logo
Tulsi Gabbard Suddenly Claims Amnesia About War Plans Group Chat

Tulsi Gabbard Suddenly Claims Amnesia About War Plans Group Chat

Yahoo26-03-2025
If you ever find yourself caught in a clear lie about a group chat to plan an attack on Yemen, the solution is easy: Pretend you can't remember a thing.
During a House Intelligence Committee hearing Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard attempted to walk back her previous claim that there had been 'no classified information' shared in the Signal group chat used by officials to plot a bombing in Yemen.
Her defense? She claimed she hadn't remembered.
'My answer yesterday was based on my recollection—or lack thereof—of the details that were posted there,' Gabbard said.
'I was not—and what was shared today reflects the fact that I was not—directly involved with that part of the Signal chat. And replied at the end reflecting the effects, the very brief effects that the national security adviser had shared,' she said.
Gabbard was referring to the one message she had sent in the chat on March 15, after the bombs had already dropped. 'Great work and effects!' she wrote.
But Representative Jim Himes wasn't buying it.
'So it's your testimony that less than two weeks ago you were on a Signal chat that had all of this information about F18s and MQ9 reapers and targets on strike, and you, in that two-week period, simply forgot that that was there?' he asked.
'My testimony is I did not recall the exact details of what was included there,' Gabbard said.
'That was not your testimony,' the Connecticut Democrat replied, referring to Gabbard's comments in a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday. 'Your testimony was that you were not aware of anything related to weapons packages, targets, and timing.'
Gabbard claimed later in Wednesday's hearing she had acknowledged that there were conversations about weapons—but she ironically claimed she couldn't remember what she'd said even just one day earlier.
When asked Tuesday by Senator Mark Kelly whether the chat had mentioned timings, units, targets, or weapons involved in the strike on the Houthis, Gabbard had responded, 'I don't remember a mention of specific targets. I believe there was discussion around targets, in general.'
This wasn't the only time Wednesday Gabbard claimed memory problems to evade a question. Representative Jason Crow asked Gabbard where she had been traveling during the discussion, and she had a similarly weak answer.
'I was traveling through the Asian Pacific region, I don't recall which country I was in at that time,' Gabbard answered.
'You don't remember the country?' the Colorado Democrat pressed.
'I'd have to go back and look at the schedule,' Gabbard said.
During the duration of the group chat, Gabbard reportedly traveled between Hawaii, Japan, and Thailand before visiting India, where she delivered a keynote address at the Raisina Dialogue on March 18.
There has been some concern that the chat could have been accessed by non-U.S. actors. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, was in Russia while sensitive messages swirled in the group chat—but he claimed Wednesday that it was all OK because the messages were sent to his personal cell phone, not his work one, which he claims he did not access until he returned to the states. Though classified information sent to a personal cellphone isn't much more comforting, is it?
Representative Jimmy Gomez slammed Gabbard's weak attempts to feign ignorance about the group chat's sensitive content.
'Deciding to use military force is something hard to imagine. So, the 'do not recall' doesn't pass the smell test,' the California Democrat said. 'It makes it—it's unbelievable that was the case. So that's what the American people don't understand.
'And I know a lot of folks in this administration were saying that they were gonna take on the establishment, and drain the swamp. But you have become that swamp in a matter of days—not weeks, not months: days!' Gomez said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Nuclear option" lingers over Senate as members leave for August recess
"Nuclear option" lingers over Senate as members leave for August recess

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

"Nuclear option" lingers over Senate as members leave for August recess

Senate leaders failed to reach a bipartisan deal to speed through more of President Trump's nominees — so senators are heading home with a GOP promise of changing the rules when they return in September. Why it matters: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) refused to back down from his demands, and Trump ultimately gave Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) cover to let his fatigued conference go home and reset. Senators will stay voting Saturday evening on a small list of nominees already primed for final confirmation. They will then head home for a month of fundraisers, town-halls and campaigning as they try to put some positive spin on the "big, beautiful bill." Zoom in: Republicans have been gunning to use their majority to make changes to Senate rules in response to Democrats' unprecedented stonewalling of the confirmation process for civilian nominees. It's unclear what exact changes Senate Republicans will pursue. It could look like eliminating one of the procedural votes on certain nominees, shrinking the length of debate time, allowing nominations to be voted on en-bloc or shortening the list of positions that require Senate confirmation. The option of recess appointments has arisen on numerous occasions, including Saturday, as another path forward. The intrigue: Trump repeatedly called for Thune to keep senators working through the whole August recess. But an enraged post on Truth Social seemed to give senators permission to head home for the scheduled break. "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL! Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are," Trump posted. "Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" The other side: Schumer and his leadership team tried to use the recess as leverage. They've demanded Republicans commit to concrete concessions, such as unfreezing some federal funding, in exchange for helping clear a logjam of nominees. Top Senate Democrats this week railed against the possibility that the GOP would change the Senate rules to confirm more Trump nominees, referring to it as a "nuclear" option. "Republicans should keep in mind that if they choose to go nuclear — yet again — it will have consequences long beyond Donald Trump's presidency," Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the Senate's Rules panel, said in a statement this week.

Donald Trump Lashes Out At Chuck Schumer As Democrats Stall Nominations
Donald Trump Lashes Out At Chuck Schumer As Democrats Stall Nominations

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Lashes Out At Chuck Schumer As Democrats Stall Nominations

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump in a strongly worded Truth Social post published on Saturday evening heavily criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, for his demands in exchange for ending his party's filibuster of every nominee the president puts before the Senate. Democrats are stalling the process, dragging it out and eating into the Senate recess and frustrating their counterparts across the aisle - as well as the president, who suggested the Republicans should tell Schumer and Democrats to "GO TO HELL!" Newsweek reached out to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's office by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday evening for comment. Why It Matters Trump still has a slate of nominees needing confirmation by the Senate, but Democrats have refused to simply pass them, even as Trump demands that his nominees "should NOT BE FORCED TO WAIT" and serve his administration. The Democrats have forced procedural votes on almost all of Trump's picks, which means the Senate has to debate and approve the rules of voting before each nominee confirmation - a process that has forced the Senate to delay its annual August recess and forcing Senate Majority Leader John Thune to keep the Senate in session over the weekend to try and push through as many nominees as possible. Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) (R) talks to reporters following the weekly Democratic Senate policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on July 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. // U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to... Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY) (R) talks to reporters following the weekly Democratic Senate policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on July 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. // U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington D.C., on August 01, 2025. More// Mehmet Eser/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Thune ahead of the weekend said he would leave negotiations to Trump and Schumer, telling reporters on Friday: "That's how this is going to get resolved. We'll see where that leads." That approach has ultimately led to Trump lashing out at Schumer on Truth Social after a day of back and forth, thought it remains unclear what Schumer is asking of Trump in exchange for allowing the confirmations to proceed at a normal pace. Trump instead blasted "Cryin' Chuck Schumer" and claimed the senator was "demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees, who should right now be helping to run our Country." "This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted," Trump wrote. "It is political extortion, by any other name." "Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!" he continued. "Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country. Have a great RECESS and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!" In a previous post, Trump said he was "Very proud of our great Republican Senators for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" He also said in that earlier post that the "Democrats want our Country to fail, because they have failed. Thank you to Senator John Thune and our Republican Warriors in the Senate. Fight and WIN. I am with you all the way!!!" He later in the evening posted two further messages - one in which he called the Democrats "EXTORTIONISTS WHO ALMOST DESTROYED OUR COUNTRY," and one in which he again praised "A great job done" by Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson for their work on passing the One Big Beautiful Bill. However, Democrats have indicated they have no desire to give in so quickly, even as they see a chance to retreat and regroup after months of unsuccessfully trying to get any concessions on Trump's bill and failing to prevent the passage of a Recissions Bill, which has gutted some public funding. Three Republicans have at times worked with Democrats throughout the process: Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Susan Collins of Maine - and Trump has criticized all of them at various times throughout the week in Truth Social posts. What Happens Next The Senate still has to see to dozens of nominations, according to The Associated Press. Confirming all of them with the current process that Democrats have pursued could take months, but the Senate may simply go on recess for August and return to fight it out again in September.

Spicer: Trump admin ‘going to piss off' MAGA base on Obama claims ‘if they don't act'
Spicer: Trump admin ‘going to piss off' MAGA base on Obama claims ‘if they don't act'

The Hill

time6 hours ago

  • The Hill

Spicer: Trump admin ‘going to piss off' MAGA base on Obama claims ‘if they don't act'

Former White House press secretary Sean Spicer in a Friday interview said the Trump administration will need to address its allegations that former President Obama manipulated intelligence related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. President Trump urged the Justice Department (DOJ) to deep dive into Obama and his officials in late July when Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard sent criminal referrals to the DOJ following a report accusing Obama's team of engaging in a 'treasonous conspiracy.' 'If these guys keep pumping out this stuff and declassifying things and don't go anywhere, you think Epstein was bad, you're going to piss off a lot of people if they don't act,' Spicer said during a Friday appearance on ' The Morning Meeting.' In response to the report released by Gabbard, the president said multiple former White House staffers would be charged with crimes. 'Based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama. He started it,' Trump said on July 22, when asked who the DOJ should target. 'And [then-vice president Joe] Biden was there with him and [former FBI director James] Comey was there and [former DNI director James] Clapper, the whole group was there. [Former CIA director John] Brennan. They were all there in a room, right here, this was the room,' he added. Spicer said the public won't back off an information hunt regarding Obama's alleged wrongdoing. 'So I think they're creating the impression that things will happen, and there better be some kind of follow-up. People who dealt with this issue are a hell of a lot more vocal than they are on Epstein. And I think you're getting a lot of people's hopes up,' Spicer said. 'So I don't know yet, but I feel like they've started to create the expectation that there will be something and people want [that].' However, Obama's office said the president's claims are ' bizarre ' and timely considering the backlash received by the Trump administration for not producing more information as it relates to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, said in a July statement sent to NewsNation, The Hill's sister company. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio, ' he added in response to Gabbard's report. Former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper also wrote a joint op-ed to reject Trump's claims. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store