DJI Mic 2 plummets to new record-low price, saving you $100!
Buy the DJI Mic 2 for just $249 ($100 off)
This offer is available from Woot, an Amazon-owned deals-focused website. It's in new condition and comes with a 90-day Woot warranty. That said, there is a sense of urgency here, as the sale is scheduled to end after today! You only have some hours to sign up.
DJI Mic 2
DJI Mic 2
Triple-redundant recording, wireless convenience
Equipped with 32-bit float internal recording, wireless transmission up to 820ft, and several hours of battery life, the transmitters included with the DJI Mic 2 wireless audio recording platform are instant favorites. Redundantly record in your pocket and on your receiving camera with one of the best affordable mobile mics.
See price at Woot!
Save
$100.00
The DJI Mic 2 quickly became one of the most popular microphones around. We can see why. This is an all-in-one mic package with everything you need. These are convenient, easy to use, very portable, and offer really good quality for the size and price.
Let's start with the receiver. This little gadget attaches to your camera's shoe, and can connect to your camera using a small cable. It will control connectivity with your transmitters and handle all the hard work to integrate your audio to the camera. It has a convenient touchscreen and simple menu, making it easy to change settings and get things running in no time. And if you're more of a mobile creator, the case stores attachments for USB-C and Lightning ports, so you can easily use it with smartphones.
We love that the transmitters are small and offer a magnetic design. This makes it easy to attach them anywhere. The magnet is really strong, and even the windscreen magnet is improved. I've never felt like anything will fall off. That said, there's also a clip if you prefer that.
Added features include 32-bit float internal recording, noise canceling (which does surprisingly well), mono/stereo recording, about six hours of battery life, and more.
This is still a go-to for content creators, mainly because they work so well without messing too much with the settings. They are easy to set up and operate. If you feel like $349 is a bit too steep a retail price, this $100 discount will feel golden. Especially considering the record-low price of a device that is rarely on sale. We've only seen it discounted once before, for a hot second, and it was $269. Hurry up! This deal will be gone tomorrow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ThreatLocker Chosen for 2025 Inc. 5000 List of America's Fastest-Growing Private Companies
Cyber Hero® Team Orlando, Florida, Aug. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ThreatLocker® Chosen for the 2025 Inc. 5000 List of America's Fastest-Growing Private Companies ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 12, 2025 – ThreatLocker® today announced its inclusion on the annual Inc. 5000 list, the most prestigious ranking of the fastest-growing private companies in America. In addition to ranking in the top 8% on the national list, ThreatLocker is No. 7 in the Orlando metro area, No. 47 in the state of Florida and No. 10 in the security industry in the U.S. The list provides a data-driven snapshot of the most successful companies within the economy's most dynamic segment: its independent, entrepreneurial businesses. 'Earning a spot on the Inc. 5000 underscores how central Zero Trust has become in cybersecurity,' said ThreatLocker CEO and Co-founder Danny Jenkins. 'Our proactive approach is essential in an era where cyberattacks are more frequent, more sophisticated, and more disruptive than ever. That's why we're growing so quickly.' This year's Inc. 5000 honorees have demonstrated exceptional growth while navigating economic uncertainty, inflationary pressure, and a fluctuating labor market. Among the top 500 companies on the list, the median three-year revenue growth rate reached 1,552 percent, and those companies have collectively added more than 48,678 jobs to the U.S. economy over the past three years. For the full list, company profiles, and a searchable database by industry and location, visit: 'Making the Inc. 5000 is always a remarkable achievement, but earning a spot this year speaks volumes about a company's tenacity and clarity of vision,' said Mike Hofman, editor-in-chief of Inc. 'These businesses have thrived amid rising costs, shifting global dynamics, and constant change. They didn't just weather the storm—they grew through it, and their stories are a powerful reminder that the entrepreneurial spirit is the engine of the U.S. economy.' Since its founding in 2017, ThreatLocker has grown from launching its first product, Allowlisting, to a global cybersecurity leader serving more than 50,000 organizations. Milestones include the introduction of key solutions such as Ringfencing™, Storage Control, Elevation Control, Network Control, Detect, and Cyber Hero® MDR. In 2025, ThreatLocker launched five new solutions: Web Control, Patch Management, Insights, User Store, and Cloud Control. The company also released Defense Against Configurations (DAC) and is now listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace. ThreatLocker has expanded its presence to more than 10 countries, added data centers worldwide, and grown its team to over 600 members, all while continually advancing its Zero Trust endpoint protection platform. Methodology Companies on the 2025 Inc. 5000 are ranked according to percentage revenue growth from 2021 to 2024. To qualify, companies must have been founded and generating revenue by March 31, 2021. They must be U.S.-based, privately held, for-profit, and independent—not subsidiaries or divisions of other companies—as of December 31, 2024. (Since then, some on the list may have gone public or been acquired.) The minimum revenue required for 2021 is $100,000; the minimum for 2024 is $2 million. As always, Inc. reserves the right to decline applicants for subjective reasons. About Inc. Inc. is the leading media brand and playbook for entrepreneurs and business leaders shaping our future. Through its journalism, Inc. aims to inform, educate, and elevate the profile of its community: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters who are creating the future of business. Inc. is published by Mansueto Ventures LLC, along with fellow leading business publication Fast Company. For more information, visit About ThreatLocker ThreatLocker® is a global cybersecurity leader that helps organizations stop cyberattacks at the source by taking a true Zero Trust approach to securing endpoints. Through powerful tools like Application Allowlisting, Ringfencing™, and Network Control, ThreatLocker gives IT teams the granular control they need to block ransomware, prevent zero-day exploits, and harden their environments from the inside out. Designed for simplicity, scalability, and speed, ThreatLocker security stack reduces complexity, accelerates compliance, and empowers businesses to take control of their cybersecurity—before threats strike. Headquartered in the United States with a growing global presence, ThreatLocker protects 50,000+ organizations across industries. Learn more here. Media Contact: Stefany Strong Attachment Cyber Hero® Team CONTACT: Stefany Strong ThreatLocker Inc +14077842109 while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
NVDA Vs. NVDY: The Better Nvidia Stock Buy For Your Investing Style
Nvidia is the crown jewel of the AI boom. But how you choose to invest in it, either directly through NVDA stock or indirectly via the NVDY covered call income ETF, reflects your risk appetite, time horizon and definition of returns. This article explores which option (NVDA stock vs. NVDY) is a better fit for your portfolio and what your choice reveals about your investor persona. What Is YieldMax's NVDY? The YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) is an actively managed fund that does not invest directly in Nvidia shares, but delivers a far higher income yield vs. NVDA. The fund's staggering trailing twelve-month (TTM) distribution yield of nearly 80% stems from a unique strategy that generates monthly income through options without actually owning NVDA stock. To achieve this, NVDY implements a 'synthetic covered call' strategy by which it To generate monthly income by selling short-term covered calls, NVDY first needs a long exposure to NVDA stock. Rather than buying NVDA shares outright, NVDY creates a cheaper, synthetic long position by This combo allows NVDY to simulate NVDA stock's price moves, without actually buying the stock. These call and put options typically have durations of one to six months and strike prices near NVDA's current price at the time these option contracts are executed. The synthetic long position provides NVDY with exposure that is nearly identical to owning NVDA stock. If NVDA rises, the call gains in value and if NVDA falls, the put incurs a loss. If NVDA stays flat, typically both options may expire worthless, and the fund may lose the cost of the call, but this will be offset by the premium received from the short put. Suppose NVDA stock is currently trading at $200/share. NVDY buys a call option with a strike price of $200 (at-the-money) by paying a premium of $15. (Premiums vary depending on volatility and expiration, and the $15 figures here are for illustrative purposes.) This gives NVDY the right to buy NVDA at $200. If NVDA rises to $250, the call option's value would increase to $50. Subtracting the $15 premium paid, the net profit on the call is $35. As part of the synthetic strategy, NVDY also sells a put option with a $200 strike price, receiving a $15 premium. This gives it the obligation to buy NVDA at $200 if the price falls below that level. If NVDA drops to $150, NVDY is forced to buy at $200, incurring a $50 loss on the put. After subtracting the $15 premium received, the net loss is $35. These call and put options together form a synthetic long position, mimicking the payoff of directly owning the stock. Although synthetic ownership is more complex than buying shares directly, it is significantly more capital-efficient. For example, buying 100 shares of NVDA at $200 each would require $20,000 upfront. A synthetic long position created by buying a call and selling a put at the same $200 strike can replicate this exposure. If the premiums for both options are around $15 each, the net upfront premium may be close to zero. Since each options contract typically represents 100 shares, this setup simulates $20,000 of stock exposure with little or no net premium paid. However, this does not mean the position is free. The short put side of the trade introduces significant downside risk and typically requires substantial margin or collateral. While the strategy uses less capital than directly purchasing the stock, margin requirements and potential losses can be huge. This is an oversimplified example meant to illustrate the concept of capital efficiency. In practice, actual capital requirements and risk exposure will vary depending on market conditions and brokerage policies. Investors don't need to worry about this nitty-gritty, NVDY fund managers will handle the complexities. NVDY then sells calls against this synthetic long position to generate income from premiums. These call options are typically short-term (expiring within one month or less) and are written at strike prices 0–15% above NVDA's current price at the time. If NVDA's price goes up, NVDY makes gains up to the strike price, but anything above that is capped, because the fund sold away that upside in exchange for income. If NVDA stays flat or dips slightly, NVDY retains the premium from selling the call options. This is its main source of monthly income. NVDY also holds short-term U.S. Treasuries that not only serve as collateral for the options in connection with its synthetic covered call strategy, but also earn some interest. NVDY also employs a 'Covered Call Spread' strategy—a more nuanced variation of the traditional covered call—used when it anticipates a sharp short-term rise in NVDA's price or when market conditions make spreads more advantageous than outright calls. In this strategy, NVDY sells a call option while simultaneously buying a call option with a higher strike price but the same expiration date. This approach still generates income and, if NVDA's price surges, allows NVDY to participate in more upside than a regular covered call would. How Does NVDY Differ From NVDA Stock? NVDA stock and NVDY are both Nvidia-focused investments but serve different goals: NVDA stock is regarded as a growth superstar, while NVDY is designed as a tactical income generator. For NVDA investors, gains and losses move in lockstep with the stock price. But, NVDY's returns, shaped by its synthetic long structure, follow a more complicated path. So, we notice that drawdowns are more or less similar for NVDA and NVDY, but gains are capped for NVDY. So, why invest in NVDY at all? Because of the outsized income yield from NVDY that far surpasses NVDA's. NVDY pays varying monthly distributions, while NVDA pays a penny in quarterly dividends. On a TTM basis, NVDY has paid distributions totaling $14.04/share, equating to 78.7% distribution yield based on NVDY's last closing price of $17.85. This far surpasses NVDA's 0.02% forward yield or annual payout of 4 cents/share on a forward basis. Price performance and Total Returns (including dividends/distributions): Even with NVDY's hefty monthly distributions, NVDA has delivered stronger total returns. NVDY's monthly payouts are a mix of return of capital (ROC) and ordinary income (such as option premiums and interest from Treasuries) For example: Why this breakdown matters: Return of capital isn't taxed when received. Instead, it reduces your cost basis in the ETF, which can increase taxable capital gains when you sell. Illustration: Once your cost basis is reduced to zero, any further ROC distributions are treated entirely as capital gains for tax purposes. The income portion of the payout, however, is taxable in the year received. For July, this would mean the remaining 63% of the distribution was taxable income. Expense Ratio: YieldMax lists NVDY's gross expense ratio as 0.99%, while many third-party sites like Yahoo Finance report the net expense ratio as 1.27%. That means an investor pays $127 annually for every $10,000 invested in NVDY. Let's say an investor bought 1,000 shares of NVDY a year ago at around $24/share: Even after accounting for the $304.80 annual fee (1.27% of $24,000), the net income is still exceptionally high. In other words, the expense ratio barely dents NVDY's income advantage. Since its inception on May 10, 2023, when it was trading around $20, NVDY has paid out $32.71 in distributions. Investors who purchased one share at launch would have recovered their full initial investment and realized an additional $12.71 in income. It is important to note that NVDY shareholders do not receive any dividends paid by Nvidia (NVDA) directly. But with these juicy payouts from NVDY, no investor would have missed much. When it comes to NVDA, the math is simple. You'll need about 10× the cost of an NVDY share to buy one share of NVDA. Sell NVDA in a taxable account, and you'll owe capital gains taxes on your profits. Sell it in a tax-advantaged account like a 401(k), and those taxes can be pushed to another day. NVDY Vs. NVDA: Advantages And Risks Lower Entry Cost: NVDY trades at roughly one-tenth the price of NVDA stock, making it more accessible for smaller investors. Capital Efficiency: Through its synthetic long position strategy, NVDY can mimic exposure to thousands of dollars' worth of NVDA stock with a minimal capital outlay. Attractive Yields - NVDY's covered call strategy generates eye-catching yields, appealing to income-focused investors. NVDA on the other hand is coveted for its growth potential rather than dividends. Faster Capital Recovery: NVDY's hefty and frequent payouts can help investors achieve 'house money' status quickly, recovering their initial investment through distributions. This can substantially de-risk the investment. NVDA requires selling shares to realize profits. Occasional Upside Participation: when NVDA stock is expected to rally in the short-term (because of a sell-off or some positive development) NVDY employs the 'Covered Call Spread' strategy, allowing more upside capture versus a standard covered call if NVDA's price surges. Asymmetric Downside: NVDY's synthetic long structure caps upside but leaves investors fully exposed to NVDA's downside. High monthly income may not be able to offset losses from a sharp NVDA correction. Investor Exodus: Significant price drops in NVDY can trigger investor outflows, lowering Assets Under Management (AUM) and making it harder to generate option income efficiently, thereby creating a negative feedback loop. Distribution volatility: While NVDA offers paltry dividends, NVDY's monthly payouts can fluctuate sharply — largely because they rely on option premium income and include return of capital. When NVDA's implied volatility drops or NVDY's Net Asset Value (NAV) erodes from repeated ROC payouts, the ETF's distributions could shrink. Opportunity Cost: Historically NVDA's returns have outpaced NVDY's significantly. Simply holding NVDA stock may generate greater total returns than NVDY, especially during strong bull runs in tech. NVDA Or NVDY — Which Investor Are You? If you are betting on Nvidia as a core pillar of an AI-driven future, and seek full participation in Nvidia's growth story — you're a Growth Chaser — you pick NVDA stock. If you are comfortable with capped upside and prioritize monthly income, you're an Income Alchemist — you choose NVDY to tactically monetize volatility and generate consistent yield. If you are looking to blend growth and income — gaining exposure to Nvidia's long-term upside while securing a steady income stream, you hold both: NVDA for capital appreciation and NVDY for monthly payouts. That makes you the Hedged Optimist. Bottom Line In my view, NVDA stock remains the superior play with its compelling long-term returns despite the meager dividend. The NVDA stock has clearly demonstrated resilience by rebounding and reaching new heights after every sharp correction, highlighting its structural strength. On the other hand, NVDY's low capital requirements, exceptional yield and the potential to recover capital in a reasonable time frame are alluring. However, the risks of asymmetric downside and NAV erosion — potentially shrinking the very dividends investors seek — make NVDY better suited as a tactical, smaller allocation in a portfolio. By contrast, NVDA stock deserves to be a core holding and investors may consider accumulating on any weakness, although past performance is no guarantee for future results.
The Drive
23 minutes ago
- The Drive
Ford Says It Will Deliver the Dream of Truly Modular Skateboard EVs
The latest car news, reviews, and features. We're about 15 years into an era of practical electric cars. For much of that time, we've been hearing about the potential of the 'skateboard' chassis—an EV can be anything, just drop it on top of a structural battery deck. But so far, no automaker has really run with this to efficiently crank out dramatically different cars on one platform. Ford, however, might finally deliver. This week, Ford shared plans to radically change the way it assembles cars. Not only is the Blue Oval brand planning to expand its EV offerings, but it's also positioning itself to make them more affordable and diverse. The '$30,000 electric truck' announcement yesterday caught our attention as car enthusiasts, but really, the Ford Universal EV Platform and Ford Universal EV Production System are a much bigger deal for the industry. By building cars in three parallel processes—the skateboard chassis, the front, and the rear—Ford can theoretically build basically anything from trucks to sedans to sports cars and vans at the same facility, using the same structural belly. The company's goal is surely to cut production costs and increase margins, but it could also represent a huge opportunity for choice on our consumer end of the deal. It was a particularly interesting development to learn about yesterday, since it was only about three months ago that Ford reportedly scrapped its next-gen zonal electrical architecture ideas, for ICE cars and EVs, pivoting to cultivating existing systems. Essentially, the company decided that by integrating some aspects of its canceled FNV4 networked-vehicle plans—like module software and central control—into its existing architecture, Ford figured it could still offer things like over-the-air updates without spending quite as much money as it'd need to build an all-new zonal system from scratch. I guess a compromise was achieved, because a big bragging point from Ford's announcement yesterday was about electric architecture commitments. 'Take for instance the wiring harness in the new midsize truck; it will be more than 4,000 feet (1.3 kilometers) shorter and 10 kilograms lighter than the one used in our first-gen electric SUV,' proclaims the press release. If Ford lives up to the Universal EV Production System's promises, then the Ford Universal EV Platform has a great chance of delivering on the dream of having a super-diverse vehicular lineup on one skateboard. In other words, Ford may have found the optimal zonal architecture solution for legacy automakers. Now, obviously, platform sharing has been around forever. There are plenty of disparate gas cars based on shared underpinnings. Ford's not the first to build different EVs on one shared skateboard, either—the Volkswagen Group's MEB platform is one such example already in production. Volkswagen spent a lot of resources trying to figure out zonal architecture, too, before deciding to just buy it from Rivian. But that's not exactly why I think Ford may do this better than VW. Despite regularly leading the industry in recalls, and killing its entire sedan and subcompact lineup, Ford knows how to have fun. Look at how many Raptors there are, Mustang variants like the GTD, funky Tremor trims on work trucks large and small. While Volkswagen is laying one egg-shaped vehicle after another, I'm hopeful that Ford will run a little wilder and squeeze a wider range of vehicle types from its new platform. And not for nothing, Ford's had more time to refine its plans and optimize factory efficiency. On a media briefing call yesterday, Ford's people talked a lot about how much casting tech had improved, giving them the bandwidth to stamp out more body types more quickly. I haven't been too optimistic about the future in general lately, but if Ford substantiates its claims of making electric cars affordable and unique within the next few years, I'll welcome that change to the industry. Got a tip? Drop us a line at tips@
