logo
‘Global red alert': Wildfires drive record forest loss in 2024, alarming data reveals

‘Global red alert': Wildfires drive record forest loss in 2024, alarming data reveals

Independent22-05-2025
Global forest loss surged to record levels in 2024, with wildfires destroying 6.7 million hectares of tropical primary forest – nearly double the previous year's – according to new satellite data.
For the first time, fires, not agriculture, were the leading driver of tropical forest loss, according to data released by Global Forest Watch, as experts called it a 'global red alert'.
The new figures, based on analysis by the University of Maryland 's GLAD Lab and published on the World Resources Institute 's Global Forest Watch platform, reveal the devastating toll of fire-fuelled deforestation on both the climate and vulnerable communities around the world.
'This level of forest loss is unlike anything we've seen in over 20 years of data,' said Elizabeth Goldman, co-director of Global Forest Watch.
'It's a global red alert – a collective call to action for every country, every business and every person who cares about a liveable planet. Our economies, our communities, our health – none of it can survive without forests.'
The loss of tropical primary forests – vital ecosystems that store carbon and support biodiversity – amounted to an area nearly the size of Panama vanishing at a rate of 18 football fields per minute.
Globally, fires emitted 4.1 gigatonnes of greenhouse gases, more than four times the emissions from all commercial air travel in 2023.
It's a global red alert – a collective call to action for every country, every business and every person who cares about a liveable planet.
Elizabeth Goldman, co-director of Global Forest Watch
While wildfires are common in boreal regions, fire has historically been a secondary cause of tropical deforestation. In 2024, however, fires accounted for nearly half of all tropical primary forest loss – up from 20 per cent in previous years. The report attributes the shift to a combination of human activity, rising land pressure and extreme heat, worsened by El Niño and the continued impacts of the climate crisis.
'2024 was the worst year on record for fire-driven forest loss, breaking the record set just last year,' said Peter Potapov, research professor at the University of Maryland and co-director of the GLAD Lab.
'If this trend continues, it could permanently transform critical natural areas and unleash large amounts of carbon, intensifying climate crisis and fuelling even more extreme fires.'
Brazil accounted for 42 per cent of all tropical primary forest loss in 2024. In the Amazon, tree cover loss was the highest since 2016, while the Pantanal saw its worst year on record. Fires, made worse by Brazil's most severe drought to date, were responsible for two-thirds of the loss in the country – a more than sixfold increase from 2023.
'Brazil has made progress under President Lula (Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva), but the threat to forests remains,' said Mariana Oliveira, director of the Forests and Land Use Program at WRI Brasil.
'Without sustained investment in community fire prevention, stronger state-level enforcement and a focus on sustainable land use, hard-won gains risk being undone. As Brazil prepares to host Cop30 [climate summit], it has a powerful opportunity to put forest protection front and centre on the global stage.'
Bolivia saw the second-highest forest loss in the tropics, overtaking the Democratic Republic of Congo for the first time. Primary forest loss there jumped by 200 per cent in 2024 to 1.5 million hectares, more than half of it driven by fires.
'The fires that tore through Bolivia in 2024 left deep scars – not only on the land but on the people who depend on it,' said Stasiek Czaplicki Cabezas, a Bolivian researcher and data journalist for Revista Nómadas.
'The damage could take centuries to undo.'
Colombia, meanwhile, experienced a nearly 50 per cent increase in forest loss, though largely from illegal mining and coca cultivation rather than fire.
'We need to keep supporting local, nature-based economies – especially in remote areas – and invest in solutions that protect the environment, create jobs and foster peace,' said Joaquin Carrizosa, senior advisor at WRI Colombia.
Forest loss also spiked across Central Africa, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Republic of Congo. In the ROC, fire-related loss rose to 45 per cent, driven by drought and unseasonably hot conditions. In the DRC, longstanding poverty and conflict continue to fuel deforestation.
'There's no silver bullet,' said Teodyl Nkuintchua, WRI Africa's Congo Basin strategy and engagement lead.
'But we won't change the current trajectory until people across the Congo Basin are fully empowered to lead conservation efforts that also support their rural economies.'
Dr Matt Hansen, co-director of the GLAD Lab, warned: 'We're seeing unprecedented forest loss from fire in the few remaining 'High Forest, Low Deforestation' countries, like the Republic of Congo. This new dynamic is outside of current policy frameworks or intervention capabilities and will severely test our ability to maintain intact forests within a warming climate.'
Amid the devastation, the report highlighted progress in parts of Southeast Asia. Indonesia reduced primary forest loss by 11 per cent, helped by long-standing efforts to restore degraded land and control fires. Malaysia saw a 13 per cent decline and dropped out of the top 10 for tropical forest loss for the first time.
'We're proud that Indonesia is one of the few countries in the world to reduce primary forest loss,' said Arief Wijaya, managing director at WRI Indonesia. 'But deforestation remains a concern due to plantations, small-scale farming and mining – even within protected areas.'
The year also saw intense fire seasons in boreal forests, with Canada and Russia contributing to a 5 per cent rise in total tree cover loss globally – 30 million hectares in total, an area roughly the size of Italy.
To meet the goal of halting forest loss by 2030, the world needs to cut deforestation by 20 per cent each year starting now. But in 2024, tropical forest loss increased by 80 per cent.
'Countries have repeatedly pledged to halt deforestation and forest degradation,' said Kelly Levin, chief of science, data and systems change at the Bezos Earth Fund.
'Yet the data reveal a stark gap between promises made and progress delivered.'
Rod Taylor, director of forests and nature conservation at WRI, added: 'Forest fires and land clearing are driving up emissions, while the climate is already changing faster than forests can adapt. This crisis is pushing countless species to the brink and forcing Indigenous Peoples and local communities from their ancestral lands.'
The report says that the path forward requires stronger fire prevention, deforestation-free supply chains, support for Indigenous land stewardship and greater political will, especially from countries that made bold commitments at climate summits, but are failing to follow through.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wildfire smoke far more dangerous than thought, say scientists
Wildfire smoke far more dangerous than thought, say scientists

The Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Wildfire smoke far more dangerous than thought, say scientists

Choking smoke spewed by wildfires is far more dangerous than previously thought, a new study has found, with death tolls from short-term exposure to fine particulates underestimated by 93%. Researchers found that 535 people in Europe died on average each year between 2004 and 2022 as a result of breathing in the tiny toxic particles known as PM2.5 that are released when wildfires rage. Under standard methods, which assume PM2.5 from wildfires is as deadly as from other sources, such as traffic, they would have expected just 38 deaths a year. The study comes as wildfires ravage southern Europe, and new data from EU fire monitors shows that 895,000 hectares (2.2m acres) have burned so far in 2025, breaking records for this time of year. They have pumped out more than twice the amount of PM2.5 that wildfires have generated on average by this point in the year over the last two decades. 'Previously, people assumed the same toxicity for wildfire particles and all particles,' said Prof Cathryn Tonne, an environmental epidemiologist at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) and co-author of the study. 'Our paper shows evidence that – although it happens less often – the health impact for the same amount of particles is stronger for wildfire particles,' she added. Dirty air is one of the biggest threats to human health, and research suggests wildfires are a significant contributor to the vast death toll. In December, a study attributed 1.53 million deaths around the world each year to short-term and long-term exposure to air pollution from wildfires. The ISGlobal researchers, who looked only at the smoke's short-term effects, for which the evidence base is stronger, combined daily mortality records from 32 European countries with estimates of PM2.5 pollution from 2004 to 2022. Using models that account for an expected lag in deaths, they found exposure to wildfire smoke increased the risk of death in the following week. For every extra microgram of PM2.5 fouling 1 cubic metre of air, they found that all-cause mortality rose by 0.7%, respiratory mortality went up by 1% and cardiovascular mortality rose by 0.9%. 'The results are concerning, considering that wildfires and other extreme events are increasing exponentially with climate change,' said Prof Antonio Gasparrini, an environmental epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study. Devastating blazes compounded by relentless heat have killed several people across southern Europe and the Balkans in recent weeks. But deaths from the toxic fumes released by the fires are likely to go unnoticed. 'Smoke can affect populations far away from the fires,' said Tonne. 'So many more people will be exposed to smoke than the immediate physical threat of the flames.' The researchers said the study was limited by the lack of variability in the data on exposure to fire-related particulate matter, which made it harder to estimate how people's health responded based on age and sex. They were also unable to 'completely disentangle' the health burden of fire-related PM2.5 from ozone, another pollutant released by wildfires, though they said estimates were largely consistent when they adjusted the main model for ozone from all sources. Toxic pollution from wildfires creeps into the homes of more than 1 billion people a year, a study found in May. It concluded that air purifiers are an effective but expensive solution to indoor air pollution, which can be nearly three times higher on wildfire days than normal days, even when all windows and doors are closed. The risk of fire weather has risen as greenhouse gas emissions have heated the planet and dried out vegetation in some regions. The Iberian peninsula has been hit particularly hard this year, with Spain and Portugal accounting for the bulk of Europe's burned area. Associate professor Victor Resco de Dios, a forestry engineer at the University of Lleida, said the fire belt would move north in the coming years and decades. 'What we are witnessing now will sooner or later occur also in central and northern Europe, where we have also seen an aggravation of the fire problem,' he said. 'This is not a Mediterranean problem, but a European one.'

Scientists reveal the surprising reason why airplane toilet water could be the secret to combatting the next pandemic
Scientists reveal the surprising reason why airplane toilet water could be the secret to combatting the next pandemic

Daily Mail​

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scientists reveal the surprising reason why airplane toilet water could be the secret to combatting the next pandemic

It's one aspect of air travel we prefer not to think too much about. But airplane toilet water could help combat the next pandemic, according to scientists. Wastewater collected from commercial aircraft could provide a major public health opportunity, they say. And it could play a crucial role in tracking dangerous drug–resistant pathogens as they spread across the globe. An international team of experts analysed the bathroom wastewater from 44 international flights arriving into Australia from nine different countries. They used advanced molecular screening methods to examine the genetic structures of any potential superbugs with antibiotic–resistant genes. Across all trips, a total of nine 'high–priority' drug–resistant superbugs were detected, including Salmonella – the bacteria that causes diarrhoea, fever and stomach pains – and Staphylococcus aureus, a germ that can develop into light–threatening infections if it gets into the body. 'We now have the tools to turn aircraft toilets into an early–warning disease system to better manage public health,' senior author Dr Warish Ahmed, from Australia's national science agency CSIRO, said. In total, 17 wastewater samples held superbugs that contained a gene which boosts resistance to existing last–resort antibiotics. This is concerning, experts say, because it means current medical treatments can be rendered ineffective. Studies suggest that this plague of superbugs may kill up to 50 million people by 2050 – causing even more deaths than cancer. The analysis, published in the journal Microbiology Spectrum, also found that wastewater samples from Australia lacked this antibiotic–resistant gene, indicating it most likely arrived from international travel. Flights from Asia, and particularly India, showed higher concentrations of antibiotic resistant genes compared to flights from Europe and the UK, the researchers said. Worryingly, the team went on to discover that the germs' DNA remained stable for as long as 24 hours after being treated with disinfectant. 'International travel is one of the main drivers of antimicrobial resistance spread,' said co–author Dr Yawen Liu, from Xiamen University in China. 'By monitoring aircraft wastewater, we can potentially detect and track antibiotic resistance genes before they become established in local environments.' Infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, influenza and SARS–CoV–2 are all known to have been spread by air travel. A range of strategies have been trialled to reduce their transmission including travel restrictions, individual passenger screening and quarantine. 'With antimicrobial resistance projected to cause more than 39 million deaths globally by 2050, the need for innovative surveillance tools is urgent,' Professor Nicholas Ashbolt, co–author from the University of South Australia, said. 'Aircraft wastewater monitoring could complement existing public health systems, providing early warnings of emerging superbug threats.' WHAT IS MRSA? Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a type of bacteria that is resistant to several widely-used antibiotics, which makes it particularly hard to treat. Catching the infection early could prevent it spreading and infecting others. Approximately 30 per cent of people carry the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria even in their nose, armpits, groin or buttocks without realising it. This can invade the body's bloodstream and release poisonous toxins that kill up to one-fifth of infected patients. MRSA is most commonly associated with hospitals. As well as being highly drug resistant, current screening methods are fairly inaccurate, which allows the infection to spread as a patient moves around both within and outside hospitals. Even when the infection is successfully treated, it doubles the average length of a patient's hospital stay, as well as increasing healthcare costs.

Why the size of your neck could reveal hidden risks to your heart health
Why the size of your neck could reveal hidden risks to your heart health

The Independent

time9 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why the size of your neck could reveal hidden risks to your heart health

The size of a person's neck relative to their body can predict various health markers, studies have found. Research has shown that the size of a person's neck in proportion to their body can be an indicator of health, linked to factors such as cardiovascular risk, nutritional status, and even the likelihood of death. Doctors are increasingly looking beyond body mass index (BMI) and waist size to better understand how fat distribution in the body affects health. One area that has become increasingly studied is neck circumference, which can act as a simple measure of upper-body fat. Research suggests that people with a larger neck size may be more likely to develop cardiovascular problems. Scientists believe this could be because fat stored in the upper body releases more fatty acids into the bloodstream compared with fat stored lower down, placing greater strain on the heart. Findings from the long-running Framingham Heart Study and other research projects have linked a thicker neck with higher rates of diabetes, insulin resistance and high blood pressure – all of which are key risk factors for atrial fibrillation (Afib), a common heart rhythm disorder. Importantly, these associations remain even when BMI and waist measurements are taken into account, suggesting that neck size provides unique insights into health risks. The NHS says Afib is a type of heart rhythm problem where your heartbeat is not steady. The main symptoms of atrial fibrillation include an irregular heartbeat, heart palpitations, and a heartbeat faster than 100 beats per minute. A large neck has also been linked to a higher chance of obstructive sleep apnoea, a condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, which itself raises the likelihood of Afib. A 2022 study in the Journal of the American Heart Association examined the data from around 4,000 people in the Framingham Heart Study. The researchers found that men with a neck size of 17 inches or more, and women with 14 inches or more, faced a higher risk of developing Afib compared to those with smaller measurements. The authors noted that 'individuals with high neck circumference had increased risk of incident Afib compared with those with low neck circumference,' and that this was true even after adjusting for BMI, waist circumference, height and weight. The association was strongest among participants with obesity, suggesting that neck size may be an especially important risk marker in this group. 'Our findings indicate that neck circumference potentially may be used as an easily obtainable measure for assessing risk of incident Afib' the researchers concluded, calling for further studies to explore its role in prevention and treatment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store