SA almost has a Budget — finance committee adopts fiscal framework, despite MK and EFF rejections
After multiple false starts, a key aspect of the 2025 Budget was adopted in Parliament on Wednesday, with the support of the ANC and DA.
When the second iteration of the 2025 Budget came before Parliament's finance committee in April, the divisions in the Government of National Unity (GNU) were on full display. The Democratic Alliance (DA) refused to support the adoption of the fiscal framework and it only moved through the committees and then the National Assembly thanks to the support of non-GNU parties such as ActionSA.
On Wednesday, 4 June, the GNU's largest members, the African National Congress (ANC) and DA, finally found each other and the fiscal framework was passed by a vote of seven to three.
The passing of the fiscal framework is a key step in the budgeting process. This framework establishes economic policy and revenue projections and sets the overall limits to government spending. This report must be adopted within 16 days after Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana tables the Budget.
While the DA opposed the fiscal framework in Budget 2.0, Wednesday's situation was different, with both the ANC and DA supporting the measure against the opposition of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party.
Wednesday's meeting was briefly halted to find a bigger venue in Parliament to accommodate all the MPs, journalists and officials, as well as ensure it was recorded, in line with MPs' requests.
There were several comments and queries by MK party MPs, including axed finance minister Des van Rooyen and former Eskom boss Brian Molefe. At one point, Molefe said the fiscal framework should include the expanded unemployment rate (43.1%) rather than the narrow definition (32.9%), but his suggestion was shot down.
The MK and EFF also criticised the increase in the fuel levy, with Molefe describing it as 'regressive' and 'not pro-growth'. On Tuesday, the Western Cape Division of the High Court dismissed the EFF's urgent bid to block the fuel levy increase.
Issues were raised on whether the Budget was that of an austerity budget, denied by the ANC – an answer the MK party and EFF continued to reject.
It was questioned several times during the meeting whether MPs were making points simply to grandstand 'because there were cameras'.
This seemed evident when EFF MP Omphile Maotwe raised objections over a section of the report that dealt with 'not providing bailouts' to state-owned entities (SOEs), rather than 'capitalising SOEs'.
Maotwe said she was at Transnet when she claimed it had been successful under the management of fellow finance committee member Brian Molefe – the former Transnet CEO turned State Capture accused, and now a member of the MK Party on its parliamentary benches.
Next week, the National Assembly will vote on whether to adopt the fiscal framework in a sitting at the Cape Town International Convention Centre. When the fiscal framework is passed, other steps in the budgeting process include the passing of the Division of Revenue Bill and the Appropriation Bill.
During the tabling of the fiscal framework in the National Assembly in April, the ANC appeared jubilant when it was passed without the DA's support, while the DA had harsh words for the ANC and other parties who supported that version of the Budget. It's unlikely there will be such acrimony next week. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
17 minutes ago
- The South African
Taxpayers cough up R1 million for Paul Mashatile's Japan hotel
Deputy President Paul Mashatile is under fire following revelations that nearly R1 million in public funds was spent on luxury hotel accommodation during a five-day diplomatic visit to Japan in March 2025. According to details disclosed in a recent parliamentary Q&A, Mashatile and his wife, Humile Mashatile, racked up R956 057 in hotel expenses alone – part of a total R2.3 million bill for the Tokyo trip, which was billed as a high-level engagement to strengthen trade and cultural ties between South Africa and Japan. The cost of accommodation has sparked particular outrage. Based on a four-night stay, the expenses average out to roughly R239 000 per night – far more than the rates charged by even Japan's most opulent hotels. Parliamentary records did not name the hotel used by the delegation, and this lack of transparency has only fueled criticism from opposition MPs and civil society groups, who say the spending is excessive and unjustifiable, especially during a time of economic hardship for many South Africans. 'This kind of wasteful expenditure is unacceptable,' said DA MP Lerato Ngobeni, who posed the original parliamentary question. 'Taxpayers are struggling to make ends meet, while senior officials are living in five-star luxury.' The March visit came just months after Paul Mashatile was sworn in as deputy president on 3 July 2024. Since then, he has undertaken several international trips, including stops in Ireland, the United Kingdom, Zimbabwe, Botswana, and Japan – trips that have collectively drawn scrutiny over rising travel costs. Mashatile did not travel alone. He was accompanied by a delegation that included ministers and deputy ministers from several portfolios, such as Sport, Agriculture, Higher Education, and International Relations. The government has defended the trip, arguing it held strategic value for bilateral cooperation in trade, education, and science. Yet critics remain unconvinced. Transparency watchdogs and public finance monitors have demanded an audit of the Japan trip and called for stricter guidelines on government travel, citing the lack of itemised breakdowns and vague justifications. 'This isn't just about one trip,' said Sipho Mbele, an analyst with the Public Accountability Forum. 'It's about a pattern of abuse where government elites operate under a different set of rules than ordinary citizens. There's very little transparency or restraint.' As pressure mounts, at the time of publishing, Paul Mashatile's office has remained silent on the matter. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Nelson Mandela Bay councillors demand answers about spending of flood disaster grants
Councillors have accused Nelson Mandela Bay's acting city manager of dodging questions about the municipality's spending of flood disaster grants. In a rare moment of unity, councillors from across the political spectrum agreed that they were unable to get proper answers over Nelson Mandela Bay's use of two flood disaster grants to repair infrastructure in Kariega. On 1 June 2024, a cloudburst in Kariega led to flooding that caused the deaths of at least 10 people and destroyed two vital bridges and several roads, while more than 1,000 people were displaced. The metro received two tranches of disaster grants after the floods to start repairing infrastructure damage estimated at R1-billion. The first tranche was for R53-million and the second for R89-million. DA councillor Johnny Faltein, seconded by councillor Franay van de Linde, this week sought clarity over the state of repairs specifically for the two canals in Kariega that are supposed to function as flood mitigation measures, but which have fallen into disrepair. Both councillors said they were very worried as three days of heavy rain are predicted for Nelson Mandela Bay next week. The South African Weather Service has issued a Level 2 flood warning. Van de Linde said she was upset when she heard at a recent meeting of the Budget and Treasury Directorate that there was no money for the repair of the canals. The leader of the DA in Nelson Mandela Bay, Rano Kayser, accused acting city manager Ted Pillay of misleading the council and asked for answers. Kayser said that as the metro was now at the end of its financial year, there was a good chance that the city would lose the R53-million grant funding due to underspending. 'But are we at risk of losing the other R89-million funding as well? There are no contractors on site,' he said. The ANC's councillor Bongani Mani said they were hearing 'scary things' about the disaster funding. 'Acting City Manager, are you confident that this will not result in egg on our faces?' he asked. 'We want it on record.' He said he was tired of receiving the 'same boring answers' about the spending of the grants. Pillay said a decision had been made to reduce the four projects that were originally planned to two. 'Only two can be implemented. We have to find funding for the other two,' he said. This included the repair work on the canals. The R53-million for the repair of roads was awarded to different companies than those which had won a triennial contract for this work. 'This will result in irregular expenditure,' Pillay said, adding that the municipality's public accounts committee would have to sort it out. However, he insisted that work on the two bridges was progressing. Kayser countered that the information he had received from the city's Budget and Treasury Department was that the contractors had been appointed illegally, as the council had not supplied the correct supporting documentation with its decision. DM
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA is awaiting a US response to its trade proposal, says Ramaphosa's spokesperson
Vincent Magwenya also confirmed that the President would attend the G7 Summit in Canada this month. President Cyril Ramaphosa will attend the annual leaders summit of the G7 group of rich countries in Kananaskis, Canada, from 14-17 June, but it is not yet certain if he will have a separate meeting on the sidelines of the meeting with US President Donald Trump. Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, said Ramaphosa would participate in the discussion on the summit theme of energy security, including critical mineral supply chains. Asked if Ramaphosa would have a separate one-on-one meeting with Trump, Magwenya told a media briefing on Thursday that Ramaphosa's schedule of individual meetings was still being arranged. However, he noted that Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump in the White House last month was comprehensive. 'I would imagine there's no real pressure for the President to push for that meeting [at the G7], because … [the White House meeting was] recent…. Instead, it would be important for Ramaphosa to give himself time to meet other G7 leaders to align the work of the G7 with that of the G20 during South Africa's presidency of the G20.' Magwenya said that Ramaphosa was more hopeful than he had been before his White House meeting with Trump that the US president would attend the G20 summit in Johannesburg in November. He said Ramaphosa had reaffirmed the invitation to Trump, who was 'not openly and outrightly opposed to that invitation … we remain hopeful that President Trump will attend'. He said Ramaphosa had made the very strong point to Trump that the US had been at the forefront of creating the G20, and so it would be important for Trump to be present when Ramaphosa handed over the presidency of the G20 to the US. He added that Trump 'acknowledged and recognised' that point. The US will be the next president of the G20, taking over from SA after the summit. Ramaphosa was 'far more hopeful now than we were before the visit to the White House that he will attend, and hopefully we'll be able to throw in a round of golf there', added Magwenya. Trump had previously indicated he would not attend the G20 summit because of the 'genocide' he said was being perpetrated against white Afrikaners. Magwenya noted that most people had based their analysis of the White House meeting on what they saw on TV, when Trump screened a video of EFF leader Julius Malema chanting 'Kill the boer' and displayed a dossier of alleged murders of white South African farmers. 'The real meat' Magwenya said, 'The real meat of the meeting was what transpired in the closed session. And the President is enthused and satisfied with the opportunity that he had to be in discussion with President Trump. The President feels that we had a much better position post that visit than we were prior to the visit. And certainly it has opened the door for more engagements between our respective trade teams.' He said that Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau had presented a trade proposal to his counterpart, the US trade representative, and Tau was 'awaiting a detailed response to that package proposal. 'And meetings are planned for later on in the month where there will be more formal and substantive engagement on what I will call the new trade relationship framework with the US.' The discussions would include the issue of trade tariffs, said Magwenya, referring to the 31% 'reciprocal' import tariffs that Trump had slapped on SA, before suspending them for 90 days on 9 April. The trade talks also offered 'an excellent opportunity to expand the basket of tradable goods between ourselves and the United States', said Magwenya. He said Ramaphosa had stated before meeting Trump that he would like to see South Africa continue to participate in the Agoa preferential trade scheme with the US. However, whether or not that happened, Ramaphosa and his administration 'are optimistic that in the end we will have what will be a mutually beneficial trade relationship with the United States'. He suggested the new relationship would be 'better for our economy as well as for the US economy'. Magwenya said the narrative that there is a 'so-called persecution of people of a particular race in South Africa … is dying a very slow natural death … because it cannot be substantiated'. Scornful Asked to confirm that a second flight of Afrikaner 'refugees' had left for the US last week, Magweyna said the government was aware of the flight and that fewer people were on it than were on the first flight. He said Pretoria was 'a bit scornful of that programme, because it's not part of any reality'. He said the programme should be called 'a recruitment of people of a particular race, with certain skills', and should not be 'disguised as other things, because there is no South African citizen that is a refugee'. On other international issues, Magwenya said that on 30 June Ramaphosa would attend the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, Spain. The conference would discuss issues such as how to fully implement the Sustainable Development Goals and reform the international financial architecture. Magwenya said South Africa would convene a side event at the conference on how to achieve debt sustainability in developing economies. Because he would be attending this conference, Ramaphosa would be unable to attend the St Petersburg International Economic Forum in Russia, he said. DM
