France to fund Ukrainian military with interest from frozen Russian assets
France will use the interest accrued on Russia's frozen central bank assets to procure weapons for the Ukrainian military, the country's defense minister, Sebastien Lecornu, has announced. Russian State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin criticized the decision, stating it contravenes international law.
Following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022, Western states froze an estimated $300 billion worth of Russian sovereign funds, of which approximately $213 billion is held by the Brussels-based clearing house Euroclear. The assets have already generated billions in interest, of which Euroclear already transferred €1.55 billion ($1.63 billion) directly to Ukraine last July.
In an interview to France's La Tribune Dimanche on Saturday, Lecornu said that 'thanks to interest from frozen Russian assets, we will also tap new funds worth 195 million euros.' He revealed that Paris would use the money to finance the delivery to Kiev of 155-mm artillery shells and glide bombs compatible with the Mirage 2000 fighter jets that France has handed over to Ukraine.
The official added that France also plans to supply an unspecified number of armored fighting vehicles, including the AMX-10 RC.
Volodin, the chairman of the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, denounced the scheme as contravening international law.
'What is obviously hysteria born of impotence has finally gotten the better of reason,' the MP said on Sunday.
Responding to a similar move by the UK on Friday, Volodin warned that London 'will have to give back to Russia what they are now so generously giving away,' adding that Moscow has 'every reason to respond in kind.'
The remarks came shortly after Ukrainian Prime Minister Denis Shmigal confirmed that Kiev had received a first tranche worth about $1 billion from London, secured by the proceeds from the Russian assets.
Late last year, the US also transferred the first $1 billion installment of a $20 billion US loan backed by interest earned from the immobilized Russian assets.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said at the time that 'this money was stolen from us. Our assets have been frozen absolutely illegally, against all norms and rules.' He added that Russia would exhaust all legal avenues to protect its property and rights.
While Kiev has long been pressing its Western backers to outright expropriate the frozen Russian assets to finance its military and reconstruction efforts, a number of EU member states, most notably Germany, France, and Italy, have been reluctant to do so, citing legal concerns. The International Monetary Fund has also warned that appropriating the funds without a clear legal basis could undermine global confidence in Western financial institutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
Paris wants to produce drones in Ukraine
Paris is pushing France's largest automaker, Renault, to establish a military drone production operation in Ukraine, the company has confirmed. The announcement comes as Kiev significantly intensifies drone attacks on civilian infrastructure inside Russia. 'We have been contacted by the Defense Ministry about the possibility of producing drones,' Renault said in a statement to several media outlets, including Reuters, on Sunday. Although 'discussions' on the issue have taken place, the company insisted that 'no decision has been taken at this stage,' and that it is awaiting further details from the ministry. French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu first revealed the plan on Friday, describing it as an 'unprecedented partnership' in an interview with broadcaster LCI. 'We are going to embark on a completely unprecedented partnership… to equip production lines in Ukraine to… produce drones,' Lecornu said, noting that the project would involve both a major carmaker and a smaller defense contractor. Renault could be tasked with setting up drone assembly lines 'a few dozen or hundreds of kilometers from the front line' in Ukraine, France Info reported on Sunday. According to the newspaper Ouest-France, the project could also involve Delair – a Toulouse-based drone manufacturer that supplies UAVs for border surveillance, reconnaissance, intelligence, and special operations forces. The company has previously delivered kamikaze drones to the French Defense Ministry, which were later sent to Ukraine. Lecornu described the initiative as a 'win-win' for Paris and Kiev, claiming no French personnel would be deployed to Ukraine. The production lines would be operated by Ukrainian workers, and the drones built for Ukraine's military would also be used by the French Armed Forces for 'tactical and operational training that reflects the reality' of modern warfare, he said. Kiev ramped up drone strikes on Russian civilian infrastructure in May, particularly targeting Moscow and other central regions. The peak came during the final week of the month, when 2,300 UAVs were shot down, according to the Russian Defense Ministry. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov condemned the strikes as deliberate attempts to sabotage peace talks. Moscow has repeatedly warned that any weapons production facilities in Ukraine are considered legitimate military targets and subject to 'unequivocal destruction.'
Russia Today
17 hours ago
- Russia Today
Brussels gripped by anti-Russian ‘war hysteria' – MEP (VIDEO)
Anti-Russian sentiment in Brussels verges on 'war hysteria,' Fernand Kartheiser, a Luxembourgish MEP recently expelled from his parliamentary group over a visit to Moscow, has said to RT. The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR Group) in the European Parliament expelled Kartheiser on Wednesday, accusing him of 'crossing a red line' with his recent visit to Russia. The MEP explained that his trip last month was an attempt to 're-establish some sort of dialogue' with Russia at a time of international tensions. In an interview with RT on Sunday, Kartheiser admitted he expected the ECR to react badly, given that some in the group maintain 'very pronounced anti-Russian stances.' The expulsion is symptomatic of 'the general attitude towards Russia in the European Parliament,' he said. 'Sometimes I would think that we could touch upon war hysteria. We are not rational in many of our attitudes,' he stated. But common citizens in the EU reacted differently to his Russia visit, he stressed. Kartheiser said that 'people in the streets come to me, congratulate me, shake hands, tap me on the shoulder. It's unbelievable.' 'It is clear that there is a divide between the official circles in the European Union, which have a very anti-Russia stance, and the general public,' according to the MEP. The regular people in the EU are 'much, much more moderate and would really wish to see some dialogue with Russia so that we could sort out our differences in a civilized way,' he added. Ahead of the trip, Baltic and Nordic delegations in the ECR had warned Kartheiser that they would push to exclude him if he went to Moscow, the Luxembourg Times reported. The Baltic, Polish, and Scandinavian factions within the parliamentary group are especially outspoken in their anti-Russian stances, Kartheiser told RT. Brussels adopted a tough stance and imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Despite US President Donald Trump's push to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict, the EU has doubled down on arming Kiev. Moscow has accused Brussels of striving to derail the US-brokered peace effort and stressed that recent EU moves to boost defense spending make it the 'war party' of Europe.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
Kiev sends the living to die, but won't accept its dead
It is sad, but peace remains elusive in the war between, on one side, Ukraine and – through Ukraine – the West and, on the other, Russia. Recently, the US has at least admitted that Moscow has plausible and important interests at stake and that the West has been using Ukraine to fight a proxy war against Russia. While very late and still incomplete, such truthfulness could help fashion the kind of realistic compromise needed to end this war. Yet Washington's European vassals have chosen this moment to discover their usually terminally atrophied capacity for talking back to the US: They clearly want the war to continue, even though that means Ukraine – about which they pretend to care – will lose even more people and territory. Against this backdrop, it was no wonder that the latest round of the renewed Istanbul talks between Russia and Ukraine produced no breakthrough, little progress, and only very modest concrete results. Also, on the eve of the talks, the Zelensky regime launched terror attacks on civilian trains in western Russia and a series of sneak drone strikes throughout the country that – in the most generous reading – involved the war crime of perfidy: That, obviously, did not help find a way forward either. Indeed, by now it is clear that Kiev's sneak drone attacks in particular have only further undermined the Zelensky regime's already fragile standing in Washington: US President Donald Trump has been explicit that he accepts Russia's right to massively retaliate, or, in the original Trumpese, 'bomb the hell' out of Ukraine. Luckily for Ukraine, Moscow is generally more restrained than America would be in a similar situation, and it should stay so. Yet the fact remains, Kiev's sneak drones have made no substantial military difference in its favor, but they have done significant political damage – to Kiev, that is. Regarding the Istanbul talks, it is likely that these assaults were meant to torpedo them. Yet Moscow did not fall for that rather transparent play. Its delegation turned up; so the Ukrainian one had to do the same. In addition, Russia ended this round of the negotiations with several good-will gestures, including an agreement to exchange POWs who are particularly young or in bad health and the offer to hand over the frozen (a common practice in war) bodies of 6,000 fallen Ukrainians. Both initiatives have run into trouble. To be precise, both are being impeded by the Ukrainian leadership. The POW swap has been delayed, and Ukrainian officials have failed to show up at the border to receive the first 1,212 of their deceased soldiers. Regarding both, Kiev has blamed Russia. Yet, remarkably, the Ukrainian statements, in reality, prove that it is indeed Kiev that is – at the very least – slowing these processes down. For what Ukrainian officials are really accusing Russia of is moving faster. The reasons for this obstructionism are unclear. The Ukrainian authorities have not shared them with the public. But there are some plausible guesses. One very likely reason why Kiev is reluctant to accept the 6,000 bodies of its own fallen soldiers is that the 'preponderant majority' of them, according to a Ukrainian member of parliament, were killed specifically during Ukraine's insane and predictably catastrophic incursion into Russia's Kursk region. Started on August 6 of last year, the operation was initially hyped by Ukrainian propagandists and their accomplices and useful idiots in the West. For the clear-eyed, it was obvious from the beginning that this was a mass kamikaze mission, wasting Ukrainian lives for no military or political advantage. Was the Zelensky regime trying to create a territorial 'bargaining chip'? Or once more 'shift the narrative,' as if wars are won by rewriting a movie script? Influence last year's US elections? Prepare for a possible victory by then presidential candidate Donald Trump? All of the above? We don't know. What we do know is that nothing Kiev may have fantasized about has worked. Indeed, by now the Kursk fiasco has only made Kiev's situation worse. Russia has retaken the territory in Kursk Region that Ukraine had seized and is advancing on the Ukrainian side of the border, taking settlements at an accelerating pace and getting close to the major regional city of Sumy. Clearly, those fallen during that particular suicide mission are evidence of Kiev's recklessness, hypocrisy, and incompetence. No wonder they seem to be less than welcome at home. A second reason for Kiev's reluctance may be even more sordid. There is speculation, for instance on social media, that it is financial. More importantly, a Russian diplomat, Sergei Ordzhonikidze, has made the same claim on the Telegram channel of the Izvestiia newspaper. For according to Ukrainian legislation, the families of the fallen soldiers are entitled to substantial compensation. Painful as it may be to acknowledge it, the Zelensky regime is not incapable of such a massive lack of piety. Whatever the precise reasons for Kiev's odd refusal to take back its prisoners and dead, they are certain to be base. This may jar with the West's well-organized and stubbornly delusional Zelensky fan club. But the best they could do for 'ordinary' Ukrainians is to put pressure on their worn-out idol to accept the prisoners and the fallen. And, of course to finally end the war.
