
Energized by Kennedy, Texas ‘Mad Moms' Are Chipping Away at Vaccine Mandates
Now, as a measles outbreak that began in West Texas spreads to other parts of the country, the 'mad moms' have a slew of new allies. The 2024 elections ushered in a wave of freshman Republicans who back their goal of making all vaccinations voluntary. But no ally may be as influential as the one they gained in Washington: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's most prominent vaccine skeptic.
More than five dozen vaccine-related bills have been introduced in the Texas Legislature this year. Last week, the Texas House passed three of them. Those bills would make it easier for parents to exempt their children from school requirements; effectively bar vaccine makers from advertising in Texas; and prevent doctors from denying an organ transplant to people who are unvaccinated.
The Association of Immunization Managers, a national organization of state and local immunization officials, is tracking 545 vaccine-related bills in state legislatures around the country, 180 more than last year — evidence, the group's leaders say, that Mr. Kennedy is changing the national conversation. After peaking at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, the number of vaccine-related bills had come down in recent years.
But the big fear of public health leaders that began during the pandemic, and accelerated with Mr. Kennedy's political rise — that states will undo school vaccine mandates — has so far not come to pass.
'For the 10 years that Texans for Vaccine Choice has existed, we have had a federal government that has been wholly irrelevant or working against us,' said Ms. Hardy, the group's president. 'We're excited about having individuals in the federal government who will actually cooperate with us. But what exactly that means, we don't know.'
The women of Texans for Vaccine Choice have long been inspired by Mr. Kennedy. When the Texas bill that would have tightened vaccine requirements was introduced in 2015, he spoke out vigorously against it. 'I don't think it's appropriate to force people to undergo, or to have their children undergo, a medical procedure in this country,' he said then. In 2019, the group hosted Mr. Kennedy for an event at the State Capitol in Austin.
Then came the 2024 election. Ms. Hardy said that after a decade of watching political speeches, she rarely gets emotional. But last year, when she watched Mr. Kennedy announce that he was merging his campaign with Donald J. Trump's, 'I had tears in my eyes.'
As health secretary, Mr. Kennedy has broken with his predecessors by refusing to advocate for vaccination. In response to the measles outbreak, he acknowledged that vaccines 'do prevent infection,' but cast the decision to vaccinate as a personal one. Testifying before Congress last week, he refused to say whether, if he were a new parent, he would vaccinate his children against measles, polio or chickenpox.
'I don't want to seem like I'm being evasive,' Mr. Kennedy said, ' but I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me.'
With vaccination rates already dropping, public health experts say it may not matter whether bills eroding vaccine mandates become law; all states already offer either religious or philosophical exemptions to school vaccine requirements. But the vocal activism surrounding the bills is encouraging more parents to seek those exemptions, experts say.
Public health leaders say that could be dangerous, and they point to the current measles outbreak as proof. Since the first cases emerged in West Texas earlier this year, measles has killed two unvaccinated children and one adult, and sickened more than 1,000 people in 30 states, making it the worst measles outbreak in the United States in 25 years.
'It used to be that we would see a bill introduced as a message bill — the intent was never to become law,' said Brent Ewig, the chief policy officer of the immunization managers group. 'What we're concerned about now is that some of those message bills are clearly intended to reduce parents' confidence in vaccination, and that will lead to lower rates. And that just invites more tragedy.'
In Republican-led states around the country, vaccine debates are playing out much as they are in Texas: The anti-vaccine movement is energized but advancing in fits and starts.
'They are making these small, incremental gains at the edges, tweaking language that makes it easier to obtain exemptions or raising the visibility that exemptions exist,' said Northe Saunders, executive director of the SAFE Communities Coalition, a pro-vaccine advocacy group. 'The castle stands, but they are chipping away at the mortar around the base.'
Idaho last month became the first state in the nation to outlaw vaccine mandates, after having the highest school vaccine exemption rate in the country, 14 percent, during the 2023-2024 school year. But the 'Idaho Medical Freedom Act,' signed into law by Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, includes exemptions for hospitals and existing school mandates.
In West Virginia, Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican who has appeared with Mr. Kennedy to condemn sugary beverages and food dyes, recently issued an executive order providing religious and philosophical exemptions to school requirements for vaccines. But the legislature refused to codify the order to give it the force of law.
As opponents of vaccination have turned their rhetoric away from vaccine injuries and autism and instead emphasized personal freedom, they have picked up Republican support. The coronavirus pandemic accentuated the trend, making vaccination a partisan issue.
Rekha Lakshmanan, the chief strategy officer of The Immunization Partnership, a Texas nonprofit that advocates for vaccination, noticed the shift in 2015. Until then, she said support for immunization was bipartisan. The defeat of the bill that moved Texans for Vaccine Choice to action, she said, was 'when you could see the switch flip.'
Ms. Evans and Ms. Hardy said they were on defense, 'killing bad bills,' for the next eight years. But in 2023, they helped pass five pieces of legislation.
As a result of their work, state law now requires doctors who accept reimbursement from Medicaid or the federal Children's Health Insurance Program to treat unvaccinated patients. Businesses cannot be sued for failing to comply with public health recommendations during a pandemic, and Covid-19 vaccine mandates are against the law.
The vaccine exemption bill that passed the Texas House last week is the group's top legislative priority this year. The measure would enable parents to download and print their own 'reasons of conscience' vaccine exemption forms from home and deliver them to their child's school. The current system is more cumbersome; the Texas Department of State Health Services must send a form, and requires it to be notarized.
'There's no other medical procedure where you have to get permission from the state to say no,' Ms. Hardy said. 'And that's a barrier to liberty and free exercise of your deeply held beliefs.'
On a sunny day in March, Ms. Evans, the Texans for Vaccine Choice political director, roamed the corridors of the State Capitol in Austin, trying to drum up supporters for the measure.
Her path to advocacy, she said, began with her second child, a daughter who received a diagnosis of autism after her first birthday. Ms. Evans began exploring the proposition, now discredited, that there is a link between autism and vaccines. She also worked on a 2016 documentary, 'Vaxxed,' that questions vaccine safety and was produced by Del Bigtree, who later became Mr. Kennedy's communications director.Today, Ms. Evans is a familiar figure at the State Capitol. State Representative Shelley Luther, a freshman Republican and Texans for Vaccine Choice ally, greeted her with a hug.
Ms. Luther, who was jailed in 2020 for opening her hair salon in violation of Covid restrictions, wrote the bill that would effectively ban vaccine ads in Texas. Mr. Kennedy, too, favors banning pharmaceutical ads from television. 'Great minds!' Ms Luther exclaimed.
Other Republicans were equally enthusiastic about the health secretary. State Representative Nate Schatzline, another freshman Republican and a Christian pastor who had recently moved back to Texas from California, said Mr. Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda 'won over a lot of middle class moms,' including his wife.
Still, the Texans for Vaccine Choice legislative agenda faced hurdles. Its high priority bills were not getting hearings in the Texas House Committee on Public Health; the panel's Republican chairman, State Representative Gary VanDeaver, was standing in the way. He said in March that he did not want to 'do anything that's going to endanger the citizens of our state in a measles outbreak.'
A few weeks later, Texans for Vaccine Choice publicly accused Mr. VanDeaver of 'stonewalling.' Before long, both the organ transplant bill and the medical exemptions bill received hearings, clearing their way for last week's passage in the House. (Ms. Luther's bill, on vaccine advertising, was handled by a different committee.)
Ms. Hardy is optimistic that all three measures will soon pass the Senate and become law. Her 'dream agenda,' she said, 'is getting to a place where your vaccination status is irrelevant to your participation in society in Texas.'
Five years ago she did not believe that would happen in her lifetime. Today, she is optimistic that it will. Still, Ms. Evans says that even with Mr. Kennedy in office, it may take years to get there.
'I know we're going to have to chip away at this very slowly,' Ms. Evans said. 'Every session, we get closer, inch by inch. But I don't think I'll be putting myself out of a job anytime soon.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More Than Deep Breathing: The Science of Coping Strategies
Your teenager just failed their driver's test—how do you respond to help them? Your toddler is SO frustrated that their block tower fell over, they fling the pieces across the room. What's your response? If you've been a parent for long, you know that a big part of this role is the emotional labor that we exert to help our children deal with difficulties or challenges like these. Learning the best coping strategies for kids becomes a big part of our job. When our children are babies, this is often fairly straightforward (although if you've had a colicky baby, maybe not). They cry. The only way they can communicate is through crying, but it often indicates a pretty solvable need. We feed them when they're hungry, change their diaper when they're uncomfortable, etc. As our children get older, the experiences they go through and the challenges they face get more complex. We realize that we can't fix everything by just meeting their need in a very straightforward way. Like the upset teen driver or the frustrated toddler, we can't simply 'fix' their emotions. In situations like these, there's almost no way for us to save them from the discomfort and anguish that come with these experiences. So what do we do? Try to bubble wrap our children so they don't experience pain? Unfortunately, even that's impossible since much of the pain is emotional. As I was thinking about this, I started digging back into all the research I did for my dissertation, which was all about how mothers coped with going through a divorce. I was reminded of the fascinating work that researchers have done studying different coping strategies. In psychology, they're usually grouped into two main categories: problem-focused coping, and emotion-focused coping. These coping strategies are helpful to understand as parents, because we can start to model them for our children. Giving our children the tools they need to cope with different types of stress and emotional upset in healthy ways. Instead of trying to shield them from all stress or difficulties, this approach is perhaps the best gift we can give them to prepare them for adult life. Think about this as filling your child's emotional toolbox with the skills they need to cope with stress effectively in healthy ways. Problem-focused coping strategies for kids (action-oriented) When facing a challenging situation, problem-focused strategies are the tangible things that you can do to overcome a problem. For example, if you feel like there's an unjust law in your community, you can write your representatives or go to City Hall to protest the regulation. Or if your car breaks down, you can take it to a mechanic and have it fixed. These are very tangible things you can do to deal with a stressful or difficult situation. For children: These types of coping strategies can be taught by helping them think through different ways to solve a problem. For example, if your child's toy isn't working correctly, model for them how you think through different ways to solve the problem—is something stuck, is a piece missing, etc. If your child is having a difficult time in school with a particular subject, you can help them work through problem-focused strategies that might help them, like getting extra help from the teacher, getting a tutor, etc. Emotion-focused coping strategies for kids Discussing emotion-focused coping is where it gets really interesting in terms of parenting. These are probably the coping strategies you hear the most about in parenting articles. These often come to mind when you think of the big emotions children often experience. For example, maybe your child is upset about a fight they had with a friend. Emotion-focused coping in this situation might be the regulation strategies they use in the moment to calm down if they're crying. These coping strategies for emotional overwhelm are things like deep breathing or distraction to take their mind off of it and physiologically calm down. These can be very helpful, but they're not the only way of coping that focuses on changing our emotional response. There are other emotion-focused coping strategies that we can help our children learn. This is one of those hidden strategies that people don't often discuss. We all, as humans, search for meaning in different ways, and especially in times of suffering or difficulty. If we can help children think through and provide some meaning for the situation they're in, this can often be a very effective coping strategy. Sometimes people may think of this as sort of a false way of coping, but it's really not. For example, suppose someone loses a loved one to a devastating disease. In that case, they'll often find meaning in that situation by establishing a foundation to help raise money for research or to support those who suffer from that disease. These are all ways of finding meaning in stressful situations that provide a lot of comfort and ways for people to move forward. For children: Meaning-making coping with children often requires your guidance to help them reframe the situation. For example, if your family pet passes away, you might help provide meaning to this situation by encouraging your child to collect pet supplies to donate to an animal shelter. Depending on your personal beliefs, meaning-making coping can also incorporate your religious or spiritual beliefs about what happens to loved ones when they die. Why do coping strategies matter? These are all just a few examples of the different types of coping strategies we can model for our children and teens. But why are these so important? Research tells us that we're currently experiencing a mental health crisis among our youth. The causes are still being debated, but we know that the more emotional tools our children have to cope with stress and difficulty, the better off they'll be as they develop. Without effective coping strategies, teens (or adults) often turn to dangerous or unhealthy ways of coping—overuse of screens, self-harm, alcohol or drug addiction, or other risky behavior. Starting to model healthy coping strategies can help prepare your child for difficulties they may experience. Even if your child is four or five years old, you can start trying to talk to them about these different ideas they could try, even in simple situations with friends or during playtime. Ultimately, this will help them understand how to regulate their emotions and get through difficult situations. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is GM's Light Truck Platform Enough to Protect Government Personnel? The Secret Service Thinks So
The U.S. Secret Service is looking for a new vehicle that's capable off-road and less conspicuous than a . interviewed top officials at the Secret Service and GM Defense who shared some insight about the parameters of such a vehicle. While the Secret Service is keeping its new multi-terrain vehicle a secret, we have some ideas about possible platforms. The United States Secret Service is in talks with General Motors Defense for a new platform of protective vehicles. That's according to Secret Service director Sean Curran, who recently spoke with Car and Driver during an exclusive interview. Along with giving the Secret Service more mobility off-road, the new vehicles could do more to blend in than the armored Suburbans it currently uses. A Suburban Substitute In addition to the famous presidential limousines, the Secret Service's current lineup is made up of armored Chevy Suburbans as well as pursuit SUVs, which look like the sort you'd see from your local state patrol. New vehicle development is a never-ending process between the Secret Service and GM Defense. 'You know, we do it based on the terrain, based on the threat environment, and just our needs,' Curran said. Without looking to get too deeply into specifics, Curran pointed out that the new platform would be something the Secret Service uses when the typical parade limousine (a.k.a. The Beast) doesn't make sense. He pointed to Africa as a place where the new vehicle would blend in better than the typical armored Suburbans, which stick out like a sore thumb in some countries. No More Monster Garage Before GM Defense began heavily investing in armored vehicles, it was common practice for government agencies, including the Secret Service, to buy cars off dealer lots and cut off body panels. They'd then weld in armor throughout the car and bolt it all back together. The downside of that process is that it would take vehicles designed for civilian use and weigh them down with thousands of pounds of armor they weren't designed to carry. GM Defense president Stephen S. duMont refers to those models as 'Monster Garage' builds. In an interview, he told us they were often slow to accelerate, and once they got going, very hard to bring to a stop. Now, GM Defense can work hand-in-hand with the Secret Service to build dedicated cars from the ground up. To Be Continued... As the Secret Service prefers to keep its cards close to its chest, director Curran kept enough ambiguity to avoid specifying exactly which platform he's working with GM Defense to build. That leaves open three likelihoods. The Secret Service could be in the market for something similar to GM's Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV), which is based on the Chevy Colorado ZR2 platform. It could also be looking at GM Defense's Light Utility Vehicle (LUV), which the company builds on its HD truck platform. Lastly, the two organizations could be working on an entirely new platform that hasn't been revealed publicly yet. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Issues Stark Warning to Russia Ahead of Putin Summit
U.S. President Donald Trump shake hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, on July 16, 2018. Credit - Brendan Smialowski—Getty Images President Donald Trump warned that "severe consequences" lie ahead for Russia if Russian President Vladimir Putin doesn't agree to stop the Ukraine war after they meet for a high-stakes summit in Alaska on Friday. Responding to a question from a reporter after announcing this year's recipients for the Kennedy Center Honors in Washington, D.C., Trump said "there will be very severe consequences" and that "he doesn't have to" specify what, should Russia not move toward a cease-fire. Trump was then asked if he believes he can "convince" Putin to "stop targeting civilians in Ukraine," to which he replied: "I've had a lot of good conversations with him [Putin], but then I go home and see that a rocket hit a nursing home [or an apartment building] and people are laying dead in the street, so I guess the answer to that is 'no.'" The U.S. President went on to add that he wants to "end the war" and will be "very proud" to end it. Trump's remarks came shortly after he shared an 'exceptionally constructive and good conversation' with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and key European leaders on Wednesday, according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Debriefing the press after the call, for which Trump dialled in virtually and U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance was also on the line, Merz suggested 'there is hope that something is moving,' ahead of the Putin summit. Read More: Zelensky on Trump, Putin, and the Endgame in Ukraine Zelensky, meanwhile, warned Trump that Putin is 'bluffing' about being open to a cease-fire and lasting peace. French President Emmanuel Macron divulged that while the group discussed a potential exchange of land, 'as of today, there are no serious territorial exchange plans on the table.' Zelensky and Merz both reiterated the need for a cease-fire and strong Ukrainian security guarantees before any negotiations take place. Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO, shared a positive outlook following the conversation. 'Great call with [Trump], Zelensky, and European leaders ahead of President Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska. We are united in pushing to end this terrible war… and achieve just and lasting peace,' Rutte said via social media. 'Appreciate Trump's leadership and close coordination with allies. The ball is now in Putin's court.' Shortly after the call, Vance spoke to U.S. soldiers at a military base in England, where he is currently on a trip with his family. 'We are going to make it our mission as an Administration to bring peace to Europe once again,' Vance said. Zelensky touched down in Berlin early Wednesday to meet with Merz and others ahead of the all-important conversation with Trump. The opportunity served as Zelensky's chance to make a final case to the U.S. President before he meets with Putin. Trump referred to the European leaders as 'great people who want to see a deal done,' in a Truth Social post early Wednesday. After the conversation, Zelensky said that Trump struck down the idea that Russia could veto Ukraine's NATO membership aspirations and reiterated calls for possible economic penalties on Russia—which the U.S. President has repeatedly promised to enact—should a cease-fire deal not be reached. Trump has also agreed to first inform Zelensky, then the key European leaders, of any updates following his conversation with Putin, according to Merz. Meanwhile, Trump previously stated that a lasting cease-fire in the Russia-Ukraine war, which was triggered when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, could only come through the exchange of territories 'for the betterment of both.' Zelensky, backed by his European allies, staunchly denounced that idea, stating that Ukraine will not 'gift their land to the occupier.' The Ukrainian leader doubled down on his position on Wednesday, saying: 'I stress that any questions concerning our country's territorial integrity cannot be discussed without regard for our people, for the will of our people and the Ukrainian constitution.' World leaders, such as France's Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, had previously urged Trump to consider inviting Ukraine to the Putin summit while reiterating their support for the eastern European nation. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' the leaders of France, Italy, the U.K., Germany, Poland, and Finland said in a statement on Saturday. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.' Russian troops advanced deeper into Ukraine on Tuesday, in what some have viewed as a bid to pressure Kyiv into considering Putin's demands for more territory. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations,' Zelensky said. Furthermore, ahead of his call with Zelensky and others on Wednesday, Trump strongly criticized what he claimed has been 'very unfair' media coverage of his upcoming talk with Putin. 'Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people,' Trump said via Truth Social, before referencing recent comments made by his former national security adviser John Bolton, who asserted that 'Putin has already won,' in an interview with The Atlantic. 'What's that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The fake news is working overtime. (No tax on overtime),' Trump maintained. Read More: World Leaders React to Zelensky and Trump's Oval Office Showdown Amid much discussion over the Trump-Putin summit and what, if any, progress can be made, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has seemingly downplayed expectations. Addressing reporters on Tuesday, she said the meeting will serve as a 'listening exercise' for Trump, in order for him to get a 'better understanding' of how to end the war in Ukraine. Contact us at letters@