
Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu: Mzwanele Manyi has redefined the term ‘political reinvention'
Ah, Chief Dwasaho! My leader, seeing as your inbox is undoubtedly groaning under the weight of diplomatic communiqués and full-course buffets since your sho't left for the United States of Amerikaners, I fully understand why my humble email slipped through the cracks.
I sent you my updated profile — certainly not for the coveted US ambassadorship, where one dines with senators and flirts with the threat of sanctions. It was for a modest writing or editing gig to keep the home fires burning.
And I do mean that quite literally and figuratively — the price of firewood, gas, and electricity in Mzansi is no joke.
Former by design, not disgrace
In the aforementioned profile, penned with all the dignity of a man whose LinkedIn boasts more chapters than the Bible, I stated — with solemn pride — that I am a former leader of the African National Congress (ANC); a former deputy chairperson of the South African Students' Congress (Sasco); and a former Student Representative Council (SRC) president at Technikon Natal (Durban University of Technology).
I am also a former Public Relations Officer of the South African Technikon Students Union (Satsu) and a former Political Education Officer of the South African Students' Press Union (Saspu) — back when 'press' meant journalism, not anti-social media. I was even a former council member of said Technikon, although whether that came with a stipend or merely a chicken feet lunch remains a mystery.
Professionally, I am formerly Director of Media and Public Relations at the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Transport, Community Safety and Liaison; formerly attached to the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Education; and formerly in national service at the Department of Basic Education, where I fought valiantly against broken grammar and ministerial misquotes.
As you can see, my formerlies are not just bona fide — they qualify as a full-blown curriculum vitae.
To crown it all, I proudly hold what may well be an unbreakable national record — I am a former student of not one, not two, but three universities. A proper academic polygamist, if you will.
I am also a former fan of all things Zumaaaaaa, back when his dance moves still thrilled the comrades and his speeches weren't riddled with 'nine-point plans' that led us nowhere slowly.
Now, Comrade Leadership, I must confess that nothing warms my heart more than being a former lover of my firstborn son's mother, who has since risen phoenix-like to become an admitted attorney of the high court. I am also, quite perplexingly, a former son to my late, unlikeable father — which surely deserves a constitutional review or at least a footnote in our next National General Council documents.
Yet, through all these exits, not once have I left under a cloud — no dishonourable discharge. As the British say, I've always known when to take my leave before the tea turned cold — and certainly, before the comrades started stirring the sugar of suspicion.
I wasn't shown the door by the party, the home, or even the communal WhatsApp group where gossip goes to find its second wind.
And yes, I was once an optimist about this democracy of ours, which in ANC circles is still referred to as a 'Democratic Breakthrough'. These days, with the movement having suffered a defeat at the polls and reduced to sharing Cabinet seats with the Opposition, comrades now refer to our electoral humiliation as the 'Strategic Setback of 2024'.
That, my leader, is the ANC for you — consistently applying revolutionary grammar to electoral trauma. But I digress.
Isn't Jimmy or Mzwanele…
As I paced in my lounge like a contemplative Marxist revolutionary considering my next audacious career move in the absence of your reply, my leader, enter, stage left: Mzwanele Manyi, formerly known as Jimmy, the ever-(dis)honourable member of many things.
Yes, him. The guy known for his vile comment: 'This over-concentration of coloureds in the Western Cape is not working for them.'
The same individual who once utilised the Department of Labour and Government Communication and Information System (GCIS) as his megaphone and later commandeered ANN7 as if it were the SABC of Saxonwold.
Now? He has been formally and formerly dismissed as the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party's chief whip.
My leader, I am convinced that Mr Manyi holds the Guinness World Record for the most 'formerlies' one man can attach to a single CV — a veritable collector of ex-titles.
Former ANC apparatchik. Former Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) fighter. A former missionary with the African Transformation Movement (ATM). Former lay preacher at the Bantu Church of Christ and former government spokesperson. The former media mogul — a generous stretch.
The former founder of the Decolonisation Foundation, which was more of a WhatsApp group than a movement. Former spokesperson of the JG Zuma Foundation — a one-person, one-fax-machine operation.
He's reinvented himself more times than the Johannesburg City Council has had mayors and Eskom has had CEOs — and that's no small feat.
From the carpeted hallways of the Union Buildings to the propaganda booths of Gupta TV, to now tiptoeing out of the corridors previously reserved for Zuma's most loyal lieutenants, Manyi has marched them all. With a microphone in one hand, a recycled manifesto in the other, and a press release tucked into the inside pocket of his camouflage blazer.
This week, when confronted by journalists about his sudden dethroning, the former chief whip declared, without flinching: 'It's not a shame.' Of course, it's not. My leader, shame has long since been voted out of the House — alongside accountability and humble pie.
In today's politics, being 'former' isn't a phase — it's a full-blown lifestyle. A calling. A brand strategy designed at Harvard. It doesn't end there!
'Formerlies-R-Us'
My leader, if political reinvention were an Olympic sport, Jimmy Mzwanele Manyi would have clinched gold in both the solo and relay events. But long before he paraded on red carpets, donned berets, and wore green fatigues, he strode the corridors of White Monopoly Capital like a man who had once read Rich Dad Poor Dad as if it were scripture.
Let's begin with the boardroom ballet. Manyi, formerly of Anglo-American, served a decade in the heart of the mining industry — not as a unionist, mind you, but as a mining and exploration geologist (without formal qualifications in the field).
You must respect the sheer grit and stamina of Jimmy for being never knowingly underemployed. He is also a former president of the Black Management Forum (BMF), where he led transformation debates with the vigour of a man who believed BEE stood for 'Bold Executive Elevation'.
Formerly employed, formidably titled
Then came Toyota South Africa, where he served as general manager — steering corporate strategy, presumably without a reverse gear. If those Toyotas could talk, they'd say: 'Mr Manyi's leadership had fewer breakdowns than Eskom.'
At Barclays PLC he held a top-level executive position, overseeing Business Banking, Development, Black Economic Empowerment, and Government Relations — a rare four-in-one combination akin to buying a car with Bluetooth, a sunroof, and a prayer included.
After government, Jimmy, or was it Mzwanele, founded Afrotone, his investment firm. Whether it generated rands, cents, sense, or simply headlines is beside the point. Then came the media ownership — The New Age and ANN7, acquired from the Gupta family. He ran both with the enthusiasm of a teenager handed the remote for the first time. Objectivity? Let's say Jimmy redefined it in his own image.
As for education, he holds a Higher Diploma in a field that even the internet doesn't know. He is degreeless, an omission that cost him the director-general post at Mineral Resources. But, my leader, when you're Jimmy, even CV gaps read like bullet points of legend.
Reload, don't resign
Just for the record, neither Jimmy nor Mzwanele is fazed by the latest development, which makes him look like a crosstitute. This makes sense because being 'former' is no longer a setback — it's a brand.
With the bluster of Donald Trump and the cryptic tone of an Elon Musk tweet orbiting the Union Buildings, he said: 'I will rise, as always.' Yes, he will; he's been a former 26 times by conservative estimates.
Till next week, my man — send me to the original Jimmy Manyi without titles. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
4 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
World Bank lifts lending freeze over Uganda anti-LGBTQ law
NAIROBI - The World Bank is lifting a freeze on lending to Uganda it put in place in response to a 2023 law criminalising homosexuality, after taking steps to counter discrimination, it said Wednesday. Uganda's anti-LGBTQ law, one of the most severe in the world, provides for harsh sentences for same-sex relations or "promoting" homosexuality, including the death penalty in some cases. After longtime President Yoweri Museveni signed it into law in May 2023, the World Bank halted all new loans to Uganda, saying projects it financed had to adhere to its non-discriminatory policies. Since then, "the World Bank worked with the government and other stakeholders in the country to introduce, implement and test measures that prevent discrimination in World Bank-funded projects," a spokesman told AFP. "We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory," he added. "Consequently, the Bank has prepared new projects in sectors with significant development needs," which will be presented to the World Bank's board, he said. "All new projects have the mitigations measures embedded in them," he added. "The World Bank cannot deliver on its mission to end poverty and boost shared prosperity on a liveable planet unless all people can participate in, and benefit from, the projects we finance." Uganda has lost between $586 million and $2.4 billion a year because of the anti-LGBTQ law, notably because of frozen financing, British charity Open for Business estimated last year.


Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA almost has a Budget — finance committee adopts fiscal framework, despite MK and EFF rejections
After multiple false starts, a key aspect of the 2025 Budget was adopted in Parliament on Wednesday, with the support of the ANC and DA. When the second iteration of the 2025 Budget came before Parliament's finance committee in April, the divisions in the Government of National Unity (GNU) were on full display. The Democratic Alliance (DA) refused to support the adoption of the fiscal framework and it only moved through the committees and then the National Assembly thanks to the support of non-GNU parties such as ActionSA. On Wednesday, 4 June, the GNU's largest members, the African National Congress (ANC) and DA, finally found each other and the fiscal framework was passed by a vote of seven to three. The passing of the fiscal framework is a key step in the budgeting process. This framework establishes economic policy and revenue projections and sets the overall limits to government spending. This report must be adopted within 16 days after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana tables the Budget. While the DA opposed the fiscal framework in Budget 2.0, Wednesday's situation was different, with both the ANC and DA supporting the measure against the opposition of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party. Wednesday's meeting was briefly halted to find a bigger venue in Parliament to accommodate all the MPs, journalists and officials, as well as ensure it was recorded, in line with MPs' requests. There were several comments and queries by MK party MPs, including axed finance minister Des van Rooyen and former Eskom boss Brian Molefe. At one point, Molefe said the fiscal framework should include the expanded unemployment rate (43.1%) rather than the narrow definition (32.9%), but his suggestion was shot down. The MK and EFF also criticised the increase in the fuel levy, with Molefe describing it as 'regressive' and 'not pro-growth'. On Tuesday, the Western Cape Division of the High Court dismissed the EFF's urgent bid to block the fuel levy increase. Issues were raised on whether the Budget was that of an austerity budget, denied by the ANC – an answer the MK party and EFF continued to reject. It was questioned several times during the meeting whether MPs were making points simply to grandstand 'because there were cameras'. This seemed evident when EFF MP Omphile Maotwe raised objections over a section of the report that dealt with 'not providing bailouts' to state-owned entities (SOEs), rather than 'capitalising SOEs'. Maotwe said she was at Transnet when she claimed it had been successful under the management of fellow finance committee member Brian Molefe – the former Transnet CEO turned State Capture accused, and now a member of the MK Party on its parliamentary benches. Next week, the National Assembly will vote on whether to adopt the fiscal framework in a sitting at the Cape Town International Convention Centre. When the fiscal framework is passed, other steps in the budgeting process include the passing of the Division of Revenue Bill and the Appropriation Bill. During the tabling of the fiscal framework in the National Assembly in April, the ANC appeared jubilant when it was passed without the DA's support, while the DA had harsh words for the ANC and other parties who supported that version of the Budget. It's unlikely there will be such acrimony next week. DM


Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The NPA illustrates the rot within South African institutions
The decision by the Free State High Court to withdraw charges against Moroadi Cholota, the former assistant to former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule, reveals the level of crisis within the NPA. But the NPA is just one example of a government institution in which officials either resist change or simply refuse to work, often aided by politicians. There will, no doubt, be several legal examinations of Tuesday's decision, in which Judge Phillip Loubser said his court had no authority to try former Free State premier Ace Magashule's former assistant, Moroadi Cholota, because the NPA had instituted her extradition from the US, while legally it should have been the Justice Ministry. While the legal correctness of this decision might be examined by higher courts, the public perception is likely to be dominated by a question of why legal technicalities matter so much. Of course, to lawyers, judges and the rule of law, they absolutely matter. But to many people, they are simply a way for people to avoid justice. The best example of this is former president Jacob Zuma, who has been able to avoid a fair trial since 2003. No accountability for the powerful The message this sends is that there is no accountability for those in power. But it also suggests that despite the reams of evidence heard at the Zondo commission, and the findings that it made, no convictions will come from it. For the moment, it seems that there is no big desire by voters to change our legal system, to remove some of the rights of those accused of wrongdoing. Considering our past, this is entirely legitimate. But if those in power continue to be able to avoid accountability, it is likely that first, trust in the justice system will continue to decline, and second, parties that propose limiting the rights of the accused will grow stronger. One of the important lessons from the NPA is that despite having independent leadership that appears determined to deliver justice, the institution itself is still very weak. The history of how the NPA was captured was being written almost in real time. People like Lawrence Mrwebi or Nomgcobo Jiba were in leadership positions there for many months. Both were found by the courts to be 'not fit and proper' for their positions. During the time they were there, it is likely that they packed the NPA with people who either supported their views or would never challenge their views. Ramaphosa But politicians have played an important role in keeping the NPA weak, too. Perhaps the person who has played the biggest role in weakening the NPA is President Cyril Ramaphosa. One of the important figures in the NPA during the State Capture period was the head of prosecutions in Johannesburg, Andrew Chauke. He was involved in delaying cases against former Gauteng Health MEC Brian Hlongwe and helped to bring a now debunked case against former KwaZulu-Natal Hawks Head Johann Booysen (Chauke has delivered a robust response to the claims against him, including in a TV interview with this writer). In 2023, National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi formally asked Ramaphosa to suspend him from his position (under the law, only the President can suspend someone in this job). Two years later, Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi said that the matter was at an 'advanced stage'. This is nonsense. If Ramaphosa really believed in the rule of law, and if he wanted a properly independent NPA, he would have suspended Chauke the moment he could. Worse for the NPA has been the Justice Ministry's refusal to share the Zondo commission database with it. Again, this must be deliberate. Even if there is some legal reason to make this difficult for the NPA, this would be for the courts hearing State Capture prosecutions to determine, not the Justice Ministry. However, it must be remembered that the situation at the NPA is repeated in many other institutions. Culture of resistance On Monday, the chair of the National Lotteries Commission, Barney Pityana, told 702's Bongani Bingwa about the difficulties he is facing in fixing the organisation, after the incredible corruption that happened there. Pityana appeared to be particularly critical of former Department of Trade, Industry and Competition minister Ebrahim Patel. One of his problems is that only the minister can appoint distributing agents to distribute funds, and the commission only had two or three when it should have had 11. As Pityana put it, 'For a long time, minister Patel was stuck with this appointment for reasons best known to him.' Pityana also said that within the organisation, 'There's internal resistance to some of the changes being made in the organisation, therefore compliance, we admit, has been a very difficult issue.' Pityana is almost pointing to a culture of people in important organisations that resist change. In some cases, it may simply be that they do not believe there is any reason for change. Or that workers in many government institutions feel that there is no reason for them to work, because it seems virtually impossible for them to be fired. The Sunday Times published an important report last weekend about the situation in Gauteng metros. It would appear that many permanently employed workers tell bosses that they can't be fired, and thus can't be forced to work. This culture has been evident in councils for many years. It could explain why services do not improve, whether it is a DA-led coalition taking over from an ANC-led coalition or the other way round. This toxic mix of a refusal by workers to change, and political interference (or so often just a refusal to act), may help to explain why so many institutions are not improving. Unfortunately, coalition politics is unlikely to make major changes. In institutions where this culture exists, workers may feel they can just outlast a new boss, knowing that they will still be there after she becomes frustrated and leaves. Ministers and others with political authority are likely to continue interfering or just doing nothing. This means that we can continue to expect the NPA, and so many institutions like it, to simply keep stumbling. DM