
NVDA Vs. NVDY: The Better Nvidia Stock Buy For Your Investing Style
What Is YieldMax's NVDY?
The YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) is an actively managed fund that does not invest directly in Nvidia shares, but delivers a far higher income yield vs. NVDA. The fund's staggering trailing twelve-month (TTM) distribution yield of nearly 80% stems from a unique strategy that generates monthly income through options without actually owning NVDA stock.
To achieve this, NVDY implements a 'synthetic covered call' strategy by which it
To generate monthly income by selling short-term covered calls, NVDY first needs a long exposure to NVDA stock. Rather than buying NVDA shares outright, NVDY creates a cheaper, synthetic long position by
This combo allows NVDY to simulate NVDA stock's price moves, without actually buying the stock. These call and put options typically have durations of one to six months and strike prices near NVDA's current price at the time these option contracts are executed.
The synthetic long position provides NVDY with exposure that is nearly identical to owning NVDA stock. If NVDA rises, the call gains in value and if NVDA falls, the put incurs a loss. If NVDA stays flat, typically both options may expire worthless, and the fund may lose the cost of the call, but this will be offset by the premium received from the short put.
Suppose NVDA stock is currently trading at $200/share. NVDY buys a call option with a strike price of $200 (at-the-money) by paying a premium of $15. (Premiums vary depending on volatility and expiration, and the $15 figures here are for illustrative purposes.) This gives NVDY the right to buy NVDA at $200. If NVDA rises to $250, the call option's value would increase to $50. Subtracting the $15 premium paid, the net profit on the call is $35. As part of the synthetic strategy, NVDY also sells a put option with a $200 strike price, receiving a $15 premium. This gives it the obligation to buy NVDA at $200 if the price falls below that level. If NVDA drops to $150, NVDY is forced to buy at $200, incurring a $50 loss on the put. After subtracting the $15 premium received, the net loss is $35. These call and put options together form a synthetic long position, mimicking the payoff of directly owning the stock.
Although synthetic ownership is more complex than buying shares directly, it is significantly more capital-efficient. For example, buying 100 shares of NVDA at $200 each would require $20,000 upfront. A synthetic long position created by buying a call and selling a put at the same $200 strike can replicate this exposure. If the premiums for both options are around $15 each, the net upfront premium may be close to zero. Since each options contract typically represents 100 shares, this setup simulates $20,000 of stock exposure with little or no net premium paid.
However, this does not mean the position is free. The short put side of the trade introduces significant downside risk and typically requires substantial margin or collateral. While the strategy uses less capital than directly purchasing the stock, margin requirements and potential losses can be huge. This is an oversimplified example meant to illustrate the concept of capital efficiency. In practice, actual capital requirements and risk exposure will vary depending on market conditions and brokerage policies. Investors don't need to worry about this nitty-gritty, NVDY fund managers will handle the complexities.
NVDY then sells calls against this synthetic long position to generate income from premiums. These call options are typically short-term (expiring within one month or less) and are written at strike prices 0–15% above NVDA's current price at the time. If NVDA's price goes up, NVDY makes gains up to the strike price, but anything above that is capped, because the fund sold away that upside in exchange for income. If NVDA stays flat or dips slightly, NVDY retains the premium from selling the call options. This is its main source of monthly income.
NVDY also holds short-term U.S. Treasuries that not only serve as collateral for the options in connection with its synthetic covered call strategy, but also earn some interest.
NVDY also employs a 'Covered Call Spread' strategy—a more nuanced variation of the traditional covered call—used when it anticipates a sharp short-term rise in NVDA's price or when market conditions make spreads more advantageous than outright calls. In this strategy, NVDY sells a call option while simultaneously buying a call option with a higher strike price but the same expiration date. This approach still generates income and, if NVDA's price surges, allows NVDY to participate in more upside than a regular covered call would.
How Does NVDY Differ From NVDA Stock?
NVDA stock and NVDY are both Nvidia-focused investments but serve different goals: NVDA stock is regarded as a growth superstar, while NVDY is designed as a tactical income generator.
For NVDA investors, gains and losses move in lockstep with the stock price. But, NVDY's returns, shaped by its synthetic long structure, follow a more complicated path.
So, we notice that drawdowns are more or less similar for NVDA and NVDY, but gains are capped for NVDY.
So, why invest in NVDY at all?
Because of the outsized income yield from NVDY that far surpasses NVDA's.
NVDY pays varying monthly distributions, while NVDA pays a penny in quarterly dividends.
On a TTM basis, NVDY has paid distributions totaling $14.04/share, equating to 78.7% distribution yield based on NVDY's last closing price of $17.85. This far surpasses NVDA's 0.02% forward yield or annual payout of 4 cents/share on a forward basis.
Price performance and Total Returns (including dividends/distributions):
Even with NVDY's hefty monthly distributions, NVDA has delivered stronger total returns.
NVDY's monthly payouts are a mix of return of capital (ROC) and ordinary income (such as option premiums and interest from Treasuries)
For example:
Why this breakdown matters: Return of capital isn't taxed when received. Instead, it reduces your cost basis in the ETF, which can increase taxable capital gains when you sell.
Illustration:
Once your cost basis is reduced to zero, any further ROC distributions are treated entirely as capital gains for tax purposes.
The income portion of the payout, however, is taxable in the year received. For July, this would mean the remaining 63% of the distribution was taxable income.
Expense Ratio: YieldMax lists NVDY's gross expense ratio as 0.99%, while many third-party sites like Yahoo Finance report the net expense ratio as 1.27%. That means an investor pays $127 annually for every $10,000 invested in NVDY. Let's say an investor bought 1,000 shares of NVDY a year ago at around $24/share:
Even after accounting for the $304.80 annual fee (1.27% of $24,000), the net income is still exceptionally high. In other words, the expense ratio barely dents NVDY's income advantage.
Since its inception on May 10, 2023, when it was trading around $20, NVDY has paid out $32.71 in distributions. Investors who purchased one share at launch would have recovered their full initial investment and realized an additional $12.71 in income. It is important to note that NVDY shareholders do not receive any dividends paid by Nvidia (NVDA) directly. But with these juicy payouts from NVDY, no investor would have missed much.
When it comes to NVDA, the math is simple. You'll need about 10× the cost of an NVDY share to buy one share of NVDA. Sell NVDA in a taxable account, and you'll owe capital gains taxes on your profits. Sell it in a tax-advantaged account like a 401(k), and those taxes can be pushed to another day.
NVDY Vs. NVDA: Advantages And Risks
Lower Entry Cost: NVDY trades at roughly one-tenth the price of NVDA stock, making it more accessible for smaller investors.
Capital Efficiency: Through its synthetic long position strategy, NVDY can mimic exposure to thousands of dollars' worth of NVDA stock with a minimal capital outlay.
Attractive Yields - NVDY's covered call strategy generates eye-catching yields, appealing to income-focused investors. NVDA on the other hand is coveted for its growth potential rather than dividends.
Faster Capital Recovery: NVDY's hefty and frequent payouts can help investors achieve 'house money' status quickly, recovering their initial investment through distributions. This can substantially de-risk the investment. NVDA requires selling shares to realize profits.
Occasional Upside Participation: when NVDA stock is expected to rally in the short-term (because of a sell-off or some positive development) NVDY employs the 'Covered Call Spread' strategy, allowing more upside capture versus a standard covered call if NVDA's price surges.
Asymmetric Downside: NVDY's synthetic long structure caps upside but leaves investors fully exposed to NVDA's downside. High monthly income may not be able to offset losses from a sharp NVDA correction.
Investor Exodus: Significant price drops in NVDY can trigger investor outflows, lowering Assets Under Management (AUM) and making it harder to generate option income efficiently, thereby creating a negative feedback loop.
Distribution volatility: While NVDA offers paltry dividends, NVDY's monthly payouts can fluctuate sharply — largely because they rely on option premium income and include return of capital. When NVDA's implied volatility drops or NVDY's Net Asset Value (NAV) erodes from repeated ROC payouts, the ETF's distributions could shrink.
Opportunity Cost: Historically NVDA's returns have outpaced NVDY's significantly. Simply holding NVDA stock may generate greater total returns than NVDY, especially during strong bull runs in tech.
NVDA Or NVDY — Which Investor Are You?
If you are betting on Nvidia as a core pillar of an AI-driven future, and seek full participation in Nvidia's growth story — you're a Growth Chaser — you pick NVDA stock.
If you are comfortable with capped upside and prioritize monthly income, you're an Income Alchemist — you choose NVDY to tactically monetize volatility and generate consistent yield.
If you are looking to blend growth and income — gaining exposure to Nvidia's long-term upside while securing a steady income stream, you hold both: NVDA for capital appreciation and NVDY for monthly payouts. That makes you the Hedged Optimist.
Bottom Line
In my view, NVDA stock remains the superior play with its compelling long-term returns despite the meager dividend. The NVDA stock has clearly demonstrated resilience by rebounding and reaching new heights after every sharp correction, highlighting its structural strength. On the other hand, NVDY's low capital requirements, exceptional yield and the potential to recover capital in a reasonable time frame are alluring. However, the risks of asymmetric downside and NAV erosion — potentially shrinking the very dividends investors seek — make NVDY better suited as a tactical, smaller allocation in a portfolio. By contrast, NVDA stock deserves to be a core holding and investors may consider accumulating on any weakness, although past performance is no guarantee for future results.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
8 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I was struggling with GPT-5's new Thinking mode — these 6 tweaks boosted my results
GPT-5 has brought with it a bunch of changes. But depending on whom you ask, these upgrades are either game-changing or a complete and utter flop. After all, there has been a GPT-5 backlash. Despite the raging war between ChatGPT fans, there is one feature that I think everyone can agree on: deep research is a game changer. GPT-5, according to OpenAI, sees a major boost to research with GPT-5 thinking mode. Not only is it smarter, but it's also more efficient, spending less time researching for just as good, if not better, responses. These days, you can be pretty specific with what you ask a chatbot, and can give it a huge number of tasks all at once. If you're new to ChatGPT, or trying to wrap your head around how best to use GPT-5, here are some tips to get started on the model's thinking Mode. There are two versions of GPT-5 thinking. Which one you choose depends on how much information you need and how long you want to wait. GPT-5 thinking is useful when you want as much information as possible, and you want the model to be absolutely correct in its decision. It takes time to search the internet, look through sources, and, where needed, use other tools to support its response. So why not use this mode every time? Taking the time to think deeply about an answer can be time-consuming. I've had the model take 10-15 minutes plus to work through a prompt to get the correct answer, and if you're asking a fairly simple question, all of that effort isn't needed. This is where GPT-5 thinking mini comes in. OpenAI describes it as a model that 'thinks quickly'. In other words, it will put in some thought, searching sources and contemplating its response, but it is trying to do it on a quicker deadline. It might not be as detailed, but it will be faster. One of the big updates that was brought in with GPT-5 was the new Auto mode. When this is used, ChatGPT will decide on its own which model is best based on your prompt. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. This can be useful day-to-day when you're just asking ChatGPT random questions, but it doesn't always accurately make the switch. If you know you want to do some deep research, make sure to choose on of the thinking modes available. Your initial prompt is the best time to layout of all of your parameters. You need to obviously make your request itself, but here you can help to get a better response by laying out some rules. State the end result that you are hoping to receive and give ChatGPT a clear goal. If you simply ask for a report on the state of AI, it will make its own decisions on what that includes. Expanding on this can be helpful in better hitting your goal. Explaining what the report is for and what you want it to include will drastically improve your end result. You can also ask it to provide you with a step-by-step of its plan before proceeding. This allows you to see what it is about to do and make changes if you're unhappy with its planned route. Sometimes, it can be helpful to include prompts that may seem counterintuitive. For example, asking ChatGPT to include a small 250 word argument attempting to disprove a research project. I have found that, when trying to use the thinking mode to learn a new subject or digest a lot of information, it can be useful to have it provide a short creative writing explanation of the subject. Before prompting, think what you need to know and what the best way to understand that might be. Equally, don't be afraid to take advantage of the model's coding and image generation abilities. These can be used to provide visual explanations for your prompt. Yes, you're using a mode called thinking, but sometimes ChatGPT doesn't think enough. It can be useful to give it small nudges in your initial prompt to help guide its actions. For example, saying, 'Think hard about this' or, 'Once you have come to a conclusion, reflect on your answer before responding." It might feel like weird things to say, but it helps highlight to ChatGPT that you're prioritizing a detailed and accurate response over something quick. It can be a good idea to split your requests into stages that might cause complications. For example, if you want a research report and a coded website that shows the information in the report, ask for the report first, and then for ChatGPT to code a website to display everything it has researched after. Normally, if you take the time with your first prompt, it should be pretty close. This final stage can be to ask follow up questions or correct the model if it has misunderstood something that you asked. Don't be afraid to follow up with ChatGPT. If your first prompt doesn't yield the response you wanted, ask for changes until you're satisfied with the results. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Intel engineer sentenced for sharing secrets with Microsoft — gets two years of probation and $34k fine for stealing 'thousands of files' that may have landed them a new job with the company
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An ex-Intel employee has been sentenced to two years' probation and fined $34,472 for pilfering 'thousands of files,' which were reportedly instrumental to him landing a new position at Microsoft. Oregon Live says that Varun Gupta, who had been a product marketing engineer at Intel for a decade, aided Microsoft in significant processor purchasing negotiations with Intel. A custodial sentence was offset by the fine and the judge's belief that Gupta had suffered enough due to a loss of reputation. The timeline As we mentioned in the intro, Gupta was an Intel employee for 10 years, but he departed the iconic PC chipmaker in January 2020, moving directly to Microsoft. From the source report, it seems that Gupta spent a lot of time copying files containing trade secrets shortly before leaving his employment at the Santa Clara headquartered corporation. These trade secrets were reportedly instrumental to Gupta securing his new position at Microsoft. Moreover, they were subsequently used for the benefit of Microsoft in processor purchasing negotiations with Intel. A particular PowerPoint document was referenced in the court records, indicating that the presentation slide(s) charted Intel's pricing strategy, as drafted for another major customer. The court proceedings Oregon Live reports that the prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney William Narus, sought an eight-month prison term for Gupta. Narus spoke about Gupta's purposeful and repeated access to secret documents. Eight months of federal imprisonment was sought as Gupta repetitively abused his cache of secret documents, according to the prosecutor. For the defense, attorney David Angeli described Gupta's actions as a 'serious error in judgment.' Mitigating circumstances, such as Gupta's permanent loss of high-level employment opportunities in the industry, and that he had already paid $40,000 to settle a civil suit brought by Intel, were highlighted. U.S. District Judge Amy Baggio concluded the court hearing by delivering a balance between the above adversarial positions. Baggio decided that Gupta should face a two-year probationary sentence. Meanwhile, that peculiar $34,472 fine is explained as equating to the cost of eight months of federal imprisonment that Gupta avoided by a hair's breadth. Baggio reasoned that the fine helped reinforce the understanding that Gupta's actions were seen as more than a one-off indiscretion. But her position was softened by the very public besmirchment of the ex-Intel exec's character. Gupta's travels Gupta was ordered to pay the fine in full before heading back to France. The ex-tech exec and his family have started afresh in La Belle France, with eyes on a completely new career in the wine industry. According to the report, Gupta is now studying for a qualification in vineyard management, while aiming to work as a technical director in the business. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Idaho Gov. Brad Little orders budget cuts amid tax breaks, revenue shortfall
Idaho Gov. Brad Little on Friday signed an executive order requiring all state agencies other than public schools to cut spending, he announced in a news release. It was the first time since 2020 such cuts have been ordered, according to the Governor's Office. The order cited the need to cut spending after Idaho lawmakers reduced income and property taxes by over 20%. The Governor's Office said the state must 'make way' for the tax cuts in President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' State agencies, including the Idaho State Police, Department of Correction and Department of Health and Welfare — which administers Medicaid — must reduce their general fund spending by 3% for the 2026 fiscal year, which began in July. They can consider consolidating services or agencies, eliminating vacant positions, cutting back on contract costs, and reviewing unused funds that are 'not critical' to operations, according to the order. 'Idaho will right-size government to match the means of Idahoans,' the order read. In the news release about the order, the Governor's Office celebrated Idaho's strong and rapidly growing economy. The Idaho Legislature this year made 'unprecedented' investments in school facilities, teacher pay and literacy, 'demonstrating we can have it all,' Little wrote in the order. 'We can simultaneously cut taxes while meeting the needs of a growing state.' Idaho Democrats pushed back on that framing. Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, in a Friday news release said 'no amount of spin can hide the truth.' 'If Idaho's fiscal health were truly as strong as Republicans claim, there would be no need to strip funding mid-year,' Wintrow said. 'Ending this wasteful scheme will not close the hundreds of millions of dollars in budget shortfalls created by Republican giveaways.' Idaho Democrats also pointed the finger at the GOP's passage of laws that cost more money, such as allowing public funding for private school tuition. Lauren Necochea, the party's chair, in another news release said the program blew 'a hole in the budget' and called the cuts 'the bill coming due for reckless Republican rule.' 'We were honest with Idahoans about where this budget was headed,' she said. 'Back in the spring, Democrats warned that Statehouse Republicans were budgeting dishonestly while the Trump regime was driving up costs and undermining our economy. The GOP ignored these warnings, and now Idaho families are paying the price.' Though it expressed appreciation for Little's exclusion of public schools from the cuts, the Idaho Education Association in a release called them 'very unfortunate and completely predictable.' 'The Idaho Legislature's massive tax cuts easily foretold this outcome, even as lawmakers dismissed the needs of basic governing and Idaho's most vulnerable residents,' President Layne McInelly wrote. 'Idaho Education Association members believe Gov. Little is right to spare Idaho's public school students and classrooms from even more fiscal austerity while lawmakers write checks to the wealthy.' In recent months, state revenues came in below forecasts set by the Legislature. Little in February told reporters he worried that lawmakers' proposals to cut taxes were beyond what the state could afford. The Legislature cut taxes by $400 million and spent another $50 million on a tax credit for private education. Those bills, which Little signed into law, reduced revenue available for the state budget by about $453 million, the Idaho Capital Sun reported. In his January State of the State address, Little called for a reduction of the fund by $100 million — less than a quarter of the Legislature's amount. 'If I would have thought we could do $450 (million), I would have proposed $450 (million),' Little said of the hundreds of millions more that lawmakers aim to return to taxpayers. On Friday, Democrats called for a special legislative session to repeal the tax credit program, often referred to as school vouchers. 'It is an essential first step toward restoring fiscal responsibility,' Wintrow said in the release. Idaho continues its 'historic' tax cuts. Here's what residents can expect What will Trump administration cuts mean for Idaho? Gov. Little predicts 'economic shock' Solve the daily Crossword