Don't chase defence stocks on sentiment; focus on fundamentals and export potential: Ashish Gupta
Live Events
"There are the few companies that will probably benefit from higher defence spending in India and globally and there we see larger upside, but I would not kind of say that it is a broad rush approach that you should take towards the sector," says Ashish Gupta , CIO, Axis Mutual Fund So, as we spoke about earlier, one should not really trade based on sentiment. Yes, definitely many of these companies, their outlook is good, their order books are full, and the revenue outlook is strong, I am not sure with what has happened overnight, there is going to be a material change for many of them immediately.So, I do not think people should react to this news and look at this sector. We saw similar reaction happened when many European countries started talking about increasing their defence spending and defence stocks globally including India rerated, but the fact is that very few defence companies in India either export to Europe or even have excess capacity to be able to export. So, one has to be careful in terms of distinguishing the sentiment versus the facts.There are the few companies that will probably benefit from higher defence spending in India and globally and there we see larger upside, but I would not kind of say that it is a broad rush approach that you should take towards the sector.The dollar. So, to some extent the tariff impacts, US economic impact will also translate into the impact on the dollar and that will be really key determinant to what happens to foreign flows . We have seen despite all the talk of tariff, recession in the US, because dollar continued to weaken, we saw FII flows to emerging markets including India resuming. So, this is going to be a critical variable to look at.If the dollar continues to weaken, that is certainly beneficial for the market. It has actually been quite interesting in the last three months because typically when US rates go higher, dollar moves higher, but this time even though despite tariff announcements, US bond yields moved up by about 50 basis points, the dollar had actually weakened and therefore, we saw flows coming back to emerging markets, even as US yields were going up, so that typically does not happen. So, the direction of dollar will be the key variable this year.So, we are looking at the consumption space more constructively. We are seeing actually mixed signs in consumption. So, there are pockets in consumption that have started to recover from the last two-three years of slowdown. So, construction is a space that incrementally that we have become more constructive on. We also like the EMS space. The opportunity there for India to benefit from the US-China rift is becoming bigger and bigger. There are not many stocks but that is a space that is evolving. Then, we continue to like pockets like travel, hospitality, hotels, and real estate
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Indian Techie Shares How He Went From Rs 6 Lakh To Rs 18 Lakh To Rs 0 Salary In A Month
In recent months, Reddit has become a popular platform for employees to share their job struggles and workplace concerns. Several subreddits have emerged where employees anonymously share their stories and also connect with others who face similar challenges. Recently, one young Indian developer took to the platform to share how his dream turned into a nightmare after a job offer from a US startup was withdrawn just as he was set to join, leaving him unemployed. In a post shared on the subreddit r/developersIndia, the techie revealed that he saw his salary increase from Rs 6 lakh per annum to a promised Rs 18 lakh per annum, only to crash back down to zero. "I was a full-stack dev at an Indian startup, grinding at 6 LPA. Learned a ton, and after a lot of effort, landed a contract offer from a very early-stage US-based startup that looked like a dream - promising around 18 LPA," the developer shared. "Everything seemed set. I put in my papers at my old job, went through all the onboarding formalities with the new US startup, and served my notice period. But just as I was ready to officially start, they hit me with the news: due to sudden internal restructuring and unforeseen changes in their needs (which I very much suspect translates to they found some other candidate as I could see a new person join their slack before I was hit with the mail but again I'm not entirely sure), they had to revoke my offer," he continued. I went from 6 LPA to 18 LPA and back to 0 over a span of a month by u/Hiddenskeptic in developersIndia The Redditor shared that the company did offer to pay him for 15 days as a goodwill gesture. "But it doesn't change the fact that I'm now unexpectedly unemployed," he said. "Trying to apply like a freak and getting literally no callbacks and it's been a tough pill to swallow, going from that high to this low so quickly," he added. "I have 1.6 years of experience, primarily as a full-stack next company I join will be my third, and so far, my entire career has been with startups. While the learning is immense, the uncertainty has been real. I'm now considering having some stability, a place where I can contribute and grow for at least 2-3 years. That doesn't mean I'll stop grinding or upskilling; I'm always eager to learn and push myself, but a bit more predictability would be welcome," the Redditor wrote. The developer turned to the Reddit community for support. "If anyone has any leads, referrals, or just some advice on navigating this, I'd be incredibly grateful. Thanks for reading," he concluded. The post quickly gained traction online. While some users resonated with the post, others praised the techie for handling his setback with dignity. "Something like this is happening to me too. I can understand your pain bro. I suggest you should post this in linkedin and twitter some kind HR or another dev might help over there," wrote one user. "Always do a thorough research before joining a company which offers impeccable pay raise from your last CTC especially startups. All the best for your journey mate," commented another. "Make a post on linkedin regarding this and mention you are available to join next day. Nice post btw, didn't feel like you were crying or something," suggested a third user. "This is a bad situation. Those companies should be sued but the government is not doing enough," expressed one user.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Why Is Moscow Pushing To Revive The Russia-India-China Troika Now?
Last Updated: Moscow has renewed its call to revive the Russia-India-China trilateral, dormant since the 2020 Galwan clash. But its timing and what it stands to gain tell a bigger story THE BIG PICTURE For the first time since 2020, Russia has openly called for reviving the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral format. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, speaking at a security conference in Eurasia in the city of Perm on May 29, said the 'time has come" to restart RIC meetings, adding that, in his view, India and China have reached an understanding on easing border tensions. 'I would like to confirm our genuine interest in the earliest resumption of the work within the format of the troika — Russia, India, China — which was established many years ago on the initiative of (ex-Russian prime minister) Yevgeny Primakov, and which has organised meetings more than 20 times at the ministerial level since then, not only at the level of foreign policy chiefs, but also the heads of other economic, trade and financial agencies of the three countries," Lavrov was quoted as saying by TASS. Big Statement by Russian FM Sergey Lavrov says 'it seems to me that the time has come to revive this Russia, India & China Troika" — Siddhant Mishra (@siddhantvm) May 30, 2025 The RIC platform, originally launched in the late 1990s, has remained dormant since the deadly Galwan clashes between Indian and Chinese troops in June 2020. While Russia had hinted at trilateral engagement during the BRICS Summit in Kazan in 2024, Lavrov's latest pitch marks the most explicit call to formally revive the RIC mechanism since Galwan. Lavrov's renewed pitch signals much more than just a procedural revival — it reflects Moscow's shifting diplomatic calculus amid changing global alignments. So, why now? What is driving Russia's push? And where does India fit into this strategic triangle? Here's a detailed look. The RIC grouping was first proposed by former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov as part of Moscow's vision for a multipolar world order. Over the years, it has convened more than 20 times at various levels, bringing together foreign ministers, trade officials, economic agencies, and security experts from the three Asian powers to foster dialogue on a range of issues. However, after the Galwan clash led to a sharp deterioration in India-China relations, the platform effectively went dormant. WHY IS RUSSIA PUSHING NOW? A Tentative Thaw Between India and China The primary obstacle to RIC's functioning has always been India-China tensions. However, the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the BRICS Summit in Kazan (October 2024) marked a significant shift. The two leaders reached an understanding aimed at easing the border standoff along the Line of Actual Control, which had remained a major flashpoint since the 2020 Galwan clash. The widely circulated handshake between Modi and Xi was also seen as a public signal of improving ties. Russia sees this tentative easing of tensions as an opening to revive RIC, hoping that both Delhi and Beijing may now be more receptive to moderated dialogue under Moscow's watch. Russia's Growing Anxiety Over India's Western Alignment Since Galwan, India has steadily deepened its ties with the United States, Japan, Australia — particularly through the Quad — as well as newer groupings like I2U2 and multiple Western defence partnerships. This growing alignment with Western powers, especially in defence, technology, and supply chain domains, has deepened Moscow's anxieties about India drifting further into the Western camp. For Russia, reviving RIC offers a way to keep India engaged within a non-Western multilateral space, while allowing Moscow to retain its role as a balancing player between its two key Asian partners. The NATO Factor: A Direct Warning Lavrov directly accused NATO of attempting to 'lure India into anti-China intrigues", describing it as a 'large provocation" that India is fully aware of. This is one of Russia's clearest acknowledgements of how it views NATO's expanding interest in the Indo-Pacific region and India's growing engagement with Western security groupings. Through RIC, Moscow is signalling its desire to keep India engaged in Eurasian multilateralism and prevent it from being drawn too deeply into the US-China competition. The Ukraine war and sweeping Western sanctions have pushed Russia to deepen its engagement across Asia. However, as Moscow's economic and diplomatic dependence on China has grown, so too have its long-term strategic concerns about being overly reliant on Beijing. By seeking to revive RIC, Russia is attempting to balance its Asian partnerships, maintain diplomatic space with India, and continue projecting itself as an independent power centre within the evolving Eurasian order. With India's growing global profile and China's rise, Russia risks being increasingly sidelined in Asia's strategic balance. The revival of RIC allows Moscow to project continued relevance as a power capable of influencing dialogue between Asia's two major players. It also aligns with Russia's broader vision of strengthening non-Western institutions that can serve as alternatives to Western-led alliances. WHAT'S AT STAKE FOR INDIA? For India, this renewed Russian pitch presents both opportunities and challenges. While New Delhi maintains strong historical ties with Moscow, deep distrust persists with China due to unresolved border disputes. India's foreign policy rests on its ability to maintain strategic autonomy, avoiding being locked into any single camp, whether Western or non-Western. If RIC discussions are revived, India could engage while continuing to maintain its partnerships with the United States, Quad members, and other emerging alliances. THE BOTTOM LINE Lavrov's call to revive RIC is about more than simply restarting old meetings. It reflects Russia's broader effort to navigate shifting global alignments, counterbalance growing Western influence in Asia, and reassert its diplomatic weight as a Eurasian power broker. For India, the revival of RIC is another test of its ability to walk the tightrope between multiple global partnerships, unresolved regional tensions, and its long-standing pursuit of strategic autonomy. About the Author News Desk The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk More Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : galwan clashes india russia china Sergey Lavrov Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: May 30, 2025, 15:25 IST News explainers Why Is Moscow Pushing To Revive The Russia-India-China Troika Now?
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Sliding oil prices have reopened the door to Russian crude
Earlier this year, the Western energy industry began to calculate how it might tiptoe back into Russia if there is peace in Ukraine. One group isn't hanging around. A cadre of Greek shipping magnates has sent a stream of ships to Russian ports in recent months, stepping back into the fold as the go-to distributors of Moscow's crude to the world. The jump back into the lucrative trade follows a fall in oil prices this year. Handling Russian oil is legal under Western sanctions if the price is below $60 a barrel. The Greek moves also reflect signs of a rapprochement between the U.S. and Moscow soon after President Trump's return to office. But Trump's recent criticism of President Vladimir Putin—including a warning of further sanctions—shows why many other Western companies have been cautious about rebuilding their businesses in Russia. Greek shipping companies collectively control the world's biggest tanker fleet, giving them a powerful role in the oil market and access in Washington. Recent meetings with Trump administration officials left some Greek shipping chiefs more confident they won't be targeted for handling Russian exports, people familiar with the discussions said. 'Everyone's feeling like it's safe to go back," said Michelle Bockmann, a London-based maritime analyst. 'The mood music is Iran no, but Russia yes." A State Department spokesperson said the U.S. wanted to give diplomacy a chance and that there were 'a range of measures available" if Trump 'determines that Putin is not interested in negotiating." Greek ships moved 26% of Russian crude shuttled from Baltic and Black Sea ports in April and 30% in March, more than double their market share in 2024, according to Vortexa, a firm that tracks ships. Most other European and U.S. tanker companies have avoided ferrying Russian oil. They see risks in operating in a country at war with an ally of Western governments and whose economy is under a patchwork of sanctions. Greek tanker owners mostly stopped ferrying Russian crude in late 2023 when oil prices rose above the $60 cap, a measure introduced to limit Moscow's profit from a key export. That left most of Russia's crude to be handled by the 'shadow fleet" of aging tankers with obscure owners, which was assembled by Moscow to sidestep the sanctions. Greece is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the European Union, and agreed to enforce measures to isolate Russia's economy after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. But this year, a surge in Saudi output, coupled with concerns that the trade war will hurt the world economy, has dragged the price of benchmark Brent crude down 14% to about $64 a barrel. Russian barrels fetch closer to $50, reflecting the discount attached to the country's oil since the start of the war. At the same time, oil traders have called on Greek tankers to replace dozens of shadow-fleet ships that have effectively been put out of action by new Western sanctions. Among the tanker owners sending their ships back to Russian ports are Ioannis Alafouzos, Andreas Martinos and George Prokopiou, according to shipping data and industry executives. The Alafouzos family controls more than a dozen tankers through Okeanis Eco Tankers, which is listed in New York. At the request of its Scandinavian investors, the company stopped handling Russian oil in 2023, soon after the sanctions took effect. But the family kept moving Russian petroleum with tankers it owns privately. Mostly named after islands in the Cyclades, the ships have picked up Russian crude nine times this year, according to the shipping data. In all, Alafouzos-controlled vessels have called at Russian ports about 140 times since the war started, the data show. Several dozen of the trips were to transport Kazakh crude exported from Russia's Black Sea coast. Alafouzos is a prominent figure in Greece, where he owns the soccer club Panathinaikos as well as a newspaper and TV station among other assets. His son, Aristidis Alafouzos, is Okeanis's chief executive. Alafouzos Jr. told analysts last year that sailing in the Black Sea was no riskier than the Arabian Gulf. 'And the AG is somewhere where everyone goes," he said. Prokopiou's Dynacom Tankers has loaded Russian crude six times this year, shipping data show. Martinos's Minerva, meanwhile, sent its first tanker to pick up Russian crude in more than a year this March. Another Minerva ship is due to load in the Baltic port of Primorsk within days. Both companies have also moved Russian products, including diesel and Kazakh crude, from Russian ports dozens of times this year. Spokespeople for Dynacom and Minerva didn't respond to requests for comment. Tanker owners can demand higher freight rates to charter their ships to traders moving Russian oil than for mainstream voyages. The premium partly reflects the legal and compliance costs of working in Russia. There is also less competition as many Western tanker companies consider Russia off limits. To be sure, not all Greek tanker owners think freight rates are high enough to compensate for the risks associated with ferrying Russian crude. One of them is George Economou, who controls a fleet through TMS Tankers. Economou moved huge amounts of Russian crude after the price cap first took effect in late 2022 but is sitting out the current rush, according to people familiar with the matter. TMS is instead limiting its Russian business to a type of fuel oil. 'It's a fluid market situation," said Basil Karatzas, chief executive of U.S.-based Karatzas Marine Advisors. 'Many shipowners have a different risk assessment." Write to Joe Wallace at and Costas Paris at
