"I'm still angry with what happened in July, but I have to defend it."
Other voters cast ballots out of fear of losing their government jobs or food and other state-controlled benefits.
"Most of my friends aren't going to vote, not even a blank vote," state employee Miguel Otero, 69, said.
"But we must comply. We have to send the photo (saying), 'I'm here at the polling station now.'"
Voting has opened for parliamentary elections in Venezuela, as opposition parties called for a boycott following mass arrests.
Venezuelans are choosing MPs, governors and other officials on Sunday.
The poll is being conducted against a backdrop of heightened government repression and opposition calls to boycott the election.
The election is the first to allow broad voter participation since last year's presidential contest, which President Nicolás Maduro claimed to have won despite credible evidence to the contrary.
It is taking place two days after the government detained dozens of people, including a prominent opposition leader, and linked them to an alleged plot to hinder the vote.
In the first hours after polls opened, members of the military outnumbered voters in some voting centres in the capital, Caracas.
No lines formed outside the centres, including the country's largest — a stark contrast with the hundreds of people gathered around the same time for the July 28 presidential election.
"I'm not going to vote," said truck driver Carlos León, 41, standing near a desolate polling station in Caracas.
"I don't believe in the (electoral authority). I don't think they'll respect the vote. Nobody forgets what happened in the presidential elections. It's sad, but it's true."
Voter participation, in the eyes of the opposition, legitimises Maduro's claim to power and his government's repressive apparatus, which after the July presidential election detained more than 2000 people including protesters, poll workers, political activists and minors, to quash dissent.
Meanwhile, the ruling party is already touting overwhelming victory across the country, just as it has done in previous regional elections regardless of opposition participation.
A nationwide poll conducted between April 29 and May 4 by the Venezuela-based research firm Delphos showed that only 15.9 per cent of voters expressed a high probability of voting on Sunday.
Of those, 74.2 per cent said they would vote for the candidates of the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela and its allies, while 13.8 per cent said they would vote for contenders associated with two opposition leaders who are not boycotting the elections.
"I think it's absolutely despicable," opposition operative Humberto Villalobos said on Saturday, referring to the election participation of some opposition members.
"We're facing the most brutal repression in recent years in the country. (The vote) is a comedy, a parody."
Voters trickled into polling places in an opposition stronghold in Caracas.
Some ignored the boycott calls based on the belief in their civic duty, while others saw the election as a chance to keep their local government under opposition control.
"I'm defending my municipality," said Edith, the owner of a bankrupt family business who declined to give her last name out of fear of government repression.
"I'm still angry with what happened in July, but I have to defend it."
Other voters cast ballots out of fear of losing their government jobs or food and other state-controlled benefits.
"Most of my friends aren't going to vote, not even a blank vote," state employee Miguel Otero, 69, said.
"But we must comply. We have to send the photo (saying), 'I'm here at the polling station now.'"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
More money to Moscow than Kyiv: Australia buying billions in fuel using Russian crude despite sanctions against Kremlin
Australia's dependence on imported oil—much of it refined from Russian crude—has handed the Kremlin billions of dollars in tax revenue from exporters, according to new research. While Australia has proudly pledged $1.5 billion in aid to support Ukraine against Russia's invasion, a new report found the country has funnelled even more money to the Kremlin. Data from the Europe-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) estimated Australia has imported more than AU$3.7 billion worth of oil products derived from Russian crude. The oil is refined overseas—including at the Jamnagar Refinery in India, which has not sanctioned Russian crude—before being legally imported into the Australian market. This would have handed Russian President Vladimir Putin about AU$1.8 billion in tax revenue, according CREA. CREA's EU Russia Analyst Vaibhav Raghunandan called it 'a significant failing of Western sanctions', exposing a glaring loophole that lets Russia bypass restrictions. 'Refineries in non-sanctioning countries buying Russian oil are… taking comfort in the knowledge that they will face no action from Western countries,' he said. Mr Raghunandan said countries like Australia 'look away and continue to import refined products', indirectly funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) warned this 'policy blind spot' was 'actively undermining our credibility' as a nation. ASPI's Director of National Security Programs John Coyne called Australia's dependence on Russian-linked fuel 'a serious national security failure and a strategic contradiction'. 'We cannot claim to support Ukraine and uphold a values-based foreign policy while simultaneously fuelling our economy with Russian-linked petroleum,' he told Sky News. 'According to reports, Australia has sent more tax dollars to the Kremlin through these imports than we've provided to Ukraine in aid. That's indefensible.' Resources Minister Madeleine King did not respond to questions asked by Sky News about the issue. Due to fuel security issues, Australia has continued to rely on imports in order to deliver its national energy demands. According to the latest Australian Petroleum Statistics, there are just 56 days of fuel supply on shore, well below the International Energy Agency's 90-day requirement. Mr Coyne said Australia's critically low domestic fuel reserves was a vulnerability. 'Our domestic fuel reserves remain critically low… Australia is dangerously exposed to global supply disruptions, conflict, or coercion,' he said. 'We are one maritime chokepoint or geopolitical flare-up away from a fuel crisis.' Mr Coyne urged the federal government to take immediate action to bolster sovereign energy capability and national resilience. 'The era of cheap energy and blind reliance on market forces to solve national problems is over. Governments can no longer outsource resilience,' he said. 'Right now, Australia is precariously vulnerable to any disruption in the global liquid fuel supply chain and that vulnerability cuts across defence, emergency response, agriculture, and logistics.' He said to address the problem, the Albanese government must close the refining loophole in its sanctions regime and improve sovereign refining and storage capacity. He added the government needed to 'embed fuel security in a coordinated, whole-of-government resilience strategy'. 'This is not just about economics. It's about whether Australia can function, respond and defend itself under stress,' Mr Coyne said.
The Age
16 hours ago
- The Age
For Trump, LA is just the beginning. Soon, he'll monitor every move Americans make
In real time, we are watching the United States of America slide further into authoritarianism. As the administration's response to protests in Los Angeles escalates, President Donald Trump's handling of the issue must be understood in the context of his broader assault on democracy and the rule of law. If deploying the National Guard and the marines to control citizens exercising their democratic right to protest was not a clear enough message, on Monday, Trump said that 'it would be a great thing' if Gavin Newsom, the Democratic governor of California, was arrested over his opposition to the federal government's intervention. Another alarming example of encroachment on citizen's rights is the recent news that the Trump administration is engaging the US-based tech company Palantir to merge government data to create one enormous mega-centre of personal information on citizens. Here, it joins China and Russia in the use of mass surveillance to monitor and control its people. The notoriously secretive tech company already has deep connections to the US government, particularly to the Central Intelligence Agency and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement – the agency that provoked the protests in California as it carried out raids and mass arrests of illegal immigrants across Los Angeles late last week. In its contract with ICE, Palantir is developing a surveillance platform that will allow the government to prioritise people for deportation, track deportations, and streamline 'deportation logistics'. And in yet another government contract revealed last month, Palantir will scrape, consolidate and analyse federal data on the health, finances and education of Americans for the Trump administration. This could give the government what the New York Times has described as 'untold surveillance power'. Critics of the project argue that providing Trump with what amounts to detailed portraits of civilians could be used to silence or punish critics of the administration. This mass surveillance program potentially encompasses all of American life. And unlike the phone and internet records secretly collected by the National Security Agency (as revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013), this technology is far more sophisticated, far more wide-ranging in scope, less understood, and less regulated. In J.R.R. Tolkein's Lord of the Rings, the word 'palantir' refers to powerful crystal balls. Made by ancient elves and used to see events of the past and future, the empire-building Sauron had one, which he could use to corrupt all others. In the real world, Palantir was co-founded by billionaire activist Peter Thiel, Elon Musk's erstwhile mentor and a long-term supporter of Vice President J.D. Vance, as well as one of the many far-right tech bros currently propping up and profiting from the Trump administration. Palantir is unapologetically ideological. The company's leaders frame its work as a defence of 'the West' in response to its decline – a decline driven, as they see it, by 'woke' agendas and efforts to redistribute wealth and power. Like Trump, they see oppression and violence as necessary to winning the war against such forces.
7NEWS
18 hours ago
- 7NEWS
US immigration riots: Why are people protesting in LA?
Hundreds of Marines and an additional 2000 National Guard members have been deployed to control the riots in Los Angeles, according to US officials. LA police have also ordered protesters to go home after days of violent demonstrations, causing the entire downtown area to go into lockdown. The unrest was sparked by US President Donald Trump's move to crack down on illegal immigration and tighten the country's border security. So, why have his orders been met with a huge backlash? A big part it, some might argue, is the role that ICE has played in all this. What is ICE? ICE, or Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is a division of the US Department of Homeland Security. It is responsible for enforcing immigration laws by detaining, deporting, and convicting unauthorised immigrants. As part of Donald Trump's immigration crackdown during his second term in office, ICE has ramped up its enforcement actions. On June 4, it arrested 2200 people which, according to NBC, is the most people ever arrested by the agency in a single day. But according to three sources familiar with the arrests, hundreds of those arrested had been enrolled in ICE's Alternative to Detention (ATD) program, which releases undocumented immigrants who are not deemed a threat to public safety. Following their release, these immigrants are tracked through ankle monitors, smartphone apps or other geolocating programs, along with periodic check-ins at ICE facilities. These LA ICE raids have also raised concerns over agents wearing masks and their lack of accountability using federal force in domestic affairs. How did the protests start? The protests started last Friday, when ICE agents raided the LA Fashion District and detained people suspected of being undocumented immigrants at their workplace. The arrest of over 100 people at multiple sites fuelled protests at the Metropolitan Detention Center. According to Homeland Security Investigations, 'approximately 44 people' were administratively arrested, and one person was arrested on an obstruction charge. President of the Service Employees International Union David Huerta was among those arrested for interfering with federal officers, according to LA-based attorney Bill Essayli. On Saturday, as word of the ICE raid spread, demonstrations continued at the heavily Latino city of Paramount, and its neighbour, Compton. Protesters attempted to again block Border Patrol vehicles near a Home Depot store in Paramount, with some hurling rocks and chunks of cement. Federal agents in response unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls. Trump signed a memo to deploy 2000 National Guard members to protect officers conducting immigration raids, contrary to the wishes of Governor of California Gavin Newsom, who accused the US president of a 'complete overreaction'. Newsom also condemned the raids, calling them 'chaotic federal sweeps' that aimed to fill an 'arbitrary arrest quota'. The escalation of tensions on Sunday triggered the deployment of 300 National Guard troops to guard federal detention centre Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown LA. Vehicles were set alight and officers in riot gear used flash-bang grenades and pepper spray to control crowds. LAPD declared the demonstration in downtown Los Angeles an unlawful assembly and ordered protesters to leave. On Monday, Trump ordered an additional 2000 National Guard members to be deployed in LA as well as 700 Marines. California has also filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, asking a judge to declare the call-up of National Guard troops unconstitutional and for the court to halt future deployments. Trump is the first president in 60 years to deploy the National Guard without that state's request. In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote, 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs' and that 'the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved'.
