India speaks for itself now: Why global outreach is not a tamasha
Dr Navneet Anand is a communications professional with a rich tapestry of experience spanning 25 years across media, academia, and the corporate sector. A graduate of Hindu College in Delhi University, Anand went on to complete his MA, MPhil and PhD in Sociology (communications) from Jawaharlal Nehru University, he has been a journalist previously with The Times of India, The Indian Express, and The Pioneer. As the founder-director of GreyMatters Communications & Consulting, Navneet has lent his expertise to a myriad of projects, including serving as a Public Communication Expert for a World Bank initiative, International Labour Organization, many Government and private agencies in India. His corporate journey includes a notable tenure as General Manager of Corporate Affairs & Communication at Fortune 500 company, Reliance Industries Limited. Navneet seamlessly integrates his extensive professional background with his rigorous academic training. He is the author of two acclaimed books, including 'The Media Effect' (2003), and regularly contributes to esteemed national and international journals and publications. A distinguished educator, Navneet imparts knowledge on journalism, social media, marketing & strategic communication, and public relations at esteemed institutions such as Indian Institute of Mass Communication, IIMs, IP University, Delhi University and JNU. With a passion for training and development, Navneet has empowered over 2,500 officials from government, police, and PSUs, while delivering over 500 lectures and training sessions. For insights on social and political issues, reach out to him at navneet@thegreymatters.in. LESS ... MORE
A quote often attributed to Winston Churchill reads: 'Some see private misfortune in public success. They forget the victory belongs to the nation, not to the noise of its doubters.'
In the tense months leading up to D-Day in 1944, Churchill made the momentous decision to back Operation Overlord, the largest seaborne invasion in military history. Many in his own cabinet and among military advisors feared the operation would end in disaster. Yet when the tides turned and Allied troops landed successfully on the beaches of Normandy, liberating Europe from fascist rule, some critics continued to murmur, unable to celebrate what was ultimately a national and civilizational triumph.
For a generation of doubters including intellectuals, perception engineers, and custodians of legacy opinion-making, the bold and decisive moves by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the wake of Operation Sindoor have, unsurprisingly, not gone down too well. Visibly irked and sensing private misfortune, their sermonizing on India's diplomacy and its handling of Pakistan has surfaced in varied formats: verbose X threads, camouflaged newspaper columns, and panels in policy dialogues.
What they refuse to acknowledge is the tectonic shift in global power. Political scientist Samuel Huntington anticipated this change in The Clash of Civilizations. He observed that in the post–Cold War world, Western dominance would decline, and its universalist narrative would lose moral currency. At the same time, Asian civilizations, particularly India and China, would grow economically, militarily, and politically. The Islamic world, he warned, would see demographic upheaval with destabilizing consequences. His warning today reads like prophecy.
In this emerging global order, India cannot afford diplomatic timidity. Our outreach via delegations of Members of Parliament, former ministers, diplomats, and strategic experts, is not a joyride or an indulgent spectacle. It is a calibrated and essential assertion of India's role as a rising power.
For many decades before 2014, a select group of journalists and foreign policy experts assumed it was their birthright to accompany every official Indian delegation: from Mongolia to Mozambique, Guyana to Great Britain, Uganda to the United States. That cosy business was shut down with Modi's arrival, and perhaps that's where the pinch lies.
Now, denied their old privileges, the same skeptics struggle to stomach a new Bharat. One that walks into the world's most strategic capitals and says, clearly and confidently: this is who we are. A nation with strength, resolve, and a clear sense of self. No euphemisms. No appeasement. No apologies.
This moment is more than just a response to Operation Sindoor. It is a redefinition of Indian diplomacy. Combating terror is no longer merely a domestic imperative. It is a global message, conveyed with precision and intent. India will not be spoken for. It will speak, and if necessary, act for itself.
Dismissing the all-party delegation's visit as a 'taxpayer-funded vacation' is not just incorrect, it is dishonest. It reduces a serious diplomatic initiative to a caricature. In today's world of weaponised misinformation, India must explain its position globally. Engaging with the international community is not vanity, it is strategy.
Calling this outreach a 'boondoggle' ignores the stakes of global opinion-making. Silence can be misinterpreted. Propaganda can metastasize if left unchallenged. The India of today cannot afford to leave narratives to others. It must shape them, assertively and truthfully.
Likewise, calling India's diplomatic messaging a display of 'victimhood' is a shallow interpretation. Nations have every right to highlight terrorism, expose international duplicity, and demand accountability. These are not signs of insecurity; instead they are expressions of sovereign confidence. Strategic autonomy does not mean silence. Nor does it mean forfeiting the right to demand solidarity when the cause is just.
A multi-party delegation member and AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi during an interaction with prominent figures, in Bahrain.
For far too long, Pakistan and its proxies cultivated a sympathetic network within India including essayists in editorial offices, content creators posing as conflict analysts. After Operation Sindoor, they were subdued. But as soon as India began reaffirming its message to the world, their discomfort resurfaced.
A multi-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor being welcomed by Ambassador of India to the United States of America Vinay Kwatra, in New York.
This time, however, the message is different. It is firm. It is public. You are either with us, or you are not. And this will no longer be whispered in closed rooms. It will be said aloud — in Geneva, in Brussels, in New York, in Tokyo — wherever India's voice needs to be heard.
Because this is not about Modi. It is about India. And India is speaking for itself now.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
ISKCON fits Sukhoi fighter jet tyres to Lord Jagannath's chariot in Kolkata
This year's Rath Yatra in Kolkata is set to be a remarkable one as Lord Jagannath's chariot will roll on tyres originally designed for the Sukhoi fighter jet — notably the ones used in India's successful Operation Kolkata has spearheaded the initiative to replace the old tyres of Lord Jagannath's tyres which were first fitted in 1977 and sourced from a Boeing aircraft. With the original manufacturer, Dunlop ceasing operations years ago, the search for suitable replacements were on for the past few had been using second-hand aircraft tyres for many years,' said Radharaman Das, Vice President of ISKCON Kolkata. 'After thorough research, we found that the tyres of Sukhoi fighter jet matched the size and specifications of the old Boeing ones.' In 2024, tyre manufacturer MRF assessed the requirements and delivered the new tyres in early 2025. A 24-kilometre trial was carried out to ensure the tyres could withstand the weight of the chariot and move smoothly through Kolkata's added, 'It is a coincidence that the tyres came from Sukhoi jets that participated in Operation Sindoor, a significant achievement for Indian defence.'While the change is a technical enhancement, it also carries symbolic significance. Das drew parallels with the Mahabharata, noting that Lord Krishna attempted to prevent war between the Kauravas and Pandavas. When diplomacy failed, the Pandavas emerged victorious, reinforcing a message of peace backed by year's Rath Yatra conveys a dual message — of devotion and determination. It reflects Sanatani values and India's readiness to rise against adversity,' said Das, hinting at current tensions with Lord Jagannath's chariot now mounted on tyres built for a combat aircraft, this year's procession is set to combine tradition with a powerful reminder of cultural resilience and national Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Plans For 19th Birthday Ended By Man Who Could Not Let Go
New Delhi: Mehak Jain's 19th birthday was just five days away and for over a month she had been preparing for the celebration for a month, meticulously planning every detail. But her life was brutally cut short by her boyfriend, Arshkrit Singh, on Sunday. The promising BA Honours in English student aspired to become a translator, following in her sister's footsteps. She had started learning Korean. Jain's sister, Mridula, said she was very excited about her coming birthday on June 6. The girl had placed several orders and frequently messaged her sister about the arrangements. Over the last two days, parcels arrived at their home with the items she ordered. Mridula added that Jain aspired to become a Korean translator and had enrolled in a course in Lajpat Nagar last year. She was a good student and had completed the first year of her BA Honours in English. The father works at a clothing shop in Chandni Chowk and her mother is a private tutor. "She wanted to secure a job and help the family," the sister added. Singh was obsessed with his girlfriend, the cops said. He was a first-year BCom student at Delhi University's School of Open Learning and came from a business background — his father has an electrical equipment trade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 180k traders trust IC Markets for CFD trading | Sign up today IC Markets Learn More Undo Jain's family said the two met at a school farewell party last year and became friends. However, things took a dark turn when Singh started harassing his friend, even demanding that she stop talking to other boys. Despite warnings to stay away from her, he continued to stalk her and even followed her to Korean classes. "They were only friends," alleged Mridula. According to police, Singh claimed to be in a relationship with Jain from last July but began suspecting that she was communicating with other boys, which led to a breakdown between them. "He created a fake social media account under a boy's name to see if she would chat with him," an officer revealed. Lately, he grew more suspicious after seeing calls on her phone and began believing she was seeing someone else. "There were instances when, during their conversations, if someone called her, he would immediately ask, 'Why did he call you?' or 'Why are you talking to him?' Over time, he became increasingly suspicious that she was involved with someone else. Her family advised him to stay away and focus on his career, which left him feeling isolated," the officer said. On the day of the murder, an argument about other boys broke out in a park. Singh brought petrol siphoned from a scooter in an empty cold drink bottle along with a kitchen knife to carry out the attack. In Jan, he had visited Sanjay Van and was familiar with its isolated areas where he believed he could commit the crime unnoticed. "The act was premeditated and his digital devices have been sent for forensic analysis to determine whether he planned it by watching videos or accessing related content online," a police officer said.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Pak wanted India on its knees in 48 hrs, folded up in 8 hrs to talk: CDS
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said Tuesday that Pakistan wanted to bring India 'to its knees in 48 hours' with Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos on May 10, but the attacks 'folded up in 8 hours' after which Pakistan 'picked up the telephone and said they wanted to talk'. He made these remarks while delivering a lecture on 'Future Wars and Warfare' at the Savitribai Phule Pune University. Detailing the Pakistani response to Operation Sindoor, General Chauhan said Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos was 'launched by Pakistan on 10th of May at about 1 am' and 'its aim was to get India down to its knees in 48 hours. Multiple attacks were launched'. He said although India had actually hit only terror targets, the Pakistanis 'escalated this conflict… into the military domain'. Stating that armed forces are the most rational actors in conflict situations, he explained why Pakistan called India. 'I think that the rationale behind this… realisation coming in… stemmed from two facts. One is that they must have assumed that if they continued this mode, they are likely to lose much more. Hence, they picked up the telephone. And second, since they had struck us at multiple fronts, they still did not have the benefit of understanding what they had struck. So, they must have thought they must have struck and, hence, they would like to talk now. And if they don't, they will tend to lose more.' Later, after a couple of days, Pakistan must have realised that their attacks had failed, he said. 'So, these were the two factors which would have made them think. But it's only after, say, one or two days, they would have realised that all… the kind of attacks they had launched against us were not fortified and they had all kind of failed.' Responding to a student's question on the losses faced by Pakistan during the hostilities, General Chauhan said, 'When I was asked about losses on our side, I said these are not important. The results and how you act are important. So it would not be very correct to talk about the losses, numbers etc.' 'You see, in a match, suppose you go into a football match and you win 3-2… that's an even-sided match. But suppose you go into a cricket Test match and win by an innings, then there is no question of how many wickets and how many balls and how many players. It's an innings (victory),' he said. 'But since there is always this inquisitiveness as to the results of your strikes… At some point of time, we will take out this particular data, and share it, to answer the queries and inquisitiveness of people… who keep asking 'How many aircraft did we destroy? How many radars did we destroy?' We will make a rough assessment of that and come out with that shortly,' he said. He said the government's objective behind Operation Sindoor was not retribution but to draw the limits of tolerance with Pakistan. 'Let me talk about reason… Operation Sindoor, as far as the government is concerned, was not about retribution. I think it was about drawing these limits of tolerance… This state-sponsored terrorism from Pakistan had to stop, and Pakistan should not be able to hold India hostage to terror activities.' Another point made by the operation was that India was not going to live under the shadow of terror and nuclear blackmail, he said. He also spoke about the emotions of India's citizens. 'The emotion… among the people of India was revenge and retribution… and to get the perpetrators to justice. That I think was playing in everyone's mind, that is the kind of emotion and public sentiment that was happening. And at the end of it, there was probably some sort of satisfaction, (and also) anxiety. Anxiety during the operation.' On the risks involved during military operations, he said, 'You can't be 100 per cent prepared for every kind of contingency and you can't have 100 per cent of the information about that. So you are always groping a bit in the dark when you are carrying out military operations. In every military operation, there is an element of risk involved. The only thing is that it should be a calculated kind of a risk.' 'In a war, even if there are setbacks, we have to adapt, understand what went wrong and go out again.' He said as an organisation, one must have an offensive spirit. 'That's why I said in a couple of my interviews that losses are not important, the outcome is,' he said. He reiterated that Operation Sindoor was not over and that there was only temporary cessation of operations. Soham is a Correspondent with the Indian Express in Pune. A journalism graduate, he was a fact-checker before joining the Express. Soham currently covers education and is also interested in civic issues, health, human rights, and politics. ... Read More
