Indigenous groups demand action from South American leaders at Amazon summit
The Fifth Presidential Summit of the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization, which officially begins in the Colombian capital on Tuesday, will bring together leaders alongside Indigenous representatives and scientists. The agenda includes public forums, cultural events and high-level meetings, culminating Friday with a joint 'Declaration of Bogota' setting regional priorities on environmental protection and climate policy.
Indigenous groups from all eight Amazonian nations issued a statement on Monday evening, calling the rainforest a global lifeline that provides about one-fifth of the world's freshwater and acts as one of the planet's largest carbon sinks, absorbing vast amounts of heat-trapping carbon dioxide. They said decades of deforestation, mining, fossil fuel drilling and large-scale farming have pushed the region toward a point of no return.
Among their demands are legal protection of Indigenous lands, recognition of their communities as official decision-makers within the treaty body, and a ban on new oil, gas and mining projects in the rainforest. They also propose a working group on a 'just transition' — a shift to cleaner energy and away from coal, oil or natural gas — and an observatory to track threats against environmental defenders.
The groups noted that many commitments made in the 2023 Belem Declaration — a joint pledge by Amazon nations to cooperate on protecting the rainforest — have yet to be implemented, and cautioned against another round of 'empty promises.' They stressed that violence against activists continues to rise across the Amazon, calling for regional protection measures.
The week-long program includes an 'Amazon Dialogues' forum bringing together civil society, scientists and Indigenous leaders; a panel on the rainforest's 'flying rivers' that help regulate South America's climate; and a 'Road to COP30' event meant to shape the Amazon's voice at the next U.N. climate conference in Brazil in November.
'There is no solution to any of the threats the Amazon is facing without its communities,' said Raphael Hoetmer, a senior advisor at Amazon Watch, a U.S.-based nonprofit, attending the summit.
'There is an historical opportunity to create a mechanism for permanent and direct dialogue and participation with Indigenous peoples through the ATCO,' he said, referring to the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization, a bloc of eight Amazonian countries.
Leaders from Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela are expected to attend, with hopes that it will be the first time Indigenous representatives will meet directly with heads of state during the summit.
'There will be no future without Indigenous peoples at the center of decision-making,' the groups said in the statement.
Grattan writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Only Trump Can Break the Deadlock on North Korea
When South Korean President Lee Jae-myung delivered an Independence Day speech earlier this month, he paid much attention to North Korea. He announced his intention to restore a 2018 era military agreement and reminded his nation that he has taken a number of steps to reduce tensions with the North, like halting anti-North propaganda balloon launches and loudspeaker broadcasts across the demilitarized border zone. Kim Jong Un responded this week with a pledge to rapidly build up his country's nuclear forces. His sister Kim Yo Jong, who is also Pyongyang's spokesperson-in-chief, then delivered a statement once again rejecting South Korean overtures, come as they did alongside Lee's efforts to maintain the U.S.-South Korea alliance. The siblings also condemned the South for continuing with annual joint military exercises that began on Monday. Lee comes from the 'progressive' camp, which has historically been more willing to offer Pyongyang concessions and aid. Yet his more conciliatory approach has so far elicited scorn or silence. Alas, that is likely to remain the case. Read More: The Meaning of Lee Jae-myung's Election Triumph The reasons are straightforward: for the time being, the North Korean side has nothing to gain from warmer ties. For decades, Pyongyang regarded South Korea primarily as a source of billions of dollars in economic support. To put it bluntly, North Korea treated the South as a state-sized ATM—especially when progressive administrations were in power. But North Korea has been subjected to a very strict U.N. sanctions regime since 2017. This U.S.-led effort is aimed at preventing North Korea from financing its nuclear program, and has made large-scale economic cooperation between Seoul and Pyongyang virtually impossible. Judging from the North's perspective, therefore, improving ties with Seoul serves little purpose: the old ATM is broken. It is true that U.N. sanctions did not ban humanitarian assistance or some cultural activities, but this is not what North Korean leaders want. They see cultural or other non-economic exchanges as harmful to the hermit kingdom, given the 30-fold gap in per capita GDP between the two Korean states. Awareness of South Korea's prosperity and freedoms inevitably raises questions about whether the North Korean system is truly superior and whether their leaders are as wise as they claim. Moreover, Pyongyang is not as desperate for South Korean aid as it once was. Arms sales worth an estimated $20 billion and steady economic support from China have helped cushion its troubles—at least for the time being. Pyongyang would also prefer to not look weak by accepting humanitarian aid it can now do without. What the North wants is money and material assistance, without strings attached and presented as tribute not aid. No doubt, the Lee administration is quite happy to provide such assistance, be it joint industrial or tourist projects like the Kaesong Industrial Zone pursued in the past. But South Korea is not going to openly violate the U.N. sanctions regime. That is why any serious shift in inter-Korean relations requires the lifting—or at least the meaningful relaxation—of U.N. sanctions. This is a step only the U.S. could engineer, and in practice only Donald Trump might attempt. During his first term, Trump came quite close to forging such a deal with Pyongyang. At the February 2019 U.S.-North Korea summit in Hanoi, the two sides discussed a formula under which North Korea would agree to dismantle its major nuclear facilities. In return, the U.S. was expected to back a revision of U.N. sanctions policy—a move that other members of the Security Council would have been unlikely to oppose once Washington gave its consent. But in the end, the two sides failed to agree on the details, and the Hanoi summit collapsed. It is possible, however, that negotiations will resume shortly; some U.S. officials have recently dropped hints about the prospects of renewed engagement with Pyongyang, and even Trump himself said a couple of months ago that he had a 'good relationship' with Kim Jong Un and hoped to 'solve the conflict' with North Korea. If negotiations do begin, there remains a genuine, but limited, chance of success. North Korea will not, under any circumstances, relinquish its nuclear arsenal. Yet from Pyongyang's perspective, there is a certain logic in pursuing a nuclear arms control agreement (if it comes with the right perks). Such a deal could offer the regime a means of easing its heavy reliance on China and Russia, the only two countries that are willing to ignore the U.N. sanctions regime when dealing with North Korea. The North Korean leadership regards such dependence as burdensome, especially regarding China. In any case, progress in inter-Korean relations ultimately hinges on direct U.S.–North Korea talks. Only if those negotiations succeed will Seoul and Pyongyang be able to move forward. And that remains, at best, a very big if.
American Military News
8 hours ago
- American Military News
China gears up for huge military parade to flaunt weapons, troops
China is preparing to hold an enormous military parade in Beijing next month to mark 80 years since Japan's surrender in World War II, an event set to put its growing military power on full display. Tens of thousands of troops are expected to take part, joined by a fleet of aircraft and an arsenal of cutting-edge weapons, many of which have never been publicly revealed. Officials said the highlights will include fighter jets, bombers, and missiles capable of traveling at five times the speed of sound, according to Reuters. The parade will also feature new tanks, early-warning aircraft meant to shield China's carriers, and vehicles designed to neutralize drones. The new missile systems are expected to attract the scrutiny of the U.S. and its allies. Wu Zeke, deputy director of the military parade, said, '(The weapons and equipment) will fully demonstrate our military's robust ability to adapt to technological advancements, evolving warfare patterns, and win future wars.' Military officials confirmed that newly developed equipment will make up a large share of the arsenal on display, though they declined to specify exact numbers of troops or weapons. The September 3 'Victory Day' parade will last about 70 minutes and consist of 45 troop formations. President Xi Jinping will preside from Tiananmen Square, joined by foreign dignitaries, including Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the last parade of its kind in 2015, more than 12,000 soldiers marched, joined by contingents from countries such as Russia, Belarus, Mongolia, and Cambodia. Some veterans from Taiwan also took part, though most Western leaders refused to attend. Preparations are already visible across Beijing. Security has been tightened with checkpoints, road closures, and the shutdown of shopping malls and offices near the parade route. Rehearsals have taken place on recent weekends, drawing tens of thousands of participants and spectators. For some participants, the occasion is deeply personal. Staff Sergeant Lan Yu, 28, who previously served in South Sudan as part of a U.N. peacekeeping mission, will march in the parade for the first time. 'This year marks my 11th year in the military, and it's my first time representing the peacekeeping force in a parade,' Lan said.
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Rwanda-backed rebels killed over 140 civilians in eastern Congo, rights group says
DAKAR, Senegal — Rwanda-backed rebels killed at least 140 people in farming communities in eastern Congo in July, Human Rights Watch said in a report Wednesday, describing the killings as 'summary executions.' The group said 141 people, predominantly ethnic Hutus, were feared dead or missing after the attacks near Virunga National Park in North Kivu province, citing local experts and witness accounts. It said the killings appeared to be part of a military campaign by the M23 group, the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups in mineral-rich eastern Congo, against the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a mostly Hutu armed group. Nearly 2 million Hutus from Rwanda fled to Congo after the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed 800,000 Tutsi, moderate Hutus and others. Rwandan authorities have accused Hutus who fled of participating in the genocide, alleging that the Congolese army protected them. The United States and others have been trying to achieve a permanent ceasefire since fighting between the M23 and Congolese forces escalated in January with the M23's seizure of two key cities. U.S. President Donald Trump this week asserted he had 'ended six wars' including this one, but experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. The U.N. has called the decades-old conflict in eastern Congo 'one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.' The Human Rights Watch report says the Rwanda Defense Force was involved in the M23 operations it describes, citing U.N. and military sources and witness accounts. There was no immediate comment from the Rwandan government. 'The M23 armed group, which has Rwandan government backing, attacked over a dozen villages and farming areas in July and committed dozens of summary executions of primarily Hutu civilians,' said Clementine de Montjoye, senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. Witnesses said M23 soldiers, accompanied by Rwandan soldiers who were identified by their accents, told them to 'immediately bury the bodies in the fields or leave them unburied, preventing families from organizing funerals,' the report said. One woman described being marched in a group to a riverbank near the town of Kafuru. The group of around 70 people was lined up before the soldiers began shooting at them. Forty-seven of the dead, including children, were identified, the report added. Willy Ngoma, military spokesperson for M23, called the report 'military propaganda.' M23 was previously accused of extrajudicial killings during its seizure of major cities earlier this year. A separate report by Amnesty International on Wednesday said the rights group found that both M23 and Congolese government-sponsored militias regularly committed mass atrocities and sexual violence against civilians, including gang rape. 'Rwanda and (Congo) cannot continue shunning responsibility; they must hold all perpetrators accountable,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's regional director for East and Southern Africa.
