
‘Moral panic' about new media's influence on young voters underplays their interest in politics, creators say
The creator behind Punters Politics, with 400,000 followers on Instagram, is a popular source of information in the lead up to the federal election, according to responses to the Guardian Australia young voter callout. He is one of a lineup of independent commentators and journalists creating content on platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Twitch that people told us they are turning to for political information.
While most respondents to our callout indicated they rely on a mix of social media and traditional media for news, influencers and experts have observed a 'moral panic' about the increase in young online creators engaging in politics.
For at least 20 years, young people have been moving away from formal politics – such as joining a political party or a volunteering organisation – and towards 'issues-based' politics, says Prof Philippa Collin from Western Sydney University. Collin researches the role of the internet in the political lives of young people.
'It's pretty common that it has been interpreted as young people not being interested or involved in civic engagement or political participation,' she says.
But research points to an increase in participatory politics, where young people 'feel a responsibility to do something about the issues that they see in the world, or that affect them directly,' Collin says.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
'They want to have more of a say, and to influence the world around them. They are facing a lot of really big issues, which they haven't played any part in creating … Think about the housing crisis, or the climate crisis, or various conflicts, or the general state of the economy.'
At the same time, young voters have grown up with the internet. Legacy media organisations are increasingly crafting and distributing media in new formats on new platforms, but there are already young creators on those platforms dedicated to particular issues – whether that be groups with a particular focus, such as sustainability and climate, or citizen journalists who 'perhaps don't even have a journalism background, but become important educators,' Collin explains.
Hannah Ferguson and her independent news commentary page Cheek Media Co and podcast Big Small Talk were collectively mentioned more than any other independent social media creators by people who responded to our callout.
Her Instagram pages have a total of 271,200 followers. Cheek Media Co publishes short reels on politics that attract tens to hundreds of thousands of views. One reel from January that breaks down the opposition leader Peter Dutton's voting history on key issues such as housing affordability and Hecs indexation racked up 1.2m views, more than 40,000 likes and thousands of comments.
Ferguson, who has recently interviewed Anthony Albanese and Adam Bandt, was one of a dozen content creators invited to the 2025 federal budget lockup, a move that was criticised by politicians and traditional media organisations.
Benjamin's Punters Politics, Jordan Shanks from Friendlyjordies and Juice Media were also frequently named by respondents.
Along with his Instagram page, Benjamin has almost 140,000 subscribers on YouTube, with videos on both platforms consistently reaching hundreds of thousands of viewers. He is known for critiquing big corporate industries, such as gas companies and supermarkets.
Shanks, a comedian known for his political commentary, continues to have the largest follower base and viewership on YouTube of the Australian creators mentioned by callout respondents. He posts to 1.38 million subscribers.
Juice Media, known for its 'honest government ads', has more than 1 million subscribers on YouTube, with videos consistently garnering half a million views or more.
Pages such as Toilet Paper Aus on Instagram, Swollen Pickles on YouTube, and Purple Pingers on YouTube – whose creator Jordan van den Lamb is running for a Senate seat for the Victorian Socialists in this election – were also mentioned by callout respondents, as were journalists such as Antony Loewenstein, Jan Fran, the former political reporter at Guardian Australia Amy Remeikis, and Soaliha Iqbal.
Abbie Chatfield, who was a reality TV contestant and host, and who now has half a million Instagram followers, is another name mentioned by callout respondents. Her interviews with Albanese and Bandt on her hit podcast It's a Lot were cleared of wrongdoing by the Australian Electoral Commission after a complaint by the Liberal party. A snippet of her interview with the prime minister posted to Instagram reached more than 700,000 viewers.
Chatfield has encouraged her followers to put the Liberal party last on ballot papers, and in response to the AEC investigation said, 'there's moral panic about influencers in politics'.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Collin agrees. She says there is a paradox here: 'On one hand, we have these discourses around young people not being interested in, not engaging in or caring about political issues.
'Then, as soon as the media and actors in society who [young people] listen to and engage with start talking politics, there is big concern about what is and isn't appropriate.
'This is just another classic moral panic around young people,' she says.
Freya Leach, who was the Liberal candidate for Balmain during the 2023 NSW election, posts conservative takes to just over 14,000 TikTok followers. Her videos on the upcoming election, frequently promoting Liberal policies to boost gas production and cut migration numbers among other things, have reached tens of thousands of viewers each.
The Australian Olympic diver Sam Fricker interviewed Dutton on his YouTube channel, which has close to 6 million subscribers, in December last year. The hour-long video reached less than 7,000 views. Fricker also recently interviewed the billionaire Clive Palmer, and energy minister, Chris Bowen, on his podcast.
Benjamin doesn't consider himself a journalist. He says independent creators are 'in a lane of our own'.
'I'm not uncovering new stories. I don't have an editor … I don't have a team of people making sure my facts are correct.'
While he has the social media following of an influencer, Benjamin doesn't use that moniker. He prefers 'video creator', and says he is a 'communicator'.
'You have scientists, you have journalists, you have economists.
'I feel like creators like myself step into the gap and do a bit of filtering … 'That's a distraction', 'this makes sense', 'let me explain this complex thing in a way that we might be able to understand'.'
Benjamin thinks Australians are looking for 'authenticity' amid 'the clinical way media presents information'.
Collin says what unites Ferguson, Benjamin and Chatfield is that they relate to a younger audience.
'They are disrupting the traditional discourse around young people and politics, and they are more likely to present as engaging in conversation and an exchange with their audience than other forms of media and political actors who tend to speak to their audience.'
Benjamin describes the phenomenon as 'talkback radio reincarnate' and says the goal is to make politics accessible to 'everyday Aussie punters'.
The former high school teacher started Punters Politics because 'it is getting harder and harder to do the very basic, simple things we are told to do'.
'Millennials, Gen Z, are told to get a job, go to uni, work hard,' he says. As younger voters grow up, they end up hitting a wall – 'Hang on, I'm never going to own a house'.'
It is then that young people realise the system is broken, Benjamin says, and want to engage.
This sentiment was frequently raised by young voters who responded to the Guardian's callout. Collin has observed it in her research as well. She says there is increasing fear and anxiety.
'Many young people are losing hope that they can have a good life through effort and making good decisions,' she says.
At the same time, her research shows young people are increasingly expressing a desire for 'a more egalitarian and a more caring society, a society that cares about the people in it, as well as the environment, and also cares about Australia's role in the world'.
'I think there's an interesting role that the kind of newer and more independent, unorthodox forms of media commentators or journalists are providing, and that is, they're connecting with that search for hope that things can be different.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court declines to block age verification law for social media
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 17 lifted a hold put on the law by a federal district judge who had ruled that it likely violates the First Amendment. U.S. District Judge Sul Ozerden had said the law is too broad, and parents have others way of monitoring their children's use of social media. The Supreme Court didn't explain its decision in the case. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that while Mississippi's law is likely unconsitutional, NetChoice didn't show that letting it be enforced during the legal challenge is sufficiently harmful. NetChoice attorney Paul Taske called the court's decision "an unfortunate procedural delay." "Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment - not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," Taske said in a statement. A spokesperson for Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch said the state is "grateful for the Court's decision to leave Mississippi's law in effect while the case proceeds in a way that permits thoughtful consideration of these important issues." Mississippi's attorneys say the law is a targeted effort to regulate social media platforms that let predators interact with children. "The Act requires what any responsible covered platform would already do: make 'commercially reasonable' efforts to protect minors," they told the Supreme Court. They said the law was prompted by a 16-year-old boy taking his own life after someone he met on Instagram threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. And they said Ozerden's order blocking enforcement conflicts with the Supreme Court's June decision upholding Texas' age verification law for pornographic websites. More: Supreme Court upholds Texas' age verification law for porn sites NetChoice said the law forces every Mississippian - adults and minors alike - to surrender personal information to access online speech that's protected by the First Amendment. "Social media is the modern printing press - it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives," said Paul Taske, co-director of the Net Choice Litigation Center. "Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online."


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
When and where is the Trump-Putin meeting? Time, schedule, livestream
Here's what to know about the highly anticipated diplomatic summit. When and where is the meeting? The pair's meeting is set to start at 11:30 a.m. Alaska time (3:30 p.m. ET) and a joint press conference is expected to follow. The two world leaders will meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. The base hosts about 30,000 service members, their family members and civilian employees, and is approximately 700 miles from the border with Russia. Trump-Putin meeting: Sprawling Army base that has hosted dignitaries is backdrop for talks Trump is scheduled to leave Washington, D.C., early Aug. 15, flying about six to seven hours on Air Force One before landing in Anchorage. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, appearing Aug. 14 on Fox News' Fox and Friends, said Trump's meeting with Putin will be followed by a "bilateral lunch" between the two leaders and their respective delegations followed by a news conference. Putin will be the first elected Russian leader to visit Alaska for the summit, land that the United States purchased from Moscow for $7.2 million in 1867, according to the National Archives. If everything goes according to plan, this trip will mark Putin's eighth visit to the U.S. during his presidency, a role he has held for more than 20 years across two separate terms since 1999. Trump-Putin summit: What to know about Putin's past meetings with US leaders Livestream USA TODAY is scheduled to provide live coverage as Trump meets with Putin in Alaska. You can watch at the embed below or on USA TODAY's YouTube channel. What might be discussed? Trump said there would be "very severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to end the Ukraine war when they meet and has said his summit with the Russian president would be "setting the table" for a possible Putin-Zelenskyy meeting that he might attend as well. In an Aug. 14 interview with conservative talk show host Brian Kilmeade on Fox News Radio, Trump called the meeting a "chess game" and predicted there's a "25% chance" the meeting could fail to advance peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. Trump has raised the idea of a "land swap" between Russia and Ukraine, asserting that both countries would have to cede land to each other to end the war. But Zelenskyy has firmly rejected the idea of ceding any land to Russia. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier," Zelenskyy said in a video posted on X on Aug. 9. What's latest in Russian-Ukraine war? A closer look at the map ahead of Trump-Putin meet Contributing: Francesca Chambers, Lauren Villagran, Tom Vanden Brook, Joey Garrison, USA TODAY; Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.


New Statesman
a day ago
- New Statesman
The rebuilding of Tommy Robinson
Photo by Benjamin Cremel/ AFP It's never occurred to me to feel nostalgic or grateful for Tommy Robinson's English Defence League. The EDL was self-evidently drawn from a school, or squadron, of politics we're rightly inoculated against, one born of the bottle and the baggie, in which protester and hooligan form one brawling silhouette. And then there was the documented plot to blow up mosques brewed up by an EDL member, the correspondence between EDL activists and the Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Breivik, and the convictions handed round after 100-man post-match pile-ups. Nope, I've always thought, I'm pretty content to see the back of them. So it's refreshing to see its reputation disinfected, laundered and aired by Robinson courtesy of the YouTube channel Triggernometry. The interview is one of a series Robinson has given to sympathetic listeners in recent days and weeks, from the former GB News hack Dan Wootton to someone called Liam Tuffs (the latter is a 'close friend of Tommy Robinson' and runs a 'no-holds-barred podcast channel'.) Robinson's appearance is the same on each: intense, suntanned and scowling. But Triggernometry is by far his biggest coup. Released on Monday (10 August), the video has already achieved 1.3 million views, and is one of the channel's most popular in its seven years online (not far behind Stephen Fry, a previous guest). If he ever truly went away, Tommy is back. And speaking here, Robinson attempts to give the EDL credit for prompting police action on the Pakistani grooming gangs in the early 2010s. Of course, this does look past the work of Sara Rowbotham, the NHS worker who raised dozens of referrals about sexual grooming in Rochdale while Robinson was keeping his good works to the terraces. And, when discussing police cover-ups of the same, he doesn't mention Margaret Oliver, the policewoman and whistleblower who has helped to expose the incompetence of her colleagues at Greater Manchester Police. But this is typical of an interview that benefits Robinson far more than it does politics or the public record. Watching Triggernometry is a strange experience. You can get past the two hosts, neither of them naturals, the anuran Konstantin Kisin, and the mostly mute and uncomfortable-looking Francis Foster. But more bizarrely, the videos are broken up by Kisin's presenting of paid sponsorship for various products tailored for a mainstream-questioning audience: VPNs, medical hypnosis treatments and saffron supplements (apparently it's the best thing for a good night's sleep). But, you must keep reminding yourself, this is the mainstream now. Kisin and Foster are – at a considerable push – our Robin Day or Russell Harty. With their help, Robinson is reaching a far larger audience, and with far less scrutiny, than his Lacoste-shirted, air-chopping younger self did with Jeremy Paxman in 2011. The chummy Triggernometry conversation with Robinson amounts to a stream of euphemism. The tone is established with the seventh word of Kisin's introduction, 'mate'. From then, Robinson is barely interrupted or opposed. A football hooligan firm is remembered as 'young men finding their identity'. Robinson's own brawling is only nudged and winked at by our hosts, a juvenile folly like scrumping or knock knock run. ('Five hundred years ago, the country would be desperate for people like you,' says Kisin at one point. 'You're a warrior.') The conversation is framed by Robinson alone. He roams freely through his twisted woodland of self-justifying anecdotes, spinning and yarning. Kisin and Foster follow patiently a few paces behind. It's left to Robinson to bring up his own criminal convictions. Thinking back to 2014, he remembers having 'a refreshing moment in jail at the time, thinking about my life, where's it heading, what's going on'. From a timeline of Robinson's convictions, this would appear to be an 18-month stretch for mortgage fraud which he called 'a complete stitch-up' at the time, so it was good he hunkered down for some soul-searching while inside. At other moments, HMP Belmarsh sounds rather like Robben Island: 'If you worry about consequence, you're never going to bring about change,' Robinson says, reflecting on another conviction for entering America on a false passport in the early 2010s. Alongside reputation management, the interview allows Robinson to relive freely the autobiography he has traded off since the late 2000s. The Luton of his birth is to be found just off the M1, and somewhere between Sodom and Gomorrah, a place of gang rapes, ethnic apartheid and chronic, stirring violence. (Writing for the New Statesman last summer, Robinson's working-class contemporary in Luton, Thomas Peak, questioned several aspects of Robinson's account.) The EDL was formed as a defensive measure, as Robinson watched the escalating outrage perpetrated by Muslim gangs. His textual study of the Koran (begun, pace this account, during another spell in solitary) has convinced Robinson that doctrinal Islam is the cause of these tensions and is incompatible with Western democracy. Though he closes the interview by distancing himself from those calling for mass remigration, at one point Robinson says 'well over a million' Muslims 'need to leave'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It's fierce stuff, and the comments beneath the video are full of support for this 'hero'. But forget his account of Luton – even Robinson's campaigning life is being contested, and looks very different when described by critical familiars. In a new memoir, the semi-retired alt-right activist Lauren Southern alleges Robinson spent his supporters' money on himself, with 'tens of thousands of these donations being pulled out of ATMs to pay for hookers, blow, and new flat-screen TVs', and that in 2018 Robinson flew her to Romania to introduce her to Andrew Tate, who later sexually assaulted her, accusations Robinson described as 'insanity'. Tommy Robinson's nature was already a matter of criminal record. As were his shapeshifting powers: he's previously been Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, Andrew McMaster, Paul Harris and Wayne King. This reappearance in public life in the guise of the vindicated prophet is a depressing reassertion of various political continuities, some as old as the financial crash. Starmer's England stinks of 2013. The sick and helpless are being reclassified as welfare queens (they only need help to wash below the waist after all). Islam has been re-identified as the enemy within. Populism leads the polls, and far-right protesters line the streets. Their leader and their parasite, the great England-hating patriot, is back with them. But the decision to front Robinson on a channel like this is evidence of a more novel phenomenon: marketing 'broken Britain' to an American audience. Almost a year ago, Robinson appeared on the Jordan Peterson Podcast, achieving 2.7 million views. Peterson had spoken sympathetically of Robinson's imprisonment as early as 2018. Steve Bannon has called him a 'hero' on his podcast (in front of his guest, a silent Liz Truss). On 2 January this year, while he was still in prison (this time on a case relating to contempt of court) Elon Musk's pinned tweet read 'Free Tommy Robinson!' A man who trades on his humble Irish-immigrant roots has become a transatlantic media starlet. As have the Triggernometry hosts. Triggernometry's very first video in 2018 featured the lads in a high-minded back-and-forth with the Financial Times foreign affairs writer Gideon Rachman. During the Tommy Robinson interview, Konstantin Kisin reads out some advertising copy for gold and silver investments with Wyoming-based Augusta Precious Metals, directed at 'helping Americans move wealth… into self-directed IRAs'. This is political broadcasting in 2025. England is simmering, and the whole world is watching the men boiling the pot. At the close of the interview, Robinson was given time to advertise his forthcoming rally on 13 September, at which he expects 'half a million to a million people'. Given the unsteady scenes outside migrant hotels across the country, should a fraction of that turn out, England can expect to see the menace of the EDL resurrected along with their leader. But perhaps don't expect as much brawling: after all, he's got mates in the media now. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related