
‘Only job I know': tiny Lesotho's garment workers reel from Trump's tariffs
The day after Donald Trump announced sweeping global tariffs, Lesotho's garment workers feared for their jobs.
Last year, Lesotho sent about 20% of its $1.1bn (£845m) of exports to the US, most of it clothing, as well as diamonds, under a continent-wide trade agreement meant to help African countries' development via tariff-free exports.
Now, all that is at risk, after the US president imposed a 50% tariff on the impoverished landlocked country, which he claimed last month 'nobody had ever heard of'.
Makhotso Moeti migrated to Lesotho's capital, Maseru, from the rural centre of the tiny mountainous kingdom entirely surrounded by South Africa. 'Factory work is the only job I've known for many years,' she said, attaching a label to Gap clothing. 'If the factories shut down, I won't have many options left. I'll be forced to return home to the very poverty I thought I had escaped when I moved to the city.'
On Wednesday, Trump unveiled what he claimed were 'reciprocal' tariffs, overturning decades of global trade policy.
The tariff rates, which are due to come into force on 9 April, range from 10% to 50% and were calculated with what economists labelled an 'idiotic' formula, penalising countries that have the highest trade surpluses with the US relative to their imports from the US.
Dr Ratjomose Machema, a lecturer in economics at the National University of Lesotho, said: 'I don't understand how this is a reciprocal tariff because we really don't charge that much in tariffs.'
Lesotho, which has a population of 2.3 million, was hit with the highest rate. In Africa, it was followed by vanilla exporter Madagascar with a tariff of 47%, diamond producer Botswana on 37%, oil-rich Angola with 32%, and the continent's most industrialised economy, South Africa, on 30%.
Like the hard-hit, south-east Asian economies, the poor majority in these countries cannot afford expensive American products. In recent decades, China has overtaken western countries to become the largest trading partner of most African countries.
According to the African Growth and Opportunities Act (Agoa) US data portal, Lesotho exported $237m of goods last year to the US and imported $2.8m, mostly clothing and diamonds. Agoa, which has allowed tariff-free access to the US market for thousands of product types since 2000, created a thriving garment industry, accounting for about 20% of GDP.
There are about 30,000 garment workers in Lesotho, mostly women, with 12,000 making clothes for US brands including Levi's, Calvin Klein and Walmart in Chinese- and Taiwanese-owned factories. While most of the jobs pay the monthly minimum wage of $146-$163, they are still highly sought after in the poor, largely informal economy.
In Madagascar, which has a population of about 32 million, Agoa has also nurtured a significant garment sector, which employs about 180,000 people in a country where GDP per head is just $575. In 2024, the island nation exported $733m of goods to the US, with clothing the top export, followed by vanilla.
Sign up to First Thing
Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Ketakandriana Rafitoson, a political science researcher at the Catholic University of Madagascar, said: 'The textile and apparel sector is really a cornerstone of Madagascar's economy … [Tariffs] will have a drastic effect on the country.'
The future of Agoa, which will expire in September if it isn't renewed by the US Congress, was already looking precarious before Trump's announcement.
Lesotho's trade minister, Mokhethi Shelile, said officials, who had been preparing to travel to the US to ask for an Agoa extension, would argue that the tariff calculations didn't include digital services from US companies such as Android and Microsoft.
He added: 'That being said, we recognise that we cannot rely solely on the American market.'
A fact sheet published by the White House to accompany Trump's tariff announcement said: 'Today's action simply asks other countries to treat us like we treat them. It's the golden rule for our golden age.'
In Lesotho, Nthabiseng Khalele, a garment worker sheltering from the rain after a long day in the factory, said: 'My hope and wish is that our prime minister could somehow reach out to President Trump and ask him to at least show some compassion for Lesotho. If we lose our jobs here, I'm almost certain that many of us will end up sleeping on empty stomachs.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
39 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Rangers, Hearts and Hibs watch Crystal Palace situation with interest as SFA has say on Euro exclusion
Uefa set to rule on multi-club ownership Sign up to our Football newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The situation with Crystal Palace potentially being denied from competing in Europe next season will not have gone unnoticed by supporters of Rangers, Hearts and Hibs. Oliver Glasner's team clinched a Europa League spot after they stunned Manchester City to win the FA Cup at Wembley last month – the first major trophy in the club's history. However, there is a complication. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Crystal Palace's Marc Guehi (centre left) and Joel Ward (centre right) lift the FA Cup after the Emirates FA Cup final at Wembley Stadium, London. Picture date: Saturday May 17, 2025. | PA Palace are facing an anxious wait to discover their fate after being required to meet with Uefa's club financial control body (CFCB) to show they do not fall foul of its multi-club ownership rules. John Textor holds a 43 per cent stake in Palace through his company Eagle Football, while he is also the owner of French club Lyon, who qualified for the Europa League with a sixth-placed Ligue 1 finish. No individual is allowed to have a significant say in the running of two clubs competing in the same Uefa competition and the CFCB will make a ruling on the case this month. Irish club Drogheda United have already been expelled from the Conference League due to multi-club ownership rules. They are currently owned by the Trivela Group - an organisation which also has a majority share in Danish side Silkeborg IF, who have also qualified for the Conference League, meaning Drogheda are unable to compete due to Uefa regulations, although club officials plan to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad While Palace are confident they can settle their case - either by proving that Textor's influence at Selhurst Park is limited or by the American agreeing to sell his stake - the outcome could have implications for the Scottish clubs who have opened their doors to investors from other clubs. Rangers were recently taken over by an American consortium involving 49ers Enterprises - who own Leeds United - while Brighton owner Tony Bloom, who is also a minority shareholder in Union Saint-Gilloise, is set to acquire a 29 per cent stake in Hearts, with non-voting rights, in return for a near £10million investment. Hibs have also linked up with Bill Foley's Black Knights Group - who run Bournemouth and have involvement with French club Lorient and Auckland FC in New Zealand. All three deals required SFA approval and the chief executive of the governing body, Ian Maxwell, has welcomed the influx of multi-club investors into the Scottish game. Brighton owner Tony Bloom is set to purchase a 29 per cent stake in Hearts. (Photo by) | Getty Images "Multi-club ownership is here. It's part of football," he stated. "When you look across Europe, the number of clubs that are involved in some multi-club structure is growing by the day. We need to be part of that or why would you limit that investment? It was actually interesting when you start to think through the process. We had dual interest regulations which meant that if you're involved in a club, you can't get involved in a Scottish club unless we say yes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "But someone like a Tony Bloom, for example, that's getting involved in Hearts, has a track record at Brighton, understands football, has Union Saint-Gilloise, knows other clubs. We actually make it harder for him to come into Scottish football than we do for someone who's just sold a company for £10 million that's got no understanding of the Scottish game. When you actually get into it, that probably doesn't make a lot of sense." Maxwell also attempted to allay fears that Scottish clubs could find themselves in the same boat as Palace if say, for example, both Rangers and Leeds qualified to compete in the same European competition with the chairman of the newly-promoted English Premier League side, Paraag Marathe, also now the vice-chairman at Ibrox. "Our board, we're looking at it from two perspectives," Maxwell added. "Does it grow and develop the game? Will it generate financial investment into Scottish football? Does it give us an integrity issue? "The integrity issue falls away because that would only happen if it was two Scottish teams playing under our jurisdiction, which it's not. The jurisdictional matter becomes a UEFA point and we've been clear in all the dual interests, all the multi-club investment models that we've done, that if there was, similar to a Crystal Palace scenario at the moment, where there's a question mark about which one's going to play in Europe, it can't be the Scottish club that's the unintended consequence or has to step aside from European competition. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Leeds United chairman Paraag Marathe is also the vice-chairman of Rangers following the recent takeover by 49ers Enterprises. | PA "Now, I don't really understand why Crystal Palace and [Lyon], but they've not been able to sort that out because UEFA have shown in the past that they can find a way. "There's both of the Red Bull teams so they've found a way to make it work, whether it's just a timing issue or whether it's not. The good thing is, because the vast majority of clubs that have came into Scotland have got other multi-club ownership models, they're used to that. "You speak to the guys involved in the Hearts deal and they're very aware of what UEFA need and what UEFA want and how that structure needs to look to make sure we don't get ourselves those problems. "So I think it's here, we can't ignore it. Why would you want to step away from it? Why would you want to block investment coming into the game if it's going to be good for our clubs? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad


Daily Record
40 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Rangers takeover crew handed ringing SFA endorsement as American dream can be good for Scottish football
Andrew Cavenah and the 49ers investors were given the green light to take charge at Ibrox and it wasn't a tough decision Ian Maxwell has revealed the SFA gave the Rangers takeover the green light as he is convinced the American money men can be a positive force for Scottish football. Hampden chiefs have the power to step in if potential new owners look dodgy with tightened up fit and proper person rules and there have also been questions raised across the globe amid the rise of multi-club ownership. Gers have been backed by the San Francisco 49ers' investment fund – who also have control at Leeds United, while Hearts and Hibs have also received cash boosts from Tony Bloom and Billy Foley, who are involved with Brighton and Bournemouth. Maxwell insisted it was an easy decision to rubber stamp the developments though – as the newcomers to Scottish football all have solid track records and are no fly-by-nights. And the SFA chief executive is convinced Andrew Cavenagh and the 49ers team will be good for Rangers and the wider game. Maxwell, speaking before Rangers slammed his organisation over the John Brown notice complaint, said: 'It's not been particularly complicated. To be honest, we've definitely been more open. Multi-club ownership is here. It's part of football. 'When you look across Europe, the number of clubs that are involved in some multi-club structure is growing by the day. We need to be part of that or why would you limit that investment? 'Why would you want to block investment coming into the game if it's going to be good for our clubs? 'The trick is the club needs to then go and spend that money as wisely as possible. 'We don't get involved in that bit, but from a board perspective there's definitely a willingness to look at anything that generates more investment into Scotland. 'It was actually interesting when you start to think through the process and we had dual interest regulations which meant that if you're involved in a club, you can't get involved in a Scottish club unless we say yes. 'But someone like Tony Bloom for example, that's getting involved in Hearts, has a track record at Brighton, understands football, has Union St. Gilloise and those other clubs. 'We actually make it harder for him to come into Scottish football than we do for someone who's just sold a company for £10 million that's got no understanding of the Scottish game. 'When you actually get into it, that probably doesn't make a lot of sense. 'Our board, we're looking at it from two perspectives. 'Does it grow and develop the game? Will it generate financial investment into Scottish football? 'Does it give us an integrity issue? The integrity issue falls away because that would only happen if it was two Scottish teams playing under our jurisdiction, which it's not.' The European issue is one that's got UEFA's attention, with several clubs now under the same umbrellas, such as the Red Bull and City Football Group. English FA Cup winners Crystal Palace are facing protests over their spot in the Europa League with their owners also involved with Lyon, who have qualified for the same competition. Maxwell is confident it won't become a problem for Scottish sides – and they would never be forced to step aside. He said: "The jurisdictional matter becomes a UEFA point and we've been clear in all the dual interests, all the multi-club investment models that we've done, we've been very clear that if there was, similar to a Crystal Palace scenario at the moment, where there's a question mark about which one's going to play in Europe, it can be the Scottish club that's the unintended consequence or has to step aside from European competition. 'UEFA have shown in the past that they can find a way, they're both Red Bull teams so they've found a way to make it work, whether it's just a timing issue or whether it's not. 'The good thing is, because the vast majority of clubs that have came into Scotland have got other multi-club ownership models, they're used to that and you speak to the guys involved in Hearts and they're very aware of what UEFA need and what UEFA want and how that structure needs to look to make sure we don't get ourselves those problems.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
G7 is a big moment for Carney. Here are five things to watch
Leaders of some of the world's wealthiest countries have descended on a luxury mountain lodge nestled in Canada's Rockies for this year's G7 summit. The elite gathering comes as western allies face numerous crises, from conflicts on three continents to global economic instability. Canada chairs the G7 this year and will host leaders of Italy, US, France, Germany, UK and Japan in Kananaskis, Alberta. It has promised a set of streamlined priorities focused around the global economy and Mark Carney's carefully planned agenda has now been upended by the Israel-Iran conflict. It is his first major international gathering as Canadian prime are five challenges ahead. Big moment for Carney as Iran derails plans This summit was set to be a test of his ability to meet three lofty goals he advanced for Canada - taking a leadership role on the global stage, becoming the strongest G7 economy and weaning off US the Iran issue has suddenly shot to the top of the G7 agenda, forcing his officials to rejig their one thing is clear. Carney will be closely watched for how he handles US President Donald Trump, who has frequently undermined Canada's issue sure to dominate G7 summitJohn Kirton, director of G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto, said that scrutiny will start from the arrival ceremony, where he'll need to show that he's treating Trump as an equal. And keep him in check when the meetings are under summit offers the potential to secure some Canadian wins, perhaps new trade and security deals with the US, hatched last month in that meeting, Carney gave the president some golf gear from the Kananaskis Country Club, a scenic course within the tightly controlled perimeter of the summit. The Trump factor The summit is taking place amid a global trade war started by Trump, who is using tariffs as a way to rebalance trading relationships. He has said the US has been "looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike".It also comes as World Bank predicts the global economy will see the slowest decade for growth since the 1960s as the effect the US tariffs are felt - making it likely there will be some awkward - or "frank", in diplomatic lingo - conversations at this family gathering. A discussion on the global economy will kick-off the summit on Monday morning. But Trump's November election win has shifted the global agenda beyond trade. The gathering offers the president a chance to secure wins on some of his other priorities, such as migration, critical minerals, security and drug trafficking - all of which are on the agenda later in the day. The president has met each of his G7 counterparts since taking office but he will line up one-on-one meetings on the sidelines - he's already got Carney and the Mexican president in the are currently two bilateral meetings on his schedule, according to US officials, though there no details on who he is speaking with. Avoiding a walkout like in 2018 This will be Trump's second time in Canada as US president, the first being a discordant summit in Charlevoix, Quebec, in 2018 shortly after he slapped steel and aluminium tariffs on Canada, Mexico and was memorable for ending in acrimony and disarray - captured in a now-famous photo of former German chancellor Angela Merkel confronting a defiant Trump as other world leaders and US aides looked on. The leaders struggled to agree on language over global trade for the final communique - a moment captured in that Merkel image - before Trump left the summit headed to Singapore to sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while posting missives from Air Force One aimed at then Canadian Prime Minister Justin of the tensions from seven years ago remain relevant today. Carney hopes to avoid a similar derailment, and told Sky News last month that the lesson he took from that blow-up "is to be consistent - say the same thing in private as you do in public, say the same things after the summit as you do during the summit".Who's who in famous G7 photoThe G7 is a "consensus body. We work together", a senior Canadian government official said in a briefing last week. With that in mind, Canada has chosen to eschew a final communique completely in favour of six of short joint statements on wildfires, critical minerals and other key agenda items. Forest fires, AI, critical minerals and Ukraine Canada's priorities for the confab are sharply focused on building stronger economies and strengthening peace and security, including harnessing the power of artificial intelligence and fortifying critical mineral supply chains. While there are no broad commitments expected on climate change, it is integrated into the agenda, a senior government official told a briefing this week, pointing to an effort to improve the international joint response to the growing global forest fire threat. Canada's worst wildfire season on record was in 2023 and this year could be on track to be the second worst. Smoke from the blazes has blanketed parts of North America and Europe and could be visible reminder to delegates in Kananaskis of the threat. Ukraine is another pressing topic on the agenda, with President Volodomyr Zelensky there hoping to discuss continued support for his country, sanctions against Russia, and future financing for reconstruction efforts. Tuesday morning will focus on that conflict, with Ukraine expected to push for more sanctions on has also placed countering foreign interference - notably interference in global diaspora communities - high on the summit's agenda, setting up potential for tense discussions with some of the attending leaders who are not part of the G7. Geopolitical minefields As host, Canada's role includes inviting leaders not permanently attached to the seven-member group, and Carney has given a number the nod to attend, some more controversial than mentioned, Zelensky will be there. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will also be a guest, with Carney saying there are important discussions that India, as a major economic force, should be a part of. Modi's attendance comes amid deeply strained relations between the two countries over the murder of a Sikh separatist leader on Canadian soil. Carney invites Modi to G7, signalling thaw in relationsCanada pledges to meet Nato's 2% defence spending target within a yearCanada has accused India of carrying out that targeted killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar two years ago and the G7 invitation has received backlash among some Sikh Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has confirmed she will be in Kananaskis. Her presence sets the stage for talks on North American trade, which has been upended by Trump's tariffs. Sheinbaum has said she is keen to set up a one-on-one meeting with Trump, which would be the first between the has also invited European and Nato leaders and his counterparts from Australia, South Africa, South Korea, Indonesia, and Brazil.