Forget Warren Buffett's Favorite Index. This Artificial Intelligence ETF Could Potentially Turn Just $500 Per Month Into $156,000 Over 10 Years.
Warren Buffett has long touted the virtues of average investors investing in an S&P 500 index fund.
However, this sector-specific ETF has crushed the S&P over the past decade.
Given its diverse exposure to key AI and automation trends, it could very well repeat in the decade ahead.
10 stocks we like better than iShares Trust - iShares Semiconductor ETF ›
Warren Buffett has long touted the virtues of investing in a low-cost index fund that tracks the S&P 500 index. The thinking behind this recommendation is that an S&P 500 index fund will track the broader market, delivering low-risk, average returns with low costs.
But there are also sector-specific exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that offer exposure to specific sectors. And while Buffett is more modest in picking specific sectors to win, it seems likely that the technology sector will, over the long run, outperform.
After all, technology is making its way into more and more of our daily lives, through smartphones, cloud computing, and now artificial intelligence. The sector, with its high technical and capital barriers, has also generally produced high margins in recent years.
Within the technology sector, one subsector has outperformed all others.
Over the past 10 years, the overall S&P 500 has performed quite well, with an annualized return of 10.7%. That has been a really great decade, outperforming the market's long-term average.
A lot of those returns have been powered by technology companies. The QQQ Trust, an ETF that aims to mirror the Nasdaq 100 index, which in itself is a proxy for the technology sector, has vastly outperformed the broader market, with a 16.7% annualized return over the past decade.
But within technology, which subsector has performed even better? Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, the semiconductor sector, as defined in the iShares Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ: SOXX), has compounded at a stunning 20% annualized rate.
That level of compounding tops even the 19.9% rate at which Warren Buffett's conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, has compounded -- although Berkshire has impressively grown at that average rate over a whopping 60 years!
What kind of difference does a 20% rate make versus a 10.7% rate? At these levels, a mere $500 monthly contribution to the iShares Semiconductor ETF over 10 years would increase to an astounding $155,906 -- 2.6 times the amount of money contributed. That compares with just $98,941 if invested in the S&P 500 for a similar length of time.
Semiconductors have a reputation for being wildly cyclical, and that is somewhat true. However, more and more chips are going into our PCs, phones, household appliances, and cars every year. In conjunction with that, game-changing technologies, such as the internet, cloud computing, and, more recently, artificial intelligence, have created entirely new industries and pools of demand.
So, why so cyclical? Because semiconductors are hardware and, thus, prone to the "bullwhip" of booms and busts. The bullwhip effect happens when customers rush to buy in good times, only to freeze up and burn down their inventories when times get tough. But taking a long-term look over 10 years, the overall trend is clearly upward and to the right, with a higher rate of growth than gross domestic product (GDP), given the increasing density of semiconductors in all products and services over time.
The sector also has a reputation for being fiercely competitive. While that's somewhat true, a wave of consolidation among the big players in the industry over the past 20 years has often reduced competition to a few players in each industry subsegment. That has helped the sector increase margins relative to the past, leading to outsized profit growth.
Here are the iShares Semiconductor ETF's top 10 holdings:
Company
% of iShares Semiconductor ETF Assets
Broadcom
8.7%
Nvidia
7.9%
Texas Instruments
7.4%
Advanced Micro Devices
7.1%
Qualcomm
6.8%
KLA Corporation
4.5%
Applied Materials
4.3%
Monolithic Power Systems
4.3%
Lam Research
4.2%
NXP Semiconductors
3.9%
Some would say it would be a stretch for the iShares Semiconductor ETF to repeat last decade's performance in the upcoming decade. After all, 10 years ago, the cloud computing revolution was just gaining critical mass, and the artificial intelligence revolution, ushered in with the release of ChatGPT in 2022, hadn't happened yet.
However, it appears to be a pretty good bet that the iShares Semiconductor ETF will continue to outperform over the long term. As long as technological innovation continues apace, humans will continue to use technology to improve their lives, save time and money, and boost connectivity. That means more semiconductors. And as semiconductor-led innovation also creates entirely new markets (like AI), the semiconductor sector should continue to outgrow GDP.
Given the massive amount of capital and technological resources required to compete, I would also expect relatively stable competition and the preservation of margins. No doubt, there will be heated competition for AI supremacy in the years ahead. However, the beauty of owning an ETF is that it will capture the winners and lower its allocation to the losers over time.
Warren Buffett's late longtime partner, Charlie Munger, used to say that over the long term, a stock's return tends to mirror its return on invested capital (ROIC). Given the generally high ROIC of leading chip designers, manufacturers, and equipment companies today, it seems likely that the next decade will also be a positive one for semiconductor stocks, just as the last one was.
Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares Semiconductor ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares Semiconductor ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Billy Duberstein has positions in Applied Materials, Berkshire Hathaway, Broadcom, KLA, Lam Research, and Texas Instruments. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Applied Materials, Berkshire Hathaway, Lam Research, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments, and iShares Trust - iShares Semiconductor ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom, Monolithic Power Systems, and NXP Semiconductors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Forget Warren Buffett's Favorite Index. This Artificial Intelligence ETF Could Potentially Turn Just $500 Per Month Into $156,000 Over 10 Years. was originally published by The Motley Fool

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Implenia gets contract for work on Nordmainische S-Bahn section in Frankfurt
Implenia has received a contract worth over €200m ($226.9m) for the construction of a section of the Nordmainische S-Bahn below central Frankfurt, Germany. The contract was issued by DB InfraGO, part of German state-owned railway company Deutsche Bahn. The new underground section will extend from Konstablerwache in the city centre to Fechenheim, passing through the new 'Frankfurt (Main) Ost (tief)' S-Bahn station. Implenia's responsibilities include building the initial construction pit, known as the 'Trog', and the pit for the underground station, as well as several auxiliary construction pits and associated civil engineering structures. Additionally, Implenia will be drilling two tunnel tubes, each around 1.2km in length, using tunnel boring machines (TBMs) and implementing water management measures. The complexity of the project is heightened by its location in a populated area of the city, necessitating a range of special foundation services to meet the demands of modern and sustainable construction. The detailed building design work is scheduled for completion by the end of 2025, with construction set to commence in early 2026 and conclude by 2031. Implenia Civil Engineering head Edwin Scherer said: 'Maintaining and developing a functioning transport infrastructure is central to the sustainable development of our cities. I'm very pleased that Implenia, with its many years of experience and comprehensive expertise, can contribute to the improvement of public transport in the densely populated Rhine-Main region.' The Nordmainische S-Bahn project is a strategic investment in the transport infrastructure of the future, aiming to enhance local transport connections. The project is seen as pivotal for expanding rail capacity in the Frankfurt (Main) hub and is expected to deliver improved reliability and comfort for commuters and travellers while also contributing to carbon reduction targets, highlighted Implenia. Last month, Deutsche Bahn commissioned a joint venture of Implenia and HOCHTIEF for '733 Tunnel Ostbahnhof', a component of the Munich S-Bahn expansion project. "Implenia gets contract for work on Nordmainische S-Bahn section in Frankfurt" was originally created and published by World Construction Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio


Fast Company
14 minutes ago
- Fast Company
NYC pension funds want asset managers like BlackRock to have legitimate net-zero plans—or lose their business
As the Trump administration funnels money into fossil fuels and the country largely retreats on climate efforts, New York City is trying to ensure its pension funds take the climate into consideration. In 2021, New York City officials announced that the city's pension funds divested an estimated $4 billion from fossil fuel companies, a landmark move in the effort to divest money from polluting industries. But divesting directly from these companies only covers a small portion of how the markets support the continued development of oil, gas, and coal. Major asset managers like BlackRock still invest in fossil fuels; so if a pension fund is invested in BlackRock, it's still essentially funneling money into oil, gas, and coal. Now, those asset managers will have to show the city that their investments align with New York's climate goals, or they could risk losing the pension funds' business. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander recently announced new climate standards for pension fund asset managers, including clear net-zero goals that decrease their scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. Asset managers have until June 30 to submit their climate strategies to the city. Officials will evaluate those net-zero plans to ensure that they're 'real and actionable.' If an asset manager's plans fail to meet those climate standards, they'll be sent to a 'rebid' process, meaning they'll have to bid again for the pension funds' business, and the funds could then move their money to a different, cleaner asset manager. As part of any new bidding process, Lander will recommend evaluating an asset manager's corporate-level climate behavior as well. 'What we're doing is getting the New York City pension funds to use their buying power to shift money from dirtier money managers like BlackRock, who are bad on climate, to cleaner money managers,' says Pete Sikora, climate campaigns director with New York Communities for Change, a nonprofit that campaigned for these new standards. Activists hope that by taking business away from the less climate friendly asset managers, those companies will be forced to clean up their portfolios in order to get back the pension funds' business. New York City's five pension funds have nearly $300 billion worth of investments, with a few hundred asset managers. The largest is BlackRock, which holds nearly $60 billion of the funds' investments. (In total, BlackRock has more than $11 trillion in assets under management.) The city's pension funds include the New York City Employees' Retirement System (NYCERS), Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and Board of Education Retirement System (BERS), which have all historically been progressive on climate action; TRS is also the largest investor with $109 billion in assets. (The other two funds are the New York City Police Pension Fund and the New York City Fire Pension Fund.) Already, since 2019, New York City's pension system has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 37%. It aims to be net-zero by 2040. This move to require climate plans from asset managers—and to stop investing with them if their climate plans aren't strong enough—is crucial to reaching that goal, Sikora says. It's a more impactful move than just divesting directly from fossil fuel companies, he notes, 'because it pushes the entire financial industry' to be cleaner. 'There's no way to stave off global climate catastrophe unless finance as a whole flees from oil, gas, coal, and deforestation,' he says. The move is also a direct response to the Trump administration's efforts to funnel money into the fossil fuel industry, and to push back the entire country's climate progress. 'We will not retreat from our strong climate action, a position that remains consistent with our fiduciary duty. Climate risk is financial risk,' Lander said in a statement. 'Some may cave to the Trump administration and reverse their climate commitments, but we will not be deterred from jointly prioritizing our climate goals and financial responsibilities.' (Lander is running to be the Democratic candidate in New York City's mayoral race, and has made ' standing up to Donald Trump ' a tenet of his campaign.) New York Communities for Change has been advocating for these climate standards for years, Sikora says, and was talking to Lander about the possibilities before he was even elected as comptroller in 2021. Before that role, Lander was on the city council, where he sponsored a resolution calling on BlackRock, JP Morgan Chase, Liberty Mutual, and other financial institutions to stop lending to and investing in the fossil fuel industry. That hinted to activists that he would be supportive of these efforts. Though this effort was years in the making, it's becoming more urgent as the financial industry backslides on climate commitments at large. In January 2025, weeks before Trump took office, six major banks left the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, a group that was setting net-zero targets for the financial world. Still, some funds are trying to hold banks to account. In February, the People's Pension, one of the United Kingdom's largest pension funds, said it was 'prioritizing sustainability' by pulling a majority of its money out of State Street; the fund moved £20 billion to a different asset manager, Amundi, which it says has stronger climate standards. Changes to New York City's pension funds won't happen immediately, though. After asset managers submit their climate plans to the city, officials have to review them before they make recommendations on whether to put the business up for rebid; those recommendations will likely start to happen in the summer or early fall. New York City's move to divest its pension fund from fossil fuels did face a lawsuit from oil and gas companies in 2023; in 2024, the city won. These additional climate requirements may also face criticism or legal pushback, particularly from the Trump administration, but Sikora is confident it will hold up in court. Investing in fossil fuels is no longer a sure route to profitability; thousands of oil and gas assets are at risk of becoming stranded —meaning they would be unprofitable or forced to shut down years before planned—because of the impacts of climate change. 'New York City pension funds have an interest in a healthy world,' he says. 'You don't have New York City pension funds in a dead New York City that is submerged under rising seas. . . . On a basic, prudential level, you shouldn't be furthering your own destruction with your investments.'


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Inflation Expectations Are Now Just Tariff Expectations
As early signs emerge that tariffs will drive up prices, the Federal Reserve faces a crucial question: Will tariff-induced inflation be short-lived, as the level of prices adjusts to the higher tariffs, or will it persist, as a series of feedback loops lead to further price increases? One feedback loop that the Fed is always on guard for is longer-run inflation expectations becoming 'unanchored' — that is, the rate is not expected to remain stable. If businesses and consumers expect higher inflation over the next several years, they may adjust their behavior now in setting prices, negotiating wages and making purchasing decisions. This would help make persistently higher inflation a reality, requiring the Fed to do more to reduce inflation to its target of 2% by keeping interest rates higher or even raising them.