
Round-table discussion planned on Friday on implications of U.S. tariff policies for Kerala
Organised by the Gulati Institute of Finance and Taxation, an autonomous institute under the Finance Department (GIFT), and the Kerala State Planning Board, the round table will assess, among other things, the direct and indirect impacts of the 'penal tariffs' on Kerala's export sectors, particularly the agriculture sector, marine products and spice-based commodities.
Finance Minister K.N. Balagopal will inaugurate the round table discussion on 'The impact of U.S. penal tariffs with a special focus on Kerala' at Hotel Mascot here on Friday. Earlier this month, Mr. Balagopal had warned that the looming 'tariff war' could have harder economic impacts than COVID-19 and urged GIFT to organise the round table to chart the way forward for the State.
The round table aims to generate actionable ideas for strengthening the State's economic resilience in an era of shifting global alignments and politicised trade by bringing together different stakeholders from academia, industry and policy circles, GIFT said.
'Tariffs on fisheries, coir, textiles, tea, coffee and spices, among others, threaten the rural export economy, while parallel concerns such as potential tightening of U.S. immigration (H1B) policies amplify the risks,' according to GIFT. The double whammy of reduced export demand and softened remittance inflows jeopardise growth prospects, public finances and social stability, it added.
Sector-specific risks, especially for MSME-dominated export clusters, opportunities for trade diversification, value addition and digital market access as strategic responses to trade realignments, will come up for discussion at the event.
It is also expected that a major outcome of the event will be policy recommendations that can be submitted to the State government and the Union Ministry of Commerce.
Representatives of commodity boards, export promotion councils, industry associations, and policy think-tanks are expected at the one-day event.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
SUV, sedan prices likely to see sharp cut, with lower 40% GST
Photo/TOI NEW DELHI: It isn't just small cars and two-wheelers, large sedans and SUVs too are likely to see a sharp reduction in prices as goods and services tax (GST) is expected to come down from the current, up to 50%, to proposed 40%, the slab for luxury and sin goods. But, there is also the fear that the GST Council may come up with a new cess on higher-end vehicles. At a ministerial panel meeting on rate rationalisation on Thursday, some states demanded a cess on top of the 40% tax. Currently, SUVs and sedans over four metres in length and engine capacity above a certain level attract 28% GST and 22% cess. A final decision on rates will be taken by the GST Council, led by Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman next month, amid indications that the Centre is keen on a flat 40% levy on a handful of sin and luxury goods without any cess. Govt sources had said that cess will be removed as it was to be levied for five years to "compensate" states for "revenue loss" due to GST implementation, but was extended by another three years to cover losses due to Covid. While small cars and two-wheelers are expected to see the burden fall from 29% to 18%, the absolute gain (in value terms) for those buying SUVs may be higher. The reduction for all internal combustion engine vehicles or those powered by diesel and petrol, including hybrids, will reduce the differential with electric vehicles, which attract 5% GST. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo by Taboola by Taboola Many see that as a disincentive for EVs, particularly in the more price-sensitive segment of two-wheelers, where the difference in GST will be 13 percentage points compared to 23 percentage points currently. EVs have a higher capital cost but lower operating cost, with purchase price often acting as an entry-level barrier. A concern among consumers and in govt circles is regarding the auto industry's willingness to pass on the gains, given that the anti-profiteering clause does not come into play. Although the auto industry is often accused of pocketing the gains, government sources said there will be pressure on companies to pass on the benefits, especially to boost demand, amid sluggish sales. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .


Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Border dispute clouds Nepal PM Oli's India visit next month
Nepal's border dispute with India over Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura resurfaced on Wednesday, weeks before Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli's visit to New Delhi. The row follows an agreement between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval to reopen three trading routes, including Lipulekh. Kathmandu says the deal was struck without its consent and undermines its sovereignty. On Thursday, lawmakers across party lines raised the issue in Parliament. 'Unilaterally deciding the use of Nepali territory is not acceptable,' members declared. Kamal Thapa, Former Foreign Minister and Chairman of the Rastriya Prajatantra Party-Nepal urged Oli to raise the matter in his upcoming visits to Beijing and New Delhi. Mahesh Bartaula, Chief Whip of the ruling Communist Party of Nepal-UML called the India-China understanding 'a dilution of Nepal's sovereignty.' Nepali Congress leader Bishwa Prakash Sharma said all parties were united on the issue. Oli will attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in China later this month and will travel to India on September 16. Nepal's Foreign Ministry said areas east of the Mahakali River, including Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura, are 'integral parts of Nepali territory.' It said India and China had been formally told not to carry out activities there. India, meanwhile, rejected Nepal's claims. 'Border trade through Lipulekh has existed since 1954. It was disrupted in recent years due to Covid and other developments. Both sides have now agreed to resume it.'


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
‘Crazy Vacancies' Force Boston Landlords to Fight Valuations
(Bloomberg) -- Kambiz Shahbazi says the value of his four Boston office buildings has tumbled because of the damage inflicted on the market by Covid-19 and the resulting exodus by tenants. Boston has already lowered the assessed value of the collected properties over the past two years by about 12%, but Shahbazi says that doesn't come close to reflecting the true declines. So he's filed challenges to the city's assessments in the hope he can ultimately lower his tax bills on the properties. For at least one, he says the value should be discounted by about 50%. He's far from alone as Boston landlords struggle with empty offices and high financing costs that make it difficult to upgrade or convert buildings to residential. Owners have challenged assessed values for 388 commercial buildings in the district that includes downtown Boston this year, according to city data obtained through a public records request. That's an 83% jump from 2024 and the highest number of requests since at least 2020. It's a worrying sign for the city, which is already struggling with strained finances and relies on property taxes for almost three-quarters of its $4.8 billion budget. 'The values have been decimated,' Shahbazi, founder of KS Partners said of the city's buildings, describing 'crazy vacancies' for so-called Class B and C buildings. 'It might take a long time, and the city might just have no option other than to fight their way and stall, but at some point they're going to have to reckon with this debacle,' he said. Boston is more reliant than most US cities on commercial property taxes. In the years leading up to Covid, its finances flourished thanks to rising property values and booming real estate development, but those values have tumbled as office vacancies still exceed 20% and workers have been slow to return to the downtown. Boston's office buildings stand to lose almost 50% of their value over the next half-decade, according to an analysis by Tufts University's Center for State Policy Analysis and the nonprofit Boston Policy Institute. That decline could cost as much as $1.7 billion in tax revenue over that span. The city's assessing officials seek to minimize year-to-year swings during both booms and busts in order to stabilize the budget, said Evan Horowitz, the Tufts state policy center's executive director. But with real-world office values sinking so rapidly, landlords have run out of patience and are now trying to 'speed things up' through the challenges to the city, he said. Officials lowered commercial property values by just 3% citywide in the fiscal year that ended in June, the first time they had decreased since 2020. As of mid-July, officials had granted only 11 of the 388 abatement applications in the downtown area, mostly for small properties, records show. A Shahbazi property is one of the few to win an abatement: The city agreed to take nearly $2 million off its initial $14.2 million assessment for an 11-story Court Square office building that Shahbazi says is about two-thirds empty. Landlords can appeal the city's decision to the state Appellate Tax Board. The owners of a handful of Boston's largest office buildings are awaiting rulings based on appeals made in prior years. Those decisions could set a precedent for similar properties post-pandemic. Business groups have clashed with Mayor Michelle Wu over her handling of property taxes. The Pioneer New England Legal Foundation, a law firm that counts some of Boston's best-known corporate lawyers as board members, has accused her administration of illegally increasing the property assessments of owners with appeals before the state board, forcing them to pay more in taxes. The foundation petitioned the Massachusetts Department of Revenue to launch an investigation, but the agency's leader responded last week that his staff was 'unable to substantiate' the claims. Frank Bailey, a former federal judge who leads the foundation, said in an interview that the organization is considering a lawsuit to challenge the practice. A spokesperson for the Wu administration called the claims 'baseless and full of misinformation,' saying that the process is guided by state law and that the city has used it for decades. Josh Kraft, a nonprofit leader who's challenging Wu in this year's mayoral race, called Pioneer's allegations 'serious and credible' at a press conference outside City Hall on Thursday. If property owners bring the city to court and win refunds on hundreds of millions of dollars in overpaid taxes, 'it will be a massive blow to Boston's finances,' Kraft said. 'Right now, it looks like the mayor is using her office to punish property owners for exercising their rights under the law,' said Kraft, the son of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft. Last year, Wu sought to temporarily raise commercial property taxes in order to limit an increase for homeowners, but failed to obtain the approval she needed from state lawmakers before tax bills were mailed to residents. She is making the same push this year. 'I'm at a different neighborhood association or event multiple times a day where this comes up, that people are feeling the pressure of property taxes making it difficult for them to stay in their homes,' Wu said in a recent interview at Bloomberg's Boston office. The mayor has sought to revitalize downtown Boston by giving out grants to retailers to fill vacant storefronts and offering tax incentives to turn empty office buildings into apartments and condos. She also proposed rezoning downtown to allow for more towers in a bid to create more housing in the neighborhood. Josh Kraft has opposed Wu's proposal to shift more of the tax burden onto commercial landlords. He has floated plans to create a cluster of new businesses in the neighborhood and invite Boston's largest universities to invest more in the city center. A revived downtown would help prop up property values and advance the revenue Boston collects from those levies. Amid a budget crunch caused by dwindling pandemic aid and a softer economy, those dollars are even more important after the Trump administration cut research funding to the lifeblood of Boston's economy — health care and higher education. (Updates with Josh Kraft comments in 16th paragraph.) More stories like this are available on