logo
"I Feel Like I Was Catfished": Women Are Raising The Alarm On This 1 "Outrageous" Word Men Are Using On Dating Apps

"I Feel Like I Was Catfished": Women Are Raising The Alarm On This 1 "Outrageous" Word Men Are Using On Dating Apps

Yahoo11-07-2025
Back in January, the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative public policy think tank, released a survey that determined 52% of single heterosexual women are less likely to date a Donald Trump supporter — with only 36% of single heterosexual men saying voting for Trump would be a dealbreaker.
And in the lead-up to Inauguration Day, Hily, a dating app with over 35 million worldwide users, released its own politics and dating study. After surveying 5,000 Gen Z and millennial Americans, Hily determined that 1 in 3 American women would decline a date over political differences. Similar to the AEI survey, Hily's study determined that only 1 in 10 American men would decline a date for the same reason.
These results could very well explain the suspicious trend of heterosexual men misrepresenting their political leanings on dating apps: Specifically, they put 'moderate' on their profiles or act vague about their politics to increase their chances of matching with women who deliberately put 'no conservatives' in their own profiles. These so-called 'moderates' connect with liberal women, only for them to discover that their matches voted for Donald Trump in the last election (a dealbreaker for many).
So why are people lying about their politics on dating apps in the first place? And how can daters spot the red flags behind these vague profiles before everyone's emotions take over? Here's what relationship experts have to say about this very 2025 dating problem.
How 'Moderate' Became A Red Flag
Ella,* a Los Angeles resident, said she's had nothing but frustration with 'moderates' on the apps. As she told HuffPost, Ella noticed that her 'large number of matches' with guys listed as 'moderate' on their Hinge dating profiles has grown significantly in recent months. But she now swipes left on all 'moderates': This is because more than once, after 'days and days of texting,' it turns out that these guys are 'really far-right, anti-feminist, etc,' she said.
Ella's theory is that conservative men might need to lie about their political views – or else they won't get any dates in a liberal city like LA.
Amanda*, creator of the 'Dating Is Dead' Instagram account, recently ended a two-year relationship with a man who also listed 'moderate' on his profile.
'I think that he was conservative more than moderate,' she said. 'I feel like I was catfished in that sense.'
She said her now-ex-boyfriend began to show his true colors during the first 100 days of the second Trump administration: 'He was becoming more and more indoctrinated to the hard right.'
Now, Amanda is questioning whether her ex's far-right attitude was there all along and she was 'just so blinded by love' — or if 'he was hiding who he was.'
Since ending that relationship, Amanda said she is far more cautious around men who put 'moderate' in their dating profiles: 'I try and bring it up more gently than I did in the beginning,' she said, 'because there's a lot of dancing around who we voted for, so now I ask immediately.'
This approach may result in some abbreviated dates, but it could also mean dodging a major bullet before you've even finished drinks: 'I actually went on a date the other night that lasted seven minutes,' Amanda said. Her date, after admitting that he voted for Donald Trump, brushed off her concerns about the president's second administration, claiming that 'nothing in America is really going to change,' which was all Amanda needed to know about this guy's values.
Bolster Your Dating Boundaries
From the chipping away of reproductive freedom to the U.S. government's pronatalist campaign, women's rights are under attack in 2025. So discovering that the 'moderate' guy you've matched with might actually be looking for a tradwife can be unsettling, to say the least.
'For a lot of women — especially women of color, queer women, women with trauma histories — conservative beliefs don't just feel like a difference of opinion,' said Cheryl Groskopf, an LA-based anxiety, trauma and attachment therapist. 'They feel like a threat. And if you've ever been dismissed, gaslit or harmed by someone who hides behind 'traditional values,' then this kind of dishonesty can feel like a violation (because it is).'
'It's also just draining to constantly have to explain yourself,' continued Groskopf. 'Think of the energy it takes to spend the first 30 minutes of a first date defending your humanity.'
Amanda knows this sentiment well. She recounted how the seven-minute-date guy disregarded her concerns about women's bodily autonomy by pointing out that she lives in a blue state like New York. 'I was like, but it's not about me,' she said. 'It's about the girl in Mississippi or Texas who was, God forbid, sexually assaulted at 13 or who needs a D&C. [Men] have the same rights across all 50 states, and I don't. It is not really up for discussion. A gun has more rights than I do.'
Bottom line? 'Women need these boundaries to protect their energy, their bodies and their sense of safety,' Groskopf said. 'They can absolutely name up-front what they need to feel safe.'
Why Are Men Misrepresenting Themselves On The Apps?
The numbers don't lie: If 52% of single women are less likely to date a Trump supporter, then it makes sense that some of those Trump supporters are attempting to game the system.
'It may be because they are trying to appeal to a broader range of women, and want to select answers that they perceive will get them past the initial screening,' observes Marisa T. Cohen, PhD, LMFT, a relationship expert with Hily. (Cohen also provided the data from Hily's pre-Inauguration Day survey.)
'They also may perceive that they are being inaccurately judged as a result of their political views, so they are trying to present themselves in a way that they think will allow them to match with more people,' she added.
But these political mismatches sometimes occur simply because some people 'may judge their own views inaccurately,' Cohen said. 'They may think they are progressive compared to other people they are associated with, but don't necessarily hold progressive views.'
Groskopf also points to a 'real-time cultural shift': Women are now asking questions like, 'Does this person feel emotionally safe to me?'
Amanda echoes that, reiterating her need to know a man's political beliefs before getting involved. 'I would not feel safe in a room with a bunch of conservative men at this point,' she told HuffPost.
While Groskopf doesn't believe all men are 'trying to maliciously deceive' their potential dates, she also observes that they're not all being honest and authentic, either.
'Many of them have just never had to think about how their political beliefs affect someone else's sense of emotional or physical safety,' Groskopf said. 'They weren't taught to connect their values to safety, or to see 'moderate' as vague instead of neutral. But what he's missing is that for a lot of women, that kind of vagueness is the red flag.'
Trust Yourself — And Your Values
If a person's political views are a dealbreaker for you, then it's imperative to tackle vague, 'moderate' profiles with a clear strategy: That starts with establishing your values, Cohen said. 'Additionally, going beyond surface-level questions to get to know a person and their worldview is important.'
That being said, Cohen advises skepticism if a potential date 'consistently fails to expand on their own views.' For the sake of your emotional safety, Groskopf recommends asking simple questions like:
'What does 'moderate' mean to you?'
'How do your values show up in your day-to-day?'
'Where do you land on things that matter to me — like therapy, mental health, women's rights?'
'The way he responds will tell you a lot,' Groskopf said. 'Does he get curious? Defensive? Does he minimize your question? Does he give a clear answer or just talk in circles and try to sound chill? If he can't meet that moment with honesty, clarity, or even basic self-awareness — that is the red flag.'
Groskopf also cautions against continued obscurity: 'If he says things like 'I'm pretty middle of the road' or 'I just don't like extremes' — but can't tell you what he does believe or values,' then that's a red flag too.
Watch out for defensiveness or mockery as well: 'If he gets weird or low-key annoyed when you ask a totally normal question about values — or makes fun of people who care about things like social issues or emotional growth — that's your sign,' Groskopf said. 'A guy who's actually grounded doesn't get defensive over basic emotional curiosity.'
Women deserve to know if someone they're dating voted against their interests from the get-go. If a guy you match with says 'moderate' on his profile, you are entitled to know his definition of the word before your emotions potentially take over.
'For you to tell me that you're a moderate, but it's OK to have unmarked police cars and people without badges sweeping people up in the streets? That's outrageous,' Amanda said of dubious 'moderate' men.
'Your non-negotiables are your non-negotiables,' Cohen said. 'If learning about a person's political leanings matters to you, ask!'
*Names of those who shared their personal stories have been changed throughout this piece to preserve anonymity.This article originally appeared on HuffPost.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent calls for internal review of Fed but doesn't think Powell needs to step down
Bessent calls for internal review of Fed but doesn't think Powell needs to step down

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent calls for internal review of Fed but doesn't think Powell needs to step down

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is taking aim at both the Federal Reserve and the rules the Fed enforces as a supervisor of big banks but making it clear he doesn't think Fed chair Jerome Powell needs to step down immediately. Monday he said on X that there should be a review of the central bank's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters and a review of its non-monetary policy operations, arguing that 'significant mission creep and institutional growth have taken the Fed into areas that potentially jeopardize the independence of its core monetary policy mission.' He posted the comments on the same day he spoke at the opening of a Fed conference designed to review the capital framework governing big banks. That conference continues Tuesday. There he made a separate call for 'deeper reforms' of the regulations governing the nation's biggest banks, arguing that 'outdated capital requirements' impose 'unnecessary burdens on financial institutions.' Specifically he suggested that regulators scrap a dual capital structure proposed during the last administration but never enacted, calling it 'flawed.' "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth," Bessent said in his remarks. But he made it clear in a Fox Business Network interview Tuesday that he doesn't think Powell should step down immediately. His boss President Trump has been calling repeatedly for Powell's resigantion. Bessent is among the candidates being considered to replace Jerome Powell as chair of the central bank once Powell's term expires in 10 months. Trump and other White House officials have been hammering Powell and the Fed over the slow pace of interest rate cuts, with none being made so far in 2025, as well as the costs involved in the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters complex along the National Mall in Washington. Bessent joined that chorus on Monday. 'While I have no knowledge or opinion on the legal basis for the massive building renovations being undertaken on Constitution Avenue, a review of the decision to undertake such a project by an institution reporting operating losses of more than $100 billion per year should be conducted,' Bessent said in his Monday post on X. Trump has considered firing Powell and Bessent urged him no to do so, according to The Wall Street Journal. Powell has said repeatedly that he intends to serve out his term as chair and that his removal is not permitted by law. Bessent in his Monday comments on X did express support for the Fed's independence on the subject of monetary policy, saying that autonomy is 'a jewel box that should be walled off' and that the Fed's independence 'is a cornerstone of continued US economic growth and stability.' But the White House has also made it known that it wants greater control over the Fed's operations outside monetary policy, including the supervision of the nation's biggest banks. Bessent earlier this year said he would be coordinating a broad re-examination of financial regulation, with an eye toward making it easier for banks to lend as a way of boosting the US economy. And he said again Monday that the Treasury would be playing a central role. "The department will break through policy inertia, settle turf battles, drive consensus, and motivate action to ensure no single regulator holds up reform," Bessent said of the Treasury. "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth." US regulators have already proposed one of the most dramatic rollbacks of bank capital rules since the 2008 financial crisis, saying last month they wanted to alter the so-called enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR). Banks have complained that this ratio penalizes them for holding lower-risk assets such as Treasury bonds. Doing away with it "should simplify bank capital management" and "that will bring down costs and help banks more effectively manage their capital levels," TD Securities analyst Jaret Seiberg said in a Tuesday morning research note. Even with proposed curtailing of this leverage ratio, large banks would still be bound by their risk weighted capital constraints, Seiberg said. "This is not going to produce material capital relief for banks," Seiberg added. More regulatory changes for big banks could still be on the way. Michelle Bowman, the Fed's top banking regulator appointed by Trump, said in a speech last month that revisiting the eSLR requirement is just the start of broader capital rollback considerations. "More work on capital requirements remains, especially to consider how they have evolved and whether changes in market conditions have revealed issues that should be addressed," she said. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

The Latest: Trump hosting Philippines leader to talk tariffs and China
The Latest: Trump hosting Philippines leader to talk tariffs and China

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Latest: Trump hosting Philippines leader to talk tariffs and China

President Donald Trump hosts Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on Tuesday at the White House, seeking closer security and economic ties at a time when China is increasingly assertive in the Indo-Pacific region. More than a month after their deployment by Trump, 700 Marines will leave Los Angeles, where they stood guard over two downtown buildings in what local officials called 'political theater.' Updated Congressional Budget Office projections show Donald Trump's tax and spending law will add $3.4 trillion more to the deficit and leave more than 10 million people uninsured. An AP-NORC poll found about two-thirds of U.S. adults expect the new tax law to mostly help the rich. And the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s family hopes his FBI case files, released as Trump tries to avoid scrutiny over the Epstein files, will be 'viewed within their full historical context.' The Latest: White House says Trump is serious about wanting Washington Commanders to go back to its former name Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at the White House Monday that sports is one of Trump's 'many passions' and 'he wants to see the name of that team changed.' The Commanders were formerly the Redskins, a name that was considered offensive to and by Native Americans. Trump threatened in a weekend social media post to hold up a deal for the team's new stadium in the nation's capital if the name isn't changed. ▶ Read more about Trump and the Washington football team Justice Department says it's in touch with attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche says he's been in touch with counsel for Maxwell to find out if she's willing to speak with Justice Department prosecutors regarding the case against the convicted sex offender, Epstein. Maxwell is Epstein's former girlfriend. She was convicted in a jury trial in 2021 of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. The request to interview her represents an additional Justice Department effort to deal with the backlash from parts of Trump's base over an earlier decision not to release additional records from the Epstein investigation. Blanche said in a statement Tuesday, 'I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days.'

Coca-Cola to release soda with cane sugar after Trump pushed for it. Is it really better than high fructose corn syrup?
Coca-Cola to release soda with cane sugar after Trump pushed for it. Is it really better than high fructose corn syrup?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Coca-Cola to release soda with cane sugar after Trump pushed for it. Is it really better than high fructose corn syrup?

Coke confirmed that it will be changing all its American product to feature cane sugar this fall. Coca-Cola announced on Tuesday that it will release a new version of Coke using cane sugar later this year. 'As part of its ongoing innovation agenda, this fall in the United States, the company plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range,' Coca-Cola said in a press release announcing its second quarter earnings. 'This addition is designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.' The announcement came days after President Trump said in a social media post that the company had agreed with him to do so. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post last week. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' Other countries, such as Mexico, already use cane sugar in their version of the soda — but the American version of Coke uses high fructose corn syrup, a different type of sweetener that has the same amount of calories. Many people prefer the so-called Mexican Coke, which, while less common, is also available for purchase in stores and restaurants around the United States. What is real cane sugar? Why aren't we using it? First, let's explain what 'real cane sugar' means. Cane sugar comes from sugarcane plants and is a natural sugar. High fructose corn syrup, on the other hand, is made from corn. Chemically, the two are slightly different: Cane sugar is made of glucose and fructose bonded together, while high fructose corn syrup has free glucose and fructose mixed separately. Cane sugar fell out of favor for use in food manufacturing about 40 years ago, when then-President Ronald Reagan put a limit on sugar imports, raising the price of domestic sugar. Enter high fructose corn syrup, which was cheaper to produce on U.S. soil. Now high fructose corn syrup is in so many foods for sale in the United States, from Coke to packaged baked goods to some pasta sauces. Even some brands of cottage cheese contain high fructose corn syrup. (And it's important to note that high fructose corn syrup is not the same as the sweet, sticky corn syrup you can find at the grocery store — it's made available only by food manufacturers.) High fructose corn syrup and cane sugar (chemical name: sucrose) may taste very similar, but they are absorbed differently by the body. When you eat sucrose, your digestive system breaks it down into glucose and fructose before they're absorbed into your bloodstream. High fructose corn syrup already contains free glucose and fructose, so your body absorbs them directly without needing to break them apart first. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's secretary of Health and Human Services, has been a vocal critic of high fructose corn syrup. He called it 'a formula for making you obese and diabetic' in a promotional video during his own failed presidential run in 2024. However, this position has placed him at odds with corn farmers, according to the New York Times — many of whom supported Trump in the 2024 election. The Corn Refiners Association warned that removing high fructose corn syrup from U.S. foods could lower corn prices by up to 34 cents a bushel and cost farmers $5.1 billion in revenue, leading to job losses and economic harm in rural communities. But RFK Jr. is far from the first person to demonize high fructose corn syrup, and studies have been done to assess its true risks. Is high fructose corn syrup really worse than cane sugar? Both high fructose corn syrup and cane sugar come with health risks, especially when consumed in excess over time. They can raise blood sugar and contribute to weight gain and inflammation, leading to chronic issues like heart disease and diabetes. Sweetened soda is especially concerning from a health standpoint: A 2025 study found that drinking sugary beverages was linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, more so than consuming sugar within food. High fructose corn syrup, however, may be worse for you than cane sugar — at least, in theory. Because fructose is mainly processed by the liver, ingesting a lot of high fructose corn syrup can put extra stress on the organ, which may lead to the risk of liver problems and other health issues over time. A 2022 study also found that higher high fructose corn syrup intake in young adults led to more fat buildup in the liver and worse insulin sensitivity, both of which increase the risk of liver disease and type 2 diabetes. However, it did not compare high fructose corn syrup with sucrose, so it's unclear if sucrose would have also had the same effect. A 2022 study found that both high fructose corn syrup and sucrose had the same effects on weight, blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar but that high fructose corn syrup caused a small increase in C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation. This could increase the risk of chronic inflammation over time, which may lead to conditions like heart disease, diabetes and other metabolic disorders. More research is needed to know if that difference really matters for long-term health. Some animal studies have raised public concern over high fructose corn syrup, such as a 2024 study that linked high fructose corn syrup to tumor growth and cancer cell acceleration. And a 2010 study from Princeton found that rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained more weight than those with access to table sugar even with diets of equal calories. But, again, these studies were not done in humans, so it's unclear what impacts they would have on our bodies. The bottom line More research must be done to assess the true harms of high fructose corn syrup versus cane sugar. What is clear: Diets high in sugar, in general, come with health concerns. Changing Coke's formula, should the company choose to do so, may or may not make a major impact on one's health — but drinking less of the sweet stuff could do your body a service. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store