Mixed bag for department store chain Myer as new Apparel Brands disappoints
The portfolio — which includes shopping mall mainstays Just Jeans, Jay Jays, Dotti, Jacqui E and Portmans — was picked up by Myer from Solomon Lew's Premier Investments late last year in a deal worth almost $900 million.
But it has been a rough few months for Apparel Brand under new management, with Myer reporting on Friday that sales of $211.2 million across the stores in the first 16 weeks of the second half of the financial year were down $8.3m, or almost 4 per cent, on the same period a year earlier.
Comparable sales were off 3.7 per cent and online sales tumbled 3.5 per cent, making up 16.8 per cent of sales.
It was a different story at Myer, which notched up total sales over the period of $837.2m, up 1.9 per cent on a year earlier.
Comparable sales rose 1.5 per cent and online sales rocketed 9 per cent, and now represent 21.4 per cent of total sales.
Myer said second-half sales so far had been hit by a number of market-wide and company-specific factors.
These included margin pressure because of higher promotional activity across the retail sector as business try to lure in shoppers keeping a closer eye on their budgets and increased costs of doing business, particularly wages and property costs impacted by inflation. Unfavourable foreign exchange movements also affected the results.
Myer Group executive chair Olivia Wirth said challenging trading conditions had been exacerbated by a subdued retail environment in the lead-up to the Federal election earlier this month.
'Consumers remain cautious and focused on value in response to cost-of-living pressures and the current macroeconomic headwinds and uncertainty,' Ms Wirth said.
'This has resulted in volatile trading conditions with widespread promotional activity across the retail sector.
'We remain focused on resetting the business and implementing our strategic growth plan to position Myer Group as an omni-channel retail platform capable of delivering growth during all phases of the economic cycle.'
The ramp up of Myer's new national distribution centre in Ravenhall in Victoria had also caused headaches for the retailer, noting automation and integration issues had forced it to bring in a third-party logistics operation ahead of the next peak trading period.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
Tesla profits drop as Musk warns of 'rough' patch before riches
Tesla reported another drop in quarterly profits Wednesday as CEO Elon Musk warned the company could face a few "rough" quarters following the elimination of federal tax credits for electric vehicles under President Donald Trump's big fiscal package. Musk, on an earnings conference call with analysts and investors, reiterated that Tesla's technology advantages position it for significant long-term profitability, but suggested the company's recent slump would continue or worsen in a difficult interim period until new autonomous transport ventures can be monetized. At issue is the period after the $7,500 federal tax credit for EV purchases expires on September 30, among the green tax credits zeroed out by Trump's sweeping package approved earlier this month. "We probably could have a few rough quarters. I'm not saying we will, but we could," Musk said of a period that immediately follows the expiration of the US tax credit for EVs. "But once you get to autonomy at scale" by the second half of 2026, "I'd be surprised if Tesla economics are not very compelling," said Musk. His comments acknowledge more short-term pain following Wednesday's results, its third straight quarter of lower profitability as the company faces intensifying electric vehicle competition and deals with backlash due to Musk's political activities. Tesla reported second-quarter profits of $1.2 billion, down 16 percent from the year-ago level. The company in a press release emphasized ongoing efforts to lead in artificial intelligence and robotics. Revenues fell 12 percent to $22.5 billion. Lower profits had been expected after Tesla earlier this month disclosed a decline in auto deliveries. Results were also impacted by a fall in average vehicle selling prices and higher operating expenses driven by AI and other research and development projects. Tesla did not offer an outlook on full-year vehicle production, citing shifting global trade and fiscal policies, as well as factors such as "the broader macroeconomic environment, the rate of acceleration of our autonomy efforts and production ramp at our factories." - 'Top pick' - The results come on the heels of Tesla's launch last month of a robotaxi service in the Texas capital Austin, Musk's first fully autonomous offering after pushing back the timeframe many times. Musk has heavily touted Tesla's autonomous driving program, as well as the company's "Optimus" humanoid robot, which employs artificial intelligence technology. But analysts have criticized Tesla's sluggishness in unveiling new autos, while questioning Musk's commitment to an earlier goal of launching a state-of-the-art electric vehicle priced at around $25,000 to bolster the odds of mass deployment. On the call, Musk reiterated his desire for a lower priced vehicle. Tesla's press release said the company began building "a more affordable model" in June, with volume set to rise in the second half of 2025. Tesla executives said they had pushed back the ramp-up on the new vehicle in order to maximize production of the company's current generation of autos before the federal tax credit expires. The worsening near-term outlook for EV sales is one reason analysts at JPMorgan Chase call Tesla's stock price "completely divorced from increasingly deteriorating fundamentals." But analysts at Morgan Stanley rate the company a "top pick" in light of its leadership in robotics and artificial intelligence, although a recent note warned Musk's political activity "may add further near-term pressure" to shares. - Political controversies - Disagreements over Trump's fiscal package have been a factor in Musk's recurring feud with the president, whose name was not mentioned during the 60-minute conference call. The billionaire donated huge sums to Trump's successful 2024 presidential campaign and then joined the administration to lead the "Department of Government Efficiency," which cut thousands of government jobs, sparking boycotts and vandalism that tarnished the Tesla brand. Musk left the White House in May. After their bitter falling out, Musk warned Trump's legislation would bankrupt the country. On July 5 the tech mogul announced he was launching a new political party in the United States, the "America Party." Trump dismissed the launch as "ridiculous," and has also threatened to look at deporting Musk and to revoking his government contracts. Shares of Tesla fell 4.1 percent in after-hours trading.
News.com.au
5 days ago
- News.com.au
Australians warned against renting bank details to crime networks
Australians have been warned against some think is a 'harmless crime', by becoming 'money mules' and renting out their bank details to criminals. In its latest warning the Australian Federal Police said many Australians were knowingly or unknowingly becoming money mules for criminals who used their bank accounts to move illicit money into a personal account to make the funds appear legitimate. According to the Australian Banking Association, the major banks made moves to shut down almost 13,000 suspected accounts in the 2024 financial year, up from the 9000 accounts they had discovered in the previous year. The big increase was largely due to an increase in detection capabilities and greater intelligence sharing between the banks and law enforcement. These mules are paid anywhere between $200 to $500 plus a commission, which is usually 10 per cent on any money moved through the account. ABA chief executive Anna Bligh said mule accounts were a key part of a scammer's business model and banks were focused on identifying, investigating and shutting them down. 'Renting or selling your bank account may seem harmless, but you may be unwittingly helping a scammer to rip-off a family member or someone else you know,' she said. 'Don't let criminals cash in on your bank account. 'There's a good chance you're being recruited to hide the profits of criminal activity.' According to the AFP, criminals are targeting Australians through social media, messaging or gaming platforms, chat forums, online advertisements and even in face-to-face meetings. These individuals will then be recruited by money laundered in three main ways. •Employment scams – these are designed to exploit job seekers by offering what seems like quick and easy money for little work. Applicants are asked to have an Australian bank account to transfer funds and are promised a commission for their work. •Threat scams – scammers contact victims threatening criminal charges and arrest unless they transfer and receive funds. •Romance scams – scammers build a relationship online and then request the victim to transfer money to other accounts, typically overseas, using their personal bank account. From here the criminal networks are increasingly telling these money mules to move the funds into a cryptocurrency exchange or ATM and global money transfer apps to make it harder to detect. AFP Detective Superintendent Marie Andersson said it was illegal to rent, buy or sell bank account details. 'Your account may be housing money derived from scams, extortion, drug trafficking and terrorism,' Ms Andersson said 'If a criminal has access to your bank accounts and personal details, they may use this information to commit other crimes, potentially implicating you in their illegal activities.'
News.com.au
18-07-2025
- News.com.au
Leaked document confirmed what we already knew. The housing accord is dead
ANALYSIS Talk about worst kept secrets. Earlier this week, federal treasury accidentally let slip what should have been a doozy … the much spoken of housing accord was on track to fail. That key Labor policy of delivering 1.2 million homes over five years was going to fall short. 'Stop press and clear the front page!' Said no one. This kind of leak is like me accidentally revealing I'm not on track to qualify for the 100 metre sprint at the next Olympics. Treasurer Jim Chalmers didn't seem too worried about it. Although he did concede 'more effort' would be required to make the target. The housing accord covers a period from 1 July, 2024, until end of June 2029. So, it's just completed its first year. Each year, 240,000 homes need to be completed in order to be on track for the target. In the first year, around 170,000 homes were completed. If this pace continues, we'll end the five years 350,000 homes behind target. Let's break it down to quarters, because all the economics boffins love quarterly data. We need 60,000 homes completed each quarter. In the first two quarters of the financial year, there were about 45,000 completions each. That then dropped to 43,500 in the third quarter. Completion data for the most recent quarter is yet to be released, but the ABS reported just over 42,000 building commencements, so we're getting further away. Meanwhile, building, borrowing and earning conditions aren't really getting any better. Economist Cameron Kusher from Oz Property Insights commented on the Australian Bureau of Statistics' Building Activity Data this week, noting 'While apartments are typically more expensive to build than houses, the average build cost of a new house in Australia has increased by almost $100,000 in the most recent two years'. When you consider the national house median price is at $888,000 according to recent PropTrack data, that's an increase of more than 10 per cent of the overall value in just two years. Then there are the shortages of skilled workers in the construction industry, the struggle that borrowers are facing as the RBA drags the chain on lowering interest rates and the fact that wages are moving about as slowly as the continents are drifting apart. And finally, what for many is the biggest hurdle of all, comes the last layer of government involved in the process: your local council. Because housing is a case of big picture to backyard. The Federal Government announces an initiative and invests some money in incentives, then it's over to the state governments to put in place their own policies and investments, including infrastructure that needs to be built around new housing. And if you are lucky enough to endure all of this and still be ready to invest in a new build, it's over to the local council for approval, but not before they ask residents if it's OK with them if something is built nearby that may create an inconvenience for them. And wouldn't you know it, those residents are often a fair bit more worried about what is happening in their own street than whether the nation is reaching its overarching housing targets. The housing accord should not be an impossible target, but it is. It won't be achieved and it never was going to be achieved. And as a result, housing will keep getting further out of reach for future generations of Australians.
