Five judges, two agencies and a 17-year wait — the long road to verdict in Malegaon blast case

Time of India

6 days ago

The trial in the
2008 Malegaon bomb blast
case, which stretched over nearly 17 years, witnessed not only a change in investigating agencies but also five different judges presiding over various stages of the proceedings.
A special court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP
Pragya Singh Thakur
and
Lt Col Prasad Purohit
, noting there was "no reliable and cogent evidence" against them.
The investigation was initially conducted by the state Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which had pinned the blame on right-wing extremists who were members of 'Abhinav Bharat' group.
The probe was later handed over to the NIA, which gave a clean chit to Thakur. However, the court conducted the trial against her, citing prima facie evidence.
From the initial remand of the accused to the filing of charge sheets, framing of charges, commencement of trial, and finally the verdict, the case passed through the hands of five judges between 2008 and 2025.
Live Events
Both the victims of the blast and the accused cited this frequent change of judges as a significant factor in derailing the trial and contributing to the prolonged delay.
Sameer Kulkarni, one of the accused who was eventually acquitted, told PTI that this was among the longest-running trials. He blamed both the prosecution and defence for failing to expedite the proceedings. Kulkarni had even filed a petition in the High Court seeking that the trial be fast-tracked.
Advocate Shaheed Nadeem, who represented several victims, acknowledged that the repeated transfer of judges had indeed hampered the trial. He pointed out that the voluminous case records meant each new judge had to start afresh, further delaying the process.
The first judge to preside over the case was Special Judge Y.D. Shinde. He handled the initial remand of the accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, and others.
In a significant ruling, Judge Shinde set aside the invocation of the
Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act
(MCOCA), observing that none of the accused were part of an organised crime syndicate.
He noted that the legal prerequisite for invoking MCOCA-that an accused must have more than one charge sheet filed against them-was not met. However, the Bombay High Court later reinstated the application of MCOCA following an appeal by the state government.
Following Shinde, special judge S.D. Tekale presided over the case from 2015 to 2018 until his transfer during annual judicial postings.
It was Judge Tekale who rejected the National Investigation Agency's (NIA) move to grant a clean chit to Pragya Thakur, asserting that there was prima facie evidence warranting her trial.
After Tekale, special judge V.S. Padalkar took over and, in October 2018, formally framed charges against Thakur, Purohit, and five others. The trial officially began under his tenure with the examination of the first witness.
Judge P.R. Sitre succeeded Padalkar after his retirement in 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic brought the trial to a temporary standstill. Despite the challenges, Judge Sitre managed to examine 100 witnesses during his tenure of just over a year.
In 2022, when Sitre was slated for transfer, victims of the blast wrote to the then Bombay High Court Chief Justice Dipankar Datta, urging that the transfer be stayed to avoid further delays.
Following Sitre's transfer, special judge A.K. Lahoti took over the trial in June 2022. Till April 2025, Judge Lahoti continued the trial.
In April, when he was slated for transfer to Nashik, the victims again wrote to the then HC Chief Justice seeking a stay on the transfer as the trial was nearing completion.
Responding to their plea, Judge Lahoti's tenure as
special NIA judge
was extended until the end of August 2025, allowing him to complete the trial.