Haryana human rights panel seeks report on rejection of claim under Dayalu scheme
The complainant was attempting to claim financial assistance under the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojana scheme after the death of his father. He informed the commission that his claim was rejected due to a mismatch in his father's age as recorded in the death certificate and the family ID.
He submitted that the discrepancy was a clerical error, which has since been rectified. However, despite presenting the corrected death certificate, the authorities failed to reopen or reconsider the claim.
The Haryana government had notified the Dayalu scheme over two years ago to provide financial assistance to families with an annual income of less than ₹1.80 lakh in case of death or permanent disability of a family member.
Justice Lalit Batra, Chairperson of the Commission, observed that such welfare schemes are aimed at providing social protection to economically weaker sections.
In his order dated July 8, Justice Batra said the rejection of the complainant's claim "defeats the very purpose of the scheme."
"The denial of financial assistance under the welfare scheme, despite the complainant's compliance and correction of official records, amounts to a violation of his right to life with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution," the order stated.
"As state instrumentalities, the respondent authorities are duty-bound to ensure the timely delivery of welfare benefits, especially to economically weaker sections. The instant case reflects procedural unfairness and administrative apathy, resulting in a breach of basic human rights," it added.
The commission found prima facie merit in the complainant's grievance, indicating an unjustified rejection and potential denial of welfare entitlements in violation of basic human rights.
Meanwhile, Dr Puneet Arora, Protocol, Information and Public Relations Officer of the Commission, said that reports have been called from the Chief Executive Officer, Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas , the Deputy Commissioner, Jind, and the Administrative Officer, Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas .
The authorities have been directed to explain why the claim was not reconsidered despite the correction of records, clarify provisions for review under the scheme, and outline steps to avoid such lapses in the future.
The commission has further directed that the case be reviewed promptly, ensuring the complainant's participation in the process and the timely facilitation of necessary formalities.
The next date of hearing has been fixed for August 21, 2025.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘Stale, troubling': Congress slams PM's I-Day speech
NEW DELHI: Terming his Independence Day address 'stale, hypocritical, and troubling', the Congress on Friday lashed out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi for praising the RSS in the speech, alleging that the ruling BJP is ready to go to any extent of 'immorality' to remain in power, and that several 'irregularities' in elections are emerging across the country. After hoisting the national flag at the Congress headquarters, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said that opposition's votes are being openly cut in the name of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls, even as those alive are being declared dead. LoP in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, and Kharge skipped the Independence Day speech,drawing criticism from the BJP. The Congress chief said the 'most surprising' thing was that the BJP has had no objection to the votes of 65 lakh people being cut. This clearly shows who benefited from the SIR exercise, he said. 'This is not a fight to win elections but to save India's democracy and protect the Constitution,' Kharge said, referring to the Congress's opposition to the SIR exercise. 'Those who are alive have been declared as dead. EC's impartiality can be understood from the fact that it is not ready to share whose votes are being cut and on what basis,' he said. Kharge also claimed that central investigation agencies like ED and CBI, and the Income Tax department have been used 'so openly for political purposes against the opponents that the Supreme Court of the country has to show them the mirror.' In a statement, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said the 'most troubling element' of Modi's speech was his 'name-checking' of the RSS, which was a 'blatant breach of the spirit of a constitutional, secular republic.
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Sanitation workers unfurl national flag in Shaikpet
Hyderabad: In a never-seen-before gesture, the residents invited garbage collectors and sweepers — the true unsung heroes of the colony — to hoist the national flag. Over 5,000 residents of Surya Nagar Colony, Shaikpet, transformed Independence Day into a statement of solidarity. It has been observed that the moment was deeply emotional — as the tricolour rose, tears streamed down the faces of the honoured sanitation workers, while residents erupted into applause, sending a powerful message. The celebration also featured sports events for seniors and juniors, 40 free blood tests, and a community breakfast — turning the protest into a festival of unity. Speaking at the event, Asif Sohail, President of the Jubilee Hills Constituency 300 Colonies Forum, said 'These sanitation workers are our backbone. Every single day, they clean our streets and keep our homes healthy. The Constitution says all are equal — and today, we proved it. They are not outsiders; they are our own.' With the recent attacked on the sanitation workers in the areas by the local leaders. The protest has already started gaining attention beyond Shaikpet. Residents have warned that any attack on those who serve the community will be met with unity, resistance, and nationwide exposure.
Hans India
39 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar's electoral overhaul: Balancing integrity and inclusion in India's democracy
The Election Commission of India's (ECI) recent initiative to undertake a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar has ignited a fervent debate, blending legal imperatives with political undercurrents. Announced in June, this comprehensive exercise, the first of its kind in the state since 2003, aims to update voter lists with July 1, 2025, as the qualifying date. With Bihar's Assembly elections looming later this year, the timing has amplified concerns about potential disenfranchisement, particularly among migrant workers and marginalized communities. Yet, at its core, the SIR represents a statutory effort to safeguard the sanctity of India's democratic process—one that demands a balanced scrutiny of its legal foundations, procedural rigor, and societal impacts. The ECI's authority to conduct such revisions is firmly rooted in the Constitution. Article 324 grants the Commission sweeping powers over the 'superintendence, direction, and control' of elections, including the preparation and maintenance of accurate electoral rolls. This is reinforced by Article 326, which enshrines universal adult suffrage, entitling every Indian citizen aged 18 or above—barring disqualifications like non-residence or criminal convictions—to vote. These provisions underscore a commitment to inclusivity while empowering the ECI to eliminate inaccuracies that could undermine electoral fairness. Parliament has translated these constitutional ideals into actionable law through the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Section 21 of the Act explicitly authorizes the ECI to prepare and revise electoral rolls, a process elaborated in the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. Under Rule 25, revisions can be intensive, summary, or hybrid, allowing flexibility based on need. An intensive revision, as chosen for Bihar, involves meticulous steps outlined in Rules 4 to 23, including door-to-door enumeration and verification. This ensures thoroughness, requiring enumerators to collect details from households and cross-check against a list of 11 specified documents, such as passports, driving licenses, or ration cards—expanded from seven in previous exercises, which the Supreme Court has noted as a 'voter-friendly' measure. The rationale for reviving an intensive approach after over two decades is straightforward yet profound. Bihar's population has surged, with urbanisation and migration reshaping its demographics. The 2003 revision, the last comprehensive one, predates significant shifts, including the exodus of millions for work opportunities elsewhere. Bogus entries—deceased voters, duplicates, or those who have relocated—persist as a perennial threat, potentially distorting outcomes and violating the 'one person, one vote' principle. The ECI's drive seeks to purge these anomalies while enrolling new voters, especially the youth turning 18. As of July 12, over 74 per cent of Bihar's approximately 7.9 crore electors had submitted enumeration forms, indicating robust participation in the process. This high response rate suggests the exercise is gaining traction, though challenges remain in reaching remote or transient populations. However, SIR has not escaped controversy. Critics, including civil society groups, allege it risks mass exclusion, with reports emerging of draft rolls containing errors like incorrect photographs or entries for deceased individuals. Petitions before the Supreme Court, led by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), claim that around 65 lakh names were omitted from the draft roll without adequate justification, disproportionately affecting migrants, the poor, and minorities. These groups argue that the process violates statutory rights, as voters have a legal entitlement to remain on rolls unless proven ineligible. The exclusion of Aadhaar as a verification document has been praised for broadening options but questioned for its potential to complicate verification in a state where digital access varies. In response, the ECI has emphasised that SIR is a routine purification effort, not a deletion drive. It has assured the Supreme Court that no name will be removed without prior notice, a reasoned order, and appeal rights. The Commission maintains that it is not legally obligated to publish a separate list of excluded voters or reasons for omissions, viewing the draft roll as a provisional document open to corrections. During ongoing hearings, the apex court has sought details on the 2003 revision's methodology, signalling a desire for transparency in historical precedents. Notably, while individual voters have filed thousands of objections, no recognized political party has formally flagged errors in the draft, per ECI reports. This absence of partisan complaints underscores that the controversy may stem more from apprehension than widespread malpractice. The debate extends beyond Bihar, highlighting systemic tensions in India's electoral framework. Similar revisions in other states, like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in recent years, have faced scrutiny for alleged biases, yet they have ultimately bolstered roll accuracy. The political stakes are high in Bihar: the state's 243 Assembly seats could see shifts if migrant voters—estimated at over two crore—are underrepresented. Demographic data from the 2011 Census, adjusted for growth, reveals that Scheduled Castes and Muslims, often economically vulnerable, form significant voter blocs; any perceived exclusion could erode trust in the system. Objectively, the ECI's actions align with global best practices for electoral hygiene. Countries like the United States and the United Kingdom periodically purge rolls to combat fraud, though with safeguards against voter suppression. In India, the ECI's recent delisting of 334 Registered Unrecognized Political Parties (RUPPs) as part of broader clean-up efforts reflects a proactive stance against electoral malpractices. However, implementation on the ground matters. House-to-house surveys, while thorough, can be susceptible to human error or bias in a polarized environment. Enhancing digital tools, such as the Voter Helpline app, could mitigate this, allowing self-verification and reducing dependency on enumerators. The Supreme Court's observations in related matters offer valuable guidance. In the ADR vs. ECI case on electronic voting machines, the court cautioned against 'blind distrust' that breeds scepticism, urging evidence-based reforms and trust-building through dialogue and transparency. As echoed in Paragraph 37 of that judgment, democracy thrives on harmony among citizens, judiciary, representatives, and electoral bodies. Para 38 expresses hope that the system will reflect the electorate's true mandate. These principles apply aptly here: while the ECI's authority to decide the timing and mode of SIR is exclusive, fostering public confidence requires proactive disclosure and inclusive outreach. Bihar's SIR embodies the delicate balance between electoral purity and inclusivity. Legally sound and procedurally robust, it addresses long-standing flaws in voter lists, yet its success hinges on equitable execution. As petitions unfold in the Supreme Court, stakeholders must prioritize evidence over rhetoric. A transparent, participatory process will not only fortify Bihar's upcoming polls but also reinforce India's democratic resilience. By embracing continuous improvement, as the apex court advocates, we can ensure every eligible voice is heard, unmarred by doubt or exclusion. (The writer is a senior Advocate)
