China's collateral demands curbing emerging countries' ability to manage finances: study
China has lent hundreds of billions of dollars for infrastructure and projects in developing countries, but has been criticised for using earnings of commodity exports from borrower nations as security for the loans, sometimes arranged during times of economic strife for the borrower.
China's government has repeatedly denied that its lending practices towards poorer countries are unscrupulous.
China's total public and publicly guaranteed lending to low and middle-income countries totals US$911 billion, said the report by AidData, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Georgetown University, together with other partners.
Of that, nearly half - or US$418 billion across 57 countries - is secured with cash deposits in Chinese bank accounts, it said.
'As security, Chinese lenders strongly prefer liquid assets - in particular, cash deposits in bank accounts located in China. They also want visibility and control over revenue,' said Christoph Trebesch of the Kiel Institute.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The deposits in accounts located in China and controlled by the lending entities can average more than a fifth of the annual payments low-income commodity-exporting countries make to service their external debt, the research found.
'Some of these revenues remain offshore beyond the control of the borrowing government for many years,' the report said, adding the lack of access or transparency compromises debtor governments' ability to monitor and steer their fiscal affairs.
China applies the practice to its lending to borrowers in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, the study, which covered 2000-2021, found.
'Our research reveals a previously undocumented pattern of revenue ring-fencing where a significant share of commodity export receipts never reach the exporting countries,' said Brad Parks, executive director of the AidData research lab.
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have in the past raised concerns about the impact of collateralised lending to developing countries.
The practice has the potential to cause debt distress to the borrowers, the two institutions said in a joint paper published in 2023, by constraining their fiscal space, increasing the risk of over-borrowing, and curbing the financing from unsecured creditors available to them.
In cases where countries have had to restructure their external debts due to distress, China's practice of securing infrastructure loans using unrelated commodity revenue flows has complicated the restructuring, the report said. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
5 minutes ago
- CNA
Watchmaker Swatch apologises for 'slanted eye' ad after online backlash in China
Swiss watchmaker Swatch has issued an apology and pulled ads featuring images of an Asian male model pulling the corners of his eyes up and backwards in a "slanted eye" pose. The images for the Swatch Essentials collection were widely condemned online in China, where many comments said they appeared to mimic racist taunts about Asian eyes. In an apology posted in both Chinese and English on its official account on the Weibo social media platform Saturday, Swatch said that it has "taken note of the recent concerns" and removed all related materials worldwide. "We sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused," the statement said. It also posted the same apology on Instagram. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Swatch (@swatch) Swatch Group did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for further comment. Swatch, which also makes Omega, Longines and Tissot watches, is heavily exposed to China for revenue, with around 27 per cent of the group's sales last year coming from the China, Hong Kong and Macau region. Revenue for the watchmaker last year slumped 14.6 per cent to 6.74 billion Swiss francs (US$8.4 billion) in 2024, hit by a downturn in demand in China, where Swatch said it was seeing "persistently difficult market conditions and weak demand for consumer goods overall".
Straits Times
5 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Australians more anxious on Trump tariffs than China, poll shows
42 per cent of respondents named US tariffs as their top concern compared with 37 per cent who cited the strategic threat from China. Australians are more worried about the Trump administration's protectionist trade policies than China's military buildup in the Asia-Pacific region, a new opinion poll showed. Some 42 per cent of respondents named US tariffs as their top concern compared with 37 per cent who cited the strategic threat from China, according to a Newspoll published on Aug 18 in The Australian. A further 21 per cent said neither bothered them, the survey conducted Aug 11 to 14 for the newspaper showed. It had a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. While Australia received the minimum 10 per cent levy on its exports to the US, it could still be in the firing line for sectoral tariffs on industries such as pharmaceuticals. More generally, it is heavily exposed to global trade as an export-reliant nation and could also see blowback on import duties from its largest trading partner, China. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese undertook a six-day visit to China in July that included meetings with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. While there, he focused heavily on boosting business and trade ties, sidestepping thornier issues around US-China competition, Taiwan and Beijing's military assertiveness. University-educated voters were more worried about US tariffs than China's military expansion, according to the survey. The results were more evenly split for those without university education, it said. On local politics, Newspoll showed Albanese's Labour Party leading the center-right coalition 56 per cent to 44 per cent, slightly up on the May 3 election result that delivered Labour 94 seats in the 150-member parliament. The prime minister's net satisfaction rating also turned positive for the first time since September 2023, it showed. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
5 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump is pushing India back toward China
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Chinese President Xi Jinping and India Prime Minister Narendra Modi meet on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, on Oct 23, 2024. BEIJING – It may be another case of the adage: The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Either way, it has come as a welcome surprise for China to see its top global rival, the United States, pick a fight with Beijing's biggest Asian competitor, India. Relations between Washington and New Delhi are on the fritz after the Trump administration threatened this month to double tariffs on Indian goods to a whopping 50 per cent, citing India's imports of Russian oil. The sudden rift threatens to undermine years of growing cooperation between the United States and India in areas like security and technology that had been fueled in large part by a shared desire to keep China's global ambitions in check. It has also injected new momentum into an easing of tensions between China and India, which had ramped up in recent years. The thaw started in earnest in October 2024 when President Xi Jinping of China met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India at a summit of emerging economies in Kazan, Russia. Since then, the two countries have increased official visits and discussed easing trade barriers and the movement of people. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDR 2025 a rallying cry amid significant challenges facing Singapore, say analysts Singapore NDR 2025: The case for growing old at home in super-ageing Singapore Singapore WP urges Government to engage widely, explore all solutions following National Day Rally 2025 Opinion A 'we first' Singapore is the hardest policy for PM Lawrence Wong to deliver Singapore Age Well Neighbourhoods, job-matching by CDCs: 10 highlights from PM Wong's National Day Rally speech Singapore LTA, SMRT join anti-vaping effort with stepped-up enforcement on public transport World Trump, tech and Texas: What's next for the US? Singapore 3 foreigners arrested for working illegally as delivery riders in Singapore: Koh Poh Koon 'I assume that there is a certain amount of schadenfreude among some folks in Beijing when they look at the trade issues between India and the United States,' said Mr Manoj Kewalramani, head of Indo-Pacific studies at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, India. 'A breakdown of political trust between New Delhi and Washington works in Beijing's favor.' To be sure, there is still much that divides the two Asian giants. That includes control of a 2,100-mile (3379km) shared border; China's coziness with India's adversary, Pakistan; and India's ambition to attract the multinational manufacturers that have been trying to reduce their dependence on China. The October meeting between Mr Modi and Mr Xi was the first time the two leaders had spoken in person since a 2019 summit in India, a year before relations cratered following a deadly Himalayan border fight between Chinese and Indian troops. Since the Russia talks, the two countries have eased travel visa restrictions and are working to restore direct flights. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. China and India are also in discussions to reopen three trading posts along their mountainous boundary, Mr Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson for India's foreign ministry, said last week. China's top diplomat, Mr Wang Yi, is scheduled to arrive in India on Aug 18 for the latest round of talks on border issues. It would be the first time Mr Wang has visited India in more than three years. This month, Mr Modi will visit China for the first time in seven years to attend a regional security summit meeting in the northeastern city of Tianjin. Mr Xi and President Vladimir Putin of Russia will also attend, bringing together three leaders at odds, to varying degrees, with the United States. The Modi government has also been careful not to raise the Indian public's ire over the way China helped Pakistan's military during a clash with Indian forces in May – a sign of New Delhi's commitment to smoother relations with Beijing. Mr Vijay Gokhale, a former Indian ambassador to Beijing, said in an opinion piece in The Times of India published Tuesday that China and India still had many diverging interests. But he wrote that China provided India and other developing countries a crucial counterbalance to 'Trumpian disorder' as a source of capital and technology and as a partner in fighting climate change. 'China is beginning to look better than at any time in the previous five years,' Mr Gokhale wrote. Beijing has responded to India's friendlier posture with cautious optimism, taking into account the chance that the reorientation could simply be a play to hedge against the Trump administration, analysts said. Mr Xi called this year for relations to resemble a harmonious 'dragon-elephant tango' in a nod to the two countries' symbolic creatures. Despite the gesture, China continues to fortify its border with India by building new roads, rail networks and villages that can also serve the Chinese military. The two powers are also vying for influence across the Indian Ocean, the crucial waterway for Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative, a global infrastructure project intended to deepen China's supply chain networks. One of the biggest drivers of tension with India from China's perspective is the suspicion that New Delhi was abandoning its historically nonaligned foreign policy to move further into Washington's sphere. Beijing points to the Quad defense group, which brings together four large democracies – India, the United States, Japan and Australia – to counter China's military rise. Whether the next meeting of Quad leaders, expected later this year in India, goes ahead will depend on whether the Trump administration and New Delhi are able to mend their trade spat and rebuild trust, an Indian official said. Still, if Indian officials want to improve ties with China, they will have to do it on Beijing's terms, analysts said. That means opening up India more to Chinese firms and investment and continuing to loosen restrictions on visas for Chinese businesspeople. India has blocked Chinese carmaker BYD from setting up factories and has banned Chinese apps including TikTok. 'If India seeks to improve its relations with China, China welcomes that,' said Mr Lin Minwang, an expert on China's relations with South Asia at Fudan University in Shanghai. 'However, China will not make significant concessions or sacrifices to accommodate India's so-called diplomatic posture.' Mr Lin said China will not budge on its national interests, even those that irk New Delhi the most, such as Beijing's close support for Pakistan. India is also wary, Mr Modi having been bitten once before after trusting Xi too readily, other analysts have said. 'India's current approach is primarily driven by strategic calculations,' Mr Lin said. 'Given its deteriorating relations with the United States, it has adopted some China-friendly gestures. I believe the Chinese side will at least assess these developments cautiously.' NYTIMES
