Paschal Donohoe to remain as Eurogroup chair for third term
will be re-elected as president of the
Eurogroup
, after those challenging him for the role pulled out of the race on the day of the vote.
Spanish economy minister Carlos Cuerpo and Lithuanian finance minister Rimantas Šadžius had both put their names forward to challenge Mr Donohoe for the influential European Union (EU) role.
The 20 finance ministers of euro zone countries are due to vote to elect a chair at a Eurogroup meeting on Monday afternoon.
Shortly before the meeting was due to start both Mr Cuerpo and Mr Šadžius confirmed they were withdrawing their names from consideration.
READ MORE
Mr Cuerpo, who was seen as the main challenger to Mr Donohoe, found his candidacy did not have enough support to be successful. Mr Šadžius said he was pulling out to maintain a 'consensus' in the room.
The Eurogroup usually meets once a month and brings together the finance ministers from the 20 euro zone countries to co-ordinate economic policy, with the president tasked with chairing the meetings.
[
Paschal Donohoe well placed in Eurogroup job race despite Spanish challenge
Opens in new window
]
Mr Donohoe will be formally elected for a third term as chair when finance ministers meet on Monday afternoon.
Heading into the contest the Fine Gael minister had more than a dozen of the 20 available votes locked up. Eleven votes are needed to be elected. It is understood both Germany and France had thrown their weight behind Mr Donohoe's re-election bid.
Many ministers whose parties sit in the same European grouping as Fine Gael, the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), also support Mr Donohoe remaining in the job.
How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax
Listen |
22:03
Mr Donohoe was first elected to the influential role in 2020, beating candidates from Spain and Luxembourg. He was re-elected unopposed in 2022 for a second term. The president, who chairs the meetings of finance ministers, holds the role for two-and-a half years.
The longest serving Eurogroup chair was former Luxembourg prime minister and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, who was in the position from 2005 to 2013.
The Eurogroup president also attends high-level international meetings, such as the Group of Seven (G7), where the leaders of France, Germany, the United States, Italy, Canada, the UK and Japan meet. The meetings are also attended by the head of the European Commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
an hour ago
- Agriland
Weakening agri policy would be ‘deal-breaker' for next EU budget
Any attempt to weaken agricultural policy within the EU would be a 'deal-breaker' in terms of the negotiation of the long term budget, known as the multi-annual financial framework (MFF). The comments came from Spanish MEP Carmen Crespo Díaz, the European Parliament's lead negotiator on the future of agriculture, regarding the plenary debate on the post-27 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). 'We firmly reject any attempt to nationalise this policy or merge its funding with other EU instruments,' Diaz, who is a member of the European People's Party (EPP) grouping in the EU, told Agriland. 'The CAP must remain a truly common policy, with dedicated funds and independent pillars, ensuring fair and equal support for all European farmers. 'Weakening agricultural policy would be a deal-breaker for the next EU long-term budget (MFF). 'We need to put farmers back at the centre of decision-making. Innovation, competitiveness, and sustainability must drive the transformation of Europe's food system without adding to the bureaucratic burden farmers already face,' she added. MEP Carmen Crespo Diaz. Image source: EPP Group EU Budget Crespo Diaz said that a stronger budget is essential to shield farmers from rising costs, climate risks, and market instability. 'In addition to strengthening agricultural aid, the EPP Group is committed to simplification and smart incentives to increase the profitability and resilience of farming across Europe,' she added. 'We support smart incentives over obligations, fair prices for producers, and better support for vulnerable rural regions.' In her draft report as rapporteur on the future of agriculture and the post-2027 Common Agricultural Policy, Crespo Diaz stated: 'It is necessary to consolidate a model based on incentives rather than obligations, promoting the adoption of sustainable practices without affecting farmers' profitability. 'Existing regulations need to be reviewed so that they do not impose disproportionate burdens, and administrative simplification needs to be encouraged, reducing bureaucracy and ensuring that support reaches those who need it in a timely manner. 'To this end, the following should be noted: CAP cross-compliance requirements should be reassessed to reduce excessive implementation requirements, administrative burdens and unnecessary costs. 'Direct payments under Pillar I of the CAP should be made available to all professional farmers, irrespective of their size and type of production,' she also stated. She also suggested the possibility of supporting sectors in difficulty or subject to specific constraints, such as arid, mountainous or outermost areas and sectors such as fruit and vegetables, wine, beekeeping. A further point made is that the Mediterranean forests and livestock, should be maintained.
Dublin Live
2 hours ago
- Dublin Live
'Regrettable' that EU and US deal not done as Trump threatens 30% tariffs
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info It is 'regrettable' that the EU and US were not able to agree a framework on tariffs ahead of an earlier deadline, the Tanaiste has said. Simon Harris said the EU has to 'prepare for all scenarios' after US President Donald Trump threatened 30% tariffs against the bloc. Mr Harris said there was a need to 'de-escalate the situation' through a framework deal that would provide certainty for businesses and protect jobs and investment. The Foreign Affairs Minister made the comments following a meeting with US ambassador to Ireland Ed Walsh. Speaking at Government Buildings, Mr Harris said: 'The message I relayed to the US ambassador is a consistent one and a very straightforward one: we in Ireland, we in Europe, want a deal. 'We want a trade deal that is good for Ireland, good for Europe, good for the United States of America, and I believe there is a clear landing zone in relation to that.' The EU and US had been engaged in negotiations ahead of a deadline last week, but Mr Trump announced he was pushing back the imposition of a higher rate of tariffs until August 1. The US president also said he would impose 30% tariffs on the bloc if a deal is not reached, in a move that EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said would make trade between the two regions almost 'impossible'. Mr Harris said: 'I believe there was a landing zone very nearly there last week, and it's regrettable that that wasn't arrived at.' However, he said he remained confident that a deal can happen in the days ahead. The European Commission is due to publish an expanded list of counter-tariffs that would be implemented if an agreement is not reached. He said the 'optimal position' would be to get to a deal where 'we can rip up that list and never need to see it implemented'. 'A countermeasure list is an important step of saying to President Trump: 'Hang on, we want a deal here, we want a way forward, but if there isn't a deal Europe also has options at its disposal'.' The Tanaiste said the Irish Government will also analyse the list and engage with the commission over any 'areas of concern for Ireland' that arise. Mr Harris's discussion with Mr Walsh also touched on the issue of the pharmaceutical sector where there is an ongoing section 232 investigation being carried out by the US administration. The Tanaiste said the pharma sector remains an area of significant concern for Ireland. 'Europe must remain calm, must remain united – our strength is in being united, 460 million of us – and must of course prepare for all scenarios.' Earlier, European commissioner for democracy, justice, the rule of law and consumer protection Michael McGrath said the bloc's response to 30% tariffs would be 'firm, quick and robust'. Mr McGrath told RTE Radio 1: 'We have two and a half weeks left before the new deadline within which we will leave no stone unturned as a European Union to get the best possible deal for our companies.' He said that if the 30% tariff is introduced by the US, the EU has measures in place to respond. He said: 'We have been preparing for a range of different scenarios for many months, and so the European Union has been keeping all of the member states, including Ireland, regularly informed of developments, there have been ongoing consultations. 'I want to underline the importance of unity. What we have been doing in relation to countermeasures is preparing for different scenarios. There are two different sets of packages of countermeasures that amount to the imposition of tariffs of exports from the US into the EU of over €90 billion. 'We do not wish for that to come to pass, but in the event that it does, then we will need to respond if the US proceeds unilaterally with the imposition of tariffs of the order that President Trump has flagged in his letter over the weekend.' Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice . For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Ireland's new defamation law ‘falls short of EU SLAPP directive'
Ireland's new defamation laws risk incurring EU legal action, the Government has been warned. The Dáil last week passed the long-awaited Defamation Bill, with the Seanad passing it at second stage last Wednesday. However, a group of organisations, including the National Union of Journalists, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, and RTÉ have argued that while the Defamation Bill contains provisions to stop so-called SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) cases, it 'fails to include the robust safeguards required to meaningfully protect public interest speech'. Such SLAPP cases usually involve affluent plaintiffs attempting to silence or censor criticism by suing critics, forcing them to spend huge sums on legal fees defending their position. The Ireland Anti-SLAPPs Network group says that, nearly a decade after the review of the Defamation Act 2009 began, 'this is a frustrating outcome and a missed opportunity to protect the freedom of expression that is the lifeblood of our democracy'. Law falls short of transposing full directive The group says that while the bill brings in provisions that give effect to aspects of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive, it falls short of transposing the directive's full set of minimum standards and protections, which Ireland is legally required to implement in full by May 2026. The anti-SLAPP provisions in the bill apply only to defamation proceedings and do not extend to privacy, copyright, or data protection cases. The group stated: The Government has provided no clear explanation of how it intends to extend protections beyond defamation in line with its EU obligations. They said that the legislation also 'omits key components of the directive that could have been readily included'. These include provision for third-party interventions in support of SLAPP defendants (Article 9), security for damages (Article 10) and a reversal of the burden of proof (Article 12). The legislation also fails to incorporate the protections against SLAPPs initiated in non-EU countries (Articles 16 and 17). 'By failing to incorporate these core safeguards, the Irish Government exposes itself to potential infringement proceedings from the European Commission," the group stated. Recommendation on countering SLAPPs It said the Government could and should have drawn on established international best practices, including the Council of Europe's recommendation on countering the use of SLAPPs. 'This recommendation includes vital safeguards, such as an automatic stay of proceedings while an early dismissal motion is being heard, which are designed to protect against abusive litigation. "It provides clear, practical guidance for safeguarding free expression and democratic accountability. Yet the Government appears to have almost entirely disregarded it.' Speaking in the Seanad on the bill last week, justice minister Jim O'Callaghan said full transposition 'will be done'. 'Let us remember that this is a defamation bill. It is appropriate that we just transpose into the Defamation Bill those aspects of the SLAPP directive that relate to defamation.' Jessica Ní Mhainín of Index on Censorship said: 'It is ironic that this piece of legislation was passed in the Dáil on European Day of Action against SLAPPs because it completely fails to offer meaningful protection to SLAPP defendants. "Its complex and flawed provisions risk becoming tools only accessible to those with significant legal resources — not the individuals most often targeted with SLAPPs.'
