
Apple Watch Series 11 — 5 upgrades Apple needs to make to stay relevant with Samsung and Google
I already got my hands on the latest Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and put it through thorough testing, with impressive results. The Google Pixel Watch 4, meanwhile, is slated for a likely August 20 debut at the Made by Google event taking place on that date. While nothing has been confirmed, rumors hint at a seriously upgraded next-gen Pixel Watch from Google.
Assuming those rumors come to fruition and based on all we learned about the Galaxy Watch 8, Apple has its work cut out this time around. With that in mind, these are the five upgrades Apple needs to make to keep the Apple Watch Series 11 relevant against its core competition.
Multi-band GPS isn't just for super-high-end smartwatches anymore. Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch 8 offer multi-band GPS, while the Apple Watch Series 10 relies on a single-band GPS antenna.
In short, more bands mean better connectivity in tricky locations where the sky might be obstructed. Think: city centers and heavily wooded areas.
While the Google Pixel Watch 3 similarly sports single-band GPS, rumors suggest that the new Pixel Watch 4 could get an upgrade to match the latest Galaxy Watches. If that occurs, Apple will be the only major smartwatch manufacturer whose flagship device doesn't offer multi-band.
And even though the Apple Watch Series 10 is a fairly reliable fitness tracker, there's certainly room for improvement. For example, when I recently biked 12 miles with the Apple Watch 10 vs the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, the latter proved more accurate. That bike route, notably, included a lot of trees and tall buildings.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Unlike Samsung, Google and Garmin, Apple doesn't provide any sort of daily energy or sleep score to help users better understand their overall health. This is a shame.
Of course, the best Apple Watch models already provide a decent level of sleep insights, even if it's not as detailed as what you get from Samsung or Garmin. However, the addition of a numeric sleep score out of 100 would bring Cupertino's sleep insights much more in line with industry leaders.
Likewise, some sort of score that takes into account both sleep quality and recent physical fitness would also be a major upgrade for Apple Watch owners (and something I've been wanting for a long time, too).
After all, Garmin's Body Battery metric has been around since 2018, and Fitbit's Readiness Score goes back to 2021. That said, Samsung's Energy Score only debuted last summer, so Apple isn't alone in joining the energy score party late. Let's just hope this is the year it happens.
Ever since the very first Apple Watch model arrived more than a decade ago, the flagship Apple Watch series has been stubbornly stuck at just 18 hours per charge in standard mode.
However, with the latest Galaxy Watch 8 models cruising for 30 hours per charge for the 40mm and 44mm models and 40-plus hours for the 46mm Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, Apple had better take battery life a bit more seriously this time around.
Likewise, in our testing, the smaller Pixel Watch 3 model was good for about 24 hours per charge, while the larger Pixel Watch 3 battery is good for 48 hours per charge. Expect those numbers to increase slightly when the Pixel Watch 4 debuts.
For the last handful of years, each new generation of the best smartwatch has debuted with a noticeably brighter screen, and 2025 sees the trend continuing. Samsung bumped up maximum brightness to 3,000 nits on the Galaxy Watch 8, an increase of 50% over the Galaxy Watch 7 (2,000 nits max brightness).
With rumors suggesting that the Pixel Watch 4 will see a similar increase to 3,000 nits, here's hoping Apple follows suit. For reference, the Apple Watch Series 10 maxes at 2,000 nits while the Apple Watch Ultra 2 tops out at 3,000 nits.
I've been pleasantly surprised by how actually useful Google's Gemini AI assistant is on the Galaxy Watch 8. Whether it's inquiring about my dog eating too many blueberries or asking for clothing recommendations for an upcoming trip, what I get from Gemini on the Galaxy Watch is a far cry from the Apple Watch's on-wrist Siri experience.
The Google Pixel Watch 4 will almost certainly debut with Gemini AI as well, leaving Apple Watch owners to ask, 'What about us?' Unfortunately, as of right now, there's little to suggest that an Apple Intelligence-powered Siri will show up in the Apple Watch Series 11 this fall (an overhauled Siri in spring 2026 is much more likely), and that's a real bummer.
While folks with the best smartwatch models for Android are having all their most burning questions answered with ease from the wrist, watchOS fans will likely have to wait at least another six months or more before an AI assistant as good as Gemini makes its way to the Apple Watch.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
6 minutes ago
- NBC News
Musk threatens 'immediate' legal action against Apple over alleged antitrust violations
Elon Musk on Monday threatened Apple with legal action over alleged antitrust violations related to rankings of the Grok AI chatbot app, which is owned by his artificial intelligence startup xAI. 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action,' Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. Apple declined to comment on Musk's threat. 'Why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics?' Musk said in another post. Apple last year tied up with OpenAI to integrate its ChatGPT chatbot into iPhone, iPad, Mac laptop and desktop products. Musk at that time had said that 'If Apple integrates OpenAI at the OS level, then Apple devices will be banned at my companies. That is an unacceptable security violation.' Prior to his legal threats against Apple, Musk had celebrated Grok surpassing Google as the fifth top free app on the App Store. When contacted by CNBC, xAI did not immediately respond to a request for further information on a potential lawsuit. CNBC confirmed that ChatGPT was ranked No. 1 in the top free apps section of the American iOS store, and was the only AI chatbot in Apple's 'Must-Have Apps' section. The App Store also featured a link to download OpenAI's new flagship AI model, ChatGPT-5 at the top of its 'Apps' section. OpenAI on Thursday announced GPT-5, its latest and most advanced large-scale AI model, following xAI's release of its newest chatbot, Grok 4, last month. Musk has an ongoing feud with ChatGPT maker OpenAI, which he co-founded in 2015. The billionaire stepped down from its board in 2018, four years after saying that AI was 'potentially more dangerous than nukes.' He is now suing the Microsoft -backed startup, and its CEO Sam Altman, alleging they abandoned OpenAI's founding mission to develop artificial intelligence 'for the benefit of humanity broadly.' Robert Keele, who headed the legal department at xAI, announced last week that he had left the company to spend more time with his family. In his announcement, Keele also acknowledged 'daylight between our worldviews' with Musk. In response to Musk's antitrust threats against Apple, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in an X post: 'This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like.' This is not the first time Apple has been challenged on antitrust grounds. In a landmark case, the Department of Justice last year sued the company over charges of running an iPhone ecosystem monopoly. In June, a panel of judges also denied an emergency application from Apple to halt the changes to its App Store resulting from a ruling that the company could no longer charge a commission on payment links inside its apps, nor tell developers how the links should look.


The Verge
6 minutes ago
- The Verge
Samsung has launched its first Micro RGB TV with improved color accuracy
First teased at CES 2025, Samsung has finally launched a TV featuring the company's new Micro RGB backlight technology. The 115-inch TV is first launching in South Korea for over $32,000, according to SamMobile, but Samsung says it's coming to the US next, followed by a wider global rollout with more size options. Samsung's Micro RGB technology is being positioned as an upgrade to Mini LED backlights that employ an array of tiny white or blue LEDs behind a TV's LCD panel. Micro RGB backlights instead use an ultra-fine pattern of individually controlled red, green and blue LEDs that are each less than than 100µm in size. The new backlight is powered by Samsung's Micro RGB AI engine, which the company says 'analyzes each frame in real time and automatically optimizes color output for a more lifelike and immersive picture.' The technology allows for improved color accuracy and better contrast by precisely controlling the intensity of the individual LEDs, and Samsung says it can even boost the color in dull scenes, making them appear more vivid and immersive. The other big advantage of Micro RGB is that the technology is cheaper to produce than MicroLED TVs. While Samsung's first 115-inch model is launching at KRW 44.9 million – or around $32,362 – the company also currently sells a smaller 110-inch MicroLED TV in the US for $150,000. Other features of the new 4K TV include a 144Hz variable refresh rate for gaming, AI upscaling, HDR10+ support, a 70-watt 4.2.2 speaker setup that supports Dolby Atmos, four HDMI 2.0 ports, a pair of USB-A ports, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. It can also function as a Matter controller, and if you use Philips Hue lights, the TV can sync their color to what's on screen. Samsung isn't the only company pursuing this upgraded approach to Mini LED TVs. Earlier this year, The Verge got a demo of Sony's awkwardly-named General RGB LED Backlight Technology, featuring backlight zones made up of red, green, and blue LEDs. And at CES 2025, Hisense announced its 116-inch TriChroma LED TV, which also features a backlight made up of individual RGB LEDs controlled by a new system the company calls RGB Local Dimming Technology. But while Hisense claims its TV can reproduce 97 percent of the BT.2020 color space, Samsung says its Micro RGB technology is even better, reproducing 100 percent and potentially making it one of the most color accurate TVs available to consumers. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Andrew Liszewski Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gadgets Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Samsung Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All TVs


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Quality Clicks: Google Rebuts Its Critics Sans Data
Amid evidence of an online catastrophe for publishers both large and small, Google is officially challenging the narrative that its AI Overviews tool is leading people to click into search engine results pages less frequently. The rebuttal comes through a now-prominent blog post by Google VP and Head of Search Liz Reid, who is contending that regardless of the numbers, the addition of the AI blurb at the top of a search is leading to more 'quality clicks.' 'Overall, total organic click volume from Google Search to websites has been relatively stable year-over-year,' Reid wrote Aug. 6. 'Additionally, average click quality has increased and we're actually sending slightly more quality clicks to websites than a year ago (by quality clicks, we mean those where users don't quickly click back — typically a signal that a user is interested in the website).' Quality Time with Google So the idea is that users will drill down deeper into things, spurred on by the introduction made by the AI tool. But this misses the point: it's the loss of aggregate traffic that hurts publishers and those trying to garner attention online, and since Google has had a practical monopoly on search for, well, decades, the impact of fewer clicks is big. But rather than leave it there, Reid added: 'This data is in contrast to third-party reports that inaccurately suggest dramatic declines in aggregate traffic — often based on flawed methodologies, isolated examples, or traffic changes that occurred prior to the roll out of AI features in Search.' The reader can assume that 'this data' refers to the first line, the organic click volume remaining 'relatively stable year-to-year' and not to the rest of it. However, outside parties are specifically taking aim at the former claim, noting that Google does not provide data to counter studies like those by Pew that definitely show lower levels of click-through traffic. With Their Own Eyes In addition to Pew's research, critics of the Google response point to their own evidence. 'Do the hundreds of thousands of Google Search Console [GSC] screenshots showing impressions remaining flat (or increasing) this year, while clicks dramatically decline – since AI Overviews were rolled out more broadly – count as 'flawed methodologies' or 'isolated examples'?' writes Amsive Vice President of SEO Strategy & Research Lily Ray. 'Thousands of us are seeing it… but it must just be some big coincidence?' 'Gaslighting of the highest order,' adds Florentina Schinteie, SEO Strategist for In-House Teams and Former Head of SEO at DesignRush. The Re-Skilling of the Web Here's another bit from the above blog post: 'While overall traffic to sites is relatively stable, the web is vast, and user trends are shifting traffic to different sites, resulting in decreased traffic to some sites and increased traffic to others. People are increasingly seeking out and clicking on sites with forums, videos, podcasts, and posts where they can hear authentic voices and first-hand perspectives. People are also more likely to click into web content that helps them learn more — such as an in-depth review, an original post, a unique perspective or a thoughtful first-person analysis. Sites that meet these evolving user needs are benefiting from this shift and are generally seeing an increase in traffic.' This seems in some ways eerily similar to the arguments of big bosses bullish on AI in the job market. Old jobs, they admit, will go away, but new jobs, they contend, will also be created. So it's a wash. Well… Workers will have to re-skill, then – what does that look like? The burden, you'd assume, would be on the workers themselves, which is convenient for whoever's moving the goalposts. The same concept is in play here. Reid suggests it's on the publishers to quickly add content … forums? Podcasts? But all of that aside, that first claim of the 'stability' of traffic is under fire. It's not just Pew, either. 'Research by AI search and SEO platform Authoritas, submitted as part of a legal complaint to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority, found that when an AI Overview is present, publishers are seeing a drop of 47.5% in per-query clickthrough rate on desktop, and 37.7% on mobile,' wrote Charlotte Tobitt Aug. 7 at PressGazette. 'Similarweb data found that among the top 100 news and media websites globally, the average rate of zero-click searches has gone from 50.5% to 52.7% in the past year. Among a wider dataset, zero-click news searches were said to have increased from 56% when AI Overviews were first launched in the US in May 2024 to almost 69% in May this year.' Publishers also report huge losses in traffic. Covering this last week, I cited this article in Columbia Journalism Review, which lays out some of these claims. For those who are skeptical about Reid's post, as a stand-in for a larger Google response: it's the numbers. The claim just doesn't seem credible, and no one from Google is coming up with any real proof. Panda and Penguin Another way to view Google's side of the issue, represented by Reid's arguments, is that the addition of AI Overviews is just like former Google algorithm changes, like Panda in 2011, and Penguin in 2012. These shifts were done with the stated goal of meeting user needs and driving positive change. Advertisers had to scramble. Digital marketers had to adapt by crafting content and sites to attract the priorities of the 'new boss' of Google favor. Conceptually, the same is true here – but the shift is much bigger, and the paradigm changes a lot more. The result appears to be a showdown between Google (which, in classical Marxian parlance, owns the means of production) and publishers, who, absent some course correction, may be left out in the cold, with simple admonitions to get started podcasting.