Microsoft's AI edge under scrutiny as OpenAI turns to rivals for cloud services
Exclusive licensing deals and access to OpenAI's cutting-edge models have made Microsoft one of the biggest winners of the generative AI boom, fueling growth in its Azure cloud business and pushing its market value toward $4 trillion.
In the April-June quarter, the tie-up is expected to have driven a 34.8% increase in Azure revenue, in line with the company's forecast and higher than the 33% rise in the previous three months, according to data from Visible Alpha.
But that deal is being renegotiated as OpenAI eyes a public listing, with media reports suggesting a deadlock over how much access Microsoft will retain to ChatGPT maker's technology and its stake if OpenAI converts into a public-benefit corporation.
The conversion cannot proceed without Microsoft's sign-off and is crucial for a $40 billion funding round led by Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Group, $20 billion of which is contingent on the restructuring being completed by the end of the year.
OpenAI, which recently deepened its Oracle tie-up with a planned 4.5 gigawatts data center capacity, has also added Google Cloud among its suppliers for computing capacity.
UBS analysts said investor views on the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership are divided, though the software giant holds an upper hand. "Microsoft's leadership earned enough credibility … such that the company will end up negotiating terms that will be in the interest of its shareholders," the analysts said.
Some of that confidence is reflected in the company's stock price, which has risen by more than a fifth so far this year.
In the April-June period, Microsoft's fiscal fourth quarter, the company likely benefited from a weaker dollar, stronger non-AI Azure demand and PC makers pulling forward orders for its Windows products ahead of possible U.S. tariffs.
Revenue is expected to have risen 14% to $73.81 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG, its best growth in three quarters.
Profit is estimated to have increased 14.2% to $25.16 billion, slightly slower than the previous quarter as operating costs rose.
Capital spending will also be in focus after rival Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab raised its annual outlay by $10 billion last week. Microsoft has repeatedly said it remains capacity constrained on AI, and in April signaled continued growth in capex after planned spending of over $80 billion last fiscal year, though at a slower pace and on shorter-lived assets such as AI chips.
Dan Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust who owns Microsoft shares, said the spending has been paying off.
"Investors may still be underestimating the potential for Microsoft's AI business to drive durable consumption growth in the agentic AI era."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
British steelmakers will be able to sell more to the EU tariff-free from Friday in a boost for the beleaguered sector. The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why is Heathrow's third runway back on the agenda?
The government has put big infrastructure at the heart of its strategy to kickstart economic growth – particularly if paid for through private investment – and has vowed to make building easier. Few projects come as big, or at such an advanced stage of planning, as Heathrow's expansion. With record numbers of passengers, Europe's busiest airport is at capacity, and it has new owners with deep pockets who see an opportunity to invest. Yes, more than once. The Conservatives overturned Heathrow's original plan, which was approved by Labour in 2009, before setting up an independent airports commission, which found a new runway was needed. The plans were endorsed by the government and voted through parliament in 2018, and were eventually upheld by the courts. But then Covid happened, passengers disappeared, and Heathrow never submitted a full planning application. They are fundamentally the same as last time, but Heathrow now believes it can pack in even more flights and passengers – up to 150 million a year – due to bigger planes and operational advances. It will cost more too because of inflation: £21bn for the runway; another £12bn to expand its terminals; and a further £15bn to upgrade the rest of the airport to match. Part of the engineering challenge is getting a runway over Britain's busiest motorway, the M25 orbiting London, at one of its most congested points. At a cost of £1.5bn, Heathrow plans to build a new stretch of M25 further west, with the runway going over the top, ready for cars to be switched overnight and allow it to complete the rest of the two-mile strip. It believes this is still better value and more efficient than situating the runway further to the east, which would mean demolishing more houses and putting much more of west London under noisy flightpaths. The government is officially reviewing the plan, as well as an alternative proposal submitted by the Arora group, alongside the existing airports national policy statement, to 'ensure that any scheme is delivered in line with our legal, environmental and climate obligations'. A response is expected in early autumn and, if green-lit, Heathrow could launch a formal public consultation before submitting a full planning application. However, its new owners, which include Saudi Arabia and Qatar, want to be sure that the legal and political context has shifted enough for its near-£50bn investment plans to come to fruition. That means passing the planning bill, so the runway is not blocked by neither bat, newt, nor judicial review. It also hopes for progress on airspace modernisation, to ensure the additional 750 planes a day can fly over London as required; and most of all, guarantees that the Civil Aviation Authority will let Heathrow charge airlines enough to recoup its investment. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion What indeed. The airports commission view a decade ago was that a third Heathrow runway could be compatible with the UK's climate commitments, so long as other aviation growth was constrained. However, airports around the UK are also now looking to expand, not least Heathrow's London rivals. Stansted's growth was enthusiastically endorsed at an early Labour 'growth summit' and the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, has given the green light to plans to double the size of Luton airport. She has also said she was minded to approve Gatwick's second runway plans, with a decision expected soon. Tens of thousands of jobs created, economic growth, and competition, cheaper fares and new destinations for passengers flying from Heathrow. Another 276,000 flights a year overhead, adding to noise and air pollution. Locally, 750 homes bulldozed, and years of disruption in construction for the rest. And an estimated extra 4.4m tonnes of CO2 a year from resulting flights, contributing to the climate emergency.
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Car finance ruling has potential to trigger millions of claims
A ruling by the UK's most senior judges later could pave the way for millions of motorists to claim compensation for motor finance Supreme Court will decide whether or not to uphold an earlier ruling which found that hidden commission payments to car dealers were nine in 10 new cars are bought on finance, so a decision could lead to billions of pounds being claimed by people who bought cars over many the industry says it did nothing wrong, leaving lenders, drivers and the government waiting for clarity from the Supreme Court later. Many thousands of car buyers are already in line for payouts, but this case could widen the pool of potential claimants lenders, such as Lloyds, have set aside huge amounts of money in preparation for such a scenario, with the possibility of payouts approaching the levels seen during the payment protection insurance (PPI) car finance sector is the second biggest lender to consumers in the UK, with people only borrowing more in mortgages. How cars were bought The vast majority of new cars, and many second-hand ones, are bought with finance agreements. Motorists put down a deposit, borrow the rest as a loan, and drive off in their new were signing up customers to these finance deals and, behind the scenes, were paid a commission by dealers were paid more in commission if they secured a higher interest rate on the loan. These were known as discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) and were banned by regulators in 2021. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is likely to set up a central compensation scheme for those drivers who were mis-sold loans that had DCAs. However, some - like Jemma Caffrey, from Blackburn - want to take their cases to court, to pursue the prospect of a bigger 42-year-old bought a car in 2009 on her first day back at work after maternity leave. Her son was born with difficulties so she needed a car to get to work and multiple medical appointments, because it was impossible on public transport."I feel I was taken advantage of as a vulnerable new mum," she paid a high interest rate for the blue Corsa. It was not until years later, having read about car finance in the local press that she went to Courmacs Legal to bring a many other cases, that is now on hold pending the Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court is considering whether nearly all hidden commission arrangements were unlawful - not just are considering three test cases, including that of Marcus Johnson, 34-year-old, from Cwmbran, Johnson said when he bought a blue Suzuki Swift in 2017 he simply did not know that the commission had been paid, although the lender said he had signed a solicitors in these three cases say that the commissions amounted to bribes at common the heart of this case is the duty of the motor dealer. When selling the car, the dealer is trying to seal the best deal for the the Court of Appeal effectively said that, when the dealer then became a broker for the loan, it had a duty to act solely in the best interests of the buyer, not the lender. Economic fallout The car finance sector insists it complied with the law as it was understood, and as regulation Finance and Leasing Association, the trade body for the motor finance sector, has said it wants the Supreme Court to provide what the rules are permanently for the FCA said it would announce whether and how it would proceed with a compensation scheme within six weeks of the February, the Supreme Court rejected an unusual intervention from the government, which was worried huge amounts of redress payments could upset the car market and make it less competitive, as well as making the UK less attractive to Treasury has said it wants to see a "balanced judgment" that delivers compensation proportionate to losses that consumers have suffered and allows the motor finance sector to continue supporting millions of motorists to own has been concerned this case is deterring investment in the UK, and hitting economic Bobby Dean, a Liberal Democrat MP and member of the Treasury Committee, who has questioned lenders and others on this topic, said growth was not in competition with fairness and redress for consumers."Good regulation can make sure that consumers are protected and have confidence to buy things like car loans and that's the best thing we can do for the economy," he said. We will bring you live reporting of the judgement as soon as we get it followed by expert analysis on what it means for millions of drivers.
