
'No one should be forced to beg for time off when their child is fighting for their life'
Ceri and Frances Menai-Davis are campaigning for the government to bring in Hugh's Law, which would give parents statutory rights if their child is critically ill.
Under current law, parents of newborn babies who become unwell within the first 28 days of life are entitled to paid leave and job protection to be by their child's bedside.
But if their child is diagnosed with cancer at 29 days old, the parents no longer have the right to financial support.
Ceri and Frances say it means there is a "cruel gap in support", not based on the severity of a child's illness but the date they are diagnosed, leaving many parents without income or job security at the worst possible time.
Hugh's Law "would offer families stability in their darkest hours, it's a moral obligation, not a luxury," Ceri said, adding that parents are often forced to quit their jobs to stay by their poorly child's side.
"Parents are being forced to sell homes, clothes and chose whether they can eat or feed their child," he said.
Ceri and Frances were inspired to start the charity It's Never You and campaign for a law change in memory of their six-year-old son Hugh, who died of cancer in 2021.
"Those are the first words that Frances said to me when he was diagnosed back in 2020: 'You always think it's someone else. It's never you'," Ceri said.
"After he passed away, and during the time that he had treatment, we witnessed parents just going through the worst time, obviously looking after their child, but also the worst time financially.
"And we realised at that point there is nothing in place in the UK that provides support, financial support to parents of a sick child."
They are hoping to amend the Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, to enshrine a new right to statutory paid leave and job protection from day one for parents whose child is diagnosed with a critical or terminal illness, up to the age of 16.
'This is about basic equality,' said Frances. 'All Parents of sick children face emotional devastation and financial stress and yet there is no guaranteed support. Help should not be cut off when a child turns 29 days old, the stress, the anxiety and the worries are still all the same.'
Their local MP, Chris Hinchliff of the Labour Party, urged Prime Minister Keir Starmer to listen to the couple.
"We've got to get this done. We can't just keep kicking the can down the road."
He added: "We've got support for children up to 28 days, but from 29 days that day one financial support that families desperately need at the worst possible time isn't there.
"But these are still children that need their parent with them when they're sick by their bedside. And we've got to have the support that makes that possible. So I really hope that the government will listen to us and we'll take these proposals forward."
He added that the financial implications for the government of bringing in the support would be "tiny".
"We're thinking about seven million pounds a year. In the grand total of government spending, that is minuscule. But I'm absolutely certain that given everything that we are doing as a government to try and support working people, we can find that money."
At present, parents of critically ill children must rely on unpaid Carer's Leave, which is capped at just one week per year. Disability living allowance is available to claim on behalf of the child, but parents must wait 90 days before applying and an application can take up to 20 weeks to be processed.
Ceri and Frances have had several meetings within government to push for the law change and the disability minister has acknowledged their campaign but Sir Stephen Timms said there are "there are no current plans" to introduce the law.
But former Paralympian Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson has tabled an amendment to Employment Rights Bill in the House of Lords where it appears to have support.
Lord Katz - a Labour whip in the House of Lords - responding to the amendment in the chamber, suggested the government were considering the proposals.
"The government is reviewing an existing... entitlement to carer's leave and considering whether further changes may be helpful in supporting those who provide care to loved ones alongside work and employment," he said.
Ceri and Frances are hoping a majority of peers back the amendment so the bill is sent back to the Commons for reconsideration.
Minister for Employment Rights Justin Madders said: "We recognise the difficulties that parents face when caring for critically ill children, and we know many employers will show compassion and understanding in these circumstances.
"We will look at further support for parents of critically ill children through our Carer's Leave review to help modernise the world of work and provide good jobs for carers through our Plan for Change."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
On Hiroshima anniversary, MoD refuses to say whether troops were used in human radiation experiments
The Nuked Blood Scandal has worsened as ministers fail to deny that troops WERE used in radiation experiments, with a lifelong impact on them and their families Ministers have failed to deny that British and Commonwealth troops were deliberately exposed to radiation during Cold War weapons tests. They have told Parliament that they do not know whether allegations servicemen were used as nuclear "guinea pigs" are true or not, 11 months after launching an internal review into the Nuked Blood Scandal. It comes as politicians worldwide marked the 80th anniversary of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, at the end of the Second World War. Less than a decade later, Britain detonated its first nuclear weapon, the first of 45 bombs and 600 radiation experiments in Australia and the Pacific. Seventy years later the Mirror uncovered evidence of the Nuked Blood Scandal, a series of orders for blood and urine testing, and chest x-rays, of troops before, during and after service at the weapon trials. The results have subsequently been found to be missing from personnel files, and are now subject of a criminal complaint and £5bn civil lawsuit. Veteran John Morris, 87, of Rochdale, has been told there is no trace of the results of blood tests he was subjected to at Christmas Island in 1957. He said: "How can they say they do not know if there were experiments when they've been sitting on the evidence all along. "They are moral cowards, too scared to open what they know will be an expensive can of worms. It's the survivors and children of Hiroshima still fighting to make people aware of what happened there, and the same is true of our families. We're not going away, so they might as well 'fess up." * You can support the nuclear veterans' fight for justice HERE The Mirror's investigation has found the names of hundreds of soldiers called up for testing, and some of the biological data gathered, have since been discovered on a top secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked on the grounds of national security. Ministers have ordered the records be published, but despite reviewing 1.1million pages of evidence have rejected calls to tell Parliament what they have found. In April, former Tory minister Lord Nick Bourne asked the Ministry of Defence to state "whether troops have ever been subject to human radiation experiments" and details of the dates, locations and aftercare if it was given. Defence Minister Lord Vernon Coaker told him "it is taking time to collate the required information" and he'd reply later. This week, when Lord Bourne asked again, Lord Coaker replied: "Officials have reviewed over 43,000 files... as part of the exercise that is looking at concerned raised with me about some nuclear test veterans' records. I will update the House when we are in a position to share the findings of the exercise." Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS, who has been unlawfully denied access to his own father's medical records, said: "If they cannot state definitively, after almost a year of looking at the files, that experiments did not take place, then either the review has found evidence to suggest it did happen, or they're looking at this stuff with their eyes closed. "Either way, veterans are dying without the answers and Parliament is not being told the degree of financial and political liability the government faces, and which increases every day. For this denial to continue even as the world acknowledges the horrors of Hiroshima and we face our own renewed nuclear threats is an act of self-harm on the part of the government." Campaigners are expecting to meet the Defence Secretary next month for an update on the records review and a promised expansion of medal criteria.


ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
Patients left in tears as NHS GPs fail to prescribe obesity jabs
ITV News Health Correspondent Rebecca Barry and Senior Producer Helena Lambert expose delays in the NHS roll-out of weight-loss drugs The vast majority of GPs in England are not prescribing weight-loss injections on the NHS despite the medication being approved for use, ITV News has found. Since June, general practitioners in England have been allowed to prescribe Mounjaro to severely obese people who have related health problems. At the time, the Health Secretary Wes Streeting described it as an "important step", bringing "revolutionary modern treatments to everyone who needs them, not just those who can afford to pay". But exclusive research conducted by ITV News has found that only four local NHS health systems in England are making the medication available to patients through GPs. Suzanne Hall from Southport feels let down by the NHS over the delayed roll-out of the drugs. The mum-of-two is on the NHS waiting list for bariatric surgery, but would prefer to try weight-loss injections first. She has managed to lose five stone in six months, through diet and exercise, but still weighs 20 stone, and her obesity is affecting her physical and mental health. The 45-year-old has multiple health problems linked to her weight, including sleep apnoea, high blood pressure and pre-diabetes. It also worsens her ulcerative colitis. When she asked her GP if she could try the jabs, she was told they still aren't available in her area. "I'm just frustrated," Suzanne told ITV News. "I just need a little bit of help, but for some reason, people like me aren't getting the help and support they need." She wishes she could buy the medication privately, but cannot afford it. "I'm working class. We're talking hundreds of pounds. I don't have hundreds of pounds at the end of the month to go and buy Mounjaro injections." In December 2024, Mounjaro was approved for the treatment of obesity on the NHS in England. The drug was initially only available through specialist weight-loss clinics. From June 23 2025, GPs in England were allowed to start prescribing Mounjaro to people with a body mass index (BMI) of over 40 and health conditions linked to their obesity, such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease or obstructive sleep apnoea. But our investigation exposes a postcode lottery. ITV News obtained information from 33 of the 42 Integrated Care Boards across England. In 29 of the local health systems, patients still can't access Mounjaro through their GP. Only four areas are currently prescribing the weight-loss jabs in NHS primary care settings. They are NHS Suffolk and North East Essex, NHS South West London, NHS West Yorkshire and NHS Sussex. Around 29% of adults in the UK are obese. It's estimated that weight-loss injections are used by 1.5 million people in the UK, mainly through private prescriptions. The government's recently announced 10-Year Plan for the NHS promises to "launch a moonshot to end the obesity epidemic". It includes a pledge to "harness recent breakthroughs in weight-loss medication and expand access through the NHS". At the Clifton Medical Centre in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, more than 200 patients have asked for the weight-loss injections, but they cannot currently access them on the NHS. "I've had patients in tears in front of me," Dr Matthew Capehorn told ITV News. Around 70% of adults in Rotherham are obese or overweight, but GPs in the town can't yet prescribe Mounjaro because local health bosses say the necessary support services for diet and exercise still haven't been set up. "We've got a medication that's approved by the NHS that can help them - and I'm having to say to them yes, it is available, but I can't prescribe it yet," Dr Capehorn, a GP and obesity expert, said. "I don't want to be an NHS doctor saying 'sorry, but you're going to have to go out and self-fund this medication,' because it's not cheap. I want to do what's best for my patients." An NHS spokesperson said: "Weight-loss drugs have a vital role to play in helping many more people manage their weight and lead healthier lives, and the NHS is developing and rolling out a range of lifestyle support that will be available locally and online to ensure they can be prescribed by GPs as part of holistic care. "The NHS is fully supporting the phased rollout of tirzepatide for eligible patients, having issued guidance and provided funding to local ICBs in March. "These represent brand new services in primary care that are being established and scaled up over time, starting with those who are in the most need – and in the meantime, eligible patients can get weight-loss support from a range of other services including the NHS Digital Weight Management programme." A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "We expect NHS Integrated Care Boards to be making these drugs, which can help tackle the obesity crisis in the UK, available as part of the phased rollout so those with the highest needs are able to access them." "As we shift our focus from treatment to prevention with our 10 Year Health Plan we are determined to bring revolutionary modern treatments to everyone who needs them, not just those who can afford to pay."


ITV News
2 days ago
- ITV News
Cutting out ultra-processed foods can speed up weight loss, study shows
Cutting out ultra-processed foods from your diet can help you lose weight twice as quickly, according to researchers at University College London, after the longest-running clinical trial of its kind. Science Correspondent Martin Stew, who has been following the trial from the beginning, reports on its findings Cutting out ultra-processed foods from your diet can help you lose weight twice as quickly, according to researchers at University College London. In the longest-running clinical trial of its kind, 55 participants followed two different nutritionally balanced diets over two eight-week periods. One diet consisted solely of minimally processed foods (MPFs), while the other included ultra-processed foods (UPFs). UPFs often contain ingredients such as emulsifiers and stabilisers that you wouldn't typically find in a home kitchen, foods like cereals, sliced bread and ready-made meals. After each eight-week phase, both groups experienced weight loss, likely due to the improved nutritional quality of their diets compared to their usual eating habits. However, the reduction was more significant in the MPF diet group, a 2.06% decrease in body weight compared to 1.05% in the UPF group. Dr Samuel Dicken, the study's lead author from the UCL Centre for Obesity Research and the UCL Department of Behavioural Science & Health, explained: 'If these results were scaled up over a year, we'd expect to see around a 13% weight reduction in men and 9% in women on the minimally processed diet, compared to only about 4% in men and 5% in women on the ultra-processed diet. "Over time, the differences become quite substantial.' ITV News has been following the experiences of two participants for more than a year. Suzy, who lost 5kg during the MPF diet, gained some weight back while eating UPFs. She has since chosen to reduce her intake of UPFs significantly. 'I feel really good,' she told ITV News. 'I feel in control of what I'm eating, which is a really nice feeling.' Similarly, 62-year-old David Bones shared his experience: 'It's like a fog lifting," he said. "You go from living in this fog, thinking that's normal, and then suddenly everything feels clearer—you feel better physically and mentally. "It's a huge improvement.' In both diets, participants were given more food than they needed. The trial found that eating MPF resulted in fewer cravings. The less calorie-dense food was often more effort to prepare and eat, which may have been a reason why participants chose to stop eating sooner. Professor Chris van Tulleken, an author of the study from UCL Division of Infection & Immunity, commented: 'The current global food system promotes poor health and obesity, largely because of the widespread availability of cheap, unhealthy foods. "This study highlights how ultra-processing influences health outcomes beyond just the nutrients, like fat, salt, and sugar. "It underscores the need to shift policy focus away from individual responsibility and towards the environmental factors shaped by multinational food companies that promote unhealthy food environments.' The trial also examined secondary health markers, including blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels, cholesterol and inflammation. Generally, there were no significant differences in these markers between the diets. The researchers caution that longer studies would be needed to properly investigate these measures in relation to changes in weight and fat mass. When I caught up with Suzy at her final weigh-in last week, she had successfully maintained her weight loss. She shared that she has adopted permanent lifestyle changes. 'You could say 100% no ultra-processed foods, but that would be really difficult with friends and family,' she explained. 'For me, it's about finding a balance, still enjoying some of the foods others eat but not making UPFs a regular part of every meal and snack. That approach has worked really well for me.'