
Bengal CPIM seeks to float ‘alternative schools', tuition centres, health camps ahead of 2026 Assembly polls
Named 'Mission 360', the party's directive was made with determination to make significant gains in the upcoming 2026 Assembly polls. However, some leaders feels the party is also placing emphasis on rebuilding its credibility through these initiatives.
In its first organisational message of 2025, called the 'party chithi', the West Bengal CPIM stated, 'The struggle to present alternatives is very relevant in the present time.'
The party has instructed its cadre to establish at least two fully functional teaching centres in every district of the state. The message noted that party-affiliated teachers, professors and older students in higher education can be involved in the initiative.
Similarly, the party has directed that health centres be set up in every area committee, where medical advice and medicines can be provided at reasonable prices. These centres can involve local doctors, nurses, medical representatives, Red Volunteers, student and youth front workers, and various other organisations. The party chithi further instructed every district committee to launch such initiatives and submit reports by August this year.
Beyond these social initiatives, the CPIM's message stressed that the 2026 assembly election is a crucial 'political struggle' and must not be neglected. The party has mandated the formation of permanent organisational structures and members at every booth. It instructed that committees be formed at every booth across the state by June 30.
The memo also read, 'Individual campaigns on social media should be stopped. Party members expressing personal opinions – especially when they contradict party decisions – must refrain from doing so. Social media must not be used for inner-party struggles.'
A senior CPIM leader said, 'The party has not only lost vote shares but also its support base across the state. This decline happened because we lost social credibility. Regaining that credibility will automatically bring votes.'
He added, 'In the past, we gained workers and activists through various movements, but we failed to integrate them into the party structure. After the RG Kar movement, many from the broader society joined us, and we must now involve them in future movements to strengthen the party.'
CPIM state secretary and politburo member Md Salim said, 'We are not challenging the public health or education systems. However, it is true that both sectors in our state have serious gaps. Because of these gaps, the working class is suffering – they go to other states or spend large amounts of money on healthcare and education. We want to bridge that gap and help the poorer sections of society.'
He added, 'Our Red Volunteers did commendable work during the Covid-19 pandemic. We are engaging them and similar forces in these alternative health and education systems. (The project is) named Mission 360 because it is a project through which the party will intervene in all sectors of society to help the people.'
Atri Mitra is a Special Correspondent of The Indian Express with more than 20 years of experience in reporting from West Bengal, Bihar and the North-East. He has been covering administration and political news for more than ten years and has a keen interest in political development in West Bengal.
Atri holds a Master degree in Economics from Rabindrabharati University and Bachelor's degree from Calcutta University. He is also an alumnus of St. Xavier's, Kolkata and Ramakrishna Mission Asrama, Narendrapur.
He started his career with leading vernacular daily the Anandabazar Patrika, and worked there for more than fifteen years. He worked as Bihar correspondent for more than three years for Anandabazar Patrika. He covered the 2009 Lok Sabha election and 2010 assembly elections. He also worked with News18-Bangla and covered the Bihar Lok Sabha election in 2019. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk Wants to Give You Money for Nothing
A Journal report last week explained how tech titans, including Tesla's Elon Musk and OpenAI's Sam Altman, envision a 'massive wealth-redistribution system' to placate worries over technology displacing human work. Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes have spent millions in recent years on pilot projects that offer unconditional monthly cash payments to low-income people. Software billionaire Marc Benioff, another 'evangelist for universal basic income,' according to the Journal, 'sees Covid-19 stimulus checks as a model for broader income distribution.' Oh, brother. It's often forgotten that in the early days of the country's 'war on poverty,' the general understanding was that you alleviate privation by reducing dependency on the government and creating incentives to become more productive. The goal was 'to help our less fortunate citizens to help themselves,' President John F. Kennedy said. 'We must find ways of returning far more of our dependent people to independence.' Paying people not to work might lift families above the poverty line, but it also increases dependency. In the 1960s and '70s, as welfare-state programs proliferated, the number of people receiving public assistance more than doubled. Giving out money for nothing is a concept typically associated with the political left. Yet over the decades luminaries on the right—Richard Nixon, Milton Friedman, Charles Murray—have advocated policies that would provide a federally guaranteed income floor and relieve able-bodied adults of the need to work. Given the economic uncertainty surrounding AI, the idea of a social insurance program in the form of a minimum level of income for everyone has an understandable appeal. But be wary of tech moguls preaching supposedly altruistic wealth-redistribution schemes to burnish their public image. As with the environmental, social and governance advocacy, there's an agenda beneath the happy talk. Silicon Valley would do better to focus less on some liberal concept of social responsibility and more on innovations that will improve productivity and produce profits for shareholders. Mr. Musk and company didn't become rich at the expense of the poor, and taking from workers to give to those who refuse to work is a recipe for resentment and a bumper crop of layabouts. Some argue that we already have a kind of guaranteed-income system that's implemented haphazardly via hundreds of welfare programs at the federal, state and local levels. A single unrestricted cash-transfer system that replaces the welfare state bureaucracy, the thinking goes, would be more efficient. Unfortunately, the country's thriving poverty industry, which includes powerful lobbyists and politicians who get elected to protect it, are unlikely to take that trade. The more probable outcome is that an income guarantee would be added to the hundreds of existing entitlement programs instead of replacing them. Nor do we have any reason to believe that issuing no-strings-attached cash stipends to poor families works as intended. 'Significant but indirect evidence has suggested that unconditional cash aid would help children flourish,' the New York Times reported last month. 'But now a rigorous experiment, in a more direct test, found that years of monthly payments did nothing to boost children's well-being, a result that defied researchers' predictions.' The study, titled 'Baby's First Years,' concluded that after four years of monthly payments of $333, children whose parents received money 'fared no better than similar children without that help.' Co-author Greg J. Duncan, an economist at the University of California, Irvine, told the Times that he was 'very surprised—we were all very surprised' by the results. 'The money did not make a difference.' That study didn't find that mothers worked less, but other research involving larger stipends has concluded they can negatively affect work habits. Last year, the National Bureau of Economic Research published a working paper on the employment effects of guaranteed income, which was described as the most comprehensive study of its kind to date. Researchers found that families who received $1,000 monthly payments for three years worked fewer hours. The problem America faces today is a lack of work incentives, and that problem is exacerbated by government programs that make not working more attractive than getting a job. 'Nearly 7 million men in the prime of life—over a tenth of the 25-to-54 age group—are neither working nor looking for work these days,' writes Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute. 'Today, for every 'prime age' man who is actually unemployed—out of a job but looking—there are three who are neither working nor looking for work.' The reasons for this are complex, but it isn't hard to understand why giving people more money to live on without working won't help matters.


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
First unit was to be commissioned by 2025: 14 yrs on, north India's first N-power plant in Haryana still hanging fire
Fourteen years on, north India's first nuclear power plant, the Gorakhpur Haryana Anu Vidyut Pariyojana (GHAVP), the foundation stone for which was laid by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, remains hanging fire, even though the initial target to commission the first unit was by 2025. Attributing the delay 'primarily to surprises in the soil conditions encountered during construction,' the Union government says the power plant is now slated for commissioning in 2031-32, that too in phased-manner, despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi's push to the nuclear energy sector — increasing the nuclear energy capacity by more than ten-fold by 2047 — in his Independence Day speech. The GHAVP was conceptualised around 2009-10, and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) subsequently identified Gorakhpur village in Haryana's Fatehabad district as a suitable site. Over the next few years, land acquisition, environmental clearances and public consultations were carried out amid some resistance from local farmers. The project formally took off after former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh laid the foundation stone on January 13, 2014. However, despite the ceremonial launch, actual construction was delayed due to administrative hurdles, compensation disputes, and procedural bottlenecks. Between 2014 and 2021, the project saw limited site development, and the Covid-19 pandemic further stalled progress. Major civil construction finally began in 2022, focusing on Phase I, which included two indigenous 700 MW PHWR reactors. But ground preparation challenges and technical issues pushed the timeline, breaching the initial target of commissioning the first unit by 2025. Officials privy to the development on the site say, 'Units 1 and 2 are expected to become operational by 2031, while Phase II (Units 3 and 4) has been projected for completion by 2032. Despite delays, the construction work has picked up pace, and the NPCIL and the Ministry of Power are now closely monitoring the project. Alongside technical development, environmental and community initiatives have also been introduced, including CSR Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities and large-scale tree plantations.' Congress's Rohtak MP Deepender Singh Hooda sought details about this nuclear power project from the government during the ongoing monsoon session of the Lok Sabha. Responding to Hooda's query last week, Union Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Prime Minister's Office Dr Jitendra Singh stated, 'The Gorakhpur Nuclear Power Project comprises of two twin units of 700 MW each, viz. GHAVP1&2 (2X700 MW) and GHAVP-3&4 (2X700 MW). The Government accorded administrative approval and financial sanction for the GHAVP-1&2 in February 2014. Presently, GHAVP-1&2 is under construction and is expected to be completed by 2031-32.' Giving details about the progress of the project, Dr Singh added, 'Excavation activities commenced in the year 2018. The site is a soil site with no hard rock. Therefore, technique of excavation and Ground improvement (GI) using compacted soil cement mix was carried out. This was followed by construction of foundation piles and their qualification. However, confirmatory geo technical investigations indicated some localised weak zones in soil strata. In view of this, a consultant of repute was roped in for resolution of the issue, who carried out comprehensive investigations and submitted recommendations for remediation, which is presently under review by the regulatory authority. The above stated process took significant time, leading to delay in start of construction of the Nuclear Island. However, award of work for equipment, major EPC packages and construction of other main plant building progressed.' About the current status of the project, Dr Singh added, 'In order to streamline the project activities, advance procurement of long manufacturing cycle equipment have been initiated. Accordingly major equipment have been ordered, some of which have also been received at site. All major equipment and works packages like Main Plant Civil Works, Nuclear Piping, Turbine Island, IDCT etc., have been awarded and works are in progress. Constant monitoring of progress of project activities at multiple levels, timely identification of constraints & making necessary mid-course corrections, frequent meetings with vendors/contractors and re-sequencing of construction activities to the extent possible, have also been taken. While work is in progress in the peripheral buildings/structures, the construction activities in the main nuclear island would be taken up in full swing once site specific ground improvement activities are concluded and regulatory clearance is obtained. The delay has been primarily due to surprises in the soil conditions encountered during construction.'


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Lining up for take-off: Resumption of direct flights imminent, Indian and Chinese airlines prepare to reclaim market lost in 2020
With Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's recent visit to New Delhi, India and China appear to be one step closer to resuming direct flight connectivity between the two most populous countries in the world. With the exception of the Chinese special administrative region of Hong Kong, India and China have had no direct flights since early 2020, just before COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic. 'Both sides agreed to resume direct flight connectivity between Chinese mainland and India at the earliest, and finalize an updated Air Services Agreement. They also agreed on the facilitation of visas to tourists, businesses, media and other visitors in both directions,' India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a release late Tuesday. Although the two countries have not given a timeline yet on resumption of direct services, the evident signs of a thaw in the India-China relationship—notably at a time when New Delhi's relationship with Washington has hit a few roadblocks—has built the hope that normalisation of air connectivity between India and China is imminent. Direct flight connectivity between India and China was initially suspended due to the pandemic, which had brought much of the international flight operations to a grinding halt globally. As the India-China bilateral relationship soured following the standoff in Eastern Ladakh in 2020 and remained frigid over the subsequent years, direct flights between the two nations did not resume despite air connectivity returning to pre-pandemic levels globally. Resumption of direct flights and normalisation of visa issuances—demands China has been making over the past couple of years—had come up in Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's discussions with Beijing during his China visit in January. At the time, the two countries had agreed 'in principle' to resume direct flights. In the preceding months, the matter featured in talks between foreign and aviation ministers of the two countries. Chinese and Indian airlines have been keenly watching the developments, and are now preparing for direct flights. Just last week, IndiGo's Chief Executive Officer Pieter Elbers had said that the carrier stands ready to resume direct flights to China as soon as the bilateral arrangements between the two countries allow. Chinese carriers, too, are eager to resume direct services, it is learnt. Lack of direct flights have led to high airfares and long travel times for those flying between India and China. According to industry insiders, airlines—Chinese as well as Indian—have been looking to restart direct flights, as there is high demand for travel between the two countries. Lack of direct air connectivity between India and mainland China, along with stringent visa restrictions, led to airlines from both countries losing out on potential passenger loads, and airlines operating from other Southeast Asian countries cashing in on the opportunity. Passenger traffic between India and China—currently solely through connecting hubs in South and Southeast Asia—is less than half of what it was in 2019. All of it is being catered to by airlines from regions like Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam. To be sure, the Hong Kong airport is not exactly considered a Chinese airport due to Hong Kong's special autonomous status and a different visa regime than mainland China. It continues to be the leading connecting hub between India and mainland China. The normalisation of air connectivity between India and China would likely be beneficial for airlines from both countries. However, Beijing appears to believe that Chinese carriers stand to gain more, as they held the dominant share of the direct flight market before the pandemic. This perception likely explains why China has been encouraging India to permit the re-establishment of direct air connectivity and normalise visa issuances for Chinese nationals. Prior to the pandemic, specifically in December 2019, there were 539 scheduled direct flights per month between the two nations, offering a cumulative seat capacity of over 1.25 lakh. Of these, Indian carriers—IndiGo and Air India—accounted for 168 flights, or approximately 31 per cent. The remaining nearly 70 per cent of flights were operated by Chinese airlines, including Air China, China Eastern, China Southern, and Shandong Airlines. Despite this historical dominance, aviation industry observers do not necessarily anticipate that Chinese carriers will maintain such a significant share once direct flight connectivity is re-established. A lot has changed within the Indian aviation sector since 2019. Air India, now privatised and well-capitalised, has ambitions for rapid growth, particularly in the international market. Similarly, IndiGo, India's leading domestic carrier, is now more focused on expanding its international network.