Federal government to change power price rules to push costs lower
The changes could spark pushback from energy retailers, as the minister points to possible new "restraints" on costs being passed on to consumers through power bills.
Energy Minister Chris Bowen will use a speech in Melbourne on Wednesday to flag the looming changes to the 'default market offer', which acts as a benchmark power price in New South Wales, South Australia and south-east Queensland.
The DMO places a cap on what customers can be charged, while retailers are encouraged to offer more competitive deals.
It has been rising faster than energy ministers would like, including lifts of up to 9.7 per cent in NSW this year.
The Australian Energy Regulator pointed out that the main driver of the price hikes was administrative costs within retailers — like advertising and the cost of managing customers.
Both state and federal ministers pushed back on that price hike when it was released as a draft in March, urging the regulator to consider the revenue and profits retailers were making.
But the price hikes went ahead largely as first proposed.
Chris Bowen is now announcing plans to change rules to try and rein in those costs.
"The DMO was intended to act as a benchmark price to stop the worst forms of price gouging while leaving the job of putting downward pressure on prices to competition between energy companies, " he will say on Wednesday.
"However, I'll be frank. I don't think it's working that way and reform is needed.
"The vast majority of bill payers, some 80 per cent, could be getting a better deal. It's difficult to defend the DMO, when the customer is required to do the deal hunting."
Mr Bowen will point to Victoria, which has its own energy regulator setting a different default market offer to other states, as a more ideal model.
"The reformed pricing mechanism will bring (NSW, SA and south-east Queensland) closer in line with other jurisdictions like here in Victoria, which this year has seen significantly smaller bill increases compared to DMO regions," he will say.
"The government will consult on the design … but changes could include stripping out the DMO's competition allowance and putting further restraints on what retailers can claim back from customers in their bills."
The Australian Energy Council has previously pushed back on suggestions that 'retail costs' are to blame for price hikes, arguing that retail margins are already "notably tight".
Chris Bowen will also use Wednesday's speech to talk up Australia's prospects of securing hosting rights for the COP31 climate summit in 2026.
The minister is also pressuring Australia's sole rival for hosting rights, Türkiye, to drop out of the race.
Australia is bidding to host the conference in partnership with the Pacific, and has the support of Pacific leaders and many European leaders too.
Mr Bowen visited Türkiye last year, while travelling to the COP29 summit, to personally lobby officials over the bid.
But Türkiye's president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, used the conference in Azerbaijan to confirm his country's hopes to host the conference.
Mr Bowen will call on Türkiye to step aside and allow Australia to take on the hosting rights unchallenged.
"We've been working hard with our international partners and Türkiye to resolve the bid," he said.
"That won't have been obvious, because we've kept those discussions private out of respect for Türkiye. It was legitimate for Türkiye to wait for the results of our election, given the opposition's position.
"But given our election, and the strong support for our bid from our group, we are now hopeful for a resolution before too long."
The minister will determine Australia's 2035 emissions target in September, a key milestone for Australia heading towards COP31.
It will be released concurrently with the government's long-term Net Zero Plan that will step out Australia's pathway to net zero emissions by 2050.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
26 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australian Jewish groups branding Netanyahu's attack on PM as ‘unhelpful'
Liberal Senator Dave Sharma discusses Benjamin Netanyahu's attempts to 'intervene' in Australian domestic politics. On Wednesday, the Israel-Australia relationship hit a new low after the turmoil following the Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Mr Netanyahu called Mr Albanese 'weak' and accused him of abandoning Jewish Australians. 'You have already seen the reaction from organised parts of the Australian Jewish community saying they find this incredibly unhelpful,' Mr Sharma said.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Productivity summit ends day two with progress on rules changes to boost housing supply
Rules holding back superannuation funds from investing potential billions of dollars into housing and renewables projects could face a shake up, after broad agreement at Canberra's productivity roundtable that there is a need for change. Super funds are required to meet a "performance benchmark", under laws designed to ensure funds are performing and maintaining the retirement savings of their members. But critics have said the rules around those benchmarks discourage investment in some assets, including a rule that requires stamp duty to be disclosed as a fee in a way that they say discourages housing investment. The government flagged it was seeking to rewrite the benchmark after a 2023 review similarly found it could unintentionally be discouraging investment in some assets. Rebecca Mikula-Wright, who heads the Investor Group on Climate Change, said there had been broad agreement at this week's summit that changing those rules could accelerate housing and renewables investment. "The Your Future Your Super performance benchmark was discussed a lot in the session I was in yesterday, and really around how that is constraining the ability of super funds to invest in higher risk projects they really want to invest into," Ms Mikula-Wright told the ABC. 'The treasurer did indicate he is likely to revisit those reforms." After a day of talks focused on finding agreement on one of the thorniest issues impacting housing and the environment — Australia's "broken" environmental approvals process — Treasurer Jim Chalmers expressed his pleasure at the "real prospect of a useful consensus" emerging on some of the country's key economic challenges. "Day two of the reform roundtable was really dominated by how we can boost housing supply, how we can responsibly reduce and improve regulation and speed up approvals," Mr Chalmers said. "I'm really encouraged by the consensus in the room for economic reform in these areas, and we're enthusiastic about some of the policies that participants put on the table." Ms Mikula-Wright said there had also been good support for a Productivity Commission recommendation to establish a "strike team" that could land faster approvals for key infrastructure projects, particularly around renewables. "We're competing with markets that are getting projects up faster and cheaper, so we have to do the same. Then we can attract more capital and get those projects rolling out," she said. After warnings from Housing Minister Clare O'Neil that red tape was dragging down housing approvals — and leaked Treasury documents indicating the government was considering a pause on the National Construction Code — attendees also agreed such a move should take place. The National Construction Code lays out minimum requirements for buildings on everything from fire exits and accessibility to insulation and capacity for electric vehicle chargers. But while changes to safety standards could continue, attendees discussed possible pauses on "non-essential" rules of the construction code, such as new requirements to lift energy efficiency standards. New South Wales Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said a pause on the code was needed, though the finer details were being worked through. "The pause is something that is where the conversation was concentrated on. In terms of how long it needs to be paused, who would do the review, what's the terms of reference, that work can be pursued," he said, "I think we will have a few more conversations at the roundtable and beyond to sort out those levels of detail." The ABC understands the government hopes to move fast on a pause, and not have discussions drag out for several months. After two successive terms of government failing to find a path through the thicket of reform on Australia's Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, attendees of today's roundtable were cautiously welcoming what appeared to be some progress. The complicated laws govern the environmental approval process for major projects, such as energy and mining projects, as well as housing and other developments where they potentially impact threatened species or significant cultural sites. But a major review of those decades-old laws published in 2020 concluded that they were no longer working for business or the environment — a view that today's roundtable attendees were agreed on. However, attempts under former environment minister Tanya Plibersek to update the laws were abandoned before the federal election — with a key sticking point being a plan to introduce a federal watchdog that could independently monitor EPBC approvals. Mining and other business groups did not support that proposed Environmental Protection Agency. But after extended talks today, they left saying they would be prepared to support an EPA, with a caveat that the final say would rest with the environment minister. There are still devils in the detail, including a desire from environment groups to see the EPA also given final approval powers on projects. But it marks the first significant advancement in EPBC discussions since they stalled last term. Australian Conservation Foundation chief executive, Kelly O'Shanassy, said there was agreement in the room that an EPA was needed but there remained different views on how it should operate. "There is a lot of support for efficient decision making, transparent decision making, accountability — that is not the current process," Ms O'Shanassy said. "You need to have an independent regulator that is held to account for the speed of its decisions and the quality of its decisions." Business Council of Australia chief executive, Bran Black, said a federal EPA should effectively be set-up in the same way as existing state-based authorities. "We take the view that it's really important to have a separation between the entity that is ultimately responsible for compliance and the entity that's ultimately responsible for approvals," Mr Black said. "In an ideal world, we wouldn't need to go down the path of creating multiple bodies at all [but] the government has committed to a new EPA. It's made it very clear, that's a point that it's taken to two elections now." "The question then is: what does this EPA do?" Environment Minister Murray Watt said, however, there was strong support around the table for "stronger" environmental protections and "faster and simpler" project approvals, through a more transparent process for businesses. "These are objectives our government supports, but we will ultimately need support across the parliament for reform. It was therefore very useful for the shadow treasurer, as a roundtable participant, to hear the depth of support for change," Senator Watt said. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the Coalition was willing to work constructively with the government to see reforms to the environment laws passed.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Australia defends Anthony Albanese after Israeli leader's attacks
The Federal Government has hit back at Israeli Prime Minister after he called Anthony Albanese a weak politician who had "abandoned Australia's jews". Political Editor Jacob Greber has more.
