Washington lawmakers pass rent-control bill, approve unemployment for striking workers
In the final days of the Washington legislative session, lawmakers hashed out agreements to approve a bill that sets limits on rent increases and a measure that gives striking workers unemployment benefits. The two bills await decisions by Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat.
If signed into law, the rent stabilization bill would be among the first in the nation, adding Washington to states like Oregon and California that have sought new ways to curb homelessness. Washington joined Oregon in efforts to give striking workers unemployment payments, following recent walkouts by Boeing factory workers, hospital nurses and teachers in the Pacific Northwest.
Washington passed its bill on a 27-21 vote with some changes, while Oregon lawmakers continue to discuss the plan. The bill started with a 12-week cap on unemployment benefits. That was cut to four weeks in the House before the conference committee reached a compromise of six weeks.
Democratic state Sen. Marcus Riccelli, who sponsored Washington's bill, said it will level the playing field for workers, even with the shorter benefits period.
'A strike is a last resort, but the bill gives striking workers the ability to afford basic needs like food and housing,' Riccelli told The Associated Press on Tuesday. 'The whole thing for me is when there's not a safety net, they face tremendous pressure to end the strike quickly.'
The Employment Security Department must report strike data to the Legislature starting in 2026, so they can assess impacts, Riccelli said. The bill sunsets on Jan. 1, 2036.
Only two states, New York and New Jersey, give striking workers unemployment benefits. Senate Democrats in Connecticut have revived legislation that would provide financial help for striking workers after the governor vetoed a similar measure last year.
Washington's rent-control bill made it through both houses, but two unexpected amendments added on the Senate floor sent House Bill 1217 into a conference committee. Those amendments increased the cap from 7% to 10% plus inflation and exempted single-family homes.
Opponents of the bill warned that developers would leave the state if it became law and argued that similar policies in Oregon and California only added to those states' financial burdens instead of slowing the homeless crisis.
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
Oregon passed a rent-control bill in 2019, and lawmakers updated the measure to cap rent increases at either 7% plus the annual 12-month average change in the consumer price index for the U.S. West, or 10% — whichever is lower.
The Washington legislature's conference committee managed to get the cap down a bit, to 7% plus inflation or 10% — whichever is lower. They also restored protections for the 38% of renters who live in single-family homes. The rent-increase cap for manufactured homes remains at 5%.
Lawmakers approved the plan Sunday on a 54-44 vote, with five Democrats joining the Republican opposition.
Michele Thomas, director of policy for Low Income Housing Alliance, said the policy was hard-fought and she was happy the state made a step toward better protections for tenants.
'Excessive rent increases threaten nearly 1 million renter households in our state with displacement and homelessness, as rents continue to rise,' she said. 'This bill will help keep people in their homes as we continue to fight for stronger protections and for more affordable housing for our communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
16 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
New Hampshire jury acquits consultant behind AI robocalls mimicking Biden on all charges
A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats last year was acquitted Friday of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors alleged, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. Prosecutors argued the calls amounted to an attack on the integrity of the primary, while Kramer's defense tried to direct outrage at the Democratic National Committee instead. At Biden's request, the DNC dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar, but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there, but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The defense also said he didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name, and Biden wasn't a declared candidate in the primary. Jurors apparently agreed, acquitting him of 11 felony voter suppression charges, each punishable by up to seven years in prison. The 11 candidate impersonation charges each carried a maximum sentence of a year in jail. 'Our commitment to enforcing election laws remains steadfast,' New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella said in a statement. 'We will continue to work diligently to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to protect the integrity of our elections.' Kramer also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission, but he told The Associated Press that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a possible shift toward loosening regulations. And though many states have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, House Republicans in Congress recently added a clause to their signature tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's recent moves risk politicizing the military, which has long strived to stay above politics
Last weekend, President Donald Trump took the rare step of mobilizing the National Guard, and then the U.S. Marines, sending them into Los Angeles over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom quickly took the president to court for unilaterally calling in the military to clamp down on protests against the administration's immigration policies. Trump followed that up with a campaign-style rally at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, where uniformed soldiers cheered as he slammed former President Joe Biden, Newsom and other Democrats — raising concerns the president was using the military as a political prop. The developments this week are the latest and most visible way Trump has tried to turn government institutions into vehicles to implement his personal agenda, and have cast Saturday's planned military parade in a new light. The scheduled parade in Washington, D.C., celebrates the Army's 250th anniversary but happens to coincide with the 79th birthday of a president who warned that protests against the event will be 'met with very big force.' 'As many lengths as Army leaders have gone through to depoliticize the parade, it's very difficult for casual observers of the news to see this as anything other than a political use of the military,' said Carrie Ann Lee, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund who also taught at the U.S. Army War College. Trump has wanted a military parade since his first term, but senior commanders balked, worrying it would be more like a spectacle one would see in authoritarian countries such as North Korea or Russia than something befitting the United States. After returning to the White House, Trump fired the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, replaced him with his own pick and dismissed several other top military leaders. In the wake of protests over the administration's immigration enforcement operation near downtown Los Angeles, Trump last weekend sent in the California National Guard — and later deployed U.S. Marines — over Newsom's objections. Trump contended Newsom had 'totally lost control of the situation.' Newsom said the president was 'behaving like a tyrant.' It's the first time the Guard has been used without a governor's consent since then-President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama in 1965 to ensure compliance with civil rights laws. A federal judge late Thursday ruled that Trump violated the law against using the military domestically in his mobilization in Los Angeles and ordered the Guard placed back under the governor's control. The ruling, which did not make a determination about the deployment of Marines, was later blocked by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals pending a hearing next week. Military experts warn of the costs of this week's events to the image of the military as a nonpartisan institution and one that has enjoyed a high level of trust among Americans. 'We don't want military forces who work as an armed wing of a political party,' Lee said. Trump has already used other parts of the federal government to reward his allies and punish his enemies. His Federal Communications Commission has launched investigations of media outlets Trump dislikes and, in some cases, is personally suing. The president has directed the Department of Justice to investigate Democratic Party institutions and a former appointee who vouched for the security of the 2020 election when Trump was arguing his loss was due to fraud. During his brief blow-up with former donor and tech billionaire Elon Musk, Trump threatened to pull Musk's government contracts — a sign of how Trump views the government as a tool for personal leverage. 'He's doing it in every aspect of government, not just the military,' said Yvonne Chiu, a professor at the Naval War College and a fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. 'But the military is the one with all the weapons.' On Thursday, Trump laughed off protests planned for this weekend against the parade, organized by the 'No Kings' movement: 'I don't feel like a king,' he said during a White House event. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' A new Associated Press-NORC Poll found a partisan divide in whether Americans approve of the parade, but wider agreement on its cost, with 6 in 10 Americans saying the tens of millions of dollars to be spent is not a good use of public money. Other recent polling has indicated that, even if many others are alarmed, most Republicans are comfortable with the way Trump is exercising his power. More than half of U.S. adults said the president had 'too much' power in an April 2025 AP-NORC poll, but only 23% of Republicans agreed. The president and his supporters have said he's simply giving voters what he promised during the campaign — a strong leader who cracks down on illegal immigration. Kurt Weyland, a political scientist at the University of Texas, said while the president has done 'shocking' things, at least part of the country's system of checks and balances has so far held to keep him in check. 'The courts have been the main line of defense,' he said. The courts stepped in again Thursday, with U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Breyer — the brother of former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer — finding that the situation in Los Angeles did not involve a rebellion, invasion or situation where the government cannot otherwise enforce its laws, which are the requirements for a president to use the military domestically. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. William Banks, a former dean of the Syracuse University law school and an expert in national security law, said there are good reasons Americans don't want soldiers or Marines performing law enforcement on their streets. The military is trained to kill enemies, not handle the fraught interpersonal task of policing American streets. 'It's corrosive,' Banks said of the military getting deployed domestically. 'We don't like that in this society; we haven't for 250 years.' Several experts said the true test for democracy lies ahead — whether it can continue to hold free and fair elections. Trump tried to overturn his own loss in the 2020 election and, since returning to power, has pardoned more than 1,000 people convicted of crimes in the attack on the U.S. Capitol. In the days after the Jan. 6 attack, one of the documents uncovered by investigators was a draft executive order that called for Trump to order the seizure of voting machines. The person the order would have directed to ensure the seizure happened was the secretary of defense. ___
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Boeing Stock (NYSE:BA) Plummets in Wake of Air India Disaster
If there was one thing that aerospace stock Boeing (BA) absolutely did not need right now, it was to have its name connected with the word 'disaster.' Sadly for all concerned, that is exactly what happened as Air India Flight 171 crashed not long after takeoff. Since Air India Flight 171 was a Boeing plane, that only made matters worse for Boeing. Frightened investors pulled back, and Boeing shares plunged nearly 5% in Thursday afternoon's trading. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter No one is sure just why the jet crashed shortly after takeoff, though some reports noted that the plane's landing gear was down at the time to the point that it looked like the plane was coming in for a landing rather than just taking off. But what is known is that there were 242 passengers and crew aboard that flight, and there were no survivors. The flight from Ahmedabad to London took off around 1:37 PM local time, reports noted, and investigation has already begun into the cause of the jet's crash. The United States is actually sending a team out under the auspices of the National Transportation Safety Board, though India—being the country where the crash happened—will be leading the investigation. The Particularly Strange Part Perhaps the oddest part about this whole tragic affair is the plane itself. This was not another incident involving a 737 Max, reports note. Rather, this was a 787 Dreamliner that went down. This represents the first such incident in Boeing's history, reports note, and the history on the Dreamliner goes all the way back to 2011. You read that right: roughly 14 years of service and not a single fatal crash. Until today. Moreover, Boeing has sold over 2,500 of these planes so far, and has delivered 1,189 of them. Air India made 47 of those purchases itself. There were some issues with the Dreamliner, reports noted; back in July 2013, one caught fire on the ground after an Emergency Locator Transmitter short-circuited. Plus, 2013 also saw two planes' lithium batteries overheat, which prompted an entire change in design philosophy. The latest such incident hit last year when a 787 lost altitude abruptly, though the investigations focused on '…an involuntary forward movement in the pilot seat.' Is Boeing a Good Stock to Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on BA stock based on 16 Buys, three Holds and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 18.43% rally in its share price over the past year, the average BA price target of $220.95 per share implies 8.31% upside potential. See more BA analyst ratings Disclosure
