Get set for Leaving Cert English with Study Hub
As the Leaving Cert Class of 2025 get set for the exams, we have great tips and advice from Study Hub with Maura Fay for Higher Level English.
Conor Murphy from Skibbereen Community College brings us through Paper 1, and then we continue with Clodagh Havel from Dublin's Institute of Education on Paper 2.
Conor says that you should try not to panic and that English Paper 1 is your friend. He also tells students how not to drop points. Press play up top!
Clodagh says: "What is the examiner looking for? They want you to show your understanding. You should show 9 key moments."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Leaving Cert maths: Some students left deflated by ‘off-putting' higher-level exam
Many higher-level Leaving Cert maths students were left deflated by paper one, but it had many manageable elements and was less wordy than in previous years, teachers have said. Eoghan O'Leary, a teacher at Hamilton High School in Cork and head of maths at , said students welcomed a return to more maths and less writing. In recent years, teachers and dyslexic students have repeatedly raised the wordiness of the maths paper, saying that it disadvantages them and is unnecessary. 'The paper was dominated by calculus, sequences & series and algebra,' said Mr O'Leary. READ MORE 'Students who hadn't revised sequences were in trouble because they featured in two long questions, so therefore could not be avoided.' Louise Boylan, a maths teacher at the Institute of Education, said that paper had an off-putting appearance, but was approachable. 'Students likely won't feel triumphant as they leave the exam hall, but they shouldn't feel defeated,' she said, adding that there were many novel elements on the paper. 'While there was a lot that was out of the box – logic puzzle style questions, material that hasn't appeared since the course's overhaul – there was much that would be welcome. Algebraic skills, rates of change, differential calculus, and sequence and series would all have fallen into the familiar,' Ms Boylan said. Stephen Begley, subject expert and head of maths at Dundalk Grammar School, said that the paper was more prompted and scaffolded than usual, and didn't appear as dense as it had in the past. 'While the short questions were rather delightful in ways, the long questions were a little light in parts and were heavily scaffolded,' Mr Begley said. 'Beneficial in ways, the examiner was generous throughout in pointing out what methods and techniques students should use to approach a question, for example by indicating to use a certain formula or technique.' This view was echoed by other teachers, including Ms Boylan. 'Later in the paper, question seven's wall of text will have caused some to pause, but once that was parsed, the underlying sequences and series were familiar,' she said. Overall, Ms Boylan said it was a challenging paper for everyone sitting it as the question setter continues the trend of drawing from all corners of the course. 'As such there was material examined on the paper that simply wasn't present in past exams and some students will rightly feel that they were pushed beyond their comfort zone. However, with much that will earn them marks, they shouldn't focus solely on the negative – the marking will reflect the challenge,' she said. Mr O'Leary said that some students were concerned that, with some students finding it too easy, there was concern that it would be harshly marked. 'I hope there will be fairness there,' Mr O'Leary said. On the ordinary level paper, Mr Begley said that it was a fair paper spanning the usual suspects of financial maths, complex numbers, algebra, calculus, functions, patterns and area. 'While parts were certainly not without challenge, the short questions in section A were quite nice and students could play to their strengths answering any five of the six,' he said. 'Those who prepared using past papers would have benefitted from the familiarity of question styles from years gone by. 'The long questions in Section B had students answer any three of the four. The topics covered here were functions, differentiation, financial maths, number patterns and area. 'Topic wise it followed suit with previous exams and students were well prompted and guided in parts. Overall, a good start to the ordinary level maths exams and all eyes will be on paper two on Monday, for which I advise students to take a look at their statistics, trigonometry, coordinate geometry of the line and circle and probability over the weekend, as these are always the main players,' Mr Begley said. Try this one at home: Leaving Cert maths, higher level, Q6(a) Write down, in descending powers of 𝑝𝑝, the first 3 terms in the binomial expansion of: (2𝑝𝑝 +3)7 Give each term in its simplest form. For example, the first term should be of the form ap 7, where a is a constant.
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Junior Cycle English short story question sparks criticism from teachers
English teachers have criticised the inclusion of an 'unwise and unfair' short story question that appeared on this year's Junior Cycle exam paper this week. Many students reported their surprise at the question on the higher-level paper, which asked students to outline how a setting has a vital influence oin a short story they studied. The Irish National Organisation for Teachers of English (INOTE) said it 'noted with dismay' the question exclusively on short stories. Students will have encountered short stories during their three-year study, and the study of short stories is required by the English specification, it added. 'However, practically in the classroom, short stories are rarely studied in the deep analytical way required of the exam paper.' Short stories are often read for enjoyment or as "stepping stones" to studying longer fiction texts, rather than for detailed narrative analysis, INOTE added. "Additionally, and sensibly, most students would instead have concentrated on their two studied novels, their studied Shakespeare play, their studied film and the array of poems they would have prepared for the exam." It would have been much fairer to pose a question about how the setting was used in a short story or a novel read by students, it added. "Narrowing the focus to short stories exclusively will have disadvantaged a significant number of students, something we absolutely reject as useful in a Junior Cycle exam." INOTE said it has felt disappointed every year with some of the questions asked in the Junior Cycle English exam, which are "either much too narrow in focus or much too ambitious in scope to allow meaningful student engagement." "Our students deserve the time and opportunity to showcase their learning rather than being punished by an exam that sometimes seems, whether intentionally or not, designed to catch them out," it added. A spokesman for the State Examinations Commission (SEC) it has been assured the exam, including the short story question, was "fully within the scope of the specification and in keeping with the aims, objectives and learning outcomes for Junior Cycle English." He added that commentary and correspondence on the examinations from students, parents, teachers, professional bodies, and other interested parties is a normal part of the examination process. "Such observations regarding test instruments are an intrinsic part of the feedback that we would expect to receive in any year. All observations received in relation to a subject are reviewed by the Chief Examiner in the context of preparing the marking scheme for that subject." The marking scheme will be published, as will the marking schemes in all other subjects, after the issue of the Junior Cycle results, he added. Read More 41646145[/readmore[
Irish Independent
14 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘One Paper at a Time' - My leaving cert journey so far
English Paper 1 was the first hurdle, and thankfully, it played to my strengths. I used my background as a rugby player to answer Question B: a pre-match captain's talk. Drawing from real-life experience made the words flow easily. For the composition, I chose to write a speech debating the motion 'Truth has become a valueless currency in today's world'. The word 'valueless' threw me at first – I had to pause and really think it through – but I stuck with it, and I'm glad I did. I felt confident coming out of the exam. That first wave of relief walking out of the hall was unmatched. That confidence carried me into home economics, but this time, things were tougher. The food commodity question focused on cheese, which was not the topic I had hoped for. Like many others, I was banking on proteins, but we got lipids. I pushed through and answered every question, drawing on all the preparation we had done over the years. That night, I was absolutely shattered. I was mentally drained but full of hope. I woke up the next morning at 6am to study for English Paper 2 – the paper I had been dreading most. It felt like the real test, the one that could make or break me. My nerves were sky-high. I walked into the hall physically shaking, heart racing, palms sweaty. I whispered a quiet prayer and hoped for a fair paper. Like many others, I was hoping for Patrick Kavanagh, Gerard Manley Hopkins or Eavan Boland to appear in the poetry section. When I opened the paper and saw both Kavanagh and Boland, I was spoiled for choice. In the end, I went with Boland, a poet whose work I had really connected with throughout the year. The cultural context question on power and control suited me perfectly for the comparative section. Then came King Lear and a question on victims, which was right up my alley. The three hours and 20 minutes disappeared. I walked out of that exam hall with a grin from ear to ear. The hard work had paid off.
