China's collateral demands curbing emerging countries' ability to manage finances: study
[NAIROBI] China's practice of securing its loans to low-income nations through commodity revenue streams and cash held in restricted escrow accounts is curbing their ability to manage their finances effectively, a study published on Thursday showed.
China has lent hundreds of billions of dollars for infrastructure and projects in developing countries, but has been criticised for using earnings of commodity exports from borrower nations as security for the loans, sometimes arranged during times of economic strife for the borrower.
China's government has repeatedly denied that its lending practices towards poorer countries are unscrupulous.
China's total public and publicly guaranteed lending to low and middle-income countries totals US$911 billion, said the report by AidData, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Georgetown University, together with other partners.
Of that, nearly half - or US$418 billion across 57 countries - is secured with cash deposits in Chinese bank accounts, it said.
'As security, Chinese lenders strongly prefer liquid assets - in particular, cash deposits in bank accounts located in China. They also want visibility and control over revenue,' said Christoph Trebesch of the Kiel Institute.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The deposits in accounts located in China and controlled by the lending entities can average more than a fifth of the annual payments low-income commodity-exporting countries make to service their external debt, the research found.
'Some of these revenues remain offshore beyond the control of the borrowing government for many years,' the report said, adding the lack of access or transparency compromises debtor governments' ability to monitor and steer their fiscal affairs.
China applies the practice to its lending to borrowers in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, the study, which covered 2000-2021, found.
'Our research reveals a previously undocumented pattern of revenue ring-fencing where a significant share of commodity export receipts never reach the exporting countries,' said Brad Parks, executive director of the AidData research lab.
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank have in the past raised concerns about the impact of collateralised lending to developing countries.
The practice has the potential to cause debt distress to the borrowers, the two institutions said in a joint paper published in 2023, by constraining their fiscal space, increasing the risk of over-borrowing, and curbing the financing from unsecured creditors available to them.
In cases where countries have had to restructure their external debts due to distress, China's practice of securing infrastructure loans using unrelated commodity revenue flows has complicated the restructuring, the report said. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Data is changing shareholder capitalism
IF AMERICA'S CEOs have learned one lesson over the last half decade, it's this: Avoid politics. It is the right lesson – as usual, Milton Friedman was correct, the primary purpose of a business should be to increase its profits – but the rapidly changing nature of the economy calls for an update: Avoid politics whenever possible, but never when necessary. The recent history of corporate activism is instructive. Just before the pandemic, the chief executives of 181 of the largest US corporations signed a pledge to 'lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders', not just shareholders. They essentially promised to pursue a better world beyond profits. It did not go well. After several prominent instances of companies or executives getting burned for taking political stances – just ask Budweiser or Elon Musk – most companies now just stick to business or at least stay silent. But as data and data analysis become more valuable commodities, neutrality and apoliticism will become harder to maintain. Perhaps Friedman's shareholder capitalism no longer makes sense in the modern economy – especially if your business is working with data. And especially if your software aids the military or helps governments monitor their citizens. Two recent books illustrate how there is no such thing as neutral values when it comes to data. One is critical of Meta, alleging it used its data to assist the Chinese government in monitoring and censoring its users. That decision surely increased profits – China is a huge market – but was it ethical? It is one thing to sell sneakers in China, quite another to sell data. Either you assist the Chinese government in its efforts, or you don't. Another book, by Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp and corporate affairs chief Nicholas Zamiska, argues that more companies need to be explicit about how their values should guide their work. Palantir, a data analytics company that is known (some might say notorious) for its contracts with the Pentagon and ICE, was co-founded by tech entrepreneur and libertarian donor Peter Thiel. Karp, meanwhile, has said that he agrees with progressives on most issues. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Politics aside, on its website Palantir says it was 'founded to help Western democracies and open societies harness data to protect citizens without compromising civil liberties'. It would be naive to take that statement at face value. Yet, even expressing these principles carries risks. Google also grew up as a values-driven company, with its (since discarded) slogan of 'Don't Be Evil'. Its employees took that to heart when they refused to work on a contract with the Department of Defence in 2018. The US$229 million contract went to Palantir instead, four years later. Was that a case of values paying off, or values aligning with profits? Google's old mission statement has become a bit of a punchline, and it's worth asking why. For one, it was never clear what 'evil' meant. Is it evil to help US special forces wage war, or is it evil to stay neutral in a fight against the Taliban? Again, regardless of what you think of Palantir's values, they are clear – so unlike Google, Palantir tends to attract employees who agree with its values. Another requirement for corporate mission statements is that they be related to the corporation's product. There's no need for a beermaker, for example, to take a political stance. One of the more grating aspects of Silicon Valley culture in recent years is how sanctimonious every tech startup became about its work, even if it is just another version of Groupon. There are other risks to a value-driven strategy. Karp argues that founder-led companies do better. Google is no longer run by its founders. Perhaps if it were, 'evil' would have been better defined. Palantir may one day face the same issue. It may be clear to Karp and his advisory board what Palantir should do when there is a conflict between morals and profits. But he won't be the CEO forever. How do values change under his successor, and the one after that? All of which raises the larger question: If the most valuable commodity in the world is the ability to analyse and interpret data, is shareholder capitalism now out of date? It isn't – but the Friedman doctrine is in need of an update. The goal should be to have a clear corporate mission that is consistent with what it does and can transcend successive generations of CEOs. The mission may be as simple as, 'We sell beer and hope to make money'; there is no reason to say, 'We make beer and try to save the world'. If a company is involved in data or weapons, it may require delving into some geopolitics, because there is no such thing as neutrality in that line of work. That's why Palantir makes a point of saying it stands for Western values, but you won't find anything on its website about its view of transgender athletes in women's sports. As the world economy enters the artificial intelligence era, and as more defence technology is developed in the private sector, companies like Palantir and Facebook will become more important, and ones like Budweiser and Nike less. That means some big companies will find it harder to avoid politics completely – and will have to consider their positions carefully. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Inter Milan secure 350 million euro financing to ease debt burden
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Serie A - Inter Milan v Lazio - San Siro, Milan, Italy - May 18, 2025 General view inside the stadium before the match REUTERS/Massimo Pinca/File Photo MILAN - Inter Milan have secured 350 million euro ($411 million) financing through a U.S. private placement of senior secured notes maturing in 2030, needed to repay early a high-yield bond due in 2027, the Champions League finalists said on Thursday. The notes, placed with institutional investors, were issued through Inter Milan's media company, which manages the broadcast and sponsorship business of the Serie A club. Last year U.S. investment fund Oaktree Capital Management took over Inter after the club's Chinese majority shareholder missed a 395 million euro payment. The club said that the debt reshuffle would improve its financial position. "Compared to the previous bond, the lower amount and tighter cost of capital achieved for the private placement represent another step in Oaktree's commitment to the long-term success and financial stability of the club," it said in a statement published on its website. Earlier this month the club had anticipated it planned to redeem the bond. Inter have progressed to the knockout stage of the Club World Cup being played in the US. They lost 5-0 to Paris St Germain in the European Champions League final last month. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Xiaomi launches YU7, undercutting Tesla's Model Y on price
[BEIJING] Chinese EV and smartphone maker Xiaomi on Thursday (Jun 26) priced its new electric YU7 SUV from 253,500 yuan (S$45,102), almost 4 per cent below Tesla's Model Y, stepping up the challenge to the US firm in the world's largest auto market. The YU7's base model costs 10,000 yuan less than the starting price of Tesla's Model Y in China, with the more premium models YU7 Pro and YU7 Max priced at 279,900 and 329,900 yuan respectively. Xiaomi started taking orders for all three models on Thursday night, with orders hitting 200,000 in 3 minutes after the sale started at 10 pm. (1400 GMT) The Model Y, which was China's best-selling SUV in May, starts at 263,500 yuan in China. Xiaomi said it will partner with BYD, GAC Toyota and Zhengzhou Nissan to build an ecosystem connecting humans, homes and cars. Xiaomi's CEO and founder Lei Jun has said he wants the YU7 to challenge the Model Y and analysts say it has the potential to succeed. Other rivals include Zeekr's 7X and Li Auto's L6. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'The YU7 will serve as an early test of whether Xiaomi can broaden its appeal beyond early adopters and tech enthusiasts to become a serious player in the mass-market EV segment,' said Rosalie Chen, senior analyst at Third Bridge. The YU7 has a driving range of up to 835 km per charge, compared with up to 719 km for the redesigned Model Y that was launched in January. The YU7 is Xiaomi's second car since the Beijing-based firm entered the auto sector last year with its sporty electric SU7 sedan, which drew styling cues from Porsche and was priced below Tesla's Model 3. Since December, the SU7 has outsold Tesla's Model 3 in China on a monthly basis. The SU7's success expedites the company's EV bid despite intense competition in China's auto market. In March, Xiaomi raised its target for EV deliveries this year to 350,000 from earlier guidance of 300,000. The company has secured a plot of land in Beijing close to its existing car factory for US$88 million, which it plans to use for a smart connected car and components project. Lei said in June that he expected Xiaomi's auto business to become profitable in the second half of the year. REUTERS
