logo
Toilets at petrol pump cannot be used as public facilities, says Kerala HC

Toilets at petrol pump cannot be used as public facilities, says Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has temporarily barred the state and local bodies from turning toilets at privately run petrol pumps into public conveniences, LiveLaw reported.
Justice CS Dias issued the order while hearing a writ petition filed by the Petroleum Traders Welfare and Legal Service Society and five individual retailers.
The petitioners argued that officials from the state government and Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation were pressuring them to let everyone use their restrooms. Posters had even been pasted on some pumps, creating 'the impression that the toilets are public toilets', they told the court.
'Public use disrupts daily operations'
According to the petition, large groups — including tourists from passing buses — now arrive expecting free access. This crowds petrol-pump premises, causes arguments and, the retailers say, raises safety risks in an area where fuel is handled.
The dealers maintain the washrooms were installed only for customers who stop to refuel and need them in an emergency. Allowing unrestricted entry would 'impede and even endanger the functioning of petrol pumps', they said.
'Hence in light of the impending threat and disastrous consequences which might ensue due to usage of such toilets by general public at large; it is essential that requisite directions may be passed by this Honourable Court to restrict usage of such toilets only to customers who come for refuelling their vehicles and that too only in emergency situations,' the petitioners submitted, as quoted by LiveLaw.
Court seeks Swachh Bharat guidelines
Earlier, the court directed the Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation to produce any guidelines issued under the Swachh Bharat Mission that could justify opening private toilets to the public.
The retailers have also asked for a declaration that their toilets are private property safeguarded by Article 300A of the Constitution, and that no law allows authorities to re-designate them as public facilities under the Petroleum Act or its 2002 Rules.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Sowing Division': BJP After Karnataka Hikes Housing Quota For Minorities
'Sowing Division': BJP After Karnataka Hikes Housing Quota For Minorities

NDTV

time20 minutes ago

  • NDTV

'Sowing Division': BJP After Karnataka Hikes Housing Quota For Minorities

The Karnataka government has increased reservation for the downtrodden and minorities under various housing schemes from 10 to 15 per cent, inviting a sharp reaction from the BJP, which has accused the Congress of "pushing religious quotas to appease its vote bank". Announcing the decision, which has been cleared by the Siddarmaiah-led Karnataka cabinet, on Thursday, state Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister HK Patil said the government had noted that the number of people without homes is higher among the downtrodden and minorities, and it is committed to providing housing for all. "We are very particular that all should get housing. Housing for all is to be implemented and, right now, we see that the houseless are more among various downtrodden and minorities. We have increased the housing reservation from 10 to 15 per cent, looking at the ground realities," the minister said. Mr Patil stressed that the reservation will be increased for all minority communities, including Christians, Jains and Buddhists. "The government is very particular that the houseless, irrespective of the community they belong to, should get (houses). Housing for all is the government's resolve," he added. Launching a scathing attack, BJP leader Amit Malviya said the decision was unconstitutional and accused the Congress of "sowing the seeds of division" and "ripping apart the social fabric of Karnataka". "This is brazen. Blatantly illegal and unconstitutional. There can be no reservation on the basis of religion - the Constitution is unambiguous on this. Yet, the Congress government in Karnataka is hell-bent on pushing religious quotas to appease its vote bank. This isn't governance, it's dangerous social engineering," he wrote on X. This is brazen. Blatantly illegal and unconstitutional. There can be no reservation on the basis of religion — the Constitution is unambiguous on this. Yet, the Congress government in Karnataka is hell-bent on pushing religious quotas to appease its vote bank. This isn't… — Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) June 19, 2025 "Congress is determined to sow the seeds of division, polarise communities, and rip apart the social fabric of Karnataka - all for short-term political gain. Karnataka deserves better," he added. Earlier Row The state had seen another controversy over reservation earlier this year, after the Assembly had cleared the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements (Amendment) Bill, providing 4 per cent reservation for Muslims in public contracts. The BJP and Janata Dal (Secular) had termed the Bill unconstitutional and sent a petition to the governor, claiming it would polarise society. In April, Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot sent the Bill to President Droupadi Murmu, saying that the Constitution does not allow reservation based on religion.

Cash discovery row: Three-member panel seeks Justice Varma's impeachment
Cash discovery row: Three-member panel seeks Justice Varma's impeachment

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Cash discovery row: Three-member panel seeks Justice Varma's impeachment

The Supreme Court-appointed three-member panel has recommended the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, a former Delhi High Court judge, in connection with the ongoing cash discovery row, NDTV reported. The panel submitted a 64-page report to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, based on an inquiry involving 55 witnesses and a statement by Justice Varma. The committee made two key observations that led to its recommendation for impeachment. The report stated, 'The three-member committee holds the money/cash, which was found in the storeroom located within the premises of 30 Tughlaq Crescent, the former residence of Justice Varma.' It added that access to the storeroom — where the half-burnt cash was discovered — was restricted to Justice Varma and his family, and the area was well monitored. The fire, which broke out late on March 14, exposed a stash of partially charred currency notes. A witness recalled the scene, saying, 'As I entered, I noticed on the right-hand side and in front, there was a large pile of cash of Rs 500 notes lying on the floor. I was shocked and surprised at such large amounts of cash strewn on the floor... I saw this for the first time in my life.' Panel names Diya Varma, Rajinder Karki The committee also looked into the actions of Diya Varma, daughter of Justice Varma, and his private secretary Rajinder Karki. According to witness accounts, both allegedly advised firefighters not to mention the discovery of the cash. In light of these findings, the panel concluded that there was sufficient evidence to initiate impeachment proceedings against Justice Varma, who is now serving at the Allahabad High Court following his transfer after the incident. Justice Varma has denied any wrongdoing. He maintained that neither he nor his family had knowledge of the money and claimed that the room where the cash was found — located separately from the main house — was accessible to anyone already present on the property. Kapil Sibal questions Centre's motives On Tuesday, Rajya Sabha MP and senior advocate Kapil Sibal criticised the government's decision to move ahead with impeachment. He suggested that the broader intent was to weaken the Collegium system and assert greater executive control over judicial appointments. Sibal also pointed to an apparent double standard, contrasting the treatment of Justice Varma with that of Justice Shekhar Yadav, who faces an impeachment motion in the Rajya Sabha filed by Opposition MPs over allegedly communal remarks made in 2023.

WhatsApp chats, no show at site: Probe flags Justice Varma's 'unnatural conduct'
WhatsApp chats, no show at site: Probe flags Justice Varma's 'unnatural conduct'

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

WhatsApp chats, no show at site: Probe flags Justice Varma's 'unnatural conduct'

Not filing a police complaint and quietly accepting his transfer to the Allahabad High Court were among the things deemed "unnatural" by the committee constituted to probe allegations of cash discovery at the residence of Justice Yashwant on these findings, the three-member panel, constituted by the Supreme Court, recommended the removal of Justice cash stash was found at Justice Varma's official residence in Delhi when a fire broke out there on March 14. Justice Varma was not at his residence then. After the matter was reported to the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court transferred him from the Delhi High Court to the Allahabad High Sources have told India Today that a motion will be tabled in the next session of Parliament to impeach Justice Varma. WHAT THE INQUIRY PANEL REPORT SAYSCommunication only through WhatsAppSeveral staff members of Justice Varma who were examined said they communicated with him only through WhatsApp on the intervening night of March 14-15. Details of this WhatsApp communication could not be retrieved as it is an encrypted show at spot where cash was foundThe panel found that Justice Varma and his wife did not visit the store room even once upon their return to Delhi. Justice Varma attempted to justify this by saying that he was concerned with the well-being of his family the committee found it to be odd, since anyone under such circumstances would visit the spot at least once to assess the claim falls flatJustice Varma never filed a complaint with the police despite alleging a conspiracy against him. The report said if there was indeed any conspiracy, the judge should have filed a complaint or brought it to the notice of the Chief Justice of the High Court or the Chief Justice of accepted transferThe inquiry panel also found that Justice Varma quietly accepted his transfer to the Allahabad High Court on the same day it was proposed, without any was done within a few hours of the transfer being proposed, despite the fact that he had time till the next morning to communicate his decision. The report said he didn't even attempt to find out the reasons behind the EVIDENCEThere are several other aspects that also worked against Justice Varma. The report mentioned that CCTV cameras monitoring the store room were not working. Justice Varma claimed that the CCTV was controlled by the security, and he was not aware why it was not in an 11-second video taken at midnight on March 15, made by Sunil Kumar, PCR in-charge, showed heaps of cash in front of the door and at the back of the store room. One person is heard saying, "Note hi note hain, dekho dikh rahein hain (The room is filled with notes, it can be seen)."Must Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store