Archaeologists Reveal Gladiator Attacked by Lion in Roman 'Spectacle'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
It has been revealed that the skeletal remains of a man from Roman-era Britain show he was bitten by a large cat like a lion, meaning that he may well have been a combatant who died in a gladiator show.
While accounts of gladiatorial fights in the Roman Empire are well documented—both human vs. human contests and human vs. animal combat—the discovery represents the first direct, physical evidence for the latter in Europe from this time.
"The implications of our multidisciplinary study are huge," said lead author and anthropologist professor Tim Thompson of Ireland's Maynooth University in a statement.
"For years, our understanding of Roman gladiatorial combat and animal spectacles has relied heavily on historical texts and artistic depictions."
The new find, Thompson added, is "reshaping our perception of Roman entertainment culture in the region."
Big cat bite marks on the man's right ilium (hip bone).
Big cat bite marks on the man's right ilium (hip bone).
From the research paper: Unique osteological evidence for human-animal gladiatorial combat in Roman Britain
The man's remains, which date back to around 200 to 300 C.E., were unearthed from the Driffield Terrace cemetery in York (once the Roman city of Eboracum) 20 years ago, along with 81 other burials and evidence of 14 cremations.
Based on the fact that the remains appeared to belong mainly to young men—and that many exhibited signs of trauma in the form of bone fractures or decapitation in an execution-style—it had long been speculated that the burials could be of gladiators.
The individual in question, who has been given the id "6DT19," was previously noted to have a series of depressions on his pelvis, which had been speculated to be carnivore bites.
In the new study, the researchers created a three-dimensional scan of the marks, allowing them to be compared with the bite marks known to be left by various animals.
The best fit was found to be from the bite of a big cat. Given the bite marks were found on the pelvis, the team said that they could have come from a lion scavenging on the body around the time of death.
"As tangible witnesses to spectacles in Britain's Roman amphitheatres, the bitemarks help us appreciate these spaces as settings for brutal demonstrations of power," said paper co-author and archaeologist John Pearce of King's College London, England, in a statement.
Pearce added: "They make an important contribution to desanitizing our Roman past."
"One of the wonderful things about archaeology is that we continue to make discoveries even years after a dig has concluded, as research methods and technology enable us to explore the past in more detail," said York Archaeology CEO David Jennings.
"This latest research gives us a remarkable insight into the life—and death—of this particular individual, and adds to both previous and ongoing genome research into the origins of some of the men buried in this particular Roman cemetery.
"We may never know what brought this man to the arena where we believe he may have been fighting for the entertainment of others, but it is remarkable that the first osteo-archaeological evidence for this kind of gladiatorial combat has been found so far from the Colosseum of Rome."
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about the Romans? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Thompson, T. J. U., Errickson, D., McDonnell, C., Holst, M., Caffell, A., Pearce, J., & Gowland, R. L. (2025). Unique osteological evidence for human-animal gladiatorial combat in Roman Britain. PLOS ONE, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319847
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Is Your Kitty Anxious? Be Aware of This Condition, Say Vets
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Cats are known to be skittish—but if yours is noticeably anxious, researchers are warning that you might want to be aware of one particular feline health condition. New research from the University of Montreal's Faculty of Veterinary Medicine has revealed a critical link between anxiety/stress and recurring bouts of a painful bladder condition—feline idiopathic cystitis (FIC). The team are urging cat owners and veterinarians to prioritize stress reduction for our more anxious furry companions. FIC is a leading cause of emergency vet visits and is characterized by acute bladder inflammation, painful and sometimes bloody urination in cats, according to the researchers. Traditionally, without detectable bacterial infections, stones or tumors, the condition is labeled as idiopathic—that is, with no "organic" cause. However, the team's study of 33 cats challenges this. A tabby cat hides and appears nervous. A tabby cat hides and appears nervous."A similar condition with the same symptoms occurs in women and is often linked to high levels of stress or anxiety," said veterinary behaviorist professor Marion Desmarchelier in a statement. "Some cats end up being euthanized because of it. The disease itself is not fatal, but the cost of repeated emergency treatments can be too much for some families." FIC has a high recurrence rate, with about half of affected cats having repeat episodes. A Connection With the COVID-19 Pandemic The University researchers also shed light on the connection between stress and cat health observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. When human companions stayed home, many cats—who are often known for their love of routine—found themselves disrupted. "We were home all the time during the pandemic," said paper co-author Marianne Caudron in a statement. "Dogs were thrilled because they got lots of walks, but we saw twice as many cases of idiopathic cystitis in cats." This observation prompted the team to launch their study, the results of which are published in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior. The research involved 33 cats diagnosed with FIC. Their owners completed a questionnaire about their cat's behavior—including their levels of aggression and fear—and details about their living environment. "We initially thought that anxious, aggressive cats would be more prone to recurrent cystitis, but it's actually the fearful, withdrawn ones that seem to be at greater risk," explained Desmarchelier. Treatment Should Focus on Mental Well-Being The study's authors advocate that the scope of FIC treatment should be expanded to include addressing cats' mental health. "We believe this condition is caused by stress and anxiety— and therefore should no longer be called idiopathic cystitis, but instead 'cystitis secondary to anxiety,'" Desmarchelier said. The study offered several practical ways to reduce feline stress, including increasing water sources in the home for cats, setting up an extra litter box than the number of cats in the home, offering a variety of toys and providing safe access to the outdoors. While these changes weren't shown to prevent all recurrences of cystitis, researchers believe they are crucial for risk reduction and overall well-being. Desmarchelier concluded with a hopeful message: "Taking a cat to the vet twice a year for a urinary blockage costs a fortune. But it doesn't have to be this way—there are solutions. That's the message we want to get across." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about cats? Let us know via science@ Reference Caudron, M., Laroche, P., Bazin, I., & Desmarchelier, M. (2025). Association between behavioral factors and recurrence rate in cats with feline "idiopathic" cystitis. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 78, 90–96.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How poisonous mercury can get from coal-fired power plants into the fish you eat – Trump's EPA plans to weaken emissions rules meant to lower the risk
People fishing along the banks of the White River as it winds through Indianapolis sometimes pass by ominous signs warning about eating the fish they catch. One of the risks they have faced is mercury poisoning. Mercury is a neurotoxic metal that can cause irreparable harm to human health – especially the brain development of young children. It is tied to lower IQ and results in decreased earning potential, as well as higher health costs. Lost productivity from mercury alone was calculated in 2005 to reach almost US$9 billion per year. One way mercury gets into river fish is with the gases that rise up the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency established a rule in 2012 limiting mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in an effort to improve air quality and public health. The first Trump administration moved to weaken the rule in 2020, arguing that the costs to industry outweighed the health benefit to the public. Then, the Biden administration tightened the regulations a few years later. Now, the Trump administration is proposing to weaken the latest regulations and, in addition, to repeal Biden-era limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, moves it hopes will boost coal power production. I study mercury and its sources as a biogeochemist at Indiana University. Before the EPA's original mercury rule went into effect, my students and I launched a project to track how Indianapolis-area power plants were increasing mercury in the rivers and soil. The risks from eating a fish from a river downwind from a coal-burning power plant depends on both the type of fish caught and the age and condition of the person consuming it. Mercury is a bioaccumulative toxin, meaning that it increasingly concentrates in the flesh of organisms as it makes its way up the food chain. The mercury emitted from coal-burning power plants falls onto soils and washes into waterways. There, the moderately benign mercury is transformed by bacteria into a toxic organic form called methylmercury. Each bacterium might contain only one unit of toxic methylmercury, but a worm chewing through sediment and eating 1,000 of those bacteria now contains 1,000 doses of mercury. The catfish that eats the worm then get more doses, and so on up the food chain to humans. In this way, top-level predator fishes, such as smallmouth bass, walleye, largemouth bass, lake trout and Northern pike, typically contain the highest amounts of mercury in aquatic ecosystems. On average, one of these fish contains enough to make eating only one serving of them per month dangerous for the developing fetuses of pregnant women and for children. In our study, we wanted to answer a simple question: Did the local coal-burning power plants, known to be major emitters of toxic mercury, have an impact on the local environment? The obvious answer seems to be yes, they do. But in fact, quite a bit of research – and coal industry advertising – noted that mercury is a 'global pollutant' and could not necessarily be traced to a local source. A recurring argument is that mercury deposited on the landscape came from coal-burning power plants in China, so why regulate local emissions if others were still burning coal? That justification was based on the unique chemistry of this element. It is the only metal that is liquid at room temperature, and when heated just to a moderate level, will evaporate into mercury vapor. Thus, when coal is burned in a power plant, the mercury that is present in it is released through the smokestacks as a gas and dilutes as it travels. Low levels of mercury also occur naturally. Although this argument was technically true, we found it obscured the bigger picture. We found the overwhelming source of mercury was within sight of the White River fishermen – a large coal-burning power plant on the edge of the city. This power plant emitted vaporous mercury at the time, though it has since switched to natural gas. We found that much of the plant's mercury rapidly reacted with other atmospheric constituents and water vapor to 'wash out' over the city. It was raining down mercury on the landscape. Mercury emitted from the smokestacks of coal-fired power plants can fall from the atmosphere with rain, mist or chemical reactions. Several studies have shown elevated levels of mercury in soils and plants near power plants, with much of the mercury falling within about 9 miles (15 kilometers) of the smokestack. When we surveyed hundreds of surface soils ranging from about 1 to 31 miles (2 to 50 km) from the coal-fired power plant, then the single largest emitter of mercury in central Indiana, we were shocked. We found a clear 'plume' of elevated mercury in Indianapolis, with much higher values near the power plant tailing off to almost background values 31 miles downwind. The White River flows from the northeast to the southwest through Indianapolis, opposite the wind patterns. When we sampled sediments from most of its course through central Indiana, we found that mercury levels started low well upstream of Indianapolis, but increased substantially as the river flowed through downtown, apparently accumulating deposited mercury along its flow path. We also found high levels well downstream of the city. Thus a fisherman out in the countryside, far away from the city, was still at significant risk of catching, and eating, high-mercury fish. As of 2022, in Indianapolis, pregnant women were still advised to avoid eating some fish from the White River altogether. The EPA created the Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, or MATS, to deal with the exact health risk Indianapolis was facing. The original rule stipulated that mercury sources had to be sharply reduced. For coal-fired power plants, this meant either installing costly mercury-capturing filters in the smokestacks or converting to another energy source. Many converted to natural gas, which reduces the mercury risk but still contributes to health problems and global warming. The MATS rule succeeded in reducing mercury emissions from power plants. It also helped tilt the national energy playing field away from coal. In 2020, the Trump Administration, in an attempt to bolster the declining U.S. coal industry, rescinded a 'supplemental finding' that it is 'appropriate and necessary' to regulate mercury from power plants. In 2022, the Biden Administration moved to reaffirm that supplemental finding, and it followed with stronger regulations in 2024. Now, the Trump administration is planning to pull back again. The new EPA proposal will go through a comment period, which will take time, but it sends a signal to the industry. Environmental groups expect to challenge the moves in court. Some economists initially calculated the net cost of the MATS rule to the U.S. electricity sector to be about $9.6 billion per year. This is roughly equal to estimates of productivity loss alone from the harm mercury emissions cause. The overall benefits of the rule were estimated to be higher. To a public health expert, this math problem is a no-brainer. Protecting the health of generations of Americans today and in the future matters. This is an update to an article originally published Feb. 15, 2022. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Gabriel Filippelli, Indiana University Read more: The US is making plans to replace all of its lead water pipes from coast to coast Gold rush, mercury legacy: Small-scale mining for gold has produced long-lasting toxic pollution, from 1860s California to modern Peru The risk of preterm birth rises near gas flaring, reflecting deep-rooted environmental injustices in rural America Gabriel Filippelli does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Overlooked Bat Viruses May Be 'Small Step' From Causing Next Pandemic
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An overlooked subgroup of bat viruses may be just one minor mutation away from being able to infect humans and potentially set off the next pandemic. This is the warning of a team of U.S.-based researchers who have been studying "merbecoviruses," a coronavirus subgenus that also includes the deadly Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus. Investigating how these merbecoviruses operate, the scientists found that while most likely pose no direct threat, the "HKU5" subgroup, which can be found across Asia, Africa, Europe and the Middle East, do possess traits that raise concerns. "Merbecoviruses—and HKU5 viruses in particular—really hadn't been looked at much, but our study shows how these viruses infect cells," said paper author and virologist Michael Letko of the Washington State University in a statement. "What we also found is HKU5 viruses may be only a small step away from being able to spill over into humans." Stock image of a Japanese house bat, Pipistrellus abramus, mid-flight Stock image of a Japanese house bat, Pipistrellus abramus, mid-flight Russell Jenkins/iStock / Getty Images Plus Even though thousands of viruses that infect wild animals have had their genomes sequences over the last couple of decades, it is typical that we have little information on the potential risk these agents pose to humans. And little attention has been given to date to the merbecoviruses, with the notable exception of MERS-CoV. First detected in 2012, this zoonotic coronavirus—which can be transmitted to us from dromedary camels—causes severe respiratory disease in humans and has a mortality rate of around 34 percent. Like SARS-CoV-2 (the virus behind COVID-19), merbecoviruses attack host cells by binding to them using a so-called spike protein. In their study, Letko and colleagues conducted experiments involving virus-like particles that sported only the binding part of the spike, allowing them to study the ability of merbecoviruses to infect human cells. Although the team found that most merbecoviruses are unlikely to have the capacity to infect humans, the HKU5 subgroup can; in fact, its members latch onto the ACE2 receptor on target cells just like SARS-CoV-2 does. At present, HKU5 viruses are only able to adequately exploit the ACE2 receptor in bats—and are far less proficient at latching onto those found on human cells. However, when the researchers analyzed HKU5 viruses from Asia (where their natural host is the Japanese house bat, Pipistrellus abramus), the researchers identified mutations that might allow the viruses to bind to the ACE2 receptors in other species, including humans. In fact, a study published in 2024 found a HKU5 virus that had spilled over into mink. "These viruses are so closely related to MERS, so we have to be concerned if they ever infect humans," explained Letko. "While there's no evidence they've crossed into people yet, the potential is there—and that makes them worth watching." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about exoplanets? Let us know via science@ References Catanzaro, N. J., Wu, Z., Fan, C., Jefferson, V., Abdelgadir, A., Schäfer, A., Yount, B. L., Bjorkman, P. J., Baric, R., & Letko, M. (2025). ACE2 from Pipistrellus abramus bats is a receptor for HKU5 coronaviruses. Nature Communications, 16(1), 4932. Zhao, J., Wan, W., Yu, K., Lemey, P., Pettersson, J. H.-O., Bi, Y., Lu, M., Li, X., Chen, Z., Zheng, M., Yan, G., Dai, J., Li, Y., Haerheng, A., He, N., Tu, C., Suchard, M. A., Holmes, E. C., He, W.-T., & Su, S. (2024). Farmed fur animals harbour viruses with zoonotic spillover potential. Nature, 634(8032), 228–233.
