Highland council may have skirted open meeting law
During a discussion about a Board of Works order that would allow the Highland Police Department to purchase a new Ford F150 Responder at its Tuesday night meeting, the conversation turned toward a second Board of Works order that would allow the department to purchase five new Ford police vehicles because five of the current vehicles have been problematic. Council President George Georgeff, R-1, had removed the second works board order off the agenda late Tuesday morning.
Councilman Doug Turich, R-2, asked the council if the special order for the five new vehicles didn't get passed, how could the council pass the appropriation. There was no special meeting called to discuss it, he said, but there was 'kind of an approval given amongst the five of us' with which he said he didn't agree.
The Police Department typically makes its vehicle purchases in September or October because it times their delivery — and therefore payment upon receipt — into the following year, Highland Police Commander John Banasiak told the council. The department got word, however, that Ford would be closing its books for law enforcement vehicles earlier than usual, so to lock in the price before it jumps, the department asked if it could trade in the five problematic vehicles; it would then purchase the new vehicles now and then get back on the fall schedule in 2026.
To do that, the council would have to approve an appropriation from the town's Municipal Capital Development fund (MCCD), Clerk-Treasurer Mark Herak said, of which the council approved a $65,000 appropriation ordinance earlier in the meeting.
'I think we should've called a special executive session or meeting to discuss this and then give the OK, but it didn't happen that way, so I'm just saying publicly that I don't agree with it, and we can go from there,' Turich said.
Georgeff then explained — and Town Attorney John Reed agreed — that there was no need for a special meeting or vote because the department would be placing the order only. If the department ends up not receiving the order for whatever reason, the dealership would be able to sell the vehicles to another department without issue, though it's unclear whether Highland would have to pay a penalty fee for not completing the purchase.
'We don't have all the information, and that's still why I'm saying there could've been a better conversation about this,' Turich said.
Georgeff said he'd 'gotten consensus' from the council that that was how it wanted to proceed, to which Turich said he didn't.
'I could show you the text messages where three of the five members said they wanted to have a special meeting,' Turich said. 'If we want, I can bring up my text messages and give the date and time.'
According to the most recent edition of the Indiana Public Access Law Handbook issued in 2022, 'If the governing body is trying to communicate simultaneously and expecting an immediate call-and-response type dialogue for the purpose of taking official action on business, the exchange constitutes a meeting.' While Indiana addresses only email, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press indicates the same argument would apply to text groups. (https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-sections/c-text-messages/).
Georgeff reiterated that he'd gotten consensus to order the cars and that he was also 'sitting with another council member' and singled out a text from Councilman Tom Black, R-4, that indicated he was fine with no special meeting if the town wasn't on the hook for the purchase.
Black corrected him.
'My text message indicated that I would've preferred a special meeting,' Black said.
'After we got the consensus,' Georgeff said.
'In order to speak on this, I think that there was a will to have a special meeting, but it was complicated in that two of the other councilors were out of town at that time,' Councilman Alex Robertson, D-3, said. 'I do appreciate that you put that agenda item for future discussion — next meeting or whenever it would be — but I think with the amount of time that we are discussing, the main motion is kind of getting off-track, so I will ask that you call a motion.'
The council voted 5-0 to approve the works board order for the responder.
The Post-Tribune filed on Wednesday an Access to Public Records Act request for all text messages among the council members, Clerk-Treasurer Mark Herak, Highland Police Chief Ralph Potesta and Banasiak regarding the new cars and their funding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Car companies are paying tariffs so you don't have to
So far President Donald Trump's trade polices have had almost no effect on new car prices. But almost no one expects that to last. By the end of the year, if not sooner, tariffs as much as 27.5% on cars and car parts will force sticker prices to rise significantly, analysts say, pushing new vehicle purchases out of the reach of many Americans. Tariffs have already chopped billions of dollars from carmakers' bottom lines. That is because the companies, fearful of losing sales, have absorbed most of the burden of Trump's new duties rather than passing it on to car buyers. The carmakers also haven't been hit by the full force of tariffs yet. Many dealers and manufacturers stockpiled cars and parts before the tariffs took effect. 'We haven't raised prices due to tariffs, and that's still our mantra,' Randy Parker, chief executive of Hyundai and Genesis Motor North America, said in an interview this month. That is good news for Trump and Republicans in Congress because it insulates them from the political consequences of higher sticker prices, which would also contribute to inflation. Carmakers 'will try to hold prices and focus on cost reduction for as long as they can,' said Lenny LaRocca, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's work with the auto industry. But, LaRocca said, 'clearly it's not sustainable.' He predicted that automakers would start raising prices significantly early next year. No car company is immune. Even those that make most of their vehicles in the United States use imported parts that can amount to more than half the value of some cars. In recent weeks General Motors, Toyota, Ford Motor, Stellantis, Tesla, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen have all blamed tariffs for declines in profit. Ford, which makes most of its cars in the United States, expects retail prices for its vehicles to rise just 1% this year, Sherry House, the chief financial officer, said last month during a conference call with reporters. But that's not because the tariffs aren't having an effect. Import duties subtracted $800 million from Ford's profit in the second quarter, leading to a slight loss for the period. For the whole year, Ford estimated that tariffs would cost the company $2 billion. General Motors, the largest U.S. carmaker, said last month that tariffs would cost the company as much as $5 billion for the full year, although it hoped to offset about a third of that amount by cutting costs and moving some manufacturing to the United States. Still, the company expects retail prices to rise 1% or less this year, Paul Jacobson, chief financial officer of GM, told investors last month. Toyota, which makes many cars in the United States but also imports them from Japan, Mexico and Canada, said Thursday that tariffs would cost it $9.5 billion. A day earlier, Honda pegged its tariff cost at $3 billion. Tariffs and sinking profits could make it harder for carmakers to do what Trump wants them to do -- relocate assembly lines to the United States from other countries. Companies will have less money to invest in new factories and equipment. The Trump administration maintains that deregulation, tax deductions for equipment purchasing and other measures will be positive for the industry. 'Two things can be accomplished at once: We can lower costs for everyday Americans while restoring American auto dominance,' Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson, said in an email. 'The administration is working closely with the auto industry to deliver on both fronts.' Car prices as measured by U.S. officials declined slightly in June, Desai pointed out, 'despite months of autos, auto parts, steel and aluminum tariffs being in place.' Others see signs that prices are beginning to creep higher. Cox Automotive estimates that tariffs will add at least $5,000 to the cost of imported cars on an annual basis. Even for cars manufactured in the United States, tariffs on components add about $1,000, not including the 50% duties that Trump has imposed on imported steel and aluminum. By the end of the year, prices could be 8% higher, Cox says, pushing the average selling price of a new car above $50,000. Higher prices would fall hardest on less affluent consumers. Many of the least expensive cars are imported, like the Chevrolet Trax made in South Korea or the Nissan Versa made in Mexico. Some car buyers will be able to afford only used models. And higher demand for pre-owned vehicles will push up their prices, too. Adding to the pain, buyers of used cars often pay much higher interest on loans, which can exceed 20% for people with less-than-stellar credit records. The cost of repairs and parts will also rise. So far the price increases have been modest, said Michael Holmes, co-chief executive of Virginia Tire and Auto. The chain of auto repair and maintenance shops adds a tariff surcharge to prices to reflect the additional cost. That can range from 50 cents or so for an air filter to around $5 for a tire. But the surcharges could rise depending on where tariffs on parts from Mexico and Canada end up, he said. His biggest problem, Holmes said, is staying abreast of shifting trade policy. 'You get exhausted trying to figure out where all these tariffs are,' he said. Trump policies have some financial benefits for carmakers. The Republican domestic policy bill passed last month eliminated penalties for violating clean air standards. That angered environmental groups but allows carmakers to build more big SUVs and pickups, which tend to have the highest profit margins. The end of those penalties has also freed established carmakers from having to buy clean air credits if they fall short of emissions targets. That will save GM and others hundreds of millions of dollars, but comes at the expense of companies that have lots of credits to sell, like Tesla and Rivian, because they make only electric vehicles that emit nothing from tailpipes. Car executives are hopeful that the Trump administration will take further steps to ease the impact of tariffs. 'We're having very constructive conversations with them to ensure a more level playing field,' House, the Ford chief financial officer, told reporters this month. But Trump continues to threaten substantial tariffs on Mexico and Canada and has yet to reach a permanent trade deal with either. Both countries are critical suppliers of vehicles and parts and are important destinations for parts and vehicles made in the United States. The policy bill also contained a measure designed to stimulate demand for cars. The provision lets taxpayers deduct from their taxes the interest they pay on loans used to buy cars assembled in the United States. But the value of the deduction will be relatively small, in the hundreds of dollars for most people. 'We don't think it's really going to drive demand,' said Erin Keating, executive analyst at Cox Automotive. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Better Buy: Rivian vs. Ford
Key Points Ford is outpacing the S&P 500 this year. Its focus on assembling cars in the U.S. gives it an edge in the tariff war. Rivian faces uphill hurdles to get to profitability, especially with its spending on expansion. 10 stocks we like better than Rivian Automotive › The electric vehicle (EV) revolution continues to unfold, but not every automaker is on equal footing. Furthermore, internal combustion engines still dominate the market. Investors looking to gain exposure to the future of transportation are often torn between growth-heavy start-ups like Rivian (NASDAQ: RIVN) and legacy automakers like Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F). Both have compelling narratives -- but only one stands out today as the better buy. Let's break down the case for each. Rivian: Ambitious growth, heavy costs Rivian once captured investor imagination with its sleek trucks and Amazon-backed promise. Fast-forward to 2025, and the company remains a speculative play, albeit one that's secured a lifeline from Volkswagen (OTC: VWAGY). According to Rivian's first-quarter 2025 financials, the company posted a net loss of $541 million. This is a good improvement from the $1.44 billion lost in the first quarter of 2024, but continues its pattern of deep losses as it ramps up production. A good thing to mention is the shift from gross losses of $527 million in 2024 to a gross profit of $206 million in Q1 2025. Still, Rivian continues to struggle with cash burn and supply chain inefficiencies. The big bright spot for Rivian is its strategic partnership with Volkswagen, which includes a $5 billion investment and joint development of next-gen EV platforms. This alliance provides a much-needed vote of confidence and access to global scale. However, a major new factory planned under this deal is going to cost Rivian a lot of money and could take years to pay off. Investors buying Rivian today are essentially betting that the company will not only survive but thrive after enduring years of costly expansion. It's a long runway -- but also a risky one. Ford: A legacy auto that's built to last Ford may not carry the same hype as Rivian, but it has things Rivian sorely lacks: scale, cash flow, and a dividend. Ford has put together four years in a row of solid revenue growth. Yes, annual net income is a bit up and down, but that's the nature of the car industry, especially when you've been pumping money into new things like EVs. The company has leaned into EVs with its popular F-150 Lightning and Mustang Mach-E while still maintaining a strong lineup of internal combustion vehicles that provide steady income. Even more importantly, Ford assembles over 80% of its vehicles in the U.S., giving it a relative advantage in the face of rising tariffs under the Trump administration. As reported by Yahoo! Finance, Ford expects to weather the tariff storm better than some of its rivals like General Motors, looking at a $2 billion (after offsetting $1 billion) bill versus higher estimates from GM. Still, Ford's business is not immune, since many of its parts are still sourced globally. But compared to start-ups and foreign automakers, Ford's domestic production base offers a meaningful cushion. From a valuation standpoint, Ford looks attractive. Its stock trades at a modest multiple of 14 times earnings, and it offers a reliable dividend yield of around 5.43% -- something growth-hungry Rivian can't match. Plus, after selling most of its stake in Rivian last year, Ford has sharpened its focus on its own EV ambitions. The better buy There's no denying that Rivian has potential. Its alignment with Volkswagen is a meaningful endorsement, and its brand is resonating with younger, affluent buyers. But as of today, it remains a speculative investment, with a high burn rate and no profits in sight. Ford, on the other hand, offers investors value, income, and relative geopolitical insulation relative to many competitors. While it too faces challenges -- especially from supply chain disruptions and legacy costs -- it's better positioned to ride out short-term volatility. And for investors looking to combine stability with EV upside, Ford is the more compelling pick. Verdict: Ford is the better buy today. It might not make you filthy rich overnight, but the dividend and low price tag make it a safer and more appealing play within the auto industry. Should you invest $1,000 in Rivian Automotive right now? Before you buy stock in Rivian Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rivian Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 David Butler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Buy: Rivian vs. Ford was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ryan Blaney, No. 12 'dirty dozen' crew claim pole for Watkins Glen
Ryan Blaney details his fast lap from Watkins Glen International as he will lead the field to green in his No. 12 Team Penske Ford on Sunday.
