Israel-Iran air war enters sixth day
Iran and Israel launched new missile strikes at each other on Wednesday as the air war between the two longtime enemies entered a sixth day.
The Israeli military said two barrages of Iranian missiles were launched toward Israel in the first two hours of Wednesday morning. Explosions were heard over Tel Aviv. Israel told residents in a southwestern area of Tehran to evacuate so its air force could strike Iranian military installations.
Iranian news websites said Israel was attacking a university linked to Iran's Revolutionary Guards in the east of the capital.
Iranian news websites said Israel was also attacking a university linked to Iran's Revolutionary Guards in the country's east, and the Khojir ballistic missile facility near Tehran, which was also targeted by Israeli airstrikes last October.
Meanwhile, explosions were heard in Tehran early on Wednesday as intense Israeli airstrikes again targeted Iran's capital in a conflict that a human rights group said had killed at least 585 people across Iran and wounded 1,326 others.
Israeli air defence systems are activated to intercept Iranian missiles over the Israeli city of Tel Aviv early on Wednesday. AFP
Iran has not been publishing regular death tolls during the conflict and has minimized casualties in the past. Its last update, issued on Monday, put the death toll at 224 people killed and 1,277 others wounded.
Iran has retaliated against Israel's airstrike campaign by launching some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel. So far, 24 people have been killed in Israel.
Meanwhile, Iran's police forces intercepted 14 drones and identified hostile drone-producing workshops and drone-carrying vehicles across various provinces, police spokesperson Saeed Montazerolmahdi said on Wednesday according to the Iranian Labour News Agency.
Two flights from Larnaca, Cyprus, landed at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion airport on Wednesday morning, airport spokesperson Lisa Dvir said, marking the first flights to bring Israelis abroad back home since the Israel-Iran conflict began.
Footage showed the first plane gliding down the tarmac after landing in Tel Aviv.
Rocket trails are seen in the sky above the Israeli coastal city of Netanya amid a fresh barrage of Iranian missile attacks on Tuesday. AFP
Israel's minister of transportation, Miri Regev, greeted the captain in the airport's control tower.
"We are waiting for you here with great anticipation,' she told her in Hebrew. "Very excited, first rescue flight.'
Israel closed its airspace to commercial flights because of the multiple volleys of ballistic missiles launched toward the country each day by Iran.
Tens of thousands of Israelis are stranded abroad, according to Israeli media reports.
Chinese authorities are advising all their citizens still in Iran to leave as quickly as possible, citing the "increasing scale and intensity of the Iran-Israel conflict' and the possibility that land borders may soon be closed.
No figures on the number of Chinese nationals in the country were given in the notice issued online Tuesday by the Chinese embassy.
The two countries have long maintained strong trade ties, with China a major buyer of Iranian crude oil and Iran an importer of Chinese consumer goods.
Addresses were given in the notice for the Razi crossing with Turkey, the Nordooz crossing with Armenia, the Astara crossing with Azerbaijan and the Bajgiran crossing with Turkmenistan.
Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
IMO urges ships to check Strait of Hormuz security measures
The International Maritime Organisation has said there were no indications of any increased threat to shipping in the Arabian Gulf, despite Iranian calls for international measures to prevent escalation in the Strait of Hormuz. Fears over a move to close the waterway after Israel's targeting of Iran's nuclear infrastructure are rising. Closure of the strait would disrupt global supply chains, as a fifth of global oil shipments pass through the channel that connects the Gulf to the Arabian Sea. Speaking at the IMO's annual safety meeting on Wednesday, secretary Arsenio Dominguez said no signs of closure or disruption had appeared yet. 'We're not at that stage,' he said, answering a question from The National. Mr Dominguez urged shipping companies to carry out security assessments before attempting to cross the strait. 'You need to carry out the security assessment and then make the decision whether it is appropriate and it is safe for the vessel to transit,' he said. Seyed Ali Mousavi, Iranian representative to the IMO – and also ambassador to the UK – warned in the morning session that increasing danger for ships was becoming apparent, after accusing Israel of attacking an oil refinery and gas field on the coast of Asalouyeh. 'These actions directly endanger international maritime security and the global energy supply chain,' he said. "If the international community fails to take urgent and concrete measures to halt this unlawful aggression, the risk of escalation at sea becomes imminent." The IMO's position is there no sign of a crisis point as yet. 'There's no indication that ships [or] seafarers are being targeted or any expected disruption right now in the region when it comes to maritime trade,' Mr Dominguez said. Mr Mousavi said the IMO was 'mandated to protect' Iran from attacks on its port and maritime infrastructure and criticised Israel for attacks on Iranian oil tankers and ports he said had been taking place since 2019. 'These hybrid threats – combining physical and cyber aggression – represent a multifaceted assault on maritime safety, port security and the freedom of navigation, which this organisation is mandated to protect,' he said. Iranian state TV told the world to brace itself for a major attack, reporting on Wednesday that "tonight, a great surprise will occur – one that the world will remember for centuries". Israel and India also made statements about the war in their addresses to the convention. Mr Dominguez said addressing the conflict was not within the agency's remit, but that it was equipped to act in the event of a 'negative impact' on shipping, as it did during the Red Sea crisis, when the Iran-backed Yemeni militia the Houthis targeted commercial ships crossing the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in response to Israel's war in Gaza, notably when it negotiated the release of the crew of the stricken MV Galaxy Leader last year. 'There's no room for IMO or specific role for IMO to come in at this stage. If things evolve, I will be the first one to start speaking to the countries,' he said. 'I demonstrated clearly, when the ships were targeted in the Red Sea, that's when I spent considerable amount of time in actually talking to the countries, bringing the parties together to address the negative impact that this situation was having on shipping, seafarers, the environment, ships and the economy." Oman – a member state of the agency - served as an intermediary for the Houthis. 'Oman was a country that helped me greatly,' Mr Dominguez said. The Houthis entered a ceasefire agreement with the US in May after an aggressive military campaign. The latest statements Mr Dominguez received from the group since the dea, which they also sent to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, featured 'no indication of targeting ships'. Mr Dominguez addressed the dis r uption to commercial cargoes in the Red Sea. 'The way that trade starts to flow back into the Red Sea is not something that will happen overnight,' he said. 'But we have seen an increase already on trade going through the Red Sea and the Suez.'
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
Is Israel aiming for regime change in Iran?
As Israeli air strikes hammer targets across Iran, officially aimed at dismantling its nuclear and missile infrastructure, questions are being raised about whether the campaign marks the start of a broader push for regime change in Tehran. The name of Israel's air assault – Operation Rising Lion – is a reference to the big cat on Iran's pre-revolutionary flag, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly suggested Iranian citizens rise up against their government. In an interview with Fox News on Sunday, he was asked whether regime change was a goal of the military operation. 'It could certainly be the result, because Iran is very weak,' Mr Netanyahu said. 'The decision to act, to rise up, at this time is the decision of the Iranian people.' He told Israeli journalists the next day that 'this is a very weak regime that now understands how weak it is. We could see many changes in Iran.' Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, has been urging Iranians to rise up, following years of anti-government protests that have been repeatedly met with brutal repression. 'The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing,' he said in video posted on social media. "What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together, we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up, the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon." Mr Pahlavi, who has lived in exile for decades, has long positioned himself as a potential transitional figure for a post-Islamic Republic Iran. But 'Pahlavi is not a politically significant individual', said Ali Alfoneh, author of Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 'Because of his close association with Prime Minister Netanyahu, his public standing is in freefall in Iran, especially as we are seeing increased number of civilian casualties of the Israeli bombings.' 'Encouraging foreign powers to bomb Iran will not increase his popularity at home,' Mr Alfoneh added. 'He should be asked, 'do you really want to be the king of a heap of ruins? Is this really what you want to be a king for?'' French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday warned against any move to alter Iran's leadership with force. 'We don't want Iran to get a nuclear weapon,' Mr Macron said. 'But the biggest error would be to use military strikes to change the regime because it would then be chaos.' Mr Alfoneh said Israel's end goal is not only the destruction of Iran's nuclear and missile programme, or regime change, but the 'fragmentation of Iran as a state'. 'We are seeing tendencies towards the beginning of a civil war, with Iran's periphery regions rebelling against the centre,' he said. 'It is also remarkable that Israel has also targeted mechanised and armoured divisions in north-western parts of Iran." This amounted to a clear indication that Israel is trying to weaken the armoured divisions that would face any Kurdish insurgents. 'Therefore, I'm not expecting the Iranian middle-class to fight the regime at a time and circumstances when there is a very real risk of collapse of the central power in Tehran and a civil war breaking,' Mr Alfoneh said. The people of Iran will all unite to preserve the country 'in spite of the hatred for the regime'. Israeli operations are designed to weaken Iran's military capacity and destabilise its leadership, but regime change is not the explicit goal, a US-based Iran analyst told The National. 'The aim is to force a choice: Iran can maintain its regime or its nuclear programme, not both,' said Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran. 'I don't think regime change is an explicit goal of this operation.' Still, he noted, 'depending on how events play out, it can result in regime collapse that could lead to regime change'. A political member of an Iraqi armed faction dismissed the possibility of regime change in Tehran. 'If the Israelis believe they can defeat 100 million Iranians, they're delusional,' the official said. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Iran's regional adversaries had steadily intensified their demands – from restricting its nuclear programme to now targeting its missile capabilities and openly discussing overthrowing its government. 'We've definitely noticed the escalation in the rhetoric of aggression towards Iran – from preventing it from obtaining nuclear weapons, to banning enrichment on Iranian soil, then banning enrichment altogether, then dismantling the entire nuclear programme, and now to denying Iran the right to missile capabilities and production – all the way to both veiled and open Israeli threats of regime change in Iran,' the official said. Meanwhile, a political figure close to Iran-backed Hezbollah said Israel's military actions against Iran could redefine regional conflict dynamics. 'The developments in the Israeli aggression against Iran may reveal the potential for a change in the rules of the game and how deeply any foreign actor becomes involved in the war, especially given the Israeli narrative of 'regime change',' the source told The National on condition of anonymity. 'That could shift the entire equation.' They denied Iran had sought military help from Hezbollah or allied groups, despite escalating hostilities. 'It's a given that Hezbollah supports Iran politically, in the media and through public solidarity,' they said. 'Tehran neither needs nor has asked for any military assistance from Hezbollah or any other resistance factions. It's inflicting pain on Israel on its own, without any help.'
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
US politicians predict Iran will run out of missiles ‘a lot sooner' than Israel
Iran is expected to exhaust its missile supply much sooner than Israel, members of the US Congress told The National on Wednesday, as the Middle East air war entered its sixth day. A long-running shadow war between Israel and Iran erupted into open conflict last week when Israel launched a large‑scale air and covert strike campaign – including Mossad-backed drone operations – against military and nuclear sites in Iran. The attacks killed senior commanders in the country's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and nuclear scientists, and damaged nuclear sites such as Natanz and Isfahan. Israel said its sweeping assault was necessary to prevent Tehran from moving closer to acquiring a nuclear weapon. An Iranian human rights group in Washington said at least 585 people, including 239 civilians, have been killed and more than 1,300 wounded. Iran has fired some 400 missiles and hundreds of drones in retaliatory strikes that have killed at least 24 people in Israel and wounded hundreds. Some have hit apartment buildings in central Israel, causing heavy damage, and air raid sirens have repeatedly forced Israelis to run for shelter. 'It's sort of a war of attrition with missiles for Iran and defence systems for Israel,' said Representative Jimmy Panetta, a Democrat. 'The Iranians are eating up their national resources on impotent responses. Their allies are turning away from them. Russia is not nearly as engaged as it's been in the past. They're alienating individuals in the region who should be their partners and their domestic situation gets worse every day that they drag this out.' 'I don't believe they have the capabilities to continue producing them [missiles] as quickly as they'll need to if they're going to stay in this conflict,' said Mr Panetta. His comments came during a conversation with The National in Abu Dhabi alongside fellow congressmen Brad Schneider, a Democrat, and Republican members Don Bacon and Zach Nunn. All have a military or national security background, with Mr Panetta, Mr Nunn and Mr Bacon having served in the armed forces. 'We saw larger salvos earlier. Now there are only smaller ones, which indicates they're having a hard time getting missiles to the launchers,' said Mr Bacon. 'Some speculate they're also running low, because they're firing far fewer now.' Iran's stockpile of ballistic missiles capable of hitting Israel was estimated to be around 2,000 before Israel launched Operation Rising Lion last Friday, according to Israeli intelligence. US commander General Kenneth McKenzie said in 2022 that Iran had more than 3,000 missiles capable of various ranges. The lawmakers stressed continued US support for Israel's defence and said Iran finds itself today in a "much weaker' position. Potential US involvement Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that his country 'will not surrender', in response to remarks made by US President Donald Trump. He also warned that any direct American involvement in Israel's war would lead to 'irreparable' consequences for the US. 'The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened,' he said in a televised speech. Mr Trump had earlier cautioned Iran that any attacks on US interest in the region would be met with 'the full strength and might' of the American military. 'We've made it clear: if there are attacks on American assets – especially the 40,000 troops we have in the region – we will respond in any way necessary to defend ourselves and our men and women in uniform,' said Mr Panetta. Trump limits Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, a member of the Senate armed services and foreign relations committees, introduced on Monday a bill that would block Mr Trump from using the American military in a conflict against Iran without explicit authorisation from Congress. Mr Nunn has reservations about restricting presidential powers. 'I don't want to put handcuffs on the President when he is trying to be in the best possible position to defend US interests,' he said. 'We're working together with 47 other members on a compendium of maximum pressure sanctions against Iran that the President can leverage immediately with Congress's backing, not only to push Iran to de-escalate but also to apply pressure where necessary.' The members of Congress said diplomacy remains a preferred option, emphasising that there is still a window for a nuclear deal. Since April, the US and Iran have held five rounds of negotiations in Rome and Muscat. The talks aimed to contain Iran's nuclear advances and prevent a regional confrontation, with both sides signalling cautious optimism. A sixth round was scheduled to take place last Sunday. However, two days earlier, Israel launched what it called 'pre-emptive' strikes against Tehran. Mr Trump had given Iran a 60-day deadline to reach a deal or face severe repercussions. Israel's operation began at dawn on day 61. Asked about whether the war amounts to an attempt to force regime change in Tehran, the politicians responded, 'That's going to be up to the people of Iran.' Degraded proxies Although the Iranians are at their weakest point in decades, their nuclear programme is at its strongest in decades, the congressmen said. 'According to the people we've been listening to, they know Khamenei made a decision to develop a nuclear weapon. So the Israelis said, 'We can't wait any longer,'' said Mr Schneider. Last week, the UN nuclear watchdog 's 35-nation board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. A central issue was Iran's failure to provide the International Atomic Energy Agency with credible explanations of how uranium traces detected at undeclared sites in Iran came to be there despite the agency having investigated the issue for years. Iran insists its programme is for civilian purposes and that it does not seek a nuclear bomb. Politicians believe that with many of its proxy groups degraded, Iran now sees nuclear weapons as its last reliable deterrent. Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza have both suffered severe losses in wars with Israel. The Houthis in Yemen have also faced setbacks: US-led strikes have halved their offensive capabilities. The regime of former Syrian president Bashar Al Assad – once a critical partner in Iran's regional axis – was toppled last year. 'Their only deterrent now would be their nukes,' said Mr Panetta. The House members said that Iran's proxies are incapable of offering meaningful defence. 'Whether or not they choose to act is going to be at their own risk – with consequences,' added Mr Panetta. Abraham Accords Mr Schneider said that the 'path to a more secure, prosperous and peaceful Middle East is through the Abraham Accords', referring to a series of normalisation agreements signed in 2020 between Israel and several Arab countries. Before the Gaza war erupted in October 2023, Saudi Arabia was in advanced talks to join the Abraham Accords and normalise relations with Israel, in a deal mediated by the US. However, the war and Israel's military campaign in Gaza halted the momentum, with Riyadh publicly emphasising the need for a credible path towards a Palestinian state before moving forward. 'We're not going to have a decision tomorrow on what happens in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank,' said Mr Nunn. 'But what we do know is there was great economic opportunity and greater security through peaceful relations. There's a mutual threat coming from Iran. And every time Iran fires off a weapon, it goes over Iraq, Jordan, Syria and others, posing a mutual risk.'
