
FINAL DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of PepGen
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (i) PGN-EDO51 was less effective and safe than Defendants had led investors to believe; (ii) the CONNECT2 study was dangerous or otherwise deficient for purposes of U.S. Food and Drug Administration ('FDA') approval; (iii) as a result of all the foregoing, PepGen was likely to halt the CONNECT2 study, and PGN-EDO51's clinical, regulatory, and commercial prospects were overstated; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On July 30, 2024, PepGen issued a press release announcing purported 'positive clinical data from the first dose cohort (5 mg/kg) of PGN-EDO51' in its ongoing CONNECT1 study. Among other results, the Company reported that 'PGN-EDO51 achieved a mean absolute dystrophin level of 0.61% of normal and a 0.26% change from baseline after 4 doses, measured at week 13 by Western blot analysis.' However, as subsequently noted by a Stifel analyst, 'the magnitude of dystrophin increase was below what [PepGen] anticipated, which is disappointing[.]' Likewise, a Leerink Partners analyst noted that the low dose missed PepGen's expectations of 1% or greater dystrophin expression.
On this news, PepGen's stock price fell $5.55 per share, or 32.69%, to close at $11.43 per share on July 31, 2024.
On December 16, 2024, PepGen issued a press release announcing that it had received a clinical hold notice from the FDA regarding an Investigational New Drug ('IND') application 'to initiate the [CONNECT2] clinical trial in patients with [DMD]' in the U.S. Notably, the FDA's issuance of a clinical hold notice for the IND application indicated that the FDA had concerns regarding risks posed to patients in the CONNECT2 study and/or there were other deficiencies associated with the study.
On this news, PepGen's stock price fell $0.17 per share, or 3.63%, to close at $4.51 per share on December 16, 2024.
On January 29, 2025, PepGen issued a press release providing updates regarding safety concerns observed in the CONNECT1 study and the FDA's concerns regarding the CONNECT2 study. With respect to the CONNECT1 study, the press release stated, inter alia, that '[d]osing of one of the[] . . . participants [in the 10 mg/kg cohort] was paused due to a reduction of his estimated glomerular filtration rate[.]' In addition, PepGen 'ha[d] received communication from Health Canada . . . request[ing] additional information from the Company to address Health Canada's safety concerns before any further dose escalation or enrollment of any additional participants at the current dose levels.' With respect to the CONNECT2 study, the same press release stated, in relevant part, that '[t]he Company is working with the FDA to address its questions regarding supportive data for the dosing levels planned for the patient population.'
Following these disclosures, PepGen's stock price fell $0.40 per share, or 21.74%, to close at $1.44 per share on January 30, 2025.
On March 4, 2025, PepGen issued a press release 'announc[ing] its voluntary decision to temporarily pause the [CONNECT2] study . . . until the Company can review results from the 10 mg/kg cohort in the ongoing [CONNECT1] study.'
On this news, PepGen's stock price fell $0.53 per share, or 18.86%, to close at $2.28 per share on March 4, 2025.
Then, on May 28, 2025, PepGen issued a press release announcing that 'PGN-EDO51 did not achieve target dystrophin levels' in the CONNECT1 study and had chosen to discontinue development of its DMD programs.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding PepGen's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the PepGen class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/PEPG or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
9 minutes ago
- Medscape
FDA Okays Ketamine-Based Med for Post-Surgical Pain
The FDA has approved the racemic ketamine product known as KETARx (PharmaTher Holdings) for the treatment of post-surgical pain. 'This historic FDA approval…is a testament to years of dedicated development,' Fabio Chianelli, chairman and CEO of PharmaTher, said in a release. 'We remain steadfast in our mission to harness the pharmaceutical potential of ketamine for a range of mental health, neurological, and pain disorders,' he added. The company noted that it hopes to expand ketamine development into conditions such as Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, depression, and complex regional pain syndrome. Its product has already received an orphan drug designation for the treatment of Rett syndrome. It added that, among psychedelic and 'psychedelic-adjacent' drugs, ketamine is the only one to be included on a list of Essential Medicines by the World Health Organization. The company initially announced that the FDA had set an approval goal date of April 2024 for KETARx. However, after 'minor deficiencies identified by Quality' were identified, the FDA assigned a new target date of October 2024. As reported by Medscape Medical News at the time, the FDA issued a complete response letter requesting additional information on the application. The final date of August 2025 was set after the company submitted the requested additional information.

Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Return of FDA official who drew ire of Trump allies hits biotech shares
Shares of biotech companies endured volatile trading on Monday following the surprise return of a top US drug regulator who left in July Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump must approach Putin with a very big stick
It has long been evident that President Trump believed Russian President Vladimir Putin could be persuaded to settle for less than the total conquest of Ukraine — specifically, for control over the Donbas region in the east — and that this would somehow be a reasonable 'deal.' From the moment Russia invaded in 2022, many analysts warned that Putin's ambitions extended well beyond those two provinces. Trump's 2024 election victory set up a test. Now, more than three years into the war and seven months since his return to the White House, Trump seems to believe that moment has arrived. His planned Aug. 15 meeting with Putin in Alaska suggests that the Russian leader may finally be ready to sign on to such an arrangement. The outlines of a deal are familiar: Russia retains roughly one-fifth of Ukrainian territory in exchange for a ceasefire and some form of security arrangement that halts the war. It is not yet clear if Putin would actually agree, and if agreement might not be a trick. But no less an obstacle may be Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Over the weekend, a day after the Alaska meeting was announced, Zelensky reiterated that 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier.' At the same time, he left the door open to 'real decisions' for peace — but only, he emphasized, with Ukraine at the table. Trump and Putin plan to meet without Zelensky. There is a game of great powers with spheres of influences and vassal states that can be bullied. Trump does not lack bargaining chips. The most immediate is the secondary sanctions package scheduled to take effect this month, which would impose tariffs and other penalties on countries —including allies such as India — buying Russian oil, effectively forcing governments to choose between discounted energy and access to the U.S. market. The threat has been enough to rattle Russia's trading partners and, if maintained, could pressure Moscow toward compromise. Ukraine also has a fresh offer of military support from NATO countries, one that Trump himself endorsed with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte last month. It allows NATO states to supply Ukraine with American weapons and ammunition for the foreseeable future. That guarantee of ongoing Western backing makes it less likely that Kyiv can be coerced. If Zelensky is to contemplate a deal that cedes territory, he would be wise to demand compensations that go beyond words — they must be concrete, enforceable and immediate. Given the nature of things, he will need Trump to represent him at the table, beginning with the Alaska meeting. The core elements of a deal acceptable to Ukraine might include the following. EU membership: Ukraine's fast-track admission to the European Union would give it a secure economic and political anchor in the West, even without NATO membership. Brussels will inevitably invoke its process and the need for reforms — especially on corruption — but events have overtaken bureaucracy. Ukraine has earned the right to be integrated fully into Europe. Trump can strong-arm the Europeans to make this happen. Reparations for destruction: Russia should be required to pay, directly or indirectly, for the rebuilding of Ukraine's cities, roads and energy infrastructure. This is a moral and practical necessity given the estimated half-trillion dollar reconstruction cost over the next decade. Frozen Russian funds, estimated at over $300 billion, can be applied toward this. Return of abducted civilians and prisoners: The safe return of the thousands of Ukrainians, including children and political detainees, believed to have been taken into Russian custody since the war began must be non-negotiable. A binding non-aggression agreement: Russia's invasion shattered trust across the region. Any settlement must include a formal pledge, with verification mechanisms, that Moscow will not attack Ukraine again or undermine its sovereignty through covert means. Given Russia's meddling in recent decades in Moldova, Georgia and other former Soviet republics in addition to Ukraine, this guarantee must be broad and backed by enforceable consequences. These provisions would not make the loss of territory painless, but they could give Ukraine a secure future within the European sphere and the breathing room to rebuild. These concessions would be hard to extract from Putin — but that's what negotiations are all about. Trump and his team need to come armed with carrots and a very big stick. The stakes are high enough for some chances to be taken, since the war's toll is staggering. Ukraine's economy has contracted by roughly 20 percent. Daily military expenditures are estimated at $140 million, totaling about $51 billion a year. Western nations have poured more than $100 billion in aid into the fight, but the damage is overwhelming: millions displaced, tens of thousands killed and over 10,000 documented civilian deaths. Russia has paid heavily as well. By mid-2024, its war bill had reached $250 billion, with defense spending consuming 40 percent of the government budget this year. Falling oil and gas revenues have deepened the strain. Over 100,000 Russian soldiers are estimated to have been killed — a human cost that would be politically unsustainable in a more open society. That Putin has been willing to bear such losses to enlarge the world's biggest country by a marginal amount is a testament to the pathological nature of his rule. That pathology is unlikely to vanish — which is why any deal must not simply stop the shooting, but guard against the next war. If Trump can do that, he may indeed bring the Ukraine war to a close. If he can also force Netanyahu to end the Gaza war, a Nobel Peace Prize ceases to be absurd. History works in strange ways, through the strangest of agents. Dan Perry is the former Cairo-based Middle East editor and London-based Europe-Africa editor of the Associated Press, the former chairman of the Foreign Press Association in Jerusalem and the author of two books.