Home Loan Rates Inch Higher for Borrowers: Mortgage Interest Rates Today for July 21, 2025
The average for a 30-year fixed mortgage is 6.81% today, up 0.05% from seven days ago. The average rate for a 15-year fixed mortgage is 6.03%, which is an increase of 0.06% from the same time last week. To secure a lower mortgage interest rate, consider increasing your down payment, improving your credit score or purchasing mortgage points.
What's behind high rates these days? Concerns about persistent inflation, threats of a global trade war and policy turbulence have created an uncertain economic outlook. In response, the Federal Reserve has adopted a wait-and-see approach and holding borrowing rates steady since the start of the year.
Most economists predict the Fed will start lowering rates in September, particularly if President Trump eases some of his aggressive tariff measures or if the labor market continues to deteriorate.
Prospective homebuyers shouldn't expect mortgage rates to become affordable overnight. While cheaper borrowing costs gradually trickle down to the housing market, the Fed doesn't directly set lenders' mortgage rates.
In today's unaffordable housing market, mortgage rates are just one piece of the puzzle. High home prices and skyrocketing homeownership expenses, like insurance and property taxes, are further compounding the pressure on prospective buyers. The possibility of a job-loss recession is also pushing many households to tighten their budgets and take on less financial risk.
When mortgage rates start to fall, be ready to take advantage. Experts recommend shopping around and comparing multiple offers to get the lowest rate. Enter your information here to get a custom quote from one of CNET's partner lenders.
About these rates: Bankrate's tool features rates from partner lenders that you can use when comparing multiple mortgage rates.
What's going on with mortgage rates right now?
The average 30-year fixed rate has hovered just below 7% for the last several months, resulting in cost-prohibitive monthly payments.
Mortgage rates are closely tied to the bond market, specifically the 10-year Treasury yield, which reflects investors' expectations for inflation, labor data, changes to monetary policy and global measures like tariffs.
"Rates could fall if inflation keeps cooling and the labor market softens," said Jeb Smith, licensed real estate agent and member of CNET Money's expert review board. "On the other hand, tariffs could create new inflation pressure. Add in government deficits and increased bond supply, and that puts upward pressure on rates."
Even as the Fed eventually starts to lower interest rates, experts caution that significant market volatility is likely. As a result, homebuyers are adopting a more patient and strategic approach to financing, comparing various loan types and planning ahead.
"Some are waiting, others are getting pre-approved now so they're ready to act if rates fall," said Smith.
For a look at mortgage rate movement in recent years, see the chart below.
Experts predict: Will mortgage rates rise or fall?
While the housing market was expected to rebound in 2025, it has remained stagnant due to ongoing economic and political uncertainties. Median family income has not kept pace with the surge in housing costs, requiring many households to earn double or triple their salary to afford a modest home in some cities.
Mortgage rates would have to drop significantly, close to 6% or below, to drum up significant homebuying demand. According to Smith, though, the more likely scenario is a slow and steady decline in borrowing costs. A return to the record-low rates, around 2-3%, we saw during the pandemic would only happen if the economy tipped into a severe recession.
Fannie Mae's forecast puts rates around 6.5% by the end of 2025 and 6.1% by the end of 2026.
Ongoing uncertainty could cause rates to stay high, or increase further. For instance, if tariffs cause inflation to reignite, which most experts and Fed officials expect, it could result in higher bond yields and fewer interest rate cuts by the central bank. Both would be bad for mortgage rates.
Which mortgage term and type should I pick?
Each mortgage has a loan term, or payment schedule. The most common mortgage terms are 15 and 30 years, although 10-, 20- and 40-year mortgages also exist. With a fixed-rate mortgage, the interest rate is set for the duration of the loan, offering stability. With an adjustable-rate mortgage, the interest rate is only fixed for a certain amount of time (commonly five, seven or 10 years), after which the rate adjusts annually based on the market. Fixed-rate mortgages are a better option if you plan to live in a home in the long term, but adjustable-rate mortgages may offer lower interest rates upfront.
30-year fixed-rate mortgages
The 30-year fixed-mortgage rate average is 6.81% today. A 30-year fixed mortgage is the most common loan term. It will often have a higher interest rate than a 15-year mortgage, but you'll have a lower monthly payment.
15-year fixed-rate mortgages
Today, the average rate for a 15-year, fixed mortgage is 6.03%. Though you'll have a bigger monthly payment than a 30-year fixed mortgage, a 15-year loan usually comes with a lower interest rate, allowing you to pay less interest in the long run and pay off your mortgage sooner.
5/1 adjustable-rate mortgages
A 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgage has an average rate of 6.02% today. You'll typically get a lower introductory interest rate with a 5/1 ARM in the first five years of the mortgage. But you could pay more after that period, depending on how the rate adjusts annually. If you plan to sell or refinance your house within five years, an ARM could be a good option.
Calculate your monthly mortgage payment
Getting a mortgage should always depend on your financial situation and long-term goals. The most important thing is to make a budget and try to stay within your means. CNET's mortgage calculator below can help homebuyers prepare for monthly mortgage payments.
How can I get the lowest mortgage rates?
Though mortgage rates and home prices are high, the housing market won't be unaffordable forever. It's always a good time to save for a down payment and improve your credit score to help you secure a competitive mortgage rate when the time is right.
Save for a bigger down payment: Though a 20% down payment isn't required, a larger upfront payment means taking out a smaller mortgage, which will help you save in interest. Boost your credit score: You can qualify for a conventional mortgage with a 620 credit score, but a higher score of at least 740 will get you better rates. Pay off debt: Experts recommend a debt-to-income ratio of 36% or less to help you qualify for the best rates. Not carrying other debt will put you in a better position to handle your monthly payments. Research loans and assistance: Government-sponsored loans have more flexible borrowing requirements than conventional loans. Some government-sponsored or private programs can also help with your down payment and closing costs. Shop around for lenders: Researching and comparing multiple loan offers from different lenders can help you secure the lowest mortgage rate for your situation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
US mulls limited authorizations for oil firms in Venezuela, sources say
By Marianna Parraga, Matt Spetalnick and Timothy Gardner HOUSTON/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is preparing to grant new authorizations to key partners of Venezuela's state-run oil company PDVSA, starting with Chevron, which would allow them to operate with limitations in the sanctioned OPEC nation, four sources close to the matter said on Thursday. If granted, the authorizations to the U.S. oil major, and possibly also to PDVSA's European partners, would mark a policy shift from a pressure strategy Washington adopted earlier this year on Venezuela's energy industry, which has been under U.S. sanctions since 2019. A senior State Department official said in a statement they could not speak about any specific licenses to PDVSA's partners, but added the U.S. would not allow President Nicolas Maduro's government to profit from the sale of oil. The U.S. might now allow the energy companies to pay oilfield contractors and make necessary imports to secure operational continuity, two of the sources said. "Chevron conducts its business globally in compliance with laws and regulations applicable to its business, as well as the sanctions frameworks provided for by the U.S. government, including in Venezuela," a company spokesperson said. Though Venezuela and the U.S. conducted a prisoner swap this month, relations between the two countries have been tense for years, and the Trump administration has publicly supported opposition leaders who say their candidate won last year's election, not Maduro. Trump in February announced the cancellation of a handful of energy licenses in Venezuela, including Chevron's, and gave until late May to wind down all transactions. The U.S. State Department, which in May blocked a move by special presidential envoy Richard Grenell to extend the licenses, is this time imposing conditions to any authorization modifications, so no cash reaches Maduro's coffers, the two sources added. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio could still decide to ban the move at the last minute or modify the scope of the new authorizations. It was not immediately clear if the terms of the license that could be granted to Chevron would be reproduced for other foreign companies in Venezuela, including Italy's Eni and Spain Repsol, which have been asking the U.S. to allow them to swap fuel supplies for Venezuelan oil. The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Banks are carrying the risk of America's foreign policy
The Treasury Department wants banks to act like national security agencies. But the infrastructure isn't there, the guidance doesn't arrive fast enough and the priorities shift too quickly for institutions to keep up. In theory, a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering and sanctions enforcement is supposed to make compliance smarter. In practice, it's become a liability. Banks are being held responsible for foreign policy pivots they didn't cause, can't predict and are rarely equipped to manage. Take Syria. The sanctions shift in June caught everyone off guard. One day, hundreds of blacklisted entities were just gone — no heads-up, no pattern. And oddly, many also stayed sanctioned with no explanation. Inside banks, it wasn't clear what to do. Teams were yanking controls, second-guessing everything, hoping they weren't missing something that would blow back later. No safe harbor was granted. No transition period was offered. It wasn't guidance — it was whiplash. In May, the Trump administration secured $600 billion in Saudi investment pledges, arms agreements with Riyadh, and commercial pacts with the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, jurisdictions with known financial crime vulnerabilities. The United Arab Emirates was only removed from international watch lists in 2024. Weeks later, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network designated three Mexican financial institutions as primary money laundering concerns under new fentanyl-related authorities, cutting off U.S. correspondent access without warning or transition. Institutions with exposure had to unwind positions and coordinate emergency legal reviews in hours. As policy swings between high-dollar engagement and abrupt enforcement, banks are expected to interpret shifting national priorities without reliable guidance, safe harbors or regulatory infrastructure. This pattern is now familiar: Foreign policy decisions are made quickly, implemented aggressively and left for the private sector to decode. And that decoding process isn't theoretical, it's budgeted, resourced and internalized by banks with finite headcount and finite patience. Meanwhile, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's beneficial ownership registry remains structurally hollow. As of March, U.S. companies are no longer required to report ownership data, leaving financial institutions without access to the very information they were promised. The database, once intended to illuminate shell structures and illicit ownership chains, is still cited in federal guidance but remains effectively unusable. With access restricted to a phased rollout and core data now absent, institutions are being held to standards they cannot operationalize. On the sanctions front, Russia enforcement has resulted in over 2,500 designations since 2022. These include banks, oligarchs, industrial sectors, shipping entities and digital asset infrastructure. The scale of enforcement has been unmatched, but typology guidance often lags weeks behind. General licenses arrive late. Enforcement FAQs change midstream. Risk modeling is updated in arrears, not in anticipation. In the United Kingdom, 82 percent of banks admitted to skipping basic verification checks on new customers, and 94 percent do not run daily screenings on existing clients, a worrying number given the rapid changes in sanctions. While these findings reflect U.K. institutions, they offer a stark warning: Even in highly regulated markets, the infrastructure banks rely on isn't scaling with enforcement expectations. In this environment, institutions are penalized not just for doing the wrong thing, but for failing to predict the next shift. They're expected to interpret national security posture in real time, while receiving no classified insight, no operational roadmap and no consistency in enforcement tone. The result? They preempt. They freeze accounts on speculation. They sever correspondent relationships on rumor. This isn't just frustrating, it's structurally unsound. Banks are now de-risking entire regions not because of active sanctions, but because of anticipated volatility. They're refusing transactions not because they're prohibited, but because they might become politically radioactive later. Compliance programs weren't built to carry this weight, and the government isn't helping them do it. Funding is flat. Tools are inconsistent. And regulators still expect real-time decisions in a system designed for after-the-fact review. The message to financial institutions is clear: Enforce foreign policy priorities. The infrastructure, stability and liability protections? Those are still pending. This isn't a partisan problem. It's a systemic one. Democratic and Republican administrations alike have made aggressive use of Treasury authorities to pursue foreign policy goals. But neither has addressed the operational burden left behind. Anti-money laundering compliance and sanctions enforcement have quietly become tools of statecraft, handed off to private institutions that cannot absorb the complexity, ambiguity and legal risk of that delegation. The result is a landscape defined by fragmentation, second-guessing and exposure. Institutions that get it right see no reward. Institutions that guess wrong face enforcement, reputational fallout, and program overhauls. Risk-based compliance only works when the risk is defined, the expectations are stable and the information flow is reciprocal. That's not what banks are getting today. They're being asked to manage not just compliance, but also geopolitical unpredictability. They are, functionally, the operational front line of an outsourced enforcement system. This is not sustainable, scalable or safe.
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk expects ‘rough quarters' for Tesla
Tesla CEO Elon Musk suggested Wednesday that the electric vehicle company could face a 'rough' couple of quarters going forward. The EV firm's earnings dipped 16 percent in the second quarter of 2025, falling to just under $1.2 billion in the three-month period between April and June. During the same period last year, the company posted $1.4 billion in net income. 'We probably could have a few rough quarters,' Musk said on Tesla's earnings call. 'I'm not saying it will, but we could.' However, he appeared optimistic about where the company is headed next year, as it increasingly focuses on autonomy and robotics. While Tesla still produces electric cars, Musk has sought to shift the company toward autonomous vehicles, like Robotaxi, and humanoid robots, like Optimus. Tesla has faced a tumultuous year so far, largely due to Musk's involvement in politics. After supporting President Trump's campaign last year, the Tesla CEO took on a high-profile role in his administration, leading the controversial effort by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to slash government spending. The EV maker became a political symbol for Musk, attracting both peaceful and destructive demonstrations. The company's stock tumbled, and it posted a 71 percent drop in earnings in the first quarter. After Musk left the administration, Tesla investors appeared hopeful for more stability. However, he quickly became involved in a contentious public feud with Trump over his so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' While the Tesla CEO voiced concerns about the tax and spending bill's additions to the federal deficit, Trump accused Musk of being upset about the repeal of an EV tax credit, which is set to expire at the end of September. Musk and his fellow Tesla executives noted on Wednesday's call that the repeal of the EV credit is likely to impact the company. 'Given the abrupt change, we have limited supply of vehicles in the U.S. this quarter,' Vaibhav Taneja, Tesla's chief financial officer, said, adding, 'If you're in the U.S. and looking to buy a car, place an order now, as we may not be able to guarantee delivery orders placed in the later part of August and beyond.' Taneja said Tesla is currently focused on building and delivering as many vehicles as possible before the credit expires, a push that it likely to slow the company's efforts to ramp up production of a new lower cost vehicle. He also warned of lower revenues after Trump's bill eliminated emissions penalties that Tesla could sell to other carmakers.
