Social Security issues ‘emergency message' on clawbacks: Here's what is changing
There were increased fears about financial hardship for Social Security beneficiaries in the coming days. In light of such an impending scenario, the Social Security Administration announced that it is reducing its overpayment clawback rate to 50% from 100%. This information was circulated via an "emergency message" to Social Security beneficiaries on April 25. Social Security to reduce overpayment clawbacks?(AFP)
The issue of this policy change stems from recovering overpayments to Social Security recipients. Earlier in March, it was announced by the SSA that 100% of the monthly checks issued will be held until the overpaid amount is recovered.
ALSO READ | New Mexico military zone: 82 people charged with trespassing, here's what happened
However, it had then sparked concerns about possible financial trouble if the checks were halted for the beneficiaries. Now, the SSA has retreated from the March policy change and is now considering a clawback rate of 50%, according to their message. SSA still mum on reason for policy change
However, SSA did not immediately explain the reason for such a major policy change. According to a CBS News report, the agency's inspector general had discovered that nearly 73,000 overpayments in 2022 were due to problems with Social Security's own calculations. Moreover, these problems had no involvement whatsoever of the beneficiary.
In a report, the inspector general stated, "SSA's automated systems could not compute benefit payments due in certain situations, and the Agency did not provide employees with a comprehensive tool to use when they had to manually calculate them. Without adequate automation tools, employees can make errors".
The 100% clawback policy was introduced by SSA Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek, suggesting that it was necessary to properly "safeguard US taxpayer funds". However, things may see a major change henceforth. During the Biden administration this clawback rate was capped at a mere 10% in 2024, after the White House came to know about financial hardships being faced by dozens of Americans, that even included homelessness. However, that 10% rate was only applicable for about a year, with SSA returning it to the 100% later.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mexicans elect their judges under shadow of crime, corruption
Mexico City: Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity. The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was "the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption." Turnout reached only around 13 percent of the 100 million eligible voters, according to the National Electoral Institute. With more than 880 positions to fill, many voters struggled to choose from the plethora of largely unknown candidates. "We are not very prepared," said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. "I think we need more information." In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her "intuition" as she did not know the candidates. Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery. While corruption already exists, "there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organized crime than other methods of judicial selection," Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP. Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: "Hands off our democracy" and "No to electoral fraud." The elections send the judiciary "to its grave," said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker. "It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch." - 'Regime of corruption' - President Claudia Sheinbaum has defended the need for the judicial reform, insisting on the eve of the vote that only those who "want the regime of corruption and privileges" to continue were against it. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Just after polls closed, she called the vote a "complete success." "For the first time in history, almost 13 million Mexican women and men exercised their right to decide the new ministers, magistrates and judges," Sheinbaum said in a video message posted to social media. The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico. But "it is logical that organized criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them," said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission. Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers "high risk," including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes. - 'Good reputation' - Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges -- including Supreme Court justices -- as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027. Candidates were supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed "a good reputation," as well as no criminal record. To do a good job, voters "would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates," said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego. He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor offices. "If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge," said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project. The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year. The main reason for the elections seems to be "because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges," Shirk said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US remittance tax to revive hawala, hand cartels a financial lifeline
Hidden on page 1,054 of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a threat to impose a 3.5 per cent tax on all remittance transfers made by non-citizens to accounts outside the country. This is a dangerous, backward-looking provision, and will make Americans less safe without raising much revenue. It is easy to understand why a measure like this would appeal to the current administration. It makes migrants' lives harder, and that's enough for it to be worth passing into law. And it certainly will create difficulties for millions of legal and illegal immigrants in the US, as well as for their families outside. Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has been a vocal opponent, saying — correctly — that this is unjustifiable double taxation. Her country, the largest destination for such transfers, has a lot to lose. But other countries are also worried. India is the third-largest destination for remittances from the US, receiving about $18 billion in 2024; the Philippines and China aren't far behind, at $14 billion each. According to Capital Economics, US-based remittances support 3 per cent of the Philippines' GDP. The impact on migration-dependent areas of the world will be severe. For some countries in Central America, national income might fall by almost 1 per cent if this proposal is implemented. Meanwhile, some estimates suggest that even a higher 5 per cent rate would only increase the US' takings by 0.1 per cent. For the remittance tax's backers, that's beside the point. Vice President JD Vance, when he was still a senator, introduced a similar bill. At that time, he said that 'this legislation is a common-sense solution to disincentivise illegal immigration and reduce the cartels' financial power.' That argument is exactly backward. What common sense actually tells you is that if less money is available in some of the poorest parts of Central America, it increases the incentives for people there to try and move to the US to join their family members already there. As for the impact on criminal networks — well, history suggests that they'll welcome this. The world has spent decades trying to make legal transfers cheap and efficient. An additional levy might increase the cost of transferring even small sums four fold. This would reverse all our efforts to force this trade above ground. If legal transfers are made too expensive, illegal and informal networks take their place. Some people have happily assumed that Bitcoin will fill the gap. But, more likely, there will be a renaissance in simpler, older mechanisms for international transfers. In South and West Asia, we call these methods 'hawala.' But other parts of the world derived equivalents independently. In China, for example, such mechanisms are called 'fei-ch'ien.' From a customer's point of view, they're simple to use. All you need to do is find a well-networked trader and give them the cash to be transferred. That person then calls somebody in their clan or village back home, who gives the same amount of cash to the chosen recipient. The two members of the hawala network settle accounts between each other once or twice a year, through smuggling or perhaps through false invoices and shell companies. Naturally, such informal mechanisms to transfer value can be used not just to evade the remittance excise, but taxes in general. Worse, they are frequently used as conduits for terrorism and drug financing — which is why governments have spent decades trying to stamp them out. This was hard because, if enough people use these systems, they can be more efficient and cheaper than formal finance. The exchange rates that hawala traders offer are often more attractive, and their fees take less of a bite out of small transactions than many banks do. In spite of the best efforts of regulators and cops, hawala networks only really shrank when other routes became more competitive. Informal currency traders need a large volume of transactions to be efficient and offer the best rates to their customers, so when their custom shrank, they became less attractive. It's this self-reinforcing loop that the remittance tax threatens to break. Suddenly, hawala networks — and their equivalents in South and Central America — will become appealing again. And when this method returns to its former prominence, it will become easier to pay those who smuggle opiates or people. And, of course, criminal syndicates of various types will once again step in to run these systems, and profit accordingly. The vice president is, not for the first time, wrong: His administration's remittance tax doesn't attack the cartels, it empowers them.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's controversial theory on Joe Biden fuels meme war online
In a move that left the internet reeling, former President Donald Trump recently amplified a bizarre conspiracy theory suggesting that President Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced by a "soulless, mindless" clone. Shared on his Truth Social platform, the claim ignited a wildfire of memes, debates, and digital mockery, further intensifying the already heated online political discourse. The theory, originating from an obscure online post, posits that Biden has been a robotic stand-in since 2020, unknown to the Democratic Party. While Trump didn't explicitly endorse the claim, his decision to share it added fuel to the fire, especially given his history of promoting unfounded theories. This latest episode underscores the former president's continued influence over online narratives and his knack for stirring controversy. The internet responded with characteristic fervor. Pro-Trump supporters flooded social media with memes highlighting alleged inconsistencies in Biden's appearance, such as changes in eye color and earlobe shape, presenting them as "evidence" of the clone theory. Conversely, critics and humorists seized the opportunity to lampoon the absurdity, creating a slew of satirical content that further blurred the lines between political discourse and entertainment. "I have questions for MAGA: 1. Was Joe Biden executed in 2020? If so, by whom? 2. Can you provide more information about this cloning technology? 3. If no, can you discuss the robotics technology used to duplicate President Biden? 4. Do you believe the assertions by llijh ?," one user has posted on X. "Trump is basically letting you know that it was a script and a clone playing Joe Biden," another user posted. "If Biden was replaced in 2020 by a robot or "clone," how did this robot/clone develop the dementia that Republicans have been focused on since 2022? Wouldn't that be just as impossible as replacing someone with a robot or clone that appears to be 82 years old?," writes another. The proliferation of such theories and the ensuing meme battles highlight the evolving nature of political engagement in the digital age. Social media platforms have become arenas where information, misinformation, satire, and genuine discourse intermingle, often making it challenging for the public to discern fact from fiction.
