US begins prosecuting migrants for breaching ‘military zone' near border
The United States has announced its first criminal prosecutions against migrants and asylum seekers accused of crossing into a newly created military zone along the country's border with Mexico.
Court filings submitted on Monday — and reviewed by US media the following day — show that approximately 28 people have been charged with 'violations of security regulations' for breaching the military zone.
That charge, though a misdemeanour, carries the possibility of heightened penalties. The US Code stipulates that violations of security regulations can result in a fine of up to $100,000 for individuals or up to a year in prison — or both.
Normally, the consequences for unlawful entry into the US are less severe. But as the administration of President Donald Trump ramps up its crackdown on immigration, critics warn of the growing militarisation of the southern border region neighbouring Mexico.
The new charges were made possible by the establishment of the 'New Mexico National Defence Area' on April 18.
The Department of Defence ordered that an Army installation called Fort Huachuca be expanded to include 109,651 acres of federal land, previously held by the Department of the Interior.
The transfer is effective for three years and turns a strip of border land adjacent to Mexico into a US military zone, where trespassing carries serious consequences. That military zone notably overlaps with routes that migrants and asylum seekers have taken to enter the US irregularly, without official paperwork.
Successive presidential administrations, however, have sought to limit asylum applicants from crossing into the US outside of official ports of entry, despite US and international law that protects the right to flee persecution.
The threat of increased penalties has been one of the tools used as deterrence.
Last week, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth visited the recently established military zone, where he touted the strip as a new line of defence against what he called an 'invasion' of migrants and asylum seekers.
'This is Department of Defence property. The National Defence Area, formerly known as the Fort Huachuca annex zone, is federal property. Any illegal attempting to enter that zone is entering a military base — a federal, protected area,' Hegseth said.
'You can be detained. You will be detained. You will be interdicted by US troops and border patrol working together.'
Since January, the Trump administration has surged the number of US troops stationed at the border, bringing the total to an estimated 11,900 soldiers.
During his visit, Hegseth revealed that he also plans to expand military zones at other sites along the US border, to add an extra line of defence against irregular migration. He played up the risks of complex criminal prosecutions and lengthy prison sentences.
'If you are an illegal crossing, you will be monitored. You will be detained by US troops. You will be detained temporarily and handed over to Customs and Border Patrol,' he said.
'If you have cut through a fence or jumped over a fence, that's destruction of government property. If you have attempted to evade, that's evading law enforcement, just like you would any other military base. You add up the charges of what you can be charged with — misdemeanours and felonies — you could be looking at up to 10 years in prison when prosecuted.'
He added that New Mexico's attorney general 'can't wait to prosecute' the first group to cross through the military zone.
But groups like the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico have voiced opposition to the new tactic, saying that human rights are at risk when the military is deployed to address civilian offenses.
'The expansion of military detention powers in the 'New Mexico National Defence Area' — also known as the 'border buffer zone' — represents a dangerous erosion of the constitutional principle that the military should not be policing civilians,' said Rebecca Sheff, a senior staff attorney for the group.
Sheff added there could be unintended consequences beyond the government's attempts to restrict irregular migration.
'We don't want militarized zones where border residents — including U.S. citizens — face potential prosecution simply for being in the wrong place.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump deploys troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against ICE raids
United States President Donald Trump is deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to the city of Los Angeles, where a continued immigration crackdown has led to protests and clashes between authorities and demonstrators. The White House said in a statement on Saturday that Trump was deploying the Guardsmen to 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester' in California. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, objected to the move and said in a post on X that the move from the Republican president was 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions'. More soon…
Qatar Tribune
9 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
AESC pauses $1.6 bn SC battery plant amid ‘uncertainty'
Agencies A Japanese company has halted construction on a $1.6 billion factory in South Carolina to help make batteries for electric BMWs, citing 'policy and market uncertainty.' While AESC didn't specify what those problems are, South Carolina's Republican governor said the company is dealing with the potential loss of federal tax breaks for electric vehicle buyers and incentives for EV businesses as well as tariff uncertainties from President Donald Trump's administration. 'What we're doing is urging caution — let things play out because all of the these changes are taking place,' Gov. Henry McMaster said. AESC announced the suspension in construction of its plant in Florence on Thursday, 'Due to policy and market uncertainty, we are pausing construction at our South Carolina facility at this time,' the company's statement said. AESC promised to restart construction, although it didn't say when, and vowed to meet its commitment to hire 1,600 workers and invest $1.6 billion. The company said it has already invested $1 billion in the Florence plant. The battery maker based in Japan also has facilities in China, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany. In the U.S., AESC has a plant in Tennessee and is building one in Kentucky. The statement didn't mention any changes with other plants. The South Carolina plant is supposed to sell battery cells to BMW, which is building its own battery assembly site near its giant auto plant in Greer. BMW said the construction pause by AESC doesn't change its plans to open its plant in 2026. AESC has already rolled back its South Carolina plans. They announced a second factory on the Florence site, but then said earlier this year that their first plant should be able to handle BMW's demand. That prompted South Carolina officials to withdraw $111 million in help they planned to provide. The company is still getting $135 million in grants from the South Carolina Department of Commerce and $121 million in bonds and the agency said a construction pause won't prompt them to claw back that offer. South Carolina is investing heavily in electric vehicles. Volkswagen-owned Scout Motors plans to invest more than $4 billion and hire 10,000 people for a plant to build its new electric SUVs scheduled to open in 2027. The state has for decades made big bets on foreign manufacturers like BMW, Michelin and Samsung that have paid off with an economic boom this century, but there is uneasiness that Trump's flirtation with high tariffs might stagger or even ruin those important partnerships.
Qatar Tribune
9 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Asia caught between US-China power plays ahead of tariff deadlines
Agencies Caught in the undertow of swirling power plays between China and the United States, Asia has become like a piece of driftwood battered by the pounding of opposing tides. With key tariff deadlines approaching in July, and in light of lingering trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies, many countries in the region are facing a delicate, pragmatic choice: bow to Washington's growing pressure to crack down on supply chains and enforcement – or preserve the economic ambiguity that underpins their deep ties with Beijing? Asian countries have entwined their supply chains, technology, markets and investment with Beijing – accounting for one-third of China's total trade volume, or US$1.89 trillion last year. Meanwhile, some of them may need security assurances from the US amid the growing Chinese influence in the region, analysts said. China remains the top trading partner for 18 countries across the region and has been the largest trading partner of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) for 15 consecutive years. Meanwhile, economic asymmetry and military advantage have often translated into Beijing's leverage in market power while, for many in the region, Washington represents security, diversification and strategic rebalancing, with its military presence, investment and advanced technology, analysts said. That leaves many Asian economies walking a tightrope – benefiting from China's vast market while remaining wary of the risks of over-dependence. For much of Asia, maintaining ties with both while caught in between has become a survival strategy. As ongoing negotiations between the administration of US President Donald Trump and Asia unfold behind closed doors and prospects remain cloudy, 'it's too early to talk about 'camps' in Asia, as Asia can't afford to do without either China or the US', said Vivek Kelkar, an independent analyst based in India. Some regional leaders, such as Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim, have been verbally supportive of China because their geography and economy do not allow them to be anything else, but they may also be aware that, without the US, they are vulnerable to Chinese domination across both economics and politics, Kelkar said. Both China and the US have shown a willingness to exercise power by weaponising supply chains and trade, Kelkar added, but there was no sign yet that Asia would cave in quite the way Trump envisages. 'Asia is trying to manage a careful balance while messaging Washington that Asia has alternatives,' he said. For instance, Malaysia's chief negotiator, Mastura Ahmad Mustafa, told domestic news outlet The Star that although her country's tariff talks with the US were in progress, those negotiations were only one part of Malaysia's broader strategy to cushion the potential impact on exporters. In a report published on Thursday, she said that it was hard to know whether the two sides could reach a deal before a 90-day pause on tariffs is lifted in July, and that the Malaysian government had 'begun rolling out contingency measures' such as market diversification and economic reforms. In April, Trump imposed a 10 per cent universal tariff on all imports effective April 5, in an effort to address America's trade deficits. His administration also announced higher 'reciprocal' tariffs on goods from select countries from April 9 – including 25 per cent for South Korea, 24 per cent for Japan, 36 per cent for Thailand, 46 per cent for Vietnam, and 49 per cent for Cambodia. However, a grace period was granted later that month for all countries except China, delaying the implementation of these higher tariffs until July 9 and giving governments time to negotiate possible exemptions or adjustments with Washington.
