UnitedHealth shares fall after HSBC downgrades rating, says shares not cheap enough
HSBC downgraded UnitedHealth shares, saying the recent rout has still not made the shares cheap enough to buy given the risks to earnings head. The firm slashed UnitedHealth's rating reduce from hold on Wednesday, and trimmed its price target to $270 per share from $490. HSBC's forecast implies roughly 16% downside from Tuesday's $321.58 close. Shares are down more than 36% in 2025, as UnitedHealth contends with multiple headwinds which include the exit of its CEO earlier this month as well as a Department of Justice investigation into allegations of fraud. UNH YTD mountain UnitedHealth stock in 2025. "[The] new CEO has opportunity to start on a clean(er) slate, but we see risk to earnings growth along with policy overhang," analyst Sidharth Sahoo wrote on Wednesday. "While the bulls point to a 30% discount to historical P/E as an attractive entry point, we highlight three key reasons that could spoil the recovery journey," added Sahoo, citing higher medical costs, political pressure on drug prices and lower overall profitability ahead, especially if there are cuts to Medicaid spending. The stock trades at a forward price-earnings ratio of just 13, near its lowest of the last 10 years, according to HSBC. UnitedHealth shares were down 6% premarket following the HSBC call. The stock had garnered some interest recently from traders because of how deeply oversold the shares had become. The stock was up 10% since last Friday through Tuesday's close. But HSBC thinks the fundamentals will deteriorate some more, further hitting the stock. "Regaining investor confidence by reminding of the vertically integrated value-based care offering can help UNH recover a part of the premium," wrote the analyst. "But any further downward earnings revision would weigh on ROE and multiples."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers push forward with budget bill
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – Elon Musk's online tirade against Republicans' tax bill has not changed minds in Congress, according to Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.). 'Not a single one,' Scalise said Friday. 'We're more united than we ever have been behind President Trump's agenda. Getting it done, on his desk by July 4th.' Musk turned on the president Thursday. In a series of escalating X posts, he opposed the 'Big Beautiful Bill' over concerns it raises the debt. The bill extends tax cuts, increases funding for border security and cuts Medicaid by adding work requirements. 'I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said. Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene says she doesn't like the cost of the bill either. The Congressional Budget Office says it would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over a decade but Greene says Musk isn't in office. 'People are going to be focused on making sure that we get the agenda we voted for, and that's President Trump's agenda,' Greene said. White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro pushed back on the CBO estimate, calling it 'dead wrong,' and saying it doesn't account for tariffs revenue. 'That dog won't hunt when you do the math properly,' Navarro said. Musk also posted that House Republicans could be at risk in the midterm elections if they vote for the bill. That doesn't alarm Tennessee Congressman Tim Burchett. 'He doesn't vote in my district,' Burchett said. Meanwhile, Democrats, like House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) continue opposing the bill over its cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. 'People will die if the GOP tax scam ever becomes law,' Jeffries said. The Senate continues work on the bill next week. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Vox
19 minutes ago
- Vox
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's fallout, explained
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk have quickly turned on each other in a very public and bitter feud. Their split isn't just personal, but has major implications for the rest of the country, with Musk now strongly opposing Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' It is the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which includes tax cuts, Medicaid reductions, and increased border spending. The proposal would also significantly raise the national debt. Musk took aim at the bill as 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled…a disgusting abomination' that would 'massively increase' the budget deficit. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In response, Trump threatened Musk's federal contracts. Then Musk threatened to start a new political party and accused Trump of covering up 'the Epstein files.'
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Sounds the Alarm on Possible Payment Delays
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Social Security workers are sounding the alarm that some beneficiaries could see payment delays as the agency undergoes significant changes in the next few weeks. Employees at the Social Security Administration (SSA) told USA Today that thousands of Americans could see delays or stopped checks, as officials have instructed workers to focus on roughly 900,000 complicated cases this month. Why It Matters Nearly 70 million Americans rely on Social Security checks each month. As the federal agency implements changes ordered by President Donald Trump's administration, any delays in payments could make a considerable impact on recipients, who often need the money for basics like housing and food. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know SSA employees told USA Today that Social Security recipients who are making simple changes like location or bank account updates could face a longer wait than usual. This will potentially cause delays as the agency focuses on the 900,000 remaining cases, courtesy of the Social Security Fairness Act. "The changes are a response to the Social Security Fairness Act, which provided benefits for those who paid into the system but were otherwise ineligible for Social Security, including police, firefighters, teachers, and other public servants," Drew Powers, founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "More than 2 million of these cases were straightforward enough to be automated, but the remaining 900,000 claims are more complicated and must be approved by hand." Newsweek reached out to the SSA for comment via email on Friday. The White House has said the focus on these cases should not affect current recipients, but employees said it could push back simple changes like updating direct deposit information or Medicaid billing issues. Workers have also been instructed to prioritize the updated payments under the act, which allows retired public service workers to receive increased funds. "Using automation, SSA has already expedited over $15.1 billion in long-delayed retroactive payments to more than 2.3 million individuals affected," White House spokesperson Liz Huston said previously. Workers say they have a deadline to update the remaining Social Security Fairness Act claims by July 1, creating a backlog for those with other issues. What People Are Saying Powers also told Newsweek: "The new directive to prioritize Social Security Fairness Act claims, along with staffing cuts enacted by DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency], is creating a backlog to complete other claims and service work like mailing address and direct deposit changes. These delays could be the difference between receiving your check or not." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "For months, we've been hearing the only cuts to Social Security would be to administrative offices, not to benefits. However, lost in the discussion was how these administrative cuts could provide their own series of problems. Applications for new beneficiaries, account changes for existing ones, and every issue in between these have to be processed, and with fewer employees to assist, delays could be significant." What Happens Next DOGE, created in the early days of Trump's second term, has set out to cut 12 percent of the SSA staff, offering buyouts for those who took early retirement. The remaining workers are being offered weekend overtime to process claims, according to USA Today. "As of right now, there is no need for concern, but the concerns should motivate those receiving benefits to start the process of enrolling, making changes, or anything else as soon as possible. And, most importantly, be prepared to wait," Beene said.
