US State Department draws criticism for shutting office that brings home deceased diplomats
The small team at the Department's Office of Casualty Assistance, which supports U.S. diplomats and their families abroad in the event of death or serious injury, received termination notices last Friday along with more than 1,350 Department employees. The firings came as a surprise, sources familiar with their situation said.
When the notices arrived by email on Friday, the team was working on repatriating the remains of a senior U.S. official who died in a car crash in Mexico last week.
The U.S. Consulate in Monterrey said in a Facebook statement that Brian Matthew Faughnan, a member of its mission, died in a car accident in the northern Mexican state of Coahuila on July 9.
Kirk Leash, the team leader at OCA, informed other U.S. officials at the U.S. mission in Mexico and his counterparts in different government agencies who were working on Faughnan's case that Leash was just removed from his job, and that he was no longer able to help, according to two sources familiar with the exchange.
The elimination of the office was part of a major overhaul of the State Department by President Donald Trump, who aims to reshape the U.S. diplomatic corps to ensure it faithfully implements his "America First" policies.
It is also part of an unprecedented push by the Republican president to shrink the federal government, which he says was misspending American taxpayers' money.
The State Department said the agency continues to be "fully equipped" with casualty evacuations if there are employee deaths overseas. "There has been no interruption in our capabilities to carry out this mission," said a senior State Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The State Department revamp drew intense criticism from Democratic senators, former diplomats and secretaries of state for what they said was the arbitrary way it was carried out. Critics said it involved the firing of experienced, specialized employees in far-flung parts of the world, and that such skilled staffers are difficult to replace quickly.
A State Department memo to employees last week, seen by Reuters, said the moves were made in a "carefully tailored" way.
But the shuttering of the bureau made some question that statement.
"I don't think any sitting president or any secretary of state would not want their people, their personnel - the most valuable asset of their agency - to be taken care of," said Edith Bartley, who is a spokesperson for the families of the Americans killed in the 1998 al-Qaeda attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
"You want to know that your country does all that it can to take care of you, your remains and your family in the aftermath. That's critical. That is America First," Bartley said.
Bartley lost her father, who was a career diplomat, and brother in the 1998 attacks, which killed 224 people, including 12 Americans. OCA was established a year later, thanks in large part to her advocacy.
The office is typically supported by volunteers from the Department's Human Resources bureau who can be mobilized on short notice following a mass casualty event. The teams were called upon after the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, which resulted in the death of four Americans including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
"OCA is in touch with the deceased employee's family within hours after the death, and provides support services as long as they are needed - for weeks, months, and in some cases, years," an undated article in the Department's magazine said, referring to the work of the office.
A senior State Department official said on Wednesday that the agency transferred the functions of the OCA to the Office of Employee Relations. But that office has a much wider remit, supporting the agency's workforce, and lacks the specific knowledge and expertise in navigating the complicated procedures of repatriating a deceased diplomat, sources familiar with the matter said.
"That function is being folded into another office," Michael Rigas, deputy secretary of state for Management and Resources, said on Wednesday, in response to a question about the closure of the office by Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen at a hearing.
Shaheen also asked Rigas to get back to her on how the department was handling the repatriation of the body of Faughnan, the U.S. official who died in Mexico. "I don't think the family thinks that that's a good firing," Shaheen said.
Reuters was unable to reach Faughnan's family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Ukrainecast What did we learn from the Trump-Putin summit?
The first face to face meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin since the war in Ukraine started is over, with Donald Trump saying 'we didn't get there' on a Ukraine deal, or a ceasefire. The meeting lasted three hours, with the US president insisting progress was made, and Putin saying he is 'sincerely interested' in ending the war, but without giving details. The two leaders both addressed the media at the end of the summit, but didn't take questions. In a special collaboration, Victoria and Vitaly were joined by Americast's Sarah Smith in Alaska and Adam Fleming from Newscast. The producers were Purvee Pattni and Cai Pigliucci. The technical producer was Antonio Fernandes. The social producer was Grace Braddock. The series producer is Tim Walklate. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham. Email Ukrainecast@ with your questions and comments. You can also send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp, Signal or Telegram to +44 330 1239480 You can join the Ukrainecast discussion on Newscast's Discord server here:
Sky News
a minute ago
- Sky News
Body language expert reveals Trump and Putin's key giveaways from their Alaska summit
Hand pats, manspreading and tell-tale signs of discontent - there was plenty on display in the body language of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to show who had the upper hand in their Ukraine negotiations, an expert has told Sky News. All eyes were on the two world leaders as they met on the red carpet at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Alaska, and again as they emerged a few hours later from their much-anticipated summit. While at first it was all "genuine smiles", when the leaders emerged from their private meeting, the lack of a deal was written all over Trump 's face, according to body language expert and psychologist Dr Peter Collett. Even in their very first handshake, there was plenty to be analysed in terms of body language, Dr Collett says. Putin was the first to extend his hand, showing "his enthusiasm, delight" and "commitment" to the occasion. But within the handshake itself were no less than five "hand pats", Dr Collett adds, which offer more insight. "During the handshakes, we also see several pats," the expert says. Putin got the first, with his "rather tentative and much less dramatic than those produced by Trump". By contrast, Trump's hand pats were a "status reminder" and "his way of telling Putin that he's the man in charge". At one stage, the US president allowed his Russian counterpart to pat his hand. Although this allowed Putin to place his hand on top, seemingly asserting his dominance, this signature move of Trump's actually allows him to "flex his muscles", Dr Collett says. "One of the reasons Trump makes a habit of doing this is that it allows him to flex his bicep and pull the other [person] towards him." Importantly, he also got the last hand pat of the interaction, Dr Collett adds. "That's what we find with high-dominance individuals, particularly politicians, they always want to have the last touch." Putin wins on manspreading Once the pair were sat down in front of the cameras, it was Putin who appeared more dominant, which he achieved through a wider "manspread" than his American counterpart. The term manspreading first emerged on social media in 2013 when it was used to describe men on public transport who encroach on adjacent seats by spreading their legs wide apart. "Highly dominant men tend to spread their thighs wide apart," Dr Collett says. "If you look at the angle between them, when we compare Trump and Putin, we find Putin with a much wider spread, in other words, displaying much greater dominance." During the news conference, Putin's dominance was also conveyed in his posture, Dr Collett adds. "In spite of their difference in height, Putin, although he's very short, sits upright, ramrod, looking very confident, whereas poor old Trump is crumpled and turned inwards." This could reflect him having "a lot on his mind that's bothering him", the expert suggests. Hand behind back shows dominance As the two leaders moved around the military base, Trump made a point of placing his hand behind Putin's back. Traditionally, a show of chivalry, in this context, it was another power play, Dr Collett says. "It looks like an expression of politeness, but in fact it's a dominance display, because it's the person who's in power, who's superior, calling the shots. "They're guiding the other individual through the space. And that's exactly what we see here… Trump gets his hand behind Putin and guides him through the next phase of the meeting." Genuine smiles Despite the repeated, thinly veiled attempts to appear the most powerful, both leaders had "genuine smiles" for each other, particularly when they first met, according to Dr Collett. "What's interesting is the high degree of smiling," he says. "It's a very serious, sombre occasion and yet they find time to smile and display their pleasure - not only at meeting each other but about the whole exercise." The smiles were genuine because they "evolve naturally" and "involved both sides of the face", Dr Collett explains. "They enlist those special little muscles around the eye, which are an indication of genuine pleasure," he says. Whereas later on, during the news conference, after the pair failed to negotiate a ceasefire, Trump offered Putin a "fake, flashbulb" smile, evidencing his disdain. All in the eyes - and the mouth After the two-and-a-half-hour meeting behind closed doors, Trump's dissatisfaction over the lack of a deal was clear in his body language, Dr Collett says. He tried to assert what psychologists refer to as "visual dominance" by avoiding Putin's gaze. 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 This technique is often used by "high-status individuals" to assert power - but it could also be a defence mechanism to "remove the negative stimulus" from the situation, Dr Collett suggests. "Trump hasn't succeeded in getting a real concession from Putin on this occasion. He's looking away because he doesn't want to be reminded of the individual who's failing to give something he can take to the American public and the world and say, 'hey look, this is what I succeeded in doing'." The shape of Trump's mouth is another tell-tale sign of his discontent. He pursed his lips on several occasions, which denotes "self-restraint", while his "oxbow mouth" showed his vulnerability, according to Dr Collett. "Politicians are quite fond of using this particular mouth posture because they think it makes them look determined," he says. But the tensed chin is a "fascinating giveaway", he adds. "It's almost as though they believe consciously that somebody is going to punch them on the chin. So when you see politicians doing that mouth posture, it's quite often because they're feeling vulnerable because they feel the need to protect themselves. "And that's my feeling - Trump was full of promise, but he came away with nothing, and we find that revealed in his little mouth postures".
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Zelenskiy to visit US, Trump speaks with European leaders after Putin summit
WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he will visit Washington on Monday to meet Donald Trump, who spoke at length with the Ukrainian president and with NATO and European leaders after the U.S. president's summit in Alaska with Russian counterpartVladimir Putin. The highly anticipated Trump-Putin summit yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Russia's war in Ukraine, although both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home. Trump held the calls with Zelenskiy and U.S. allies on his way back to Washington, where he landed in the early hours of Saturday morning, the White House said. Zelenskiy described the over 90-minute call with Trump as "long and substantive." Zelenskiy said Ukraine supported Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the U.S. and Russia. He also said he discussed with Trump the "positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine's security." "Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this. On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war," Zelenskiy said on X. Axios reporter Barak Ravid said, citing a source, that Trump told Zelenskiy and European leaders during the phone call that Putin was not interested in a ceasefire but in a comprehensive agreement to end the war. "I think a fast peace deal is better than a ceasefire," Trump said in the call, according to Ravid, who cited a source on the call without identifying that person. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron and leaders from Germany, Finland, Poland, Italy and Britain joined the call in which Trump briefed allies about the summit with Putin.
