Why did such a powerful earthquake produce such a weak tsunami?
But later in the morning, the centers began to downgrade or retire those warnings in some places, including parts of California, Hawaii, China and Japan, as the big waves failed to appear. What happened?
According to Diego Melgar, a geophysicist at the University of Oregon, part of the reason the tsunamis were weaker than anticipated may have to do with the size of the earthquake. "There's big,' he said. "And then there's really, really, really big.'
The most recent event had an estimated magnitude of 8.7 or 8.8 on the scale scientists use to measure the strength of earthquakes, Melgar said. By contrast, catastrophic tsunamis in the past, including a wave that struck Indonesia in 2004 and another that hit Japan in 2011, were about a magnitude 9.
That may sound comparable to Wednesday's quake, Melgar said, but it is significantly bigger. That's because the earthquake scale is logarithmic: A magnitude 9 event possesses about 10 times as much energy as a magnitude 8.7 event, and about three times as much energy as a magnitude 8.8 event.
The earthquake Wednesday occurred along a subduction zone, where one of Earth's tectonic plates slides under another. This can cause the seafloor to move up and down, creating a wave that propagates across the ocean.
According to Melgar, current models suggest that Wednesday's earthquake occurred across a stretch of seafloor that was hundreds of miles long. The longer the quake, the more energetic the tsunami can be, he said.
A motorcyclist rides past a tsunami evacuation route sign during a tsunami warning in Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia, on Wednesday. |
AFP-JIJI
A larger earthquake typically generates a larger wave. But the wave size depends on smaller details of the quake, like the depth of the motion at different parts along the line where the two tectonic plates meet.
"Not all earthquakes are created equal,' Melgar said. "We're still untangling the details. It's going to take weeks to months of research to figure out exactly what happened.'
More likely than not, this earthquake just wasn't big enough to create a catastrophic wave. "Don't get me wrong, it's still huge,' he said. "But those in 2004 and 2011 were behemoths.'
Current estimates of the wave height along the U.S. coastline vary by location. Alaska was mostly spared, and parts of California experienced waves around 3 feet (91 centimeters) high, according to Vasily Titov, a scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who simulates tsunamis. Hawaii saw slightly higher waves.
That has generated flooding, but so far, no reports of casualties.
But the tsunami was not weak everywhere. Along the coast of Kamchatka, it was "a huge tsunami and mega-event,' Titov said, possibly comparable to the wave that struck Japan in 2011, which reached heights of nearly 130 feet (39 meters). NOAA's tsunami models are not well-tuned in Kamchatka, which is far less populated.
"We got lucky that this energy did not go directly to U.S. coastlines,' Titov said, referring to the strength of the wave. The coast of Chile remains on alert.
Tsunamis are different from typical ocean waves, which are shallower ripples created by the wind. Tsunamis, by contrast, are generated deeper down and are more like the waves produced if you submerge your hand in water and move it up and down.
Wednesday's event was a bit poetic, Melgar said: An earthquake struck in the same place in 1952. That triggered a 12-foot-high wave that reached the coast of Hawaii with little warning. This time, the network of warning centers in the Pacific Ocean meant the world was more prepared.
"It's kind of a better-safe-than-sorry situation,' Melgar said. "Warnings went out. This is a big success.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
16 hours ago
- Japan Times
Kamchatka quake may have awakened volcano dormant for 600 years, Russia says
The overnight eruption of the Krasheninnikov Volcano in Kamchatka, its first in 600 years, may be connected to the huge earthquake that rocked Russia's Far East last week, Russia's RIA state news agency and scientists reported on Sunday. "This is the first historically confirmed eruption of Krasheninnikov Volcano in 600 years," RIA cited Olga Girina, head of the Kamchatka Volcanic Eruption Response Team, as saying. She added that the eruption may be connected to the earthquake on Wednesday that triggered tsunami warnings as far away as French Polynesia and Chile, and was followed by an eruption of Klyuchevskoy, the most active volcano on the Kamchatka Peninsula. On the Telegram channel of the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Girina said that Krasheninnikov's last lava effusion took place on 1463 — plus/minus 40 years — and no eruption has been known since. The Kamchatka branch of Russia's ministry for emergency services said that an ash plume rising up to 6,000 meters (3.7 miles) has been recorded following the volcano's eruption. The volcano itself stands at 1,856 meters. "The ash cloud has drifted eastward, toward the Pacific Ocean. There are no populated areas along its path," the ministry said on Telegram. The eruption of the volcano has been assigned an orange aviation code, indicating a heightened risk to aircraft, the ministry said.
NHK
2 days ago
- NHK
Japanese researchers create tsunami simulation after Russia quake
Japanese researchers are analyzing the effects of Wednesday's powerful earthquake in Russia's Far East. They've created a simulation to shed light on why some of the largest tsunami came later. The group is led by Professor Imamura Fumihiko from Tohoku University's International Research Institute of Disaster Science. The simulation shows how tsunami waves changed course after hitting an underwater feature called the Emperor Seamount Chain. A tsunami measuring 1.3 meters was seen at Kuji Port along Japan's northeastern Sanriku coast more than five hours after the quake. The simulation suggests reflected waves reached the area at around that time. Professor Imamura says tsunami are unpredictable, and knowing when to issue and lift advisories can be difficult. He also says people should always try to follow the latest information.
Japan Times
4 days ago
- Japan Times
Why did such a powerful earthquake produce such a weak tsunami?
Early Wednesday, a powerful earthquake, one of the largest ever recorded, struck off the coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia. Tsunami centers along the Pacific coastline quickly sprung into action, issuing warnings for the potential of colossal ocean waves that are often generated by big earthquakes. But later in the morning, the centers began to downgrade or retire those warnings in some places, including parts of California, Hawaii, China and Japan, as the big waves failed to appear. What happened? According to Diego Melgar, a geophysicist at the University of Oregon, part of the reason the tsunamis were weaker than anticipated may have to do with the size of the earthquake. "There's big,' he said. "And then there's really, really, really big.' The most recent event had an estimated magnitude of 8.7 or 8.8 on the scale scientists use to measure the strength of earthquakes, Melgar said. By contrast, catastrophic tsunamis in the past, including a wave that struck Indonesia in 2004 and another that hit Japan in 2011, were about a magnitude 9. That may sound comparable to Wednesday's quake, Melgar said, but it is significantly bigger. That's because the earthquake scale is logarithmic: A magnitude 9 event possesses about 10 times as much energy as a magnitude 8.7 event, and about three times as much energy as a magnitude 8.8 event. The earthquake Wednesday occurred along a subduction zone, where one of Earth's tectonic plates slides under another. This can cause the seafloor to move up and down, creating a wave that propagates across the ocean. According to Melgar, current models suggest that Wednesday's earthquake occurred across a stretch of seafloor that was hundreds of miles long. The longer the quake, the more energetic the tsunami can be, he said. A motorcyclist rides past a tsunami evacuation route sign during a tsunami warning in Buenaventura, Valle del Cauca Department, Colombia, on Wednesday. | AFP-JIJI A larger earthquake typically generates a larger wave. But the wave size depends on smaller details of the quake, like the depth of the motion at different parts along the line where the two tectonic plates meet. "Not all earthquakes are created equal,' Melgar said. "We're still untangling the details. It's going to take weeks to months of research to figure out exactly what happened.' More likely than not, this earthquake just wasn't big enough to create a catastrophic wave. "Don't get me wrong, it's still huge,' he said. "But those in 2004 and 2011 were behemoths.' Current estimates of the wave height along the U.S. coastline vary by location. Alaska was mostly spared, and parts of California experienced waves around 3 feet (91 centimeters) high, according to Vasily Titov, a scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who simulates tsunamis. Hawaii saw slightly higher waves. That has generated flooding, but so far, no reports of casualties. But the tsunami was not weak everywhere. Along the coast of Kamchatka, it was "a huge tsunami and mega-event,' Titov said, possibly comparable to the wave that struck Japan in 2011, which reached heights of nearly 130 feet (39 meters). NOAA's tsunami models are not well-tuned in Kamchatka, which is far less populated. "We got lucky that this energy did not go directly to U.S. coastlines,' Titov said, referring to the strength of the wave. The coast of Chile remains on alert. Tsunamis are different from typical ocean waves, which are shallower ripples created by the wind. Tsunamis, by contrast, are generated deeper down and are more like the waves produced if you submerge your hand in water and move it up and down. Wednesday's event was a bit poetic, Melgar said: An earthquake struck in the same place in 1952. That triggered a 12-foot-high wave that reached the coast of Hawaii with little warning. This time, the network of warning centers in the Pacific Ocean meant the world was more prepared. "It's kind of a better-safe-than-sorry situation,' Melgar said. "Warnings went out. This is a big success.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company
