Read AT&T CEO's frank response to employee feedback about a 5-day RTO mandate
In a lengthy Friday memo addressed to "all AT&T managers" that was obtained by Business Insider, Stankey shared his thoughts on the results of the company's employee engagement survey.
The AT&T CEO said he is "not surprised" by the declining self-reported employee engagement level and touched on some changes the company is going through.
The note was, in part, to help workers identify where their "professional expectations" may be "misaligned with the strategic direction of this company," he wrote.
"If you are of the small minority that shared comments similar to, 'I have heard this nonsense before and I'll ignore things until this goes away…' or 'things were just fine the way they were…' there might be a disconnect between you and your current professional choice," Stankey wrote.
According to the memo, 79% of respondents said they feel committed and engaged with their work. The survey results represent over 99,000 employees, which is 73% of the company.
AT&T told BI that the company has no additional comments on Stankey's memo because it "speaks for itself."
"We run a dynamic, customer-facing business, tackling large-scale, challenging initiatives," Stankey wrote. "If the requirements dictated by this dynamic do not align to your personal desires, you have every right to find a career opportunity that is suitable to your aspirations and needs."
"That said, if a self-directed, virtual, or hybrid work schedule is essential for you to manage your career aspirations and life challenges, you will have a difficult time aligning your priorities with those of the company and the culture we aim to establish," Stankey added.
AT&T has undergone a series of changes this year, starting with replacing a hybrid schedule with a five-day in-office mandate. Some AT&T employees previously told BI that it became difficult to obtain office desks and parking spaces amid the RTO push, while the telecom's rival, Verizon, saw the office mandate as an opportunity to recruit AT&T workers interested in hybrid schedules.
In the memo, Stankey addressed the "right to expect to work in a professional, well-maintained, and functional facility" and the ongoing and coming investments into office hubs.
Stankey is the latest CEO to tell employees to get on board with a return-to-office policy or go elsewhere.
He also described the company's transition as a shift away from some elements, including "loyalty, tenure, and conformance with the associated compensation," to "a more market-based culture —focused on rewarding capability, contribution, and commitment."
"When I read comments lamenting disruption, I tried to pick my brain for an example of another 100+ year old company that didn't have to disrupt itself to secure sustainable relevance," he wrote. "I am still searching for the first example."
So far, AT&T shares have risen more than 21% in 2025, and the company posted robust earnings that met analyst expectations over the past two quarters.
"I know change like this is difficult and can be unsettling for some," Stankey said in the memo. "However, as General Eric Shinseki so eloquently stated, 'If you dislike change, you're going to dislike irrelevance even more.'"
Read AT&T CEO John Stankey's full memo:
A Message from John Stankey
My Observation on our Employee Survey results
To: All AT&T Managers
Thank you to the over 99,000 employees who responded to this year's Employee Survey. Your feedback helps us understand what we need to focus on—and how we need to communicate — as we strive toward our goal of ranking in the top third of Fortune 100 companies in employee engagement. It is incredibly encouraging that 73% of our employees took the time to respond to the survey, with 79% of those respondents feeling committed and engaged with their work at AT&T. While this is reassuring, especially considering the amount of change we've navigated as a company recently, it wasn't a surprise to me that we fell short of our engagement goal. Nor was it a surprise that scores declined since our 2023 survey. We are midstream on a multi-year journey to build the company we want, not simply optimize the one we have — and I believe your feedback accurately reflects where we are.
In the survey you asked for transparency in communication from leadership. Although not my best in terms of brevity, the purpose of this multi-page note is to share a few of my thoughts with you directly while your leaders work with you to prepare their action plans. After reading this, I'm hopeful you will understand my perspective on the company we are working to build and what we can and will do to respond to elements of your feedback.
This note may also help you identify areas where your professional expectations might be misaligned with the strategic direction of this company. Most points outlined below have been communicated in other forums and with your leadership, but this is my attempt to articulate how all the pieces fit together.
Let me start by setting some context on what has been underway at AT&T over the last 4 years. To secure our long-term success as a company, we concluded that a shift in our operating culture was essential. For those of you who are fans of management science, this shift can be characterized as moving away from an orientation on hierarchy and familial cultural norms and towards a more externally focused and competitive market-based culture.
I understand that some of you may have started your tour with this company expecting an "employment deal" rooted in loyalty, tenure, and conformance with the associated compensation, work structure, and benefits. We have consciously shifted away from some of these elements and towards a more market-based culture — focused on rewarding capability, contribution, and commitment. We believe this is the only way to succeed in the dynamic, technologically driven markets where we operate. I know change like this is difficult and can be unsettling for some. However, as General Eric Shinseki so eloquently stated, "If you dislike change, you're going to dislike irrelevance even more." Many of your survey comments indicate agreement with this notion — a desire for our company to evolve to better support our customers and each other.
If you are of the small minority that shared comments similar to, "I have heard this nonsense before and I'll ignore things until this goes away…" or "things were just fine the way they were…" there might be a disconnect between you and your current professional choice. It takes every one of us, moving in the same direction, to win against the competition, sustain our business, and create rewarding and interesting challenges for employees who want to work in a market-based culture. Changes to compensation, pensions, benefits (paid time off, care leaves, mental health support), delayering, work locations, and workplace environment are all in service of this change.
When I read comments lamenting disruption, I tried to pick my brain for an example of another 100+ year old company that didn't have to disrupt itself to secure sustainable relevance. I am still searching for the first example. I suspect our willingness to disrupt ourselves is the under-pinning of why this company approaches 150 years of relevance — from fixed to mobile, TDM (Time Division Multiplexing) to IP (Internet Protocol), and narrowband to broadband to name a few. I recall at every turn there were parts of the organization advocating to maintain the status quo, and I suspect hindsight would tell us we are happy we chose change — as messy as the journey might have been.
Your Survey Feedback
Now to the survey. There was quite a bit to unpack in your feedback, but like any business imperative, focus and prioritization are essential. Your collective data and comments were analyzed to extract the most critical themes outlined in this note. You will hear more specifics from your respective leaders around these themes in the coming weeks.
1. Career and professional growth
I agree with the sentiment that everyone should understand potential career opportunities and career paths we have here at AT&T. With that, you should have a solid sense of the contribution required in your current role, and what can be done to earn more responsibility to push professional pursuits to a higher level.
Many leaders have not yet fully addressed this expectation within their own organizations. Our shift to hub locations was a pivotal step to more effectively achieve this goal. Concentrations of employees enables the teamwork, mentorship, and visibility that, when combined with performance and contribution, can better equip you to advance your career. While we have made strides to get more people into fewer places, we have more work to do to align complimentary work functions in the right places. I expect all department leaders to complete this work — to thoughtfully consolidate coordinating functions and career paths to reduce the ongoing need to relocate for growth and development.
2. Capabilities to do your job
You deserve tools, processes, and capabilities that help you serve our customers effectively, without being hindered by internal process friction or system constraints.
While we've made progress with legacy migrations and infrastructure upgrades, there's still a long way to go. We find ourselves at the midpoint in what is a long and technically challenging journey. You have my commitment that improving these capabilities remains a top priority. We are committed to allocating resources and attention to ensure we see tangible benefits of our record levels of investment in these areas, and we'll continue to update you on these improvements.
3. Where we work
You are right to expect to work in a professional, well-maintained, and functional facility. Another reason we established a focused set of hubs was to allow us to invest in our workplaces and bring them to a more common standard. This was something we never would have been able to achieve while operating in 500+ metropolitan areas. It's also why we need to continue exiting under-utilized real estate (the remnants of deferred maintenance from a long string of mergers and acquisitions) to free up resources to invest in our core locations.
The fact is real estate transitions require sustained efforts over several years to arrive at the place we desire and you deserve. Some of you are in a location where enhancements are actively underway or even completed. Others may be unaware of changes that are coming in short order. We will more actively share where we are making investments, what has been accomplished, and what is on the horizon. We agree with the feedback you shared, and we are taking this seriously. I expect we all will be required to demonstrate some patience and flexibility as we work towards a better place.
4. Culture
Your collective comments about culture may be the most difficult to synthesize. This topic is a bit like beauty — it's all in the eyes of the beholder. Many of you suggest a desire to improve upon what you're observing as "daily norms." I wish I could summarize a set of actions that could quickly guarantee our transition to the market-based cultural norms I described earlier. But I don't think a short-term list of actions or programs would suffice. Believe me, there is nobody more impatient for this outcome than yours truly. Changing and embracing a workplace culture is like learning a language — knowledge grows in a variety of ways and develops over time. Like learning a language, you gain proficiency by practicing in the real world. We need to commit to learning the language together so we can all share a common "shorthand."
To that end, we will be doing some additional work illustrating what market-based culture norms look like in practice — and sharing some prompts that can be applied in your daily work life. We'll keep coming at this cultural evolution from every angle — but I have to ask you to commit. Commit to adjusting your own behaviors and actions without looking to your right or left (or above) to see what everybody else is doing. A favorite quote by W. Clement Stone comes to mind: "So many fail because they don't get started." Please jump in and avoid the human tendency to blame the neighbors for the problems in the neighborhood! We will all change at a slightly different pace, and that's to be expected.
5. Personal wellbeing
I understand that many may find the demands of your daily lives challenging and difficult. Elder care, job stress, child rearing challenges, economic uncertainty, community unrest, technology anxiety — the list can get long. While no company can address how the combination of these dynamics might impact your specific circumstances, we can work to support employees in a way that improves their ability to manage what life throws at them.
Our decisions to maintain industry-leading healthcare, change time-off policies, augment leave structures, offer financial counseling, and enhance mental health benefits are examples of overt decisions we have made on this front. Despite rising medical costs, we intend to hold management medical contributions flat for the 2026 renewal cycle. We continue to test new approaches to services and care in the workplace and are seeing some promising models emerge that may warrant implementing at scale. These are just some examples of how we are constantly evaluating how we can best support you in managing life dynamics, and you can expect more updates in the coming year.
Now, onto some additional context and expectation setting.
How we work together
The most challenging things we do here at AT&T require unwavering teamwork - it's essential that we attract and promote talent that embraces working together to deliver results. When you think about what we are doing to transform this company - efforts like legacy sunset, fiber deployment, wireless network modernization, moving down market in Business, BSS/OSS (Business Support System/Operations Support System) platform migrations, digital/online/omni channel enablement, core routing network consolidation, and 5G standalone core - these are all efforts that require inter-departmental collaboration and coordination. They constitute the bulk of our $23 billion annual investment.
This work is far more demanding and challenging than our efforts to keep the train on the tracks during enforced COVID isolation. -person collaboration and predictable presence improves each team's ability to execute effectively on large, complex projects. Our customers expect us to be here to serve their needs. Our third-party partners need to be able to consistently depend on times to collaborate. Our employees deserve reliable support with their current responsibilities and impromptu guidance for continued development. This is why we work in person, together, during common hours.
We run a dynamic, customer-facing business, tackling large-scale, challenging initiatives. If the requirements dictated by this dynamic do not align to your personal desires, you have every right to find a career opportunity that is suitable to your aspirations and needs. That said, if a self-directed, virtual, or hybrid work schedule is essential for you to manage your career aspirations and life challenges, you will have a difficult time aligning your priorities with those of the company and the culture we aim to establish.
Does this mean there isn't room for emergencies or special circumstances? Of course not. will always try to support that which can't be planned for — or that which needs to be deliberately planned for — and I expect any leader to manage their organization accordingly.
Contribution, trust, and effectiveness
Our cultural tenants include our intent to Win as One. Implicit in this commitment to one another is that we all carry our part of the load aid measurably contribute to the priorities the team. As technology and the "information economy" evolves, each of our respective contributions are going to become increasingly measurable.
In addition to information garnered from performance reviews, peer feedback, assessments work history, and certifications (to name a few), we analyze patterns of behaviors from broad cohorts (aggregated data). This allows leaders to identify behaviors that are obvious outliers, supplemented with the broadest set of information available, to determine if the behavior being evaluated is consistent with our stated priorities and employment expectations.
An employee's data must significantly differ from their peers — to a level harming team cohesion, compensation, and inconsistent with our Win as One philosophy — before an individual's name is linked to any behavior.
Some may view this approach as a matter of trust, and that perspective is understandable. In several forums, I've expressed concerns that past data indicated more outliers than we'd like.
If we overlook these outliers, it can impact overall trust in leadership and coworkers, especially among those who consistently contribute and uphold our standards. Addressing these exceptions is important to ensure we're fair to the vast majority of employees who support their colleagues and deliver for the organization every day.
Next steps
I hope this clarifies how we've prioritized action planning around your feedback — and transparently explains why some concerns and desires expressed may not be entirely aligned with our strategic direction as a company. While it's natural to feel uneasy during times of conflict and change, the greatest source of lasting anxiety is when expectations aren't aligned or discussed openly.
Determining the best way to address new challenges and position the company for long-term success is constantly on our minds as leaders. I truly believe that this approach is the way to attract and retain customers, secure necessary resources from our investors, and offer meaningful employment to as many of our folks as possible. As difficult as it is to balance all these stakeholders, I am confident that we are on the right track.
Your leadership team will be outlining our path forward in response to the survey in more detail. Until then, I ask that each of you explore your own opportunities to make a difference. While there will certainly be actions and initiatives that require sponsorship from senior leaders, our collective success also depends on each of us taking ownership where we can. Rather than waiting for others to act, I encourage everyone to share their ideas and take initiative.
As I said at the beginning, we are midstream on a multi-year journey to build the company we want, not simply optimize the one we have. Your feedback makes us better, and we have many strong capabilities and attributes to leverage.
John

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
The hottest jobs today didn't exist a few years ago — and degrees won't get you there, one of LinkedIn's top economists told BI
Some of today's most in-demand jobs didn't exist a few years ago, and no traditional degree can fully prepare you for them, one of LinkedIn's top economists told Business Insider. Chua Pei Ying, LinkedIn's head economist for Asia Pacific, told BI on the sidelines of the Fortune AI Brainstorm 2025 Conference in Singapore that employers were already shifting toward "skills-based hiring" even before the rise of AI. Employers don't just look at the candidate's degree or past job titles. They think about the skills candidates bring, especially because a lot of jobs are new, Chua said in the interview last month. According to LinkedIn data, more than one in five professionals hired in Asia Pacific hold job titles that didn't exist 20 years ago, from data scientists to content creators. "You can't hire someone for a brand-new type of job if that job never existed in the past," Chua said. "Similarly, you can't hire someone who has a degree for that area if this area is completely new," she added. The rise of new digital tools and platforms is changing how companies operate — and what they expect from workers. "AI literacy is going to be mainstream," Chua said. "It's going to be expected for everyone." Skill sets for the same job have changed by 40% since 2016, LinkedIn data showed. This will accelerate to 72% by 2030. What job seekers can do Chua said workers should "lean into technology" and not fear it by learning how to use it responsibly, verify its outputs, and treat it as a tool, not a crutch. Chua said soft skills like communication and collaboration are increasingly important for experienced workers and fresh graduates alike. Agility is another key trait employers are actively seeking, especially for entry-level workers, she said. Tech leaders have been vocal about AI shaking up jobs. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said that AI may eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has said AI won't kill jobs, but it will transform how every job is done. "I am certain 100% of everybody's jobs will be changed," he told CNN's Fareed Zakaria last month. "The work that we do in our jobs will be changed. The work will change. But it's very likely — my job has already changed." Perplexity's CEO, Aravind Srinivas, said in an interview with Matthew Berman that people need to spend more time using AI. "People who really are at the frontier of using AIs are going to be way more employable than people who are not," he said last month. "That's guaranteed to happen." Some tech leaders have also emphasized the importance of soft skills in setting candidates apart in the AI era. Salesforce's chief futures officer, Peter Schwartz, told BI in an interview that "the most important skill is empathy, working with other people." "That will be the most important thing because the AIs can deal with all the routine stuff," he added. Mark Zuckerberg said in a July interview with Bloomberg that he believed the most important skill was "learning how to think critically and learning values when you're young." "If people have shown that they can go deep and do one thing really well, then they've probably gained experience in, like, the art of learning something," Zuckerberg said, discussing what he looked for in job candidates.

Business Insider
11 hours ago
- Business Insider
GitHub CEO delivers stark message to developers: Embrace AI or get out.
This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. In an unambiguous message to the global developer community, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke warned that software engineers should either embrace AI or leave the profession. His candid statement, part of a blog post titled "Developers, Reinvented," underscores the dramatic transformation underway in software development, a shift not just in how code is written, but in the very nature of what it means to be a developer. The blog drew from interviews with 22 developers already deeply integrating AI into their workflows. Their experiences paint a clear picture: AI isn't a distant future, it's a present necessity. "Either you have to embrace the Al, or you get out of your career," Dohmke wrote, citing one of the developers who GitHub interviewed. This is the latest example of a strange marketing strategy by AI companies. Instead of selling products based on helpful features and letting users decide, executives often deploy scare tactics that essentially warn people they will become obsolete if they don't get on the AI bandwagon. For instance, Julia Liuson, another executive at Microsoft, which owns GitHub, recently warned employees that "using AI is no longer optional." From skeptics to strategists Dohmke said developers who initially dismissed tools such as GitHub Copilot as gimmicks now see them as indispensable collaborators. Through trial and error, these people have evolved from skeptics to AI strategists, learning to delegate coding tasks to AI agents and focusing their efforts on context design, prompt engineering, and verification, the CEO added. This is no marginal change. Developers at the leading edge of this transition report that their roles have shifted from writing code to architecting and auditing the code generated by AI. They speak of themselves not as coders, but as "code enablers" or even "creative directors of code," Dohmke wrote in his blog. Redefining developer value The CEO argued that this transformation does not diminish developers' value, but redefines it. Those who adopt AI tools early gain leverage, not redundancy. The blog highlights a major mindset shift: instead of optimizing solely for speed or efficiency, developers are using AI to raise the ambition of what's possible, Dohmke wrote, while noting that complex, large-scale refactoring tasks or multi-agent feature builds that once seemed out of reach are now achievable. Related stories Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know This reframing comes with a career challenge: adapt or risk becoming obsolete. As AI rapidly advances toward automating up to 90% of code writing — a timeline developers estimate could arrive within just two to five years — the skills that will matter most include system design, AI fluency, delegation, and quality assurance, he predicted. "The software developer role is set on a path of significant change. Not everyone will want to make the change," the CEO wrote. "Managing agents to achieve outcomes may sound unfulfilling to many, although we argue that's what developers have been doing on a lower level of abstraction, managing their computers via programming languages to achieve outcomes." Humans are often reluctant to change, and Dohmke ended his blog by saying "that's okay." What's clear is that the CEO thinks these humans should seek another profession. Maybe plumbing?

Miami Herald
11 hours ago
- Miami Herald
AT&T, ordered to keep providing land-line service, takes fight to California legislature
Telecommunications giant AT&T, stymied last year by regulators in its bid to drop land-line service to California customers, is taking its battle to the state Legislature. And so far, the reception is much improved. Assembly Bill 470 would allow the company, which provides the vast majority of the state's landline service, to drop most of those customers, including nearly all of the hundreds of thousands in the Bay Area and millions around the state. It easily passed a floor vote in the Assembly in late June, and is now before the state Senate's appropriations committee. Berkeley hills resident Cynthia Larson, 63, an author who does not own a cell phone, is worried. "To me the landline is irreplaceable," she said. Even if Larson started using a cell phone, a fire or other natural disaster could disrupt internet and cell service, leaving her cut off from vital information. "Do I need to evacuate the house right now? Is the fire coming here right now? The landline is the standard for reliable communications. How many people is it OK to kill through this lunacy?" she asked. Because of its earlier monopoly status and state law requiring voice communications for all who want them, AT&T is for much of California the "carrier of last resort" or COLR - the utility required to provide phone service to anyone wanting it in its service area, unless another provider takes over the legal obligation. The bill aims to replace aging copper-wire landlines with phone service from cellular and cable providers. It would also force AT&T to significantly expand California fiber-based internet and phone service - with half the expansion in areas with poor internet and phone service - in exchange for breaking free of its obligations as a carrier of last resort under state law. "Right now we have 5% of Californians still using their copper lines," said Southern California Assembly Member Tina McKinnor, the bill's author. "Most of that is an older population. When we no longer have them with us, like my parents, we probably won't be 5%. We have to build up our infrastructure. There's no mandate making any other company build the fiber." Last year, the California Public Utilities Commission unanimously shot down a massively unpopular proposal by AT&T to scrap landline service for most of the Bay Area and much of California. Critics charged the pullback would have stripped many older people and rural residents of a communications lifeline in power outages and disasters such as fires and floods. Now, the utility, which reported $12.3 billion in profit last year, even though it says its carrier-of-last-resort status costs it $1 billion a year, is banking on AB 470. "It most definitely is an end run around the PUC," said Regina Costa, telecom policy director at The Utility Reform Network, a San Francisco-based consumer advocacy group opposed to the bill. AT&T's president for California Susan Santana pledged in a statement last week that "no customer will be left without access to voice or 911 service." If AB 470 passes, the company will work with state leaders and residents "on policies that create a thoughtful transition to bring more reliable, modern communications to all Californians," Santana said. AT&T would move away from landlines in a "phased, multi-year approach, and "current copper services will be maintained until new technologies are available that are equally or more reliable," the company said. AT&T has found support for AB 470 among business and community groups and public officials, including San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan. His office did not respond to questions about his support for the bill, listed in the most recent legislative analysis of the proposed law. The bill would let AT&T end landline coverage in areas deemed "well served" because they have three alternatives for basic voice phone service, including a provider of wire-based service such as cable, and a provider that offers the Lifeline discount service for low-income households. In most areas, two of the alternatives would likely be cell phone services. McKinnor, whose campaign for the 2026 election received a $5,500 donation from AT&T according to state records, introduced the bill in February. A spokesperson for McKinnor said campaign donations "have no impact on legislation that Assemblymember McKinnor either authors or takes a position on." McKinnor said the bill would "create the largest union-built private investment in advanced fiber optic networks in state history and will ensure that all California households will continue to be able to make affordable, reliable telephone calls and connect with emergency services when they need it." McKinnor noted that during fires, landline customers cannot receive evacuation notices via text message. A dozen Bay Area assembly members voted for the bill. South Bay Assembly Member Patrick Ahrens said the bill "contains protections ensuring that no one will go without access to telephone service and improves public safety by making significant investments in public infrastructure." Assembly Member Gail Pellerin, whose district includes forested areas of Santa Clara and Santa Cruz counties where many residents rely on landlines, declined to vote on the bill. Pellerin said in a statement she is focused on ensuring her constituents, "especially those in areas where internet service is not reliable, are not left without access to a landline should we remove COLR obligations." Pellerin said that at the time of the votes she "felt there was a discrepancy between the intent of the bill and the actual real-life applicability." If AB 470 passes, the California Public Utilities Commission would have to adopt a map designating well-served areas by Dec. 15, 2026. But TURN's Costa argues federal government maps to be used in creating the commission's map show areas where cable and wireless broadband are present, but millions of Californians there lack broadband and reliable cell service. Companies will not be required to provide service to every home, Costa said. A requirement for backup power for cellular or cable-based phone services applies only to fire-risk areas, despite California's history with floods and earthquakes, and loopholes mean many locations could still lose phone service during power outages, Costa said. Customers losing landlines could face higher costs from purveyors of alternative services, according to a report last month to the state Senate's committee on energy, utilities and communications. "Nothing limits these providers from raising their rates after a telephone corporation relinquishes its COLR duties," the report said. For customers in purportedly well-served areas who lose landlines and can't secure an alternative, the Public Utilities Commission would have to confirm the absence of options. "There is no way that people will understand what's going on," Costa said, "and there's no way that the commission has the resources to go out and verify throughout the entire state where there are verified alternative services." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.