
Changes on homegrown pot rules don't go far enough, says Manitoban who challenged prohibition
Social Sharing
More than six years after cannabis was legalized in Canada, Manitoba is about to allow residents to grow their own marijuana at home — but a cannabis advocate who challenged the province's previous prohibition says the changes don't go far enough.
Starting May 1, Manitobans over the age of 19 will be allowed to grow up to four cannabis plants — the maximum allowed under the federal Cannabis Act — in their home, as long as they're indoors and not accessible to anyone under 19.
Jesse Lavoie founded the cannabis advocacy organization TobaGrown, which took Manitoba to court over its previous rules in 2020.
He argues even under the relaxed rules, the ban on outdoor growing feeds negative stereotypes associated with cannabis.
"When you're only allowed to grow in a locked room somewhere in your house and you're not allowed to bring those plants outside, that's still keeping the taboo [alive]," Lavoie said.
The federal government set up rules for home cultivation when cannabis use became legal in 2018, but gave the provinces and territories the authority to set further restrictions.
Manitoba's previous Progressive Conservative banned growing cannabis at home, making Manitoba and Quebec the only provinces to do so.
TobaGrown's court challenge argued the federal Cannabis Act gives individual provinces the opportunity to impose restrictions, but not an outright ban.
That challenge was dropped when Manitoba's NDP government, elected in 2023, passed an amendment last June to allow homegrown cannabis.
But Lavoie said he now plans to continue his legal battle with a new lawsuit against the province over the restriction on growing outdoors.
"The ban on outdoor growing still keeps it criminal, so our role at TobaGrown is to remove stigma," Lavoie said.
Rules a balancing act: justice minister
Manitoba Justice Minister Matt Wiebe said the removal of the ban is intended to bring Manitoba up to speed with other jurisdictions and adhere to federal law.
"It gives the ability to those users to have choice, to be able to grow in a responsible way … and ensures we are capturing this part of the market," Wiebe said.
Quebec, whose ban was upheld in a 2023 Supreme Court ruling, is now the only province in Canada that bars people from growing their own pot.
Wiebe said Manitoba's rules on home-growing, including restricting growing outdoors, are a balancing act between allowing Manitobans access to marijuana, while also protecting kids and neighbourhoods.
"When it comes to crime and public safety, if you have plants that grow in an accessible way [outdoors], that might just invite others to come in," he said.
Wiebe said the government has also heard from consumers who want to smoke marijuana outside their homes and is listening "very closely," but is working to allow personal choices in a way that also takes public health into account.
For now, the legislation change "gives people a lot of more choices … but we're doing it in a responsible way," he said.
Retailers licensed by The Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Authority of Manitoba will be the only establishments allowed to sell cannabis seeds and plant material under the rules.
Those products will be ordered by the Manitoba Liquor & Lotteries, the official wholesaler and distributor of cannabis for licensed retailers, the Crown corporation said in a statement.
Manitoba's continued ban on outdoor growing feeds negative cannabis stereotypes: activist
4 minutes ago
Duration 1:44
More than six years after cannabis was legalized in Canada, Manitoba is about to allow residents to grow their own marijuana at home — but a cannabis advocate who challenged the province's previous prohibition says the changes don't go far enough.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Story continues below advertisement The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.


Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
HALIFAX – A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Bolsonaro co-accused testifies on plot to ‘redo' 2022 Brazil election
Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro speaks to the press at Congress in Brasilia, Brazil on March 26, 2025. (Eraldo Peres / AP Photo) Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro helped draft a plan to 'redo the election' he narrowly lost in 2022, a co-accused testified in the former president's coup trial on Monday. Prosecutors accused the 70-year-old far-right leader, who governed Brazil from 2019 to 2022, of having led a 'criminal organization' plotting to prevent leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva taking power. The plot failed, the charge sheet says, for a lack of military backing. Bolsonaro and six co-accused appeared in the Supreme Court on Monday to undergo questioning. A seventh took part via videoconference from prison. Former right-hand man Mauro Cid, who has turned state's witness, told the court that Bolsonaro had 'received and read' a draft decree for the declaration of a state of emergency. He then 'edited' the document, which would have paved the way for measures to 'redo the election' Lula had narrowly won, and also envisaged the imprisonment of officials. Apart from the alleged coup plot, Bolsonaro also stands accused of having been aware of plans to assassinate Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin, and Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes -- an arch-foe. Bolsonaro, who is hoping to make a comeback in 2026 presidential elections despite being barred from running, denies all charges. He and his former aides risk sentences of up to 40 years behind bars. Although he has the right to remain silent, the former president told reporters he plans to respond 'without any problem' to questions from the court. 'It's an excellent idea to speak openly about the coup. I will be very happy to have the opportunity to clarify what happened,' the former army captain said last week. 'It's the moment of truth.' 'Dictator' The Supreme Court headquarters in Brasilia, where Bolsonaro will take the stand -- likely Tuesday or Wednesday -- was one of the targets of rioting supporters known as 'Bolsonaristas' -- who raided government buildings in January 2023 as they urged the military to oust Lula. Bolsonaro was abroad at the time of the last gasp effort to keep him in power, after the alleged coup planning fizzled. For the former president, the trial marked a reunion with former allies and sworn enemies including Cid, who has been labeled a traitor for testifying against his former boss. His testimony had allowed police to identify various actors in the alleged coup plot and to lay hands on compromising information, according to the investigation. Four former ministers and the former heads of Brazil's navy and intelligence agency will also be giving testimony in an in-person questioning session expected to run no later than Friday. The proceedings are broadcast live. Bolsonaro will face questions not only from prosecutors and defense attorneys, but also judge Moraes, whom the former president calls a 'dictator.' 'History' in the making Since the alleged plot was conceived over a long period, and because some of the charges are new to the Brazilian system, 'an extremely complex legal discussion' is expected, according to Rogerio Taffarello, a criminal law expert at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. New witnesses may yet be called before the court gets to closing arguments and sentencing deliberations. Bolsonaro spent the weekend with his lawyers preparing his testimony at the residence of Sao Paulo state governor Tarcisio de Freitas, local media reported. In a preliminary phase, Freitas, who served as Bolsonaro's infrastructure minister, testified his boss had 'never touched' on the subject of a coup or 'mentioned any attempt at constitutional disruption.' But two former army commanders said Bolsonaro had hosted a meeting where the declaration of a state of emergency was discussed as a means to overturn Lula's election victory. Bolsonaro's trial is the first for an attempted coup under a democratic regime in Brazil.