The golden dome: A bold vision or an overpriced dream?
Donald Trump has unveiled an ambitious plan to shield America from missile attacks with a space-based defense system called the 'Golden Dome.' Inspired by Ronald Reagan's vision from decades ago, Trump claims today's advanced technology makes this dream achievable. Unlike Israel's Iron Dome, which protects against short-range rockets, the Golden Dome aims to cover the entire United States using thousands of satellites. These satellites would detect enemy missiles and destroy them before they reach American soil.
During his campaign, Trump promised to fund this project through a 'big and beautiful' tax bill, allocating $25 billion to kickstart it, with total costs estimated at $175 billion. However, Congress has yet to approve this funding, and experts warn the price tag could balloon to over $500 billion, taking decades to complete. Trump's timeline of two and a half to three years is also considered overly optimistic.
The promise of 'close to 100% protection' sounds reassuring, but it's not that simple. A recent study by the American Physical Society highlights the challenge: to stop just ten North Korean Hwasong-18 missiles, the U.S. would need around 16,000 defensive missiles in space. Why so many? Hitting a missile in space is like shooting a bullet with another bullet at incredible speeds. Even the best systems aren't perfect, so multiple interceptors are needed for each incoming threat. Add to that the vastness of space, unpredictable missile paths, and enemy decoys, and the numbers grow quickly.
The challenge gets tougher with time and territory. If decision-makers want just 30 seconds to think before launching interceptors, the number of defensive missiles jumps to 36,000. Protecting additional areas like Alaska or the Midwest would require thousands more. It's like guarding a massive fence line that stretches in every direction—each new section needs its own network of defenders.
The Golden Dome is a response to a rapidly changing threat. For years, U.S. defenses focused on missiles coming over the North Pole from places like Russia. But new hypersonic missiles can change direction mid-flight, and 'fractional orbital' missiles circle the Earth before striking. Intelligence reports now show potential attacks from all directions—north, south, east, and west. Canada, a close ally, is even considering joining the project, as it faces similar risks.
But the Golden Dome isn't just about defense—it's part of a larger battle for control of space. Russia and China are developing weapons to destroy satellites, which the Golden Dome would rely on. Russia's Cosmos 2553 satellite, for instance, is suspected to be a test for a nuclear bomb that could wipe out satellites across vast areas. China, meanwhile, is building anti-satellite weapons at an alarming pace, according to U.S. Space Command.
Space is no longer just for exploration or communication. It's a new battleground where nations are racing to build defenses while creating weapons to disable each other's satellites. This creates a dangerous cycle: America plans to deploy thousands of satellites for the Golden Dome, while Russia and China develop tools to take them out.
The stakes are higher than military defense. Satellites power everyday life—phone calls, internet, GPS navigation, even banking and power grids rely on precise timing from space. Attacks like jamming (blocking GPS signals) or spoofing (sending fake signals) are already on the rise. If space weapons destroy these satellites, it could disrupt everything from ATMs to traffic lights.
The competition in space is getting intense. Russia's Cosmos 2576 satellite recently shadowed an American spy satellite, raising fears of a potential space weapon. China's TJS-4 satellite cleverly used the sun's shadow to hide from an American surveillance satellite. France is now exploring 'bodyguard' systems to protect its satellites with robots or lasers. Even the U.S. is playing this game—last month, an American satellite 'buzzed' two Chinese satellites, coming dangerously close in a provocative move.
This cat-and-mouse game in space shows how nations are using satellites to stalk, intimidate, and outsmart each other. What was once a peaceful frontier is now a high-tech battlefield, with each side accusing the other of the same aggressive tactics they use themselves.
The Golden Dome is a bold idea, but it comes with big questions. Can America afford a project that could cost half a trillion dollars? Will it deliver the near-perfect protection Trump promises? And how will it fare in a space increasingly crowded with threats? As the U.S. pushes forward, it must balance ambition with reality, ensuring this shield doesn't become a golden dream too costly to achieve.
( Girish Linganna is an award-winning science communicator and a Defence, Aerospace & Geopolitical Analyst. He is the Managing Director of ADD Engineering Components India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of ADD Engineering GmbH, Germany. Contact: girishlinganna@gmail.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
12 minutes ago
- United News of India
Trump takes jab at Biden, says his administration prevented Russia-Ukraine war from becoming a WWIII
Washington, Aug 9 (UNI) Taking a jab at his predecessor Joe Biden, US President Donald Trump said that the Russia-Ukraine war could have escalated into a third world war, were it for his administration. He further argued that global tensions peaked when relations between Moscow and Washington hit their lowest point during the Biden administration, reports RT. Since his return to office, Trump has resumed diplomatic ties with Moscow which had been virtually suspended in 2022 during the Biden administration, and has indeed made calls with both Putin and Zelensky to come to a settlement. However, while he shares good ties with the Russian President, his efforts have not yielded much success while his policies have been a lot more anti-Kremlin, weaponising trade in an attempt to get Moscow to stop its attack on Kyiv, targeting both Moscow as well as Russia affiliated nations. Speaking to journalists at the White House on Friday, Trump claimed that, if not for his administration's actions, the Ukraine conflict 'would have ended up being a world war." 'We've brought it down a long way, but when I first came in, I thought, 'Wow, this thing is really bad,'' Trump added. 'Now the only question is: when is it going to be settled? And it could be very soon,' he said. The president again termed the ongoing war 'Biden's war' and criticised what he described as the previous administration's vast military support for Kyiv. 'Through Biden and his people, we're probably in for $350 billion,' he said. Trump has claimed that he aims to recover this sum through a rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine, which he states could refill the US coffers. However, many analysts have called the move a folly, as majority of the minerals lie in areas such as Donetsk and Luhansk – both of which have become a part of Russia. While Washington has echoed Moscow's position on the conflict – terming it as a proxy war against Russia – the Trump administration has continued with its weapons exports to Ukraine, supplying the country with both Patriot missile batteries, as well as Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, artillery systems, and anti-tank munitions. Kremlin officials have stated that securing a peaceful resolution will be the central focus of the bilateral meeting between Trump and Putin. UNI XC ANV GNK
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Shyam Sankar: Disruptor-in-chief
In Silicon Valley, where startups often burn bright and vanish fast, Palantir Technologies has defied the odds. Over the past year, the software company's stock has soared more than 600%, making it the best-performing AI name in the S&P 500 and one of the decade's biggest tech-success stories. On August 9, shares closed a record $186.96, pushing the company's market cap north of $443 billion. At the centre of this rise is Shyam Sankar, Palantir's Mumbai-born Chief Technology Officer. On July 25, his net worth crossed $1.3 billion as the company's stock soared. Raised in Orlando, Mr. Sankar earned a BS in electrical and computer engineering from Cornell University and an MS in management science and engineering from Stanford University. Known as a 'slayer of bureaucracy', he has spent over two decades building disruptive software and AI solutions for government and private clients. Mr. Sankar first learned about Palantir when a friend mentioned a small, stealthy, yet exciting software start-up looking for its first business hire in a largely technical role. The friend introduced him to one of the founders, and after seeing version 0.7 of the app, meeting a team of 'brilliant' people, and hearing about the company's mission, Mr. Sankar knew exactly where he wanted to be. Founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel — a crucial backer of Donald Trump's first presidential campaign — along with Alex Karp, Joe Lonsdale, and Stephen Cohen, the Silicon Valley unicorn was initially funded by In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital arm. It built its early reputation serving the U.S. government, particularly national security agencies, with a founding vision of harnessing man–machine symbiosis to help American and allied intelligence communities share data securely and prevent another 9/11 without compromising civil liberties. Since joining Palantir in 2006 as its 13th employee, Mr. Sankar has pioneered the 'forward deployed engineer' model — embedding engineers directly with clients to tackle urgent, real-world challenges in real time. This approach was key to the success of Palantir's business model. Now headquartered in Denver, Palantir's platforms include Gotham, Foundry, and its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP). Its name, drawn from J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, refers to 'seeing stones' that reveal hidden truths. Inside the company, the unofficial motto — 'Save the Shire' — reflects its mission in plain terms: protect America from threats. Palantir's technology centralises and analyses large and disparate datasets, with applications ranging from tracking enemy drones for soldiers to monitoring ship parts for sailors, to assisting health officials in processing drug approvals. In 2020, it went public via a direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange. When the company's profile and operations expanded, so did Mr. Sankar's role. Leadership role In January 2023, he was made the CTO and executive vice-president. 'Under his leadership, Palantir transformed from a Silicon Valley start-up to a global, industry leading software and AI company,' reads Mr. Sankar's profile on his Substack page. Today, Palantir counts more than 30 U.S. federal agencies and a group of Fortune 500 companies as clients. In the second quarter of 2025, it posted $1 billion in revenue — up 48% from a year earlier — beating Wall Street forecasts. In the first half of 2025, it pulled in more than $322 million from federal contracts, a 12% increase from two years earlier. The U.S. Army, once an adversary in a contracting dispute, has become one of its biggest customers. In June, Mr. Sankar himself was commissioned into the Army Reserve, a symbolic move that underscored Palantir's alignment with military priorities. Some Pentagon officials have voiced concern about over-reliance on a single contractor for core data-processing needs. Palantir's reputation as a rapid-response problem solver was cemented during crises. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, it built systems to track the virus and vaccine distribution. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Palantir's technology got integrated into multiple Ukrainian government and military agencies. Similarly, days after the Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023, Mr. Karp — who is Jewish — flew with senior executives to Tel Aviv. Following a January 10 meeting with Israel's Defence Ministry officials, Palantir entered a strategic partnership with Israel to provide technology to aid its war efforts. The move drew criticism from pro-Palestinian activists in the U.S. At home, Palantir drew flak for a government contract to build an app that integrates data from across the government to assist with immigration enforcement. With debates still simmering, Palantir is looking beyond U.S. borders. It is pursuing lucrative contracts in Saudi Arabia, from overhauling the country's healthcare system to helping build Neom, a futuristic megacity in the desert that has collided with practical and financial challenges. But for Mr. Sankar and Mr. Karp, controversies are part of Palantir's DNA. Regarding working with different government agencies on data processing and other projects, Mr. Sankar once said, it's like 'shining a light on the battle space'. 'The things that you couldn't see before, you could see now...'
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump–Newsom feud could end the governor's career as White House bid looms
Political Attacks and Counterattacks Live Events What Lies Ahead in the 2028 Presidential Election FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The political tension between California Governor Gavin Newsom and U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified over recent months, resulting in conflicts that could influence the 2028 presidential election . Newsom, a leading Democrat, and Trump, the prominent Republican figure, have clashed over major issues such as immigration enforcement , governance, and state versus federal early 2025, federal authorities, under the direction of the Trump led Department of Homeland Security, initiated aggressive immigration raids across Los Angeles and other California locations. These raids focused undocumented immigrants and were part of a broader operation meant to prevent illegal border crossings. It instantly sparked issues, leading to protests involving thousands of demonstrators who protested the raids as inhumane and politically influenced. Governor Newsom opposed the actions, stating that they were made to coerce immigrant communities and obstruct local federal government's response to the protests was unprecedented. To assist local law enforcement and secure federal facilities, National Guard troops and Marines were deployed to different California cities. Newsom criticized this militarized approach, stating it as an intrusion of federal power that violated state sovereignty. In retaliation, his administration filed lawsuits aimed at halting the deployment and protection of immigrant rights. This legal battle further escalated the resentment between Newsom and Trump, with each side accusing the other of sabotaging the rule of from the immigration dispute, Trump has constantly targeted Newsom's record as governor, mainly focusing on California's expensive and delayed infrastructure projects like the high speed rail project of the state. Trump portrayed Newsom as a failed leader who mismanages taxpayer dollars and burdens residents with costs and taxes. These attacks have received traction among conservative voters and have been a crucial element of Trump's strategy to weaken Democratic leadership on the West turn, Newsom has used these attacks to galvanize his base, depicting Trump's criticism as part of an effort to divert from national Republican failures. He has positioned himself as a progressive defender standing up to Trump's discourse and policies. By increasing his visibility in national debates and utilizing the immigration controversy, Newsom appears to be setting a place for a future presidential run or greater influence in the Democratic Party As the 2028 presidential election nears, the rivalry between Newsom and Trump is expected to be a central plotline in American politics. Newsom's ability to maintain public support apart from Trump's aggressive critiques will be important to his political future. Similarly, Trump's constant attempts to dismantle Democratic policies and gain Republican dominance will test the endurance of leaders like Newsom.A1. Donald Trump is a former President of the United States and a leading figure in the Republican Party A2 Gavin Newsom is the Governor of California and a member of the Democratic Party.
