
Blue state lawmakers' response to Medicaid cuts: Keep calm and bash Republicans
Congress' Medicaid cuts came as dozens of state legislatures dried the ink on their own annual budgets and adjourned — some for the summer, many for the year. But in the face of a funding chasm no state can bridge, uncertainty over the effects of the cuts and the view that Republicans will take the lion's share of the blame, many blue states are opting to wait and see before trying to solve a problem they didn't create.
The megabill, which passed Thursday, cuts roughly $1 trillion from Medicaid. While a $50 billion fund for rural hospitals was added last minute to assuage Republicans representing some rural and purple districts, there are still strong concerns over how the cuts will affect the millions of Americans on Medicaid and the rural communities that overwhelmingly voted to send President Donald Trump back to the White House.
States that took advantage of the Medicaid expansion programs created by the Affordable Care Act stand to lose the most. Some GOP-led states, like Ohio, already have plans to roll back their own expansions in the wake of Congress' cuts. But few states have the budget capability to make up for the massive sums of federal dollars they could lose from cuts to Medicaid, food assistance and other benefit programs.
Rather than make eleventh hour budget changes or immediately summon special sessions, Democratic lawmakers launched last-ditch efforts to get Congress to reject the bill. While ultimately unsuccessful, the strategy is a sign of how Democrats may continue to message federal cuts headed into the 2026 midterms.
'You don't have to be a genius political consultant to conclude that it's a pretty devastating political message,' said veteran Democratic strategist Lis Smith. 'The only thing voters hate more than people who take away their benefits are people who lie and take away their benefits.'
Lawmakers and party officials quickly organized events across the country to pin the blame for the Medicaid cuts on the GOP. Alaska Democrats held an emergency town hall on Wednesday — attended by Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) — to criticize Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, and Rep. Nick Begich for voting in favor of the bill. Murkowski's support was key to its passage by a single vote.
In blue Colorado, Sen. John Hickenlooper and Gov. Jared Polis, along with Democratic House members and state lawmakers, held a virtual rally on the 'extreme' budget bill — which passed with only Republican support.
Democrats can, generally speaking, afford to wait. Many of the cuts won't hit until fall at the earliest, with the bulk going into effect next year. Most Democrats believe that Republicans will largely take any blame leveled.
Part of the problem for Democratic lawmakers is that no matter what they do, an insurmountable gulf remains between what their states can contribute versus what they will lose in federal dollars.
'We're going to do everything we can to preserve health care, but there's no way we can get … billions of dollars that they're taking away,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told reporters Wednesday. The governors of Washington, Pennsylvania, Colorado and Arizona echoed Pritzker's sentiment in recent days.
In New York and California, leaders are already hedging their bets. Democratic Govs. Kathy Hochul of New York and Gavin Newsom of California could face pressure from supporters hoping they'll be compelled to make up at least some of the gap left by Congress and President Donald Trump. Hochul was already putting blame squarely on the state's Republican House members as the GOP megabill neared the finish line.
'They're in the majority, they have the power,' Hochul said of the delegation. 'You have the power, and if you don't use that power, then you are complicit in this attack on the American people.'
Some states — including New Mexico, Massachusetts and Oregon — have already made preparations for the anticipated cuts by preemptively increasing state health care program dollars or leaving an unallocated surplus in budgets passed this spring.
Oregon's recently-passed budget included $10 million for reproductive health in anticipation of cuts to federal funding for Planned Parenthood, for example. New Mexico — which has one of the nation's highest poverty rates and relies deeply on federal medicaid dollars and SNAP — will lose $2.8 billion in federal funding under the Big Beautiful Bill, according to numbers shared with POLITICO by the New Mexico Health Care Authority. The state's all-volunteer Legislature created a Federal Funding Stablization Committee specifically to address the cuts, and passed a bill in March that creates a trust fund to protect its Medicaid program. The first allocation into the trust fund was just $300 million, however, a far cry from the nearly $3 billion in cuts. But the fund is set to increase gradually until it reaches $2 billion.
In New Jersey, which finalized its budget late Monday with a $6.7 billion surplus, state Senate President Nick Scutari said even that large reserve won't make up for the federal cuts. Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy does not have immediate plans to call the legislature back into session
Most states, in fact, say they have the time to wait.
A spokesperson for Colorado's Polis said the governor 'is considering all options, including whether a special session would be needed.' California officials told POLITICO it's too soon to know how the cuts will affect Medi-Cal or the state budget, but policy experts said the state may have to open up the budget this year to begin creating the tech infrastructure needed to process the new work requirements included in the megabill. That could include sending money to counties to hire welfare eligibility workers.
As Democrats sort out their approach, they believe they have political winds at their backs.
'If your home burns down, you blame the arsonists. You don't blame the firefighters,' said Democratic strategist Jesse Ferguson. 'The challenge for Democrats is keeping the focus on the arsonist who lit the match' between now and the 2026 midterms, he explained.
In red Ohio, the Legislature's Democratic minority already believes the cuts will help them scrape away at the state's Republican supermajority. The state legislature recently passed a budget with trigger language that would roll back state Medicaid coverage if federal contributions to the program are reduced by 10 percent or more. State Rep. Tristan Rader, a progressive Democrat, said the effects of the state cuts would be felt sooner than the federal cuts.
'Without Trump at the top of the ticket, we know that we can take back a few seats,' Rader told POLITICO. 'They're making incredibly unpopular decisions of giving away literally billions of dollars to billionaires while undercutting education and Medicaid — we know that's not popular.'
Shia Kapos, Ry Rivard, Rachel Bluth and Kelly Garrity contributed to this report
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Peru enacts amnesty for military personnel and police in Shining Path insurgency
LIMA, Peru — Peru's president on Wednesday signed an amnesty bill into law, preventing military personnel and police officers from being prosecuted over alleged human rights abuses during the country's armed conflict decades ago. The new law came despite calls from the local and international community to strike it down. The war that raged between the Peruvian military and the Shining Path communist insurgency from 1980 to 2000 left an estimated 70,000 people dead, the majority of them in rural areas. President Dina Boluarte said during an official ceremony that Peru 'honors' those people who confronted the insurgency with 'courage and dedication.' She added that military members and police officers have carried 'for years the burden of endless trials, unjust accusations and a pain that has affected not only them but also their families.' The decision to enact the law drew immediate criticism from some rights groups. Human Rights Watch said in a statement that the law 'grants impunity' to those involved in serious crimes, adding that Peru now 'joins Nicaragua, Venezuela and other countries' in 'disregarding the rights of victims.' 'This law is quite simply a betrayal of Peruvian victims,' said Juanita Goebertus, Americas director at the rights group. 'It undermines decades of efforts to ensure accountability for atrocities and weakens the country's rule of law even further.' The law was passed by Congress in July. A coalition of human rights organizations said that it could wipe out 156 convictions and another 600 cases that are being prosecuted. Supporters of the law come from right-wing political parties that have historically defended the military, including the Popular Force party led by Keiko Fujimori, daughter of former President Alberto Fujimori, who died in September. The ex-president, who led Peru from 1990 to 2000, was in prison for most of the last 15 years of his life in prison after being convicted of crimes against humanity. Fujimori's administration helped to put the nation's economy on track following years of hyperinflation and defeated the Shining Path, a fanatic communist group that led a violent campaign to overthrow the government. But his government took an authoritarian turn in 1992, when he ordered the military to shut down Peru's congress and its supreme court and declared a state of emergency. Other amnesty laws passed in 1995 in Peru shielded military and police personnel from prosecution for alleged human rights abuses during the country's internal conflict, including massacres, torture and forced disappearances. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights had at least twice previously declared amnesty laws in Peru invalid for violating the right to justice and breaching international human rights standards. A truth commission determined that the majority of the conflict's victims were Indigenous Peruvians caught up in clashes between security forces and Shining Path.

Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
An appeals court lets the Trump administration suspend or end billions in foreign aid
WASHINGTON — A divided panel of appeals court judges ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can suspend or terminate billions of dollars of congressionally appropriated funding for foreign aid. Two of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that grant recipients challenging the freeze did not meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction restoring the flow of money. In January, on the first day of his second term in the White House, Republican President Trump issued an executive order directing the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development to freeze spending on foreign aid. After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. The appeal court's majority partially vacated Ali's order. Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Gregory Katsas concluded that the plaintiffs did not have a valid legal basis for the court to hear their claims. The ruling was not on the merits of whether the government unconstitutionally infringed on Congress' spending powers. 'The parties also dispute the scope of the district court's remedy but we need not resolve it ... because the grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event,' Henderson wrote. Judge Florence Pan, who dissented, said the Supreme Court has held 'in no uncertain terms' that the president does not have the authority to disobey laws for policy reasons. 'Yet that is what the majority enables today,' Pan wrote. 'The majority opinion thus misconstrues the separation-of-powers claim brought by the grantees, misapplies precedent, and allows Executive Branch officials to evade judicial review of constitutionally impermissible actions.' The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals. Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden. Kunzelman writes for the Associated Press.


Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Actor applauds ‘terrific' announcement of Trump to host Kennedy Center Honors
Actor and director Robert Davi discusses President Donald Trump's hosting of The Kennedy Center Honors on 'The Ingraham Angle.'