Cornyn: Paxton allegations ‘just the tip of the iceberg'
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in an interview published Friday suggested the allegations that fueled Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's (R) impeachment inquiry — which ultimately failed — were 'just the tip of the iceberg.'
Speaking to The New York Times, Cornyn placed emphasis on the importance of character as he vies for reelection next year in the Senate GOP primary against Paxton.
'I'm willing to bet my career and my future and this job on my belief that character does matter still,' Cornyn said, suggesting Paxton believed instead 'that he can get away with a whole litany of misbehavior and corruption that should disqualify him from the job.'
Paxton was acquitted in the Texas state Legislature's impeachment inquiry in September 2023, which alleged he had 'used, misused, or failed to use his official powers in a manner calculated to subvert the lawful operation of the government of the State of Texas and obstruct the fair and impartial administration of justice.'
The allegations particularly suggested Paxton was inappropriately helping Nate Paul, one of his donors.
'John Cornyn is peddling a new fake lie every week because he's down 20 points and trying to process the fact that his 40-year political career is coming to an end,' Paxton said in a statement responding to Cornyn's interview with the Times.
'His pathetic attacks can't change the fact that he worked with Joe Biden to take away our gun rights, said President Trump's 'time has passed him by,' and called the border wall 'naïve,'' he added, a nod to Cornyn's involvement in a bipartisan gun safety bill that was signed into law by former President Biden and that sparked criticism among some Texas Republicans.
Republicans are bracing for a nasty primary between the two men – which could potentially offer an opening to Democrats in Texas, as the race shows only greater signs of divisiveness and personal attacks.
One Republican-aligned poll and one public poll from the Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center at Texas Southern University have shown Cornyn trailing Paxton in a GOP primary. However, both showed Cornyn faring better than Paxton in a general election.
Cornyn's campaign released a slew of ads earlier this week, first shared with The Hill, accusing Paxton of 'funding the left,' citing grant money his office gave different Texas legal groups.
Meanwhile, Paxton's allies have hit back at the campaign's allegations, suggesting they're false, and have reminded voters that Cornyn has previously criticized Trump. The president hasn't weighed in on the primary between the two men.
Noting other Republicans have similarly recanted past criticism of Trump, Cornyn told the Times, 'I was wrong and President Trump was right, obviously.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Support for same-sex marriage stays strong as party divide widens, poll shows
The Brief A decade after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage, 68% of Americans still support it, according to Gallup. Support among Democrats has reached a record 88%, while Republican support has dropped to 41%, creating the largest-ever partisan gap on the issue. Despite steady national support, the widening divide and political efforts to revisit past rulings may put same-sex marriage rights at risk. WASHINGTON - It's been a decade since the Supreme Court made same-sex marriages legal across the U.S. in its ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. A recent Gallup poll said currently 68% of Americans still support the ruling. By the numbers According to Gallup, since 2021, about 68% to 71% of U.S. adults have supported same-sex marriage. While overall support has stayed steady, party opinions have shifted. Support among Democrats has hit a record high of 88%, and independents remain steady at 76%. RELATED: Trump signs order aiming to limit gender transitions for minors But Republican support has dropped from a high of 55% to 41%, the lowest since 2016. The gap between Democrats and Republicans is now 47 points—the widest it's been since Gallup started tracking this issue 29 years ago. Support for same-sex marriage was low in 1996, with only 27% of Americans in favor. By 2004, it rose to 42%, and in 2011, most Americans supported it for the first time. After the 2015 Supreme Court ruling, support jumped to 61% in 2016 and has stayed above that since. Democrats have always been more supportive than Republicans, with independents generally closer to Democrats. A majority of Democrats have backed same-sex marriage since 2004, and independents since 2011. Support has grown among both groups. Republicans have only shown majority support twice—at 55% in 2021 and 2022—but that number has since dropped. Why you should care Gallup's May 1–18 poll showed that 64% of Americans say gay or lesbian relationships are morally acceptable. That number has stayed the same for the past three years. However, it is down from a high of 71% in 2022. Most Americans have felt this way since 2010. As with same-sex marriage, Democrats and Republicans are growing further apart. Right now, 86% of Democrats say same-sex relations are morally acceptable—a new high—while only 38% of Republicans agree, the lowest since 2012. Republican support peaked at 56% in 2022 but has dropped since then. Independents are closer to Democrats on this issue, with 69% currently saying same-sex relationships are morally acceptable. Their views have stayed more stable over time. Dig deeper Even though national support remains high, the growing political divide could put LGBTQ+ rights at risk. In 2022, Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should reconsider past rulings, including those on same-sex marriage. Since then, some Republican lawmakers have pushed for the Supreme Court to overturn that decision. RELATED: What is DEI? Trump ends equal employment 'restoring merit-based opportunity' President Donald Trump has also rolled back protections for LGBTQ+ people, especially transgender individuals. These actions suggest same-sex marriage could face new legal and political threats. The Source The information in this story comes from Gallup's annual Values and Beliefs poll, conducted from May 1 to May 18, 2025. This story was reported from Los Angeles.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
With Riggs in place, NC Democrats launch Anita Earls' 2026 Supreme Court campaign
The midterm elections are well over a year away, but North Carolina Democrats have already begun one campaign in earnest. With national interest attuned to the courts as federal judges seek to limit President Donald Trump's unprecedented efforts to reshape government and North Carolina still reeling from a lengthy battle over the 2024 state Supreme Court election results, Justice Anita Earls kicked off her reelection campaign Friday with a sobering message: 'Our courts are the last hope as the guardians of our democracy — and that is no exaggeration,' Earls, a Democrat seeking her second term on the state's high court, told supporters at a fundraiser in Durham. The state Supreme Court has been front-and-center over the last six months as Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin unsuccessfully sought to overturn his 2024 loss to Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs. With Riggs's victory now safely certified, the party shifts its attention to defending Earls' seat — the first step in its long term plan to regain control of the powerful court in 2028. Republicans gained a 5-2 majority on the court after the 2022 midterms. Shortly after taking office, the new majority reversed previous rulings on gerrymandering and election law, upholding the Republican-controlled legislature's ability to draw maps that favor their own party and their push to require ID at the polls. 'They have wielded the courts in political power, and they have utilized the fact that they have extreme Republicans on these benches right now that are willing to bend the knee to do anything for the state legislature,' Anderson Clayton, chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party, told The News & Observer. Three Republican justices are up for reelection in 2028. If Democrats can defend Earls' seat in 2026, they'll only have to win two of those races to retake control of the court. The stakes are high in a state where most major legislation and electoral maps are challenged in court. Earls said voters need look no further than the Supreme Court's handling of the election dispute over one of its own seats to understand why a change is needed. When Griffin's case came before the high court, it dismissed his most sweeping challenge to the election results. However, all but one of the Republican justices agreed to allow a 30-day ballot review period for challenged military and overseas votes that could have resulted in thousands of votes being cancelled. A federal judge later reversed this ruling and ordered the state to certify Riggs as the winner of the election. 'Four members of my court were willing to throw out the legitimate ballots of voters who voted in accordance with the laws in effect at the time,' Earls told the N&O, 'And these include military people who serve our country at great sacrifice to themselves overseas.' Only one Republican has announced a campaign to challenge Earls so far: Rep. Sarah Stevens, a nine-term state lawmaker and attorney from Surry County. 'On the Supreme Court I will be a conservative voice for justice and families,' Stevens said last month in her campaign announcement. 'My experience as a family law attorney and a state legislator has prepared me to be a voice for those who cannot advocate for themselves.' At her event on Friday, Earls railed against Stevens' record in the legislature, noting she voted for electoral maps that a court later ruled were gerrymandered and supported efforts to spent millions on private school vouchers. 'She's a career politician and there are real choices that voters have to make in November of 2026,' Earls said. While Republicans may have to wait for a primary to rally around a candidate, the party is already pushing against Earls. 'Justice Earls is responsible for years of N.C. Supreme Court decisions in which Democrats pushed radical left-wing politics under the guise of dubious legal theories,' Matt Mercer, a spokesperson for the NC GOP said in a statement. 'The voters of North Carolina won't be fooled and will elect a new conservative Justice in 2026 who will follow the law.' Earls said she was proud of her record on the court, even if much of it has been served in the minority. As the only Black member of the Supreme Court, Earls said she was grateful to have 'been able to bring a measure of perspectives that helps ensure that our court is serving a broad base of the entire state.' While the Trump administration continues to target diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives nationwide, Earls has previously been outspoken about the need for diversity in the judicial system, prompting rebukes from Republicans and even an investigation. In 2023, Earls announced she was suing the Judicial Standards Commission, a body that handles ethics complaints against judges, after it threatened disciplinary action against her for critical comments she made about diversity in the state's judicial system. Earls later withdrew her lawsuit after the commission informed her it had dismissed the complaint. She said the specter of that investigation as well as Griffin's attempts to overturn the 2024 election add pressure to her campaign, but will not silence her. 'I will always endeavor to make sure that I speak in a way that never causes the courts to be called into disrepute,' Earls said Friday. 'But as a justice, I'm allowed to write dissents and I'm allowed to tell the public what those dissents say. '...I'm going to continue to make people aware of what matters to me and what my vision is of what our court system should provide for the people of the state. That seems, to me, fundamental to our democracy.' In the Spotlight designates ongoing topics of high interest that are driven by The News & Observer's focus on accountability reporting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GOP Senator Doubles Down On 'We All Are Going To Die' Comment In Wild Non-Apology
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) has doubled down on her dismissive response to worries about GOP legislation that includes huge Medicaid and food assistance cuts. On Friday, Ernst faced angry constituents at a town hall in Parkersburg, Iowa, with one woman in the crowd yelling, 'People will die.' Ernst replied, 'People are not ― well, we all are going to die. So, for heaven's sakes, folks.' The retort was met with backlash and mockery. On Saturday afternoon, Ernst addressed the controversy with what may have initially appeared to some to be a genuine apology. 'Hello everyone, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely apologize for a statement that I made yesterday at my town hall,' Ernst said in a video posted to her Instagram Story. Ernst's tone began to shift as the video continued. 'See, I was in the process of answering a question that had been asked by an audience member when a woman who was extremely distraught screamed out, from the back corner of the auditorium, 'People are going to die!'' It soon became crystal clear that Ernst had no intention of delivering a real apology. 'And I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said. 'So I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.' In a second video, she followed up with a pitch for Christianity. 'But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ.' Eagle-eyed observers may also notice both videos were filmed in a cemetery. The non-apology went viral, with one X user noting that 'Against all odds, Joni Ernst has made it worse.' The Republican legislation that sparked the town hall exchange on Friday includes $1 trillion in cuts to federal health and food programs and would result in an estimated 8 million fewer Americans having access to health insurance. The massive cuts offset the bill's nearly $4 million in tax cuts, which mostly benefit higher earning people. GOP Senator Pooh-Poohs Fears On Medicaid Cuts: 'Well, We All Are Going To Die' GOP Senator Ignores Insane Town Hall Gaffe — And Social Media Goes Off House Passes Trump's Tax And Spending Cuts
