
African grey court battle sparks debate on parrot welfare and pet safety
Cheeky Beaks is a non-profit organisation dedicated to rescuing and re-homing parrots across the country. Steyn, who has 20 years of experience with parrots, not only wrote an article about the harms of cohabitation with other animals in 2024, but reiterated the fact in an interview with Lowvelder: 'Mammal saliva is toxic to birds (including human saliva) and it is a cause for concern. If your bird ingests this, or a wound is inflicted, whether intentional or not, it can prove to be fatal.'
In her article, Steyn elaborated: 'If a predator pet plays with a bird, it can lead to wounds or scratches that go unseen underneath a bird's many feathers. Even a small scratch can be lethal due to the possibility of bacterial transfer going unnoticed. Coupled with the fact that birds will always try to hide their injuries or illnesses for as long as they can, chances are you won't know something is wrong until it's too late.'
The well-being of an African grey with two names, Zazu and Zippy, has captured the attention of readers since an article about the custody battle between Crystle Pachos and Obert Ntuli appeared on the front page of last week's Lowvelder.
Pachos – whose bird Zazu flew away in early 2020 and was found in May 2021 – remains determined to reclaim her beloved 'boy'. After three rounds in court, she maintains the African grey is hers and she can prove it.
Ntuli, a local attorney, maintains the bird is his. In an unopposed court proceeding, he obtained a court order in April to have 'Zippy' returned – through the order was not based on ownership.
In Pachos' home, 'Zazu' had a cage filled with toys and daily interaction with Pachos. At night, the cage was covered with a blanket.
In Ntuli's home, 'Zippy' roams freely in an enclosed area with a big tree. The bird shares the space with two other African greys and five toy pom dogs, and sleeps in the tree, in the one cage or 'with the dogs' in the two dog shelters provided.
Opinions on cohabitation differ
SPCA Nelspruit's opinion on the matter was addressed by its chairperson, Jason Blockley, who said: 'Lifelong confinement deprives African grey parrots of the ability to express natural behaviours and can lead to serious physical and psychological harm.
'Cohabitation arrangements are assessed on the welfare, safety, and species-specific needs of all animals. In this case, the dogs have adequate shelter and space, and the birds can move between the outdoors and the indoor area.'
Steyn disagrees: 'We have had numerous cases of birds coming into our care after an incident in a multi-pet household where they were left unsupervised and the bird had sustained some serious injuries. In these cases, whether the birds are surrendered or not, the vet bills can be staggering. It is entirely possible to have a multi-pet household; however, predator and prey animals should never be left together unsupervised, even if a bird is locked in a cage or you trust your other pets unconditionally. Accidents can still happen.'
The SPCA said Ntuli confirmed the birds had access to the house at all times, sheltering them from inclement weather, including rain, cold temperatures and thunderstorms.
Blockley said an inspector of the SPCA visited 'Zippy' at Ntuli's house and found no actionable contraventions of the Animals Protection Act. 'We have made further recommendations regarding diet to ensure optimal nutrition.'
Parrot behaviour a lot like humans
Steyn specialises in avian behaviour and collaborates with experts in the field worldwide.
She studied the videos used in Lowvelder's article and shared her opinion:
'I can confirm that most African greys choose one person as an owner. They are a lot like humans. They might like more than one person, almost like extended family, but they will usually never be as close with them as their person. There are exceptions, and some may not be extremely close even with their chosen person, but the bond is still very clear.
'When I studied the videos and photos of the bird with Pachos, he was on her head and shoulder and showed extreme hormonal behaviour. The parrot's bum was flat against her head and shoulder with open wings, showing his affection.'
By contrast, Steyn said that 'Zippy', in the videos of his release, didn't display positive behaviour.
About 'Zippy's' interaction with Ntuli, Steyn commented: 'He was not happy. He kept walking backwards while the man was swirling his hand around him. He did not lean into the behaviour; he rather opted to take a step back. Some birds would like this type of interaction, but they would behave differently and lean into it or engage back.'
According to Steyn, only time will tell whether Zippy will adapt well to his new environment.
'Birds adapt. It is their instinct to do so, but one can't determine how well it will go. He might follow the lead of the other parrots, as we often witness when introducing a parrot into new surroundings. It is stressful for the bird, and if he is not happy in the long run, it could lead to self-mutilation.'
Cheeky Beaks supports birds living more freely: 'We aim and educate bird owners to let their birds live as close to nature as possible. When people buy birds, they don't always have the knowledge to give them the proper, comprehensive care they need.
'However, they can't simply be released back into the wild if they were bred and raised in captivity, as they no longer have strong survival instincts. We encourage owners to allow their birds as much time outside their cages as possible, avoid clipping them if feasible, and provide ample foraging opportunities, along with a nutritious diet,' Steyn added.
Social media storm
A social media storm erupted after the parrot saga was published.
Maria Cato directed her comment at Ntuli: 'The bird is clearly not yours. I don't know what you try to accomplish by taking the bird away from his/her owner. Why is there an assessment done if the court ruled in favour of the wrong owner? I have an African grey and let me tell you one thing, I will fight till I die to get my bird back!!'
Mandie Fouche defended Ntuli and posted: 'Sorry folks, unfortunately not all the information and evidence has been posted in this article, thus it has created a biased opinion among readers', but did not provide further evidence after being probed by other social media users.
Caging birds is harmful – SPCA
SPCA Nelspruit reacted to the social media posts with: 'We'd like to clarify that the Nelspruit SPCA is first and foremost opposed to keeping wildlife as pets and, secondly, firmly opposed to the caging of animals, including birds such as African greys.'
It further stated that Ntuli's birds have coexisted peacefully with dogs for a long time without incident. Their instincts allow them to move away when they feel uncomfortable or unsafe.
Lowvelder asked the SPCA why, if the organisation believes birds should not be caged, it has not intensified attempts to curb their sale.
They replied: 'There is a clear distinction between our law enforcement capability and our policy position (ie, our belief system in terms of our statement of policy). The SPCA operates under the Animals Protection Act No 71 of 1962, which empowers us to act in cases of cruelty but does not regulate the sale of animals. Where contraventions are identified, action is taken in terms of the law.'
On Tuesday afternoon, a petition to bring 'Zazu' home and protect the emotional welfare of African grey parrots was launched on the Support Change.org website.
Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel.
Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
Read original story on www.citizen.co.za

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Rhodes University honours Justice Lex Mpati with law building naming
The law faculty of Rhodes University will be named after Justice Lex Mpati. Image: Christelle du Toit Rhodes University's Faculty of Law will officially name its iconic law building in honour of one of its most distinguished alumni and the revered outgoing Chancellor, Justice Lex Mpati. This forms part of its 120th anniversary, marking more than a century of academic excellence and profound contributions to the South African legal landscape. As a testament to this enduring legacy and its pivotal role in shaping the nation's jurisprudence, it will honour Justice Lex Mpati by naming the faculty after him. 'This occasion signifies a commitment to recognising visionary leaders and inspiring future generations who will uphold the rule of law across South Africa,' Judge Gerald Bloem, Council Chairperson of Rhodes University said. He added that Justice Mpati's life and career embody the core values our institution promotes, which includes integrity, excellence, and social justice. 'His jurisprudence consistently demonstrates a deep commitment to constitutional values, like equality and human dignity,' said Judge Bloem. Rhodes University Vice-Chancellor, Professor Sizwe Mabizela said: 'Justice Mpati was a father figure to me and someone who was a source of wisdom. He is an integrity personified – a quintessential gentleman and the embodiment of humility.' Justice Mpati was the first African to be Chancellor of Rhodes University. Dean of Law, Professor Michelle Karels, meanwhile said coming from a background where he experienced the injustices of apartheid firsthand, Justice Mpati's rise to prominence represents the transformation the university seeks to inspire in their students – using law as a tool for positive social change. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'Justice Mpati's leadership has demonstrated his commitment to accountability, transparency, and ethical governance – principles we aim to instill in our future legal professionals,' he said. The naming ceremony, set to take place on August 26 at the Rhodes University Law Building in Makhanda, marks a pivotal moment in the 120-year celebrations and will convene an esteemed assembly of South Africa's most prominent legal figures, judicial leaders, and valued alumni. It is said that this gathering serves not only to celebrate Justice Mpati's extraordinary legacy but also to ensure that the Lex Mpati name will stand as a daily reminder of what can be achieved through dedication to legal principles, commitment to education, and unwavering integrity. Justice Mpati was born in Durban in 1949 and he obtained his BA in 1982 and LLB in 1984 from Rhodes University. He rose from a legal clerk to becoming President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. He was a former Judge of the Eastern Cape Division and later President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. He was also an acting judge in the Constitutional Court in 2007. Beyond his judicial work, Justice Mpati chaired the Commission of Inquiry into allegations of impropriety at the Public Investment Corporation (PIC). He served as Chancellor of Rhodes University for 13 years, bridging the world of academic legal education and judicial practice. His lectures, mentorship, and guidance have inspired generations of law students, many of whom have served in various capacities in our legal system. He has consistently advocated for access to justice and legal education for all South Africans.


The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
African grey court battle sparks debate on parrot welfare and pet safety
Allowing parrots to live with other animals can put their lives at risk, warns Mieke Steyn, an avian specialist and a manager at Cheeky Beaks Parrot Rescue. Cheeky Beaks is a non-profit organisation dedicated to rescuing and re-homing parrots across the country. Steyn, who has 20 years of experience with parrots, not only wrote an article about the harms of cohabitation with other animals in 2024, but reiterated the fact in an interview with Lowvelder: 'Mammal saliva is toxic to birds (including human saliva) and it is a cause for concern. If your bird ingests this, or a wound is inflicted, whether intentional or not, it can prove to be fatal.' In her article, Steyn elaborated: 'If a predator pet plays with a bird, it can lead to wounds or scratches that go unseen underneath a bird's many feathers. Even a small scratch can be lethal due to the possibility of bacterial transfer going unnoticed. Coupled with the fact that birds will always try to hide their injuries or illnesses for as long as they can, chances are you won't know something is wrong until it's too late.' The well-being of an African grey with two names, Zazu and Zippy, has captured the attention of readers since an article about the custody battle between Crystle Pachos and Obert Ntuli appeared on the front page of last week's Lowvelder. Pachos – whose bird Zazu flew away in early 2020 and was found in May 2021 – remains determined to reclaim her beloved 'boy'. After three rounds in court, she maintains the African grey is hers and she can prove it. Ntuli, a local attorney, maintains the bird is his. In an unopposed court proceeding, he obtained a court order in April to have 'Zippy' returned – through the order was not based on ownership. In Pachos' home, 'Zazu' had a cage filled with toys and daily interaction with Pachos. At night, the cage was covered with a blanket. In Ntuli's home, 'Zippy' roams freely in an enclosed area with a big tree. The bird shares the space with two other African greys and five toy pom dogs, and sleeps in the tree, in the one cage or 'with the dogs' in the two dog shelters provided. Opinions on cohabitation differ SPCA Nelspruit's opinion on the matter was addressed by its chairperson, Jason Blockley, who said: 'Lifelong confinement deprives African grey parrots of the ability to express natural behaviours and can lead to serious physical and psychological harm. 'Cohabitation arrangements are assessed on the welfare, safety, and species-specific needs of all animals. In this case, the dogs have adequate shelter and space, and the birds can move between the outdoors and the indoor area.' Steyn disagrees: 'We have had numerous cases of birds coming into our care after an incident in a multi-pet household where they were left unsupervised and the bird had sustained some serious injuries. In these cases, whether the birds are surrendered or not, the vet bills can be staggering. It is entirely possible to have a multi-pet household; however, predator and prey animals should never be left together unsupervised, even if a bird is locked in a cage or you trust your other pets unconditionally. Accidents can still happen.' The SPCA said Ntuli confirmed the birds had access to the house at all times, sheltering them from inclement weather, including rain, cold temperatures and thunderstorms. Blockley said an inspector of the SPCA visited 'Zippy' at Ntuli's house and found no actionable contraventions of the Animals Protection Act. 'We have made further recommendations regarding diet to ensure optimal nutrition.' Parrot behaviour a lot like humans Steyn specialises in avian behaviour and collaborates with experts in the field worldwide. She studied the videos used in Lowvelder's article and shared her opinion: 'I can confirm that most African greys choose one person as an owner. They are a lot like humans. They might like more than one person, almost like extended family, but they will usually never be as close with them as their person. There are exceptions, and some may not be extremely close even with their chosen person, but the bond is still very clear. 'When I studied the videos and photos of the bird with Pachos, he was on her head and shoulder and showed extreme hormonal behaviour. The parrot's bum was flat against her head and shoulder with open wings, showing his affection.' By contrast, Steyn said that 'Zippy', in the videos of his release, didn't display positive behaviour. About 'Zippy's' interaction with Ntuli, Steyn commented: 'He was not happy. He kept walking backwards while the man was swirling his hand around him. He did not lean into the behaviour; he rather opted to take a step back. Some birds would like this type of interaction, but they would behave differently and lean into it or engage back.' According to Steyn, only time will tell whether Zippy will adapt well to his new environment. 'Birds adapt. It is their instinct to do so, but one can't determine how well it will go. He might follow the lead of the other parrots, as we often witness when introducing a parrot into new surroundings. It is stressful for the bird, and if he is not happy in the long run, it could lead to self-mutilation.' Cheeky Beaks supports birds living more freely: 'We aim and educate bird owners to let their birds live as close to nature as possible. When people buy birds, they don't always have the knowledge to give them the proper, comprehensive care they need. 'However, they can't simply be released back into the wild if they were bred and raised in captivity, as they no longer have strong survival instincts. We encourage owners to allow their birds as much time outside their cages as possible, avoid clipping them if feasible, and provide ample foraging opportunities, along with a nutritious diet,' Steyn added. Social media storm A social media storm erupted after the parrot saga was published. Maria Cato directed her comment at Ntuli: 'The bird is clearly not yours. I don't know what you try to accomplish by taking the bird away from his/her owner. Why is there an assessment done if the court ruled in favour of the wrong owner? I have an African grey and let me tell you one thing, I will fight till I die to get my bird back!!' Mandie Fouche defended Ntuli and posted: 'Sorry folks, unfortunately not all the information and evidence has been posted in this article, thus it has created a biased opinion among readers', but did not provide further evidence after being probed by other social media users. Caging birds is harmful – SPCA SPCA Nelspruit reacted to the social media posts with: 'We'd like to clarify that the Nelspruit SPCA is first and foremost opposed to keeping wildlife as pets and, secondly, firmly opposed to the caging of animals, including birds such as African greys.' It further stated that Ntuli's birds have coexisted peacefully with dogs for a long time without incident. Their instincts allow them to move away when they feel uncomfortable or unsafe. Lowvelder asked the SPCA why, if the organisation believes birds should not be caged, it has not intensified attempts to curb their sale. They replied: 'There is a clear distinction between our law enforcement capability and our policy position (ie, our belief system in terms of our statement of policy). The SPCA operates under the Animals Protection Act No 71 of 1962, which empowers us to act in cases of cruelty but does not regulate the sale of animals. Where contraventions are identified, action is taken in terms of the law.' On Tuesday afternoon, a petition to bring 'Zazu' home and protect the emotional welfare of African grey parrots was launched on the Support website. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on


Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Loaded for Bear: Much of the reaction to US hunter killed by buffalo in SA is callous and ignorant
If you don't like trophy hunting, fine. But it is important to base opposition on facts. And even if trophy hunting makes you see red, that is no reason to celebrate the death of a human with mocking commentary. On Sunday, 3 August, a US trophy hunter was killed by a charging Cape buffalo at a reserve in Limpopo. Asher Watkins (52) was a Texas millionaire and rancher – a demographic that, combined with his status as a hunter, makes him a barn door-sized target for vilification by animal rights activists. 'Is there a picture of the buffalo standing behind his trophy,' was one of the many disparaging comments made on the Facebook link to the Times' story. 'Sounds like poetic justice,' read one. 'What the phrase tough shit was invented for,' was another. One person posted: 'The comments section is renewing my faith in humanity.' These are just a few samples, and it boils down to a celebration of 'poetic justice' because a reviled trophy hunter was gored to death by an animal he was hunting. A lot of people simply detest hunting, and a lot of people who don't mind hunting in general dislike trophy hunting. This is fuelling campaigns to ban the import of hunted trophies – with Africa the main focus – in countries such as the UK. Distaste for trophy hunting is understandable. But many of the campaigns against it are rooted in misinformation and conceal the spoor of the vital role that hunting plays in conservation. Such campaigns ignore the demonstrable conservation benefits of hunting and in a misleading manner often say things like 'endangered animals can still be hunted', implying that charismatic species such as elephants and lions are 'endangered' by trophy hunting. No species of African animal is being driven to extinction because of trophy hunting – I have yet to find a peer-reviewed article in a reputable scientific journal making that case – and there are countless examples of how the revenue raised provides incentives to landowners and communities to protect and conserve dangerous wildlife. If you don't like trophy hunting, fine. But base your opposition on facts. If it comes down to revulsion at images of hunters standing over animals with rifles, fine. Just keep in mind that this is the vein of emotion that NGOs mine when they ask for a donation beneath an image of 'Cecil the Lion'. Also keep in mind the role that trophy hunting plays in conservation. It is true that the hunting industry can inflate its economic and conservation contributions. But the ecological value of alternatives such as photographic wildlife tourism are also often inflated. Indeed, there is a mountain of evidence that 'non-consumptive' wildlife tourism has a massive ecological footprint and can disturb animals. Take the mad stampede of vehicles so tourists can take pictures of the Serengeti wildebeest migration. Safari guide Nick Kleer expressed his outrag e last month when he witnessed more than 100 vehicles converging on a river crossing point in Tanzania, causing mayhem and confusion for humans and wildebeest alike. 'This morning in Serengeti National Park, I witnessed some of the most shocking behaviour I've ever seen. Not from the animals, but from the people meant to protect them,' Kleer wrote on Instagram. 'Guides and rangers were allowing, and even encouraging, their guests to block wildebeest river crossings. Guests were out of their vehicles. Hundreds of people were crowding the banks. The wildebeest tried again and again to cross, but access was cut off repeatedly.' This may be an extreme example, but non-consumptive wildlife tourism has a bigger negative ecological impact than hunting on many fronts: reserves to accommodate game watchers tend to have more roads and amenities than hunting lodges and because many more people 'shoot at' animals with a camera than a rifle, the carbon emissions linked to the sector are far larger. It is also revealing to note that tourists who want to explore Big Five country on foot are almost always guided by armed rangers trained to shoot to kill a dangerous animal if it charges. And yet it is somehow acceptable to risk an encounter with a large animal that might prove fatal to it so that tourists can seek the thrill of walking in a dangerous game country. That does not mean non-consumptive wildlife tourism does not have an important place in conservation – it does. It's simply to point out that it is not a panacea and can have questionable environmental outcomes. I'm also not trying to 'greenwash' the hunting industry. Trophy hunting, for example, can negatively impact local populations of species such as lions and there is legitimate debate about things such as the 'six-old-year' rule for harvesting males. Watkins, the Texan killed by a buffalo in the Limpopo bush, would have been aware of the risks of stalking Cape buffalo on foot. Part of the allure of trophy hunting potentially menacing game, is the same thing that attracts many of the people who embark on walking photographic safaris in big-critter country – the element of danger. Would anyone make sarcastic social media comments about a tourist killed on such a walking excursion by a charging buffalo? I would guess not, but that animal was probably shot dead moments later, or tracked down and killed later – and it is only dead because humans chose to walk in its terrain. Watkins paid for his passion with his life, but even if trophy hunting makes you see red, that is no reason to celebrate the death of a human with mocking commentary. I have also seen this when a suspected rhino poacher has been killed by lions or elephants in the Kruger National Park – glib mockery along the lines of 'the bastard had it coming to him'. For rhino poachers, their motive is not the pleasure derived from killing protected animals – it is usually poverty, which underscores the point that the Kruger is hardly generating sufficient jobs and revenue for its surrounding communities. In Watkins's case, he was a visiting overseas tourist making a small but positive legal contribution to South Africa's economy and conservation efforts. And that Cape buffalo probably would not have been in that area if it was not for the hunting industry. Celebrating Watkins's death sheds light on the dark side of animal rights activism, and the callousness and ignorance that drives much of it. DM