What to know about the man charged with trying to assassinate Trump in Florida
A man charged with attempting to assassinate president Donald Trump in South Florida last year was back in court this week, asking a federal judge to let him represent himself, as prosecutors tried to block him from introducing irrelevant evidence during trial.
Ryan Routh's court-appointed federal public defenders on Thursday asked to be taken off the case, saying he had refused repeated attempts to meet with their team.
Separately, prosecutors trying the case asked a judge ahead of the September trial to rule out the introduction of inadmissible evidence, such as Routh's previous writings, that may unfairly influence jurors. The judge was planning to hear arguments over that matter on Friday.
Here's what to know about the case.
The judge lets Ryan Routh represent himself US District Judge Aileen Cannon signed off Thursday on Ryan Routh's request to represent himself during his trial but said court-appointed attorneys need to remain as standby counsel.
The judge told Routh that she believed it was a bad idea for Routh to represent himself, but he wouldn't be dissuaded. Routh, who has described the extent of his education as two years of college after earning his GED certificate, told Cannon that he understood and would be ready.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now
Tips and Tricks
Undo
On Friday, the judge was hearing a motion from prosecutors to limit unrelated evidence at trial. "As the Court knows, Routh has been very explicit in his desire to turn this trial into a circus where his supposed good character is weighed against the President's," the prosecutors wrote.
Routh is a self-styled mercenary leader The 59-year-old Routh was a North Carolina construction worker who in recent years had moved to Hawaii.
A self-styled mercenary leader, Routh spoke out to anyone who would listen about his dangerous, sometimes violent plans to insert himself into conflicts around the world, witnesses have told The Associated Press.
In the early days of the war in Ukraine, Routh tried to recruit soldiers from Afghanistan, Moldova and Taiwan to fight the Russians. In his native Greensboro, North Carolina, he had a 2002 arrest for eluding a traffic stop and barricading himself from officers with a fully automatic machine gun and a "weapon of mass destruction," which turned out to be an explosive with a 10-inch-long fuse.
In 2010, police searched a warehouse Routh owned and found more than 100 stolen items, from power tools and building supplies to kayaks and spa tubs. In both felony cases, judges gave Routh either probation or a suspended sentence.
Routh is charged with attempted assassination Authorities said Routh tried to assassinate Trump, who was running for his second term last September as the GOP presidential nominee, while he played golf at his golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida.
Routh is facing five felony counts in federal court in Fort Pierce, Florida. They include attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate; possessing a firearm to carry out a violent crime; assaulting a federal officer; felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition; and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.
Judge presided over Trump's classified documents case If the judge's name sounds familiar, it's because she presided over another high-profile case involving Trump - the classified documents case.
Last year, Cannon sided with Trump's lawyers who said the special counsel who filed the charges was illegally appointed by the US justice department. Cannon's ruling halted a criminal case that at the time it was filed was widely regarded as the most perilous of all the legal threats the president faced before he returned to office last January.
Cannon was a former federal prosecutor who was nominated to the bench by Trump in 2020.
Trump was not hurt in the incident He was fine, US secret service agents stationed a few holes up from where Trump was playing golf noticed the muzzle of an AK-style rifle sticking through the shrubbery that lines the course, roughly 400 yards away. An agent fired, and the gunman dropped the rifle and fled in an SUV, leaving the firearm behind along with two backpacks, a scope used for aiming and a GoPro camera. He was later stopped by law enforcement in a neighbouring county.
Last September's assassination attempt took place just nine weeks after Trump survived another attempt on his life in Pennsylvania.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Criminal with Rs 20k bounty killed in Yamunanagar encounter
Yamunanagar: Police gunned down a wanted criminal accused of carrying out firings in order to extort money from businessmen in an encounter on the Ratoli-Khera road here on Wednesday morning, said an official. Yamunanagar superintendent of police (SP) Kamaldeep Goyal said the operation was part of an ongoing anti-gangster. Slain criminal Bheem alias Bikeshwar, who hailed from Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh, had a reward of Rs 20,000 on his head and was wanted in several serious criminal cases, said the SP. According to police, Bheem was facing cases of attempted murder, extortion, drug trafficking, and possession of illegal firearms. Acting on a tip-off, a police team reached Ratoli-Khera road to apprehend him, said the SP. He claimed that upon spotting the cops, Bikeshwar opened fire, prompting the police to retaliate. The SP claimed that two bullets fired by Bheem two policemen in their bullet-proof jackets, but they escaped unhurt. Bheem was hit during the gunfight and died on the spot, added the SP. Bheem had recently moved to Azad Nagar, Yamunanagar, said the SP. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like From Smoothies to Stretching: Gentle Ideas for Lower Back Wellness Read More Undo A few days ago, he allegedly opened fire at the residences of a businessman named Bobby and a cloth merchant named Ravi near ITI in Yamunanagar. After the encounter, a forensics team was despatched to the scene and collected evidence. The police recovered a firearm, live cartridges, and a motorcycle from the spot. SP Goyal said Bheem worked for a gang being run by one Noni Rana, who is accused of multiple cases in which gunshots were fired to extort money from people. "Rana is also a wanted gangster who has been associated with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi. Efforts are being made to apprehend him too," he said. Later in the day, the SP defended the encounter, saying that police had "full legal authority" to respond to a criminal's gunfire with gunfire. "No officer should hesitate in confronting anti-social elements," the SP said.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explainer: What do Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on India mean? What happens if they stay…
India has become the latest addition to the list of countries subjected to higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade strategy. (AI image) US President Donald Trump has hit India with a 25% tariff rate ahead of his August 1 reciprocal tariff deadline. India and the US are working on a trade deal but no interim agreement has been finalised. With this India has become the latest addition to the list of countries subjected to higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade strategy, which seeks to restructure American trade partnerships through enhanced reciprocal arrangements. The revised US tariffs will affect India's export of goods to America, projected at approximately $87 billion in 2024. This includes labour-intensive sectors including apparel, medicines, gems and jeweler, and petrochemical products. The trade imbalance between the United States and India is at $45.7 billion, favouring India. US Tariffs on India : What did Trump announce? Taking to social media platform Truth Social, Trump said, 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Last Chance: 80% Off This Artisan's Retirement Jewelry Sale The Maker's Journal Read More Undo Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA! The additional penalty for trade with Russia remains unclear for now. Also Read | Donald Trump imposes 25% tariffs on India! How does India compare to other economies like China, Japan, Vietnam on the rate list? Check details What India Has Said About the 25% tariff In a statement, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said, "The Government has taken note of a statement by the US President on bilateral trade. The Government is studying its implications." "India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs. The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK," India has said. How will the 25% tariffs hit India? Agneshwar Sen, Trade Policy Leader, EY India says, 'The decision to raise the US tariff to 25% on Indian exports is an unfortunate development, particularly given the strong strategic partnership that has been steadily built between India and the USA in recent years. If this tariff is sustained, this move may directly affect key sectors such as marine products, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather, and automobiles, where bilateral trade has been especially robust. However, it's important to note that both countries remain positively engaged in active negotiations with the US team expected in India later in August to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement,' he said. 'I am confident that, considering our shared interests and history of cooperation, the two sides will be able to address these contentious issues constructively and arrive at a mutually beneficial agreement in the very near term,' he added. Garima Kapoor, Economist and Executive Vice President at Elara Capital sees the 25% tariff as a negative development, and one that may shave off 20 basis points from India's GDP growth if the tariff rate stays at that level. 'The exact details of the tariffs on the exempted items such as pharma and the ones that were charged at a differential rate such as iron, steel and auto is unknown as of now, but inclusion of pharma into tariffs should be incremental negative for India's exports as US accounts for more than 30% of India's pharma exports. If no deal is signed by Sept-October, we see a downside to the full year GDP growth estimate for India by 20 basis points,' she said. Also Read | India-US trade deal: Donald Trump announces 25% tariff on India, plus penalty for buying energy and arms from Russia Agricultural economist Ashok Gulati is of the view that the tariff will significantly affect India's seafood exports, particularly shrimps. The decision by US President Donald Trump to levy higher tariffs on Indian products is "very bad" and "shocking", noted Gulati, who had anticipated a more modest increase of 10-15 per cent. "This clearly shows Trump is unpredictable and punitive," he told PTI. The economist indicated that this development will substantially affect India's shrimp trade, whilst Ecuador stands to benefit due to its reduced tariffs and closer proximity to the United States. The impact of increased US tariffs will extend beyond shrimps to affect India's textile sector as well. Gulati further added that the benefits acquired through the India-UK free trade agreement would be offset by these elevated US tariffs. Earlier this month, an SBI Research report said that even if India is unable to secure a trade deal as per its desire, the impact is likely to be limited. 'With India's service exports reaching a new high each year, a record $387.5 bn in 2024-25 driven by sectors like IT, financial and business services, our total exports are not likely to get significantly impacted,' the report said. India's Exports Uncompetitive? The most worrying bit about the 25% tariff is not the figure itself, but the fact that India's Asian peers have managed to secure deals with the Trump administration that have lower duties. Japan will pay 15%, Vietnam will pay 20% and Indonesia has a tariff of 19%. This will hit India's competitive advantage for US exports. India is actually looking to secure a trade deal that will give it preferential access to US markets compared to peers. Talking about the India-US trade deal negotiations Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said, '...what is important is to get preferential market access over our competitors, our peers.' Garima Kapoor of Elara Capital says, 'The 25% tariff rate is certainly a negative development as it compares to lower rates for peers such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Philippines which compete with India in a similar category of labour-intensive products and electronic goods.' But is the 25% tariff rate all bad? Ajay Srivastava from Global Trade Research Initiative explains, 'Some sectors like our top exports to the US are pharmaceuticals, medicines, so Europe will be paying 15%, but European medicines are expensive, high-end proprietary medicines. We are into generics. So if we are paying 25%, I don't think much of the generic market exports to India, exports to the US from India will be impacted.' Regarding smartphone exports, particularly iPhones, he noted that with only China and India being major exporters to the US market, the 5% duty differential (China at 30% and India at 25%) would not significantly affect trade patterns. Garima Kapoor believes a hasty deal would have not helped. 'On the positive side, it is pertinent to note that any hotchpotch deal which would have compelled India to give concessions to its agriculture and dairy sector may have had much deeper ramifications politically, socially, and eventually on livelihoods,' she says. 'A well negotiated deal that addresses all aspects of trade, investment and tariff and non- tariff barriers by September October 2025 is likely to yield long term benefits than a hurried deal. The India-UK deal template which gave concessions to auto and opened public procurement sector has shown that India is willing to shed its protectionist tag in sectors where it doesn't impact the marginal producer, which is a huge departure from its earlier stance,' she adds. 25% Trump Tariffs temporary in nature? As trade deal talks appeared to have hit a stalemate with the next round expected in August-end, it appears that India was already bracing for 20-25% tariffs from the Trump administration. "Talks are progressing well," a government official had been quoted as saying by Reuters, adding Trump could issue a tariff order in a "worst-case scenario". "But, we assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out,' the official had said. As US officials visit India for the sixth round of talks in August-end, there are hopes that a trade deal will be finalised in the coming months. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high court imposes cost on petitioners for misuse of legal process
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court imposed a Rs 10 lakh cost on six petitioners for concealing crucial facts and misusing legal procedures in a land acquisition case. "The petition, replete with suppression and bereft of bona fides, must meet its dismissal, not dismissal simpliciter, but with an exemplary cost. If the petition is now entertained on any score, it would amount to putting a premium on the litigative persistence of the petitioners and rewarding abuse of the process and tacit fraud played on this court. This forms the ninth petition on the same cause of action, seeking the very same prayer, differently worded, after the dismissal of eight rounds of litigation, all of which are suppressed in the subject petition," Justice M Nagaprasanna observed in his order. The case involves legal representatives of Venkata Bhovi and Hanumantha Bhovi, who received 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Nagadevanahalli, Bengaluru, through an official memorandum dated Jan 9, 1979. The land was previously under their unauthorised occupation, and the deputy commissioner subsequently granted them ownership, recording their names in revenue records. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru The land acquisition process began on July 31, 1986, with a preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, followed by a final notification on Jan 22, 1987. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The compensation was fixed at Rs 65,000 per acre plus Rs 15,000 per acre in solatium and interest on June 6, 1987. The divisional commissioner deposited the award amount on Oct 9, 1987. Following Venkata's death, his legal heirs sought to remove the property from acquisition through various representations. They cited a draft notification under Section 48(1) of the Act from April 23, 1993. The petitioners approached the authorities on Jan 24, 2025, requesting a no-objection certificate, claiming their lands were excluded from acquisition based on a Sept 3, 1993 notification. Justice M Nagaprasanna noted that the petitioners' latest argument relied on a previously unmentioned 1993 notification. The court observed that this revelation came after eight rounds of litigation, characterising it as judicial manipulation rather than justice-seeking. "What I witness is not the pursuit of justice, but a game of judicial hide and seek, where one of the family members of the grantee seeks invocation of the writ jurisdiction, while the other member hides. Later, the other member seeks, and the former hides. Such cynical use of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India must be arrested in its tracks," Justice Nagaprasanna observed while dismissing the petition by Gangamma and five others to prevent abuse of judicial process and ensure finality in judicial decisions. —— BOX 3-decade saga The first round of litigation started in 1993. In 1994, the high court dismissed the petition. The second challenge was made in 1997 and the same was also dismissed. The third one was a suit filed in the civil court in 1993 which also met the same fate. In 2003, another petition was filed in the high court and was dismissed. In 2004, a second civil suit was filed and the same was dismissed as not maintainable. In 2007, the children of Vektata filed a petition on the same cause of action and it was dismissed on the grounds of delay. The order was challenged before a division bench in 2012 and the order of the single bench was affirmed in Nov 2022. In between, during the pendency of the writ appeal, a petition was filed in 2016 which was eighth in the series. However, when the petition was pending, the latest petition was filed on March 4, 2025. The petition filed in 2016 was withdrawn.
