No translation help for riot forms, Cleveland PCC says
The office for a police and crime commissioner has said the Home Office did not help translate riot compensation forms to help those affected by last summer's disorder.In the wake of a stabbing attack in Southport, rioting broke out across the country, with disorder in Hartlepool on 31 July, followed by Sunderland on 2 August and Middlesbrough on 4 August.A spokeswoman for Cleveland's Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) said that many of those affected did not speak English as a first language and so they would have expected some translation help with the forms designed to offer support. The Home Office declined to comment.
The Riot Compensation Act states that victims of criminal damage during civil unrest in England and Wales are entitled to claim for losses, even if they are not insured or their insurance will not pay out.The office of Cleveland PCC said three drop-in sessions were held for people who wanted more information about the scheme in Hartlepool and Middlesbrough."There was clearly some assistance needed," the PCC spokeswoman said."There's always an assumption that everyone speaks English and that's not always the case."
At the drop-ins, the team helped people fill out the forms required to claim compensation. People were largely seeking help over vehicle or property damage such as smashed windows, she said.When the PCC make leaflets or forms it typically seeks to translate them to some of the most common languages spoken in the region such as Urdu. "You just worry that people may not have access to the support they need if they do not have the ability to read or write in English – it will be a challenge to fill out that form," the spokeswoman said.She said the team asked the Home Office to translate the riot compensation forms but the request was denied.The office of Northumbria PCC said it had also "raised the matter" with the Home Office when asked if it shared similar frustrations. Money paid out as part of the scheme is coming out of local police budgets.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘A loan to fund my divorce left me homeless and £300k in debt'
Shelley Kavanagh knew getting divorced would be expensive. But she never imagined it would leave her homeless and saddled with a six-figure debt. The 55-year-old mother-of-three went from living in a seven-bedroom house to struggling to rent a flat after taking out a loan to fund her legal costs. She said: 'By the time everything unravelled, the combined loan and legal costs had far exceeded my assets, leaving me financially ruined.' The Telegraph has spoken to several women who were advised by their solicitors to fund their divorces using huge loans that devastated their finances. The loans – provided by litigation funders – were borrowed against the marital home so they could only be repaid following the sale of the property. Until then interest piled up at a rate of 18pc. This eye-watering level of interest meant that by the time the women came to sell up, the debt had eroded the equity in their homes. Campaigners are now calling for tighter regulation of lenders trying to cash in on divorce. 'It had a direct impact on my children' Ms Kavanagh's ordeal began when she was introduced to Novitas, one of the best-known divorce lenders, in 2015 by her solicitors. A housewife at the time, she agreed to borrow £150,000 to finance her divorce. The initial interest rate was 18pc – adding £27,000 in the first year, not including other charges. By the time the divorce was over, the debt had ballooned to over £300,000. She said: 'My credit rating was destroyed, and I became homeless. This had a direct impact on my children, as my unstable housing situation meant overnight stays with me were nearly impossible. Even finding a rental property became a challenge, as landlords were reluctant to accept tenants with poor credit histories.' Ms Kavanagh, who now lives in Oxfordshire, had to move in with her father while she got back on her feet. She was only able to find accommodation after he lent her money to pay the rent in advance. She said: 'Without that support, the outcome would have been significantly different.' The Novitas loan was paid using the proceeds of the house sale, leaving Ms Kavanagh 'with very little remaining'. The lender agreed to a £50,000 reduction after she complained. But she still believes the company should not have lent to her in the first place. 'Targeted at the height of vulnerability' Launched in 2011, Novitas at one point described itself as the leading provider of loans for people going through divorce. It claimed to work with 900 law firms, according to a post on the platform Twitter, now X, from 2019. Documents show Novitas would carry out a credit check as part of an individual's application. It said it was 'unlikely' to lend if the applicant had a County Court Judgement (CCJ). Ms Kavanagh had a CCJ – yet she was lent the money anyway. She said: 'A CCJ is a clear warning sign of financial vulnerability, yet Novitas proceeded with the loan regardless. This suggests that they either failed to conduct proper credit checks or deliberately ignored red flags.' She said women like her had been presented with the loans while they were at 'the height of their vulnerability'. She added: 'We want justice for what we've been through.' 'My divorce debt snowballed to £700,000' The litigation funding industry has grown dramatically over the past decade, filling a vacuum left behind by cuts to legal aid. Lenders argue they give important financial backing to individuals pursuing fair divorce settlements. However, in recent years a number of borrowers have lodged complaints about litigation loans with the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), some of which have been upheld. Another mother introduced to Novitas by her solicitor was Rosie Heys. In 2014, Ms Heys, 59, from Oxfordshire, agreed to borrow £100,000 to cover her divorce costs. Again, this loan, which carried an 18pc interest rate, was secured against her property. At the time, she only earned about £1,000 a month working as a freelance personal assistant – although the stress of the divorce meant she eventually lost the job. As the case dragged on, Ms Heys agreed to take out additional borrowing, taking her total debt to £230,000. She instructed a different solicitor and took out a personal loan with a lower interest rate from another provider. This was used to pay the new fees and the Novitas loan. She said: 'I couldn't see a way out. I was stuck in a house I couldn't sell, with a debt that was accruing at £600 a day. I just didn't know what to do.' It took Ms Heys a decade to sell the property, with £700,000 of the proceeds used to pay off the loan. Ms Heys complained to Novitas who agreed to refund her £7,000 in interest because it had failed to provide her with regular statements about her debt. However, it did not accept her other complaints and so Ms Heys approached the FOS, which concluded in 2023 that the loan was unaffordable and that Novitas had not carried out adequate affordability checks. It ordered Novitas to refund the interest and charges, which added up to £50,000 in total, but not the capital, as this had been used to cover the solicitors' fees. In a separate case, involving a woman who borrowed £45,000, the FOS went further and instructed Novitas to refund almost her entire debt. The lender was told to cap her liability at £1,745 as this was the amount the FOS decided she might reasonably have spent on mediation. 'I wish I'd walked away and let my husband take everything' Ms Heys and Ms Kavanagh have spoken to dozens of women who also took out litigation loans that significantly impacted their finances and mental health. One mother, who asked to remain anonymous, told The Telegraph she wished she had just walked away and left her ex-husband everything rather than get divorced because at least then she would not be in debt. Ms Heys said: 'Some people are so traumatised that they just can't handle it.' She said the debt had also had a profound impact on the children of the women affected, as many were now living in rental accommodation. 'Renting in this country is very precarious because people can give you notice and get you out in two months. And that's the situation most of these children have found themselves in.' Ms Heys and Ms Kavanagh want those affected to know they may be able to seek redress through the FOS. But they also want greater awareness of the risks of litigation loans for those going through a divorce. Former MP Seema Kennedy, of campaign group Fair Civil Justice, said: 'These appalling cases highlight the urgent need for reform. Vulnerable individuals going through divorce should not be exploited by litigation funders with clear conflicts of interest, racking up excessive fees that can reach hundreds of thousands of pounds. Without proper regulation, consumers are left dangerously exposed.' Litigation loans are regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. But they are also part of the broader third-party litigation funding industry, which is largely self-regulated. Other agreements are 'non-recourse', meaning the litigation funder only gets paid if the case is successful. The Civil Justice Council this week called for 'light-touch regulation' of litigation funding following a consultation. In a report, it said complaints about litigation loans with the FOS reinforced the need 'for effective financial services and legal services regulation' and highlighted the need for consumers to be 'fully informed' about the nature of this funding. Novitas was bought by Close Brothers in 2017 in a £31m deal. However, it ceased lending to new customers in 2021 and is now in the process of being wound down. The banking group had to set aside over £100m to cover its bad loans. In its 2022 accounts, Novitas earmarked £5.3m in redress for customers who took out loans to fund divorce and probate cases.
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mystery as man dies in car after being found ‘unresponsive' outside Asda car park
A MAN has been found dead in a car outside Asda. Cops rushed to the supermarket in Leicester at 7.10am on Saturday. A man in his 70s was found unresponsive and then declared dead - though police have not released further details about the circumstances. A witness told LeicestershireLive there were multiple police cars at the scene, as well as a private ambulance and two truck. A Leicestershire Police spokesperson said: "Shortly after 7.10am on Saturday police were called after a man was found unresponsive in his car in Exploration Drive, Leicester. "Officers attended, along with the ambulance service, and the man, who is in his 70s, was declared deceased at the scene. "There are not believed to be any suspicious circumstances surrounding his death and a file will be prepared for HM Coroner." 1
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Birmingham landmark building death as man falls from upper levels
The death of a man who fell from the upper floors of a high-rise Birmingham landmark is not being treated as suspicious, police were called to The Cube on Wharfside Street at 18:30 BST on Saturday.A spokesperson for West Midlands Police said the man's family were aware and being supported by in the building's 240 flats have been allowed to go back to their homes and access to commercial venues was fully restored, the force confirmed. Venues in the £100m development were temporarily closed while emergency services carried out investigations.A police spokesperson asked for "privacy and understanding" as inquiries continued. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
